Thanks To: Considerations for Developing non GMO Dairy Rations. Special Thanks To: Background. Kiira Heyman. Heather Walker

Similar documents
Considerations for Developing Non-GMO Dairy Rations. Dr. L. E. Chase Cornell University

Lowering dietary protein in commercial herds: Case study

Webster County Diversified Agriculture Conference

Precision Feeding High Forage Economics

Work on Sustainability

DAIRY Feed Management Plan Checklist

BEEF. Pre-harvest Production Systems. Purpose. Natural 4/26/12. Natural, Grassfed and Organic. Natural. Describe production specifications for:

FEEDING THE HIGH PRODUCING DAIRY HERD

TDN (g) CP (g) NE(Mcal) Ca (g) P(g) Maintenance plus low activity

Low Cost Rations for More Milk Dollars

Forage Value of Cover Crops. Jim Paulson Nutritionist and Forage Specialist Fieldstone Consulting

Beef Cattle Handbook

Certified Non-GMO by AGW

Effects on Manure P and P Cycles

co-products ethanol for cattle Distillers Grains for Beef Cows

Pre-harvest Production Systems. Niche Markets Explained Maybe? Niche Markets = Grass based Beef Production Systems. Purpose. Options for Niche BEEF

VOF 100% Grass Fed Guidelines

Linking Crop Rotations & Feeding Programs

Short Forage What to Do? Options Available Using an Example Herd

Real Feed Costs on WI Dairy Farms January 2011

Phosphorus Management to Improve Profit and Ensure Environmental Sustainability

The Modern Dairy Cow

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

2013 Georgia Grazing School:

Agriculture Media Planning Guide. August 2018

Certified Non-GMO by A Greener World (Certified Non-GMO by AGW) Standards

Other Unique Components

Protein Sources : State of Play in Europe

Feed & Bunk Management KPI s. Robb Bender, PhD

Seed Certification in Canada. By Dale Adolphe, Executive Director Canadian Seed Growers Association (CSGA)

Putting It All Together To Stay In Business. Major Challenges

FEED COSTS FROM A NUTRITIONIST PERSPECTIVE

Genetically Engineered Crops: What are They? Who s Growing Them? Who s Eating Them? Who Cares?

Designing Heifer Systems That Work on Your Farm

(Gives background and presents arguments for both sides) by P. Byrne, D. Pendell, & G. Graff* Quick Facts...

102 - PHOSPHORUS ON THE FARM FROM FEED GRAINS AND BY- PRODUCTS - by Mike Gamroth and Troy Downing, Oregon State University

Precision Feeding Dairy Heifers. Heifers: Strategies and Recommendations

Benchmarking High Producing Herds

Highlights of the Past and a Look into the Future of Dairy Nutrition

Calculating rations for winter feeding of gestating and lactating goats

Management of TMR Feeding Programs

A COMPARISON OF BARLEY DISTILLERS DRIED GRAIN, SUNFLOWER MEAL AND SOYBEAN OIL MEAL AS PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS IN BACKGROUNDING RATIONS

What is the Dairy Feeding Value of High-Quality Grass Forage?

Grouping Cows. Mike Gamroth Extension Dairy Specialist Oregon State University. Introduction

Phosphorous (and Nitrogen) Management on Dairy Farms

Calculating Dry Matter Intake from Pasture for Ruminants

Section 5: Production Management

Strategic Management Options to Maximize Dairy Farm Profitability

Making The Best Use of Alfalfa in Dairy Rations

4-H Dairy Project Record Dairy Cow

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Impact of Agronomic Management on Nutritive Value of Corn Silage. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Suggested Environmental Considerations for Processed Food

EVALUATION OF YIELD AND NUTRITIVE VALUE OF PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE SORGHUM AND SORGHUM-SUDANGRASS 1, 2 / Background

Randy Shaver Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin Madison

Understanding the 2011 Planting Outlook, Ethanol, and Food Pricing. March 31, 2011

A Refresher Course on Finishing Cattle in Tennessee. Genetics, Quality and Efficient Production for Marketing

Forage and Livestock Management Considerations

Cleaver s Certified Organic Grass Fed Assurance. Grass Fed Assurance Standard 1

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Washington County Agriculture Profile

Environmental Sustainability, Food Security and Animal Food Production: Milk and Dairy as a Case Study

ALFALFA FOR DAIRY CATTLE

Economical Feeding And Management Practices For Herds Approaching 30,000- Pound RHAs: A Panel Discussion

Margin = Difference. Navigating Through Financials- Careful Where you Step! Stepping Forward. Revenue $$$ less expenses $$$ Improving Margins

Greenhouse gas emissions from feed production. Lisbeth Mogensen

Forage Utilization Guidelines for Beef Cattle

Cow/calf Management Winter and Spring

1/16/2013. Lessons Learned from the Drought of Milk Fat and Milk Protein Relationships (Source: Hoard s Dairyman) Looking Ahead to 2013

Feeding small grains and small grain silages

Canola Meal & The Beef Industry. J. McKinnon & K. Wallburger University of Saskatchewan & B. Doig Saskatchewan Agriculture & Food

Pocket K No. 11. Contribution of GM Technology to the Livestock Sector

The Effective Fibre Source for Livestock

Protein Crops. Objective. Main drivers

Survey of Silage Crop Nutritive Value in New Mexico and West Texas

Michelle Wright Consulting, LLC Regulatory & Labeling Consulting for the Food Industry. GMO Labeling PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

LIMIT FEEDING CONCENTRATE DIETS TO BEEF COWS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO FEEDING HAY. David Lalman, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist OSU Animal Science

The impact of forages and their quality on the efficiency of dairy production. Randy Shaver, Ph.D., PAS, ACAN Dairy Science Department

More Feed = More Milk. Dry Matter Intake Used To Express Feed. Intake ASC-135. Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Roger W. Hemken, and William L.

Double-cropping options for Today s Dairies

THE ROLE OF THE U.S. ETHANOL INDUSTRY IN FOOD AND FEED PRODUCTION

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series September 20, 2013

USE OF PEGASUS TO ESTIMATE THE ECONOMIC V ALUE OF ALF ALF A HA y FOR HORSES. John R. Dunbarl

Optimization of Whole Farm Nutrient Balance: N-CyCLE. Michel A. Wattiaux 1. 1 Department of Dairy Science, UW-Madison.

IMPACTS OF ETHANOL CO-PRODUCTS ON 2011/12 CORN AND SOYBEAN SUPPLIES AND ACREAGE

E ffect of Diets Containing a

EkoNiva as milk producer: is it possible and does it make sense to export milk products?

Drought Strategies - What To Do?

Milk From Farm to Fridge

Dairy Farms: Where Cows Come First

Improving Dairy Farm Sustainability through Strategic Alternatives to Corn Grain Feeding

This brochure is brought to you by a group

TITRE. Organic System Plan (OSP) NOP Unit Description EC 834/2007. Information and documents requested

Classes of Livestock. Numbers to Remember. Crude Protein. Nutrition for the Cow-calf. Factors influencing Requirements

Feed Cost Indices for a Dairy Cow Enterprise Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

Report on Experimental Feeding of Dairy Cattle with DDGS (Distiller s Dry Grains with Solubles ) *)

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

Non-GMO Project Product Verification Guide

Heifer rearing cost: Critical control points

Transcription:

Considerations for Developing non GMO Dairy Rations DR. L. E. CHASE CORNELL UNIVERSITY Jennifer Simpson Alex Lundstrom Chip Hyde Dan Button Jeff Tikofsky Thanks To: Rick Canfield Ashley Audet Bella Stahl Dave Gast Joe Lawrence Kiira Heyman Heather Walker Special Thanks To: Background There are at least 2 dairy processors in the U.S. that are sourcing non GMO milk from dairy farms (Dannon, Fage). Primary use is for yogurt production. There are a number of New York and Northeast dairy farms that are changing cropping programs to transition to non GMO forages for feeding their herds. It is unclear how much the demand for non GMO milk will grow. This is a market differentiation approach.

What Does Science Say? Dr. A. L. Van Eenannam University of California Davis: Data from >100 studies feeding GE crops did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in livestock health and productivity. Genetically engineered crops are digested in animals in the same way as conventional crops. Genetically engineered DNA, or the novel proteins encoded therein have never been detected in the milk, meat or eggs derived from anima fed genetically engineered feedstuffs. There is no reason to suspect that genetically engineered DNA will behave any differently than any other sources of DNA. National Academy of Science 2017 There was no substantial scientific evidence that foods from GE crops were any less safe when compared to foods from non GMO crops The Other Side of the Coin To date, there have been no epidemiological studies investigating the effects of GMO food on human health. A comprehensive review of peer reviewed animal feeding studies of GMO s found a roughly equal number of research groups raising concerns about GE foods and those suggesting that GMO s are safe. Most studies finding GMO s safe were performed by biotechnology companies or their associates. a growing body of evidence connects GMO s with health problems and environmental damage. Who is Setting the Standards? The Non GMO Project. Publishes a standard publication. Most recent was September 22, 2017. Not sure how much they really understand animal agriculture. Seem receptive to interaction.

Verified Products Must Have Systems in Place For Testing Traceability Segregation Formulation Labeling Quality assurance Key Questions How does going non GMO affect: Available forages and feeds. Ration formulation strategy. Herd management. GM and Isogenic Corn Hybrids L. Ferraretto and R. Shaver 2015. Meta analysis. Compared nutrient composition and milk production. Studies used had a GM corn hybrid and it s isogenic hybrid. 21 means for isogenic 13 means for GM hybrids Nutrient Composition Item Isogenic Hybrids GM hybrids P value CP, % of 8 8 0.88 NDF, % of 39.2 40.4 0.10 Lignin % of 2.6 2.7 0.73 Starch, % of 34.5 33.1 0.02 Ash, % of 4.8 4.8 0.79

Item Animal Performance Isogenic Hybrids GM Hybrids P value I lbs. 53.5 53.5 0.55 Milk, lbs. 77.0 76.6 0.50 3.5% FCM, lbs. 78.3 77.7 0.38 Milk fat, % 3.62 3.61 0.67 Milk true protein, % 3.19 3.19 0.58 MUN, mg/dl 17.1 17.1 0.98 Ingredient Classes Major > 5% of total ration. Must be verified or tested. Minor At least 0.5% but <5% of total ration. Are exempt from evaluation. Can use multiple minor ingredients Micro <0.5% of total ration Any added nutrient, vitamin or other active compound = non GMO As of May 2019, all minor and micro ingredients in livestock feeds are exempt from evaluation. Example Dairy Ration Feed Lbs. of % in Ration GMO Non GMO BMR CS 12.2 22 X Conv. CS 9.25 17 X Alfalfa 8 14 X haylage Corn grain 10 18 X SBM 1.9 3.6 X X Soy hulls 2.2 4 X x Example Ration 2 Feed Lbs. % of Ration GMO Non GMO Canola meal 1 Feed Lbs. % of Ration Roasted 2.5 4.6 X X soybeans Expeller 2.5 4.6 X X SBM Bypass fat 0.5 0.9?? Min vit 2.3 4.2 RPAA 0.05 0.1

Non GMO Feeds Available (if verified or tested) Corn, hominy, distiller s, CGF, CGM. SBM, expeller SBM, soy hulls, roasted soybeans. Beet pulp. Canola meal, expeller canola meal. Alfalfa pellets. Sunflower meal. Linseed meal. Non GMO Feeds 2 Wheat, oats and barley grains and their processed products should be non GMO since there are no GE varieties of these grains. There has been an increase in number and availability of non GMO feeds in the last year or so. Soybean Example There are non GMO soybean varieties available. There has been difficulty in getting large quantities of non GMO soybean products. One reason is a lack of a consistent supply of non GMO beans. A second reason is the segregation requirement Either a dedicated processing facility. Or a complete clean out of an existing facility. An estimate is that non GMO SBM is priced at $100 150/ton > GM SBM. Testing There are about 8 labs in the U.S. approved for testing non GMO ingredients. Testing is done using PCR techniques. Strip tests are available for on farm testing of corn, cotton, alfalfa and soybeans.

Feed Companies The best situation would be to source ingredients that have been tested, verified and have documentation to verify this. If an ingredient is sourced that doesn t have this, it must be stored separately sampled and samples sent for testing. It cannot be used until test results are returned and product is verified and approved. This may take 1 2 weeks. If it doesn t meet test requirements then it cannot be used in non GMO rations. What Records Are Required? Forage and feed purchases Supplier and date of purchase. Quantity purchased and storage location. Save invoices, feed tags, weight slips and information on forage seed bags. Verification Requires letters from suppliers if they are providing non GMO certified products. Feed ingredients GMO or non GMO status of each feed must be recorded. Forages Track the hybrids or varieties purchased. Field maps as to where planted. Planting and harvest dates. Quantity harvested and storage location. Segregation. Aerial maps of storage facilities? Rations The quantity of each feed in the ration needs to be recorded. List of GMO and non GMO ingredients in the ration. Percent of the ration dry matter from each feed. Actual dry matter intakes are needed. Need to track quantity of feed fed and refusals. Adjustments for forage dry matter changes. Best way to do this is the use of an electronic feed management system.

Herd Management Dairy calves no changes to current feeding programs. Heifers Can be fed GM based rations for most of the growing period. However, they must be fed a non GMO ration for at least 30 days before milk can be verified as non GMO. This may require a change in heifer housing and rations. What if she calves early? Dry and lactating cows Must feed non GMO rations continuously once they have calved for the first time. 3 rd Party Verification There are 4 companies currently approved as 3 rd party auditors. In general, they use the Non GMO Project Standards as the base. However, the may also have some variation in the interpretation of the standards and auditing procedures ( similar to milk inspectors). It is imperative for the feed company and/or dairy producer to know who the 3 rd party auditing firm is and what their specific standards and guidelines are. Third Party Verification Each milk processor will contract with a 3 rd party firm to conduct audits and verification. Need to know the specific requirements from the specific 3 rd party auditor working with your farms. The basic requirement is to have the records and documentation required by the 3 rd party auditing firm. May include on farm audits and visits. Traceability Example Corn Silage Hybrid 1. Seed purchased should be non GMO tested and verified by hybrid company. 2. Need to obtain a letter or seed tag information and keep it on file. 3. Need to have records on which fields it was planted on and planting date. 4. Need a record of any other cultural practices. 5. Need to record harvest date and where the material is stored. 6. Need to address any segregation concerns. 7. Record feed out data. 8. Might be needed to have aerial photos of storage facility.

Summary Non GMO rations will need to be developed on a number of New York and Northeast dairy farms. Ration feed cost will be increased due to higher ingredient costs. Ration formulation parameters will be similar to what you currently use. Increased management time will be needed on the farm to do the record keeping required to meet the non GMO requirements. There needs to be a milk pricing contract that provides a premium to the farm to cover added costs. It will take time to get the whole forage and feed supply chain in place. Thanks!