James Studer, 2 Barry Ronellenfitch, 2 Adam Mabbott, 2 Heather Murdoch, 2 Greg Whyte, and 3 Ian Hakes. REMTECH 2008 at Banff, Alberta

Similar documents
Lessons Learned During In Situ Chemical Oxidation - Failure & Success?

Recent Field Applications of Activated Persulfate Including Petroleum Sites

State of the Practice versus State of the Art in Chemical Oxidation / Reduction Technologies.

Environmental Solutions. Klozur CR. Combined Chemical and Bio-Remediation

Bench- and Pilot-Scale Treatability Testing of ISCO and Surfactant Enhanced Biodegradation of Long Chain Petroleum Hydrocarbons

CASE STUDY COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE ACTIVATION METHODS FOR SODIUM PERSULFATE ISCO TREATMENT

Extended Release Potassium Persulfate: Laboratory and Field Results

Combining Persulfate, In Situ Ferrate Generation and Enhanced Bioremediation for Safer, More Effective Remedial Actions

Novel Activation Methods for Persulfate Oxidation: Cement and Calcium Peroxide. RE 3 Conference November 13, 2012

Chemical Oxidation: Lessons Learned from the Remediation of Leaking UST Sites

COUPLED CHEMICAL OXIDATION AND ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION PILOT TEST - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON PLUME MIGRATING IN FRACTURED ROCK

Prepared by Jean Paré, P. Eng. Chemco Inc.

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation DOUG HAMILTON, PRINCIPAL HYDROGEOLOGIST ACV ENVIRO

AIPG 4 th Conference: Innovative Environmental Assessment and Remediation Technology

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment

Addressing Residual LNAPL Using Klozur Persulfate. John Valkenburg, MS, PE Senior Engineer Technical Sales Manager

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Technologies and Case Studies. Dan Socci EthicalChem. SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 4, 2016

Subsurface Distribution of ZVI/EHC Slurry Validating Radius of Influence. Josephine Molin, PeroxyChem October

Ian Ross Ph.D. Mike Mueller & Philip Bock Ph.D. Aquaconsoil, Barcelona April 16, 2013

Prepared by Ken Summerour, P.G.

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

In Situ, Low Temperature Thermal Remediation of LNAPL with Pesticides and Other Recalcitrant Compounds

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

Eden Remediation Services Kenneth Summerour, P.G.

CATALYZED PERSULFATE OXIDATION TREATMENT - UPDATE

Manganese Activated Persulfate (MnAP) for the Treatment Recalcitrant Organics: Development and Commercialization

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION EVALUATION USING THE WATERLOO EMITTER

Catalyzed Persulfate Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds in Soil

In Situ Chemical Oxidation of VOCs and BTEX Plume in Low-Permeability Soils. Amit Haryani, PE, LSRP

CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETION REPORT

Common Causes of Remediation Failure and Solution Practices

IPEC Conference San Antonio, TX November 13, 2013 Glenn Nicholas Iosue

Field-proven remediation technologies for the most challenging sites.

A division of Ethical Solutions LLC. Oily Wastewater Treatment Dan Socci, CEO

The InSitu Remediation of PFAS-Impacted Groundwater Using Colloidal Activated Carbon

What is the CAPISCO process. Technologies used

In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater: Lessons Learned from the Field

Surfactant Enhanced Product Recovery for Creosote Remediation

IN SITU WORKSHOP RENARE MARK-2011

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Technologies

PROOF-OF-CONCEPT EVALUATION PASSIVE IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED-BENZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS USING GREEN TECHNOLOGY

Phased Implementation of In Situ Chemical Oxidation for a Large TCE DNAPL Source Area at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant

Case Study Catalyzed Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment of a TCE DNAPL Plume

Presenters' Contact Information

Interpreting Analytical Results

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Surfactant Enhanced Insitu Chemical Oxidation New York State s Experience. Jim Harrington NYSDEC

Lecture 6: In Situ Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation

WM 03 Conference, February 23-27, 2003, Tucson, AZ IN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IN THE PRESENCE OF RADIONUCLIDES

Executive Summary. ES.1 Objectives and Scope

ETHICALCHEM BACKGROUND

Technologies. Sciences. Clichés 11/21/2017

MDEQ PROJECT UPDATE (2015 4Q PROGRESS REPORT)

IN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION REMEDIATION PROGRAM INTERIM REPORT PHASE 2B

In Situ Geochemical Stabilization (ISGS) for NAPL Management. Fayaz Lakhwala, Ph.D. PeroxyChem

IXPER 70C Calcium Peroxide CASE STUDY

CRT CRT. Carus Remediation Technologies. Simplified Science. Carus Remediation Technologies. Carus Remediation Technologies

Remediation of 1, 4-Dioxane

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

ORIN. Remediation Technologies. ORIN Remediation Technologies. Chemical Treatments. By: Larry Kinsman

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Permeable Reactive Barriers for Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Bruce Tunnicliffe Vertex Environmental Inc.

Enhanced In Situ Biodegradation of PCE Following Electrical Resistance Heating at a DNAPL Source Area

Final Report - Annex Report on the validation of the technique using a multi criteria analysis VOPAK-EXPERO3 - LIFE09/ENV/B/000407

New Approach to Fuel Additive Ethylene Dibromide Removal from Groundwater: BiRD

Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation Using CAP18 as a Polishing Application for CVOC Impacted Groundwater

ATTACHMENT 12: CDISCO Description and Sensitivity to Input Parameters

Applications of In-Situ Chemical Oxidation/Reduction. Jay Romano

Designing an ISCO Remedy for a Wood Treating Site Using Hydrogeologic Testing, High-Resolution Site Characterization, and 3D Modeling

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

In Situ Activated Carbon-Based Technology for Groundwater Remediation: Overview, Best Practice and Case Studies

Attenuation Factors for Hydrocarbons Associated With a Diesel Spill

Characterization and Remediation of Diesel in a Fractured Rock Aquifer with a Nutrient-Flushing System

IN-SITU BIOLOGICALLY MEDIATED REMEDIATION. Margy Gentile September 30, 2016

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

PermeOx. Plus. Enhanced Aerobic Biodegradation

Ozone Based In-Situ Remediation of a PCB and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Release. John M. Mateo The Resource Renewal Companies, Moorestown, NJ

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Of Petroleum and Chlorinated Contaminated Sites. Bud Ivey Ivey International

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation from Pilot Study to Full-Scale Implementation

Passive Groundwater Plume Treatment using Sustained-Release Oxidants: Experimental and Modeling Studies

Permeable Reactive Barriers for Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons under Nitrate and Sulfate Reducing Conditions

Confirmation of MTBE Destruction (not Volatilization) When Sparging with Ozone

Self-Sustaining Treatment for Active Remediation (STAR): Overview and Applications of the Technology

Anaerobic Benzene Biodegradation - Insights from Treatability Studies and Molecular Tools. Sandra Dworatzek

Benefit of Using Chemical Oxidation to Mass Transfer Adsorbed Phase Contaminants into the Dissolved Phase

COGAC - Chemically Oxidized Granular Activated Carbon Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies

Tools and Methods to Reduce Uncertainties Associated with the Use of In Situ Remediation Techniques for Organic Contaminants in Soil and Groundwater

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

Vertex Environmental Inc.

Enhanced Delivery of Potassium Permanganate Using Horizontal Wells

Sulfolane Impacted Soil and Groundwater Treatability Study

Testing of an in situ chemical oxidation treatment on a plume of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons: Results, conclusions and future possibilities

Plume Area Treatment Example

MTBE and TBA Groundwater Remediation Using Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation

Transcription:

PILOT TEST OF ISCO TECHNOLOGIES LEADS TO IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF IMMEDIATE AND MID-TERM GEOCHEMICAL RESPONSE AND CONTAMINANT DESTRUCTION WITHIN PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON PLUME 1 James Studer, 2 Barry Ronellenfitch, 2 Adam Mabbott, 2 Heather Murdoch, 2 Greg Whyte, and 3 Ian Hakes 1 ChemRem International LLC, 8100 M-4 Wyoming Blvd. NE #410, Albuquerque, NM 87113 USA; 2 Cirrus Environmental Services, Inc., Bay 10, 1916 30 th Avenue, Calgary, AB T2E7B2; 3 City of Medicine Hat, 580 First Street SE, Medicine Hat, AB T1A 8E6 REMTECH 2008 at Banff, Alberta

Presentation Goal Report on ISCO pilot test involving activated sodium persulfate and petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) that was designed to gather critical information on: 1) Spatial distribution of components of injected fluids and chemical and biological reaction by-products within 7 and 20 days of start of chemical application; and 2) Magnitude of sediment and groundwater contaminant concentration reduction in the presence of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL).

Presentation Outline Chemical Oxidation and Injection Overview Pilot Test Background and Program Results - Immediate (7 Day) Injectate Distribution Results - Distribution of Treatment Chemicals and Reaction Byproducts within Mid-Term (20 Days) Results - PHC Reductions in GW and Soil at Day 20 Summary and Implications

Project History and Site Features Former retail service station in Southern Alberta Operated for 30 years - multiple fuel releases Decommissioned in 1989 - site assessment followed Underlain by a sandy unconfined aquifer (6 m-bg) PHC plume including smear zone and groundwater Area of impact ~ 5000 m 2 (high impact area ~1000 m 2 ) Plume stable or growing slowly as of 2007 Requirement for remedial action and developer interest in property led to feasibility study and pilot test in 2007

Site Location

Chemical Oxidation Overview In Situ Chemical Oxidation involves the injection of a dilute oxidant (and potentially an activator) into the subsurface to transform organic contaminants into by-products of carbon dioxide, water, and other benign compounds Low temperature combustion of organic chemicals (e.g., fuels, herbicides/pesticides, PCE, TCE, high explosives) Success depends on effective chemical and hydrogeologic engineering

Chemical Oxidation Overview The chemical oxidation technology area currently includes four unique classes: Ozonation (O 3 and radicals) Permanganate (MnO 4 ) Catalyzed Hydrogen Peroxide (H 2 O 2 and radicals) Activated Persulfate (S 2 O 8 and radicals)

Chemical Oxidation Overview Klozur Persulfate S 2 O -2 8 Strong Oxidizer Persulfate anion: 15S 2 O 8-2 + 30H + + 30e - 30HSO 4-1 E 0 = 2.12 v Example of direct oxidation of benzene (C 6 H 6 ) C 6 H 6 + 12H 2 O 6 CO 2 + 30 H + + 30e - Need 15 mole S 2 O 8-2 per mole of C 6 H 6 mineralized

Chemical Oxidation Overview In general, direct oxidation by persulfate anion is kinetically slow...activation of the anion produces a very strong and kinetically fast acting oxidizer in the Sulfate Free Radical SO 4 - + e - SO 4-2 E 0 = ~ 2.6 v S 2 O 8-2 2 SO 4 - or (SO 4 - + SO 4-2 ) Initiation, propagation, and termination reactions are complex and may involve many types of radicals

ZOE = Zone of Effect at times of physical displacement and max dev Conceptualization of Injection & Placement R Plan View - Radius of Influence R R Profile - 2D ROI 3D ZOE ZOE pe ZOE max

Conceptualization of Injection & Placement ISCO! Actual Areal Distribution R ISCO-BIO Plan View - Radius of Influence R R ZOE max ZOE pe ZOE max GW Flow

Conceptualization of Injection & Placement Actual Areal Distribution R Plan View - Radius of Influence R Reality Bites! ZOE pe ZOE max

Site and Vicinity

Looking West

Test Pits, Borings and Wells (2006)

Geologic Profile A-A

Geologic Profile A-A (2006) BH-7 CO1-01

Potentiometric Surface (2006) Groundwater Velocity ~ 0.1 ft/day to 0.3 ft/day or 3 ft/month to 9 ft/month

Hydrocarbon Plume (pre-test) Iron Reduction Nitrate Reduction Sulfate Reduction O 2 Utilization High Impact Zone > 5000 mg/kg TPH Sharp Redox Zonation

Pilot Test Program Pilot Test Program Design Data Collection (DDC) Treatability Study Klozur Na 2 S 2 O 8 and iron-edta Klozur CR (base activated chemox-bio) H 2 O 2 DDC Scope: Field Pilot Test (Klozur CR, Klozur and Dissolvine) 1. Direct push continuous sampling 2. Collection of sediment core and samples for: 1. OVA screening, NAPL detection, TOC, TPH 2. Geologic description 3. Install pilot test array - test out field protocols 4. Baseline groundwater sampling and analysis (TOC + DOC)

Pilot Test Area

Hydrocarbon Plume (DDC 2/08) Weathered NAPL within Limits Former NAPL Footprint (>5000 mg/kg TPH)

DDC Plume Delineation

DDC Plume Delineation

DDC Plume Delineation

Pilot Test Arrays and Injection Pts BH-7 SZ Test CO1-1 SZ Test

Pilot Test Array Detail

Pilot Test Implementation Detail Injectate Summary for BH07 (Klozur+Fe-EDTA) Date Batch No. Klozur Fe-EDTA Water % w/w 2/22/12 1 25 0.1 37.5 15 2/22/12 2 25 0.1 37.5 15 2/26/12 3 25 0.1 37.5 15 2/26/12 4 25 0.1 37.5 15 Injectate Summary for CO1-01 (Klozur CR) Date Batch No. Klozur PoxP Water % w/w 2/21/12 1 20 22 37.5 22.8 2/22/12 2 20 22 37.5 22.8 2/27/12 3 20 16 45 17.4 2/27/12 4 20 16 45 17.4 Total injected ~160 gal of 15% and at ~60 C Na 2 S 2 O 8 C o ~ 150,000 mg/l Chemical in Kg Water in US Gallons Total injected ~175 gal of 20% ~80 gal at ~60 C when injected Na 2 S 2 O 8 C o ~ 100,000 mg/l

Pilot Test Implementation Detail Process Monitoring Visual Observations at monitoring wells / ground surface Electrical Conductivity Sulfate ph Temperature (heated water used) ORP (strong function of ph) Dissolved Oxygen Performance Assessment Soil and groundwater sampling and analysis for TOC/DOC and BTEX F1 F2 F3 F4 (F3 and F4 for soil only)

Immediate Distribution (Day 7) ZOE pe day 7 ZOE geochemical

Mid-term Distribution (Day 19) GW General ZOE geochemical at Day 19 indicated by yellow

Groundwater PHC Concentrations (Baseline to Klozur CR Day 20) Well BenzeneTolueneE-benzeneXylenes F1 F2 CO1-01 Baseline ND ND 0.511 1.16 4.3 2.71 1 m NE Day 20 ND ND 0.554 1.78 4 3 CO7-43 Baseline ND ND 0.938 0.0453 2.2 31.5 2.5 m NEDay 20 ND ND 0.345 0.009 1.9 5.2 CO7-44 Baseline ND 0.009 1.29 0.0107 3.5 21 4.0 m NNWDay 20 ND ND 1.71 0.0083 2.9 6.4 CO7-47 Baseline ND ND 0.205 0.258 14.3 22.5 4.0 m E Day 20 ND ND 0.174 0.0939 3.3 9.4

Groundwater PHC Concentrations (Baseline to Klozur Iron-EDTA Day 19) Well BenzeneToluene E-benzeneXylenes F1 F2 C07-35 Baseline ND ND 0.0185 0.0016 0.5 3.3 1 m NNE Day 20 ND ND 0.0038 ND 0.1 0.7 C07-36 Baseline ND ND 0.121 ND 0.7 2 1 m NNE Day 20 ND ND 0.0282 ND 0.3 0.9 C07-38 Baseline ND ND 0.0016 0.0029 0.2 1.4 4 m NNEDay 20 ND ND ND 0.005 ND 0.3 C07-41 Baseline ND ND 0.0062 0.0027 6.4 5.7 5 m ESE Day 20 ND ND ND ND 0.3 0.7

Baseline Soil Sampling Locations

Post-Injection Soil Sampling Locations CO7-39 to BH08-57 C07-45 to BH08-55 BH06-26 to BH08-56

Soil PHC Concentration Changes (Day 20 after First Klozur CR Batch Injection) Comparison of CO7-45 to BH08-55 (Before and After) Analyte CO07-45, mg/kg BH08-55, mg/kg Benzene <0.005 <0.005 Toluene <0.05 <0.05 Ethyl Benzene 14.2 1.35 Xylenes 56.4 6.61 F1 -BTEX 800 40 F2 1980 39 F3 473 60 F4 12 <10 Note: Value in bold indicates the soil remediation guideline is exceeded.

Soil PHC Concentration Changes (Day 20 after First Klozur CR Batch Injection Comparison of BH06-26 to B H08-56 (Before and After) Analyte BH06-26, mg/kg BH08-56, mg/kg Benzene 0.11 <0.005 Toluene 0.11 <0.05 Ethyl Benzene 84 <0.01 Xylenes 315 <0.05 F1 -BTEX 3630 <10 F2 4710 51 F3 1020 34 F4 <10 <10 Note: Value in bold indicates the soil remediation guideline is exceeded.

Soil PHC Concentration Changes (Day 19 after First Klozur and Iron-EDTA Injection) Comparison of CO07-39 to BH08-57 (Before and After) Analyte CO07-39, mg/kg BH08-57, mg/kg Benzene <0.005 0.057 Toluene <0.05 <0.05 Ethyl Benzene 7.1 0.95 Xylenes <0.05 1.14 F1 -BTEX 810 460 F2 906 2360 F3 258 844 F4 <10 16 Note: Value in bold indicates the soil remediation guideline is exceeded.

Summary and Implications Idealized injection ROI rarely occurs and is even more rarely observed - the ZOE pe and ZOE max (or ZOE time ) concept is more applicable Few empirical studies of short and mid-term injectate and by-product distribution (need more and better studies) ISCO and ISCO-Bio phases of action are highly dynamic in four dimensions - what is your ROI???

Summary and Implications Distribution and migration tracked using visual presence of injectate, heat, sulfate, EC, ph, ORP, DO, TOC/DOC as well as BTEX F1-F4 Short term ZOEpe non-uniform and variable but geochemical response more uniform-widespread Significant mid-term expansion observed that exceeds groundwater advection rate

Summary and Implications Klozur CR performed better then iron-edta activated Klozur persulfate NAPL presence was not a show stopper ZOE max for CR is best determined at later times (e.g., six month to year) and future studies should encompass larger area, more depth, and more discrete intervals