How to Prepare Your Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Information and Prepare a Brief Environmental Assessment

Similar documents
Environmental Clearance and Next Year s Grant. Los Angeles Airport District Office. Presented by: Brenda Pérez George Buley David Cushing

ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, Federal Aviation Administration

Updates on FAA Order F. Agenda. Communicate FAA Order Updates. Educate attendees on the changes to FAA Order

Environmental Process at 10,000-foot Elevation

TIER 2 EIS SCOPING MEETING WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SCOPING MEETING

Environmental Considerations: Renewable and Conventional Power Plant Siting

Southern Ute Indian Tribe Coordination Kick-Off Meeting November 4, 2015

An Overview and Comparison of the Tennessee Department of Transportation s Environmental Evaluation Process

Procedure for NEPA for County or City Projects

COMBINED PUBLIC WORKSHOP/ PUBLIC HEARING

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

What s a NEPA? Modern Environmental Planning in the United States. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Compliance with NEPA

CHAPTER 8: ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW

CLT. Charlotte Douglas International Airport. Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Overview

The Caltrans Contract Manager will assign specific projects to the Consultant through the issuance of Task Orders.

WELCOME TO THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINSTRATION SCOPING MEETING

Methodology for Project Data Collection. And. Results of Review. Oil & Gas Exploration and Development Categorical Exclusion.

Draft Environmental Assessment Terminal B/C Redevelopment, Secure National Hall, and Related Improvements

Washington Dulles International Airport EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CLT. Charlotte Douglas International Airport. Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Overview

INDEX FOR UNIFORM FILE SYSTEM, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A. NEPA Assessment Checklist

Attachment A FTA DCE Worksheet Section II, NEPA Class of Action

7 Financial Analysis 49

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

Airport Master Plan Update June 14, 2017

Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority

Federal Aviation Administration

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF RULES OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Rules Governing. Water Pollution Control Loan Fund

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Western Technical Operations Anchorage, Alaska

Kammy Horne, AICP URS Corporation Multimodal Transportation Manager Phoenix, Arizona

Hartford Brainard Airport (HFD) Environmental Assessment for Tree Obstruction Removal

Decision Memo. Delta A Septic Repair (#33)

NOAA s NEPA Checklist Categorical Exclusion Checklist for Non-Construction National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Grants

House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Subcommittee on Highways and Transit Attention: Andrew Okuyiga From: Subject:

National Environmental Policy Act & Habitat Conservation Plans

Programmatic Categorical Exclusions

PROGRAM NAME: Northfield Owner-Occupied Home Rehabilitation 2015

NEPA: Analyzing Impacts (# ) Lesson 3 Determining Significance

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS - COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REGULATIONS CHECKLIST

Wildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING SUMMARY

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process and Federal Agency Compliance

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS. Categorical Exclusions for Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Activities. USDA Forest Service

SUSTAINABLE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN (SAMP) UPDATE

SRF 101 SRF Cross Cutters: Understanding the Environmental

Agency Scoping. May 31, :00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. Environmental Impact Statement Port Columbus International Airport

Arizona Association of County Engineers New Rules for Categorical Exclusions for FHWA Projects

Airports 101. (or, 10 Things You Need to Know about Airports) MARY ASHBURN PEARSON, AICP ROY G. LEWIS, AICP DELTA AIRPORT CONSULTANTS, INC.

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE GRANTS PROGRAM

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

DECISION MEMO SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATION FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS

Categorical Exclusion Programmatic Agreement Between the Federal Highway Administration And the Indiana Department of Transportation

Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act. SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is proposing to amend its

GUIDE FOR PREPARING THE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT FOR WATER AND WASTE PROJECTS

GUIDELINES FOR THE UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS IN PENNSYLVANIA

2.1 Project Definition/Classification/Initial Study Project Definition

FSH NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT HANDBOOK CHAPTER - ZERO CODE. Table of Contents

Decision Memo. USDA Forest Service Mountain Home Ranger District, Boise National Forest Boise County, Idaho

MARIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ALEX HINDS, DIRECTOR

Atlanta SMAC Conference April 18, 2017

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CHECKLIST

Decision Memo for Juniper Ridge Opal Mine

Chapter 2 Table of Contents 2.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Agency Organization Organization Address Information. Name United States Department of Agriculture

Instructions for the South Pacific Division Nationwide Permit Pre- Construction Notification (PCN):

SAN LUIS VALLEY PUBLIC LANDS CENTER

DECISION MEMO. Missoula Electric Cooperative Point 118. MEC - Buried Electric Powerline (Along West Fork Butte Access Road #37 to Point 118)

DECISION NOTICE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT USDA FOREST SERVICE TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST WRANGELL RANGER DISTRICT MIDDLE RIDGE CABIN CONSTRUCTION

October 19, 2017 Community Engagement Panel Meeting #4 Overview of Environmental Effects

Pinecrest Amphitheater Movies Special Use Permit (40431) Decision Memo

NEPA Session 2 When to Start NEPA

PROGRAM NAME: Washington County HOME Program 2015

Chapter 3 FEDERAL POLICIES SOUTH DAKOTA DRAINAGE MANUAL

Better Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA

Preliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs

DECISION MEMO Lazyman Repeater Shelter and Tower Replacement

National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA ) 2013 Environmental Law Workshop Loyola Law School/Sierra Club Angeles Chapter

Decision Memo. Programmatic Forest Plan Amendment for Cultural Resource Protection Standards and Guidelines. United States Department of Agriculture

3905 Hartzdale Drive Suite 508 Camp Hill, PA Eastern Region (717)

Appendix A: Air Quality Environmental Documents

1.0 Introduction. The USACE Fort Worth District s goals for the REIS are to:

Manhattan Regional Airport Draft Environmental Assessment. Table of Contents

NEPA - CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS (CATEX)

Better Preservation Solutions through Early Coordination of Section 106, Section 4(f) and NEPA

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Project Information. *Project Name: *Responsible Entity: Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): State/Local Identifier: *Preparer:

IOWA STATE REVOLVING FUND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION

Environmental Planning: Collaborative Approaches, NEPA Preparation, and Schedule Considerations for Airport Projects.

Preliminary Decision Memo 2017 BPA Utility Corridor Maintenance and Danger Tree Project

Final Environmental Assessment for the Long Term Airport Development at the Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport

CEQA BASICS. The California Environmental Quality Act. Prepared for: Orange County Department of Education. Prepared by:

US Army Corps of Engineers

SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUSTAINABLE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN NEAR TERM PROJECTS

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

February 23-24, 2009 Robert D. Thornton, Partner

Environmental. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Transcription:

How to Prepare Your Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Information and Prepare a Brief Environmental Assessment Presented to: By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date:

CATEX Presentation Outline National Environmental Policy Act background New Western-Pacific Region, Airports Division CATEX form Steps in preparing the CATEX information 2 2

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) NEPA requires each Federal agency to disclose to the interested public, a clear, accurate description of potential environmental impacts that proposed Federal actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions would cause. FAA must comply with NEPA for all proposed airport development projects that require a federal action. Main FAA Federal actions: Airport Layout Plan (ALP) approval, Federal funding requests, Passenger Facility Charge approvals, including locally funded items that require ALP approval. 3 3

FAA References FAA Order 1050.1E Agency-wide environmental policy on how FAA will comply with NEPA FAA Order 5050.4B Supplements 1050.1E by providing NEPA instructions for proposed airport development projects 4 4

Types of NEPA Review Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Environmental Assessment (EA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 5 5

Presented to: By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date:

New CATEX Form Previous CATEX form was too long. A checklist form does not require sufficient review of potential impacts. After FAA and airport sponsor input, a new CATEX form was approved by the FAA Western-Pacific Region, Airports Division, in May 2006. Two-page form describes format for reviewing and documenting extraordinary circumstances. 7 7

New CATEX Form Titled: Extraordinary Circumstances Evaluation Information Submittal for Categorical Exclusion of Airport Projects. Form to be available at FAA website: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/ regional_guidance/western_pacific/ 8 8

Applicability Sponsors do not need to submit the documentation for: Equipment and vehicle purchases Snow removal equipment Security equipment, computers Runway/taxiway edge lighting Control panels, regulators Master Plans, Part 150 studies Feasibility studies 9 9

Sponsor Information Submittal - Timing Provide information for proposed projects 12 months prior to funding request or Airport Layout Plan approval. This will allow FAA to determine if additional information is needed. Objective is to complete the NEPA process in ad van ce o f th e fu n d in g n eed d ate o r p ro p o sed p ro ject co n stru ctio n sch ed u le. 10 10

Steps in the CATEX Process 1. Define the proposed action 2. Review if the action is identified is on the CATEX list 3. Sponsor conducts extraordinary circumstances review 4. Provide extraordinary circumstance information to FAA 5. FAA extraordinary circumstances review 6. Comply with any special purpose laws 7. FAA issues a CATEX determination 11 11

Step 1: Define the Proposed Action Sponsor to clearly identify the project and why it is needed. Describe the details of the proposed project to allow identification of the extent of potential impacts. Maps/drawings/photos to show the project footprint and surroundings are important. 12 12

Step 2: Review if the Action Identified is on the CATEX List Sponsor can review Paragraphs 307 to 312 in FAA Order 1050.1E, which list the various FAA actions that are normally categorically excluded. Tables 6-1 and 6-2 of FAA Order 5050.4B p ro vid e listin g s o f C A T E X s p ertain in g to airport actions. C A T E X s ap p ly to actio n s th at F A A h as fo u n d, b ased o n p ast exp erien ce, d o n o t n o rm ally require an EA or EIS. 13 13

Step 2: Review if the Action Identified is o n th e C A T E X L ist (co n t d ) An action on the categorically excluded list is not automatically a categorical exclusion. If no applicable CATEX, then an EA is required. Contact your Airports District Office, Environmental Protection Specialist (EPS), to answer any questions. 14 14

Step 3: Sponsor Conducts Extraordinary Circumstances Review If a CATEX is applicable for the action, Sponsor conducts preliminary review for any extraordinary circumstances. Sponsor collects necessary resource data to support extraordinary circumstance evaluation. Sponsor coordination with ADO regarding proposed project. 15 15

Extraordinary Circumstances Described in Paragraph 304 of FAA Order 1050.1E. Exist when the proposed action may have a significant effect and, Involve impacts to any one of the following: Air quality, coastal resources, 4(f) properties, natural resources and energy supply, farmlands, fish, wildlife and plants, floodplains, hazardous materials, historic, architectural, archeological and cultural resources, noise, secondary impacts, water quality, wetlands, wild and scenic rivers, and likely to be highly controversial or not consistent with local, state or federal plans and policies, or directly, indirectly or cumulatively create a significant impact on the human environment. 16 16

Sources for Information Master Plan studies Previous environmental studies Part 150 studies Feasibility studies General/Specific Plans County/City Planning Department Local, state and federal resource agencies 17 17

Step 4: Provide Extraordinary Circumstance Information to FAA Sponsor to prepare information per the Western- Pacific Region, Airports Division new CATEX form. Submit to your Airports District Office (ADO). Can submit advance copy to the ADO EPS. Provide point of contact on the form for further information and questions. 18 18

Step 5: FAA Extraordinary Circumstances Review FAA must review if any extraordinary circumstances exist as a result of the proposed project. FAA uses information from the airport sp o n so r to d o cu m en t th e A g en cy s examination of extraordinary circumstances. FAA will use this information to determine if it can categorically exclude the action or if an EA or an EIS is required. 19 19

Step 6: Comply with any Special Purpose Laws FAA and sponsor prepare any required documentation to comply with Special Purpose Laws. These are Federal laws, regulations, executive orders or departmental orders that are required outside of NEPA. Endangered Species Act * Coastal Zone Management Act National Historic Preservation Act * Air Quality Act Floodplains Clean Water Act * FAA consultation required if any potential impacts 20 20

Step 7: FAA Issues a CATEX Determination Western-Pacific Region, Airports Division policy is to provide a written determination to airport sponsor. The purpose of the documentation is to complete the administrative file to document compliance with grant assurances, and compliance with NEPA in case of legal challenge. FAA unconditionally approves the project on the ALP and the project is eligible for FAA funding consideration. Airport sponsor may now proceed with the action. 21 21

Questions 22 22

Presentation Outline Brief Environmental Assessment (EA) Background What a Brief EA is and is not Preparing a Brief EA 23 23

EA Required For actions not on the CATEX list. For actions on the CATEX list, which due to extraordinary circumstances FAA determines an EA is required. Automatically for: New airport New runway Major runway extension 24 24

EA Content FAA Order 5050.4B, Chapter 7 discusses content. Recommended 15 pages maximum. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) F o rty M o st A sked Q u estio n s C o n cern in g C E Q s N E P A R eg u latio n s Q u estio n 36a, ad vises th at E A s b e kep t to n o m o re th an 10-15 pages. 25 25

Brief EA R eco g n itio n th at som e E A s d o n ot n eed th e sam e level of detail. Used for proposed projects which cannot be categorically excluded from an environmental assessment, but the environmental impacts are expected to be insignificant. A lso referred to as a sh o rt fo rm E A Still requires sufficient documentation to allow the FAA to make a determination that there are no significant impacts. For actions where less documentation is justified. 26 26

What a Brief EA is Not Not meant to short cut the environmental regulations and laws. Does not revise the standard EA format 27 27

What a Brief EA is Allows for quicker processing and review of the documentation. Intended to meet the regulatory requirements of an EA, while simplifying the documentation process 28 28

Resource Impact Evaluations Only enough information is needed to support that no significant impacts would result from the project. For those resource categories where no impacts are expected, i.e. coastal zone impacts to an inland site, information can be minimized. 29 29

Brief EA Format Similar to EA format, but information within the document is abbreviated. Limit to only essential maps, drawings and photos. FAA Airports Headquarters to come out with more details in the environmental desktop reference, anticipated by year end. 30 30

EA Format Cover sheet Purpose and Need Proposed Action Alternatives Affected Environment Environmental Consequences Mitigation Cumulative impact analysis Agencies, organizations and persons consulted 31 31

For More Details Contact your Airports District Office (ADO) Environmental Protection Specialist San Francisco ADO (650)-876-2778 Camille Garibaldi, extension 613 Barry Franklin, extension 614 Aimee Kratovil, extension 612 Los Angeles ADO Michelle Simmons, (310) 725-3614 Victor Globa, (310) 725-3637 32 32

Helpful Websites FAA Environmental Program: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/regional_ guidance/western_pacific/environmental/ FAA Order 1050.1E http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_notices /media/10501echg.pdf FAA Order 5050.4B: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/resources /publications/orders/environmental_5050_4/ 33 33

Questions 34 34