Produced by Agriculture and Extension Communications, Virginia Tech

Similar documents
The following guidelines are intended to control contamination by. 4Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 and other pathogenic Shiga-toxin producing E.

Inactivation Processes for RTE Meat and Poultry Products. Bob Hanson, HansonTech RMC 2007 SDSU

HPP Safety Validations: a Key Element for the Production of Innovative Dips and Wet Salads. October 17, 2016 Lincoln, NE

Microbial Risk Factors Associated With Condensation In Ready-To-Eat Processing Facilities

FOOD SAFETY TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY

Table of Contents Page

Establishment Name Date Establishment Address Establishment Number Establishment City, State, Zip Code. Date: Approved by:

Appendix A Compliance Guidelines For Meeting Lethality Performance Standards For Certain Meat And Poultry Products

should remain in refrigerated or frozen state.

Sample Food Safety Plan MEETS BC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS READY TO EAT SAUSAGE

FOOD SAFETY TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY. Currently available seconds at C. High effluent loading. High water use recirculation may be necessary

The microbiological risks of mechanically tenderizing beef products

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MICROBIAL SAMPLING OF READY-TO-EAT (RTE) PRODUCTS

Reduced Oxygen Packaging of Potentially Hazardous Foods at Retail

Achieving FSIS HACCP Validation Compliance. March 15 th and 17 th, 2016

The microbiological risks of mechanically tenderizing beef products. Trish Desmarchelier

Meat and Poultry Hazards and Controls Guide

Oven Validations and In-Bakery Data Collection at ARYZTA Bakeries for Baked Goods. Wafa Birbari, Ph.D. October 2018

Utilization of Microbial Data to Improve Food Safety Systems

Ohio Department of Agriculture and Ohio Department of Health

Food establishments that package Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) Food using ROP methods must implement a HACCP plan.

Hazard Analysis Worksheet. Table #A-3 provides 6D process times for a range of cooking temperatures, with L. monocytogenes as the target pathogen.

Sample Food Safety Plan MEETS BC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS DUCK POT PIE

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE (HACCP-PREERQUISITES LETTER) July 2015

REPLACEMENT FOR APPENDIX A IN COOKED MEATS. Andrew Milkowski, Ph.D. Adjunct Professor of Meat Science, University of Wisconsin

Food Safety. Sanitation and the Value Added Farmers Market Venues. Bryan Haugen

Identifying and Controlling Listeria in Food Processing Facilities. James L. Marsden, Ph.D. Executive Director Food Safety Chipotle Mexican Grill

Heat Treated, Shelf-Stable

Lessons from USDA s Mandatory HACCP Rule for Meat and Poultry

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FOOD SERVICE FACILITY CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP WITH NO CHANGES TO OPERATION, EQUIPMENT, OR FACILITY

REQUEST FOR RESEARCH PROPOSALS

Controlling Listeria What you need to know about USDA s new guidance

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE (HACCP-PREERQUISITES LETTER) December 2016

Public Health Consumer Protection Program

Implementing a Food Safety Intervention Strategy

FSIS PERSPECTIVE ON PATHOGEN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Patricia S. Schwartz, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development FSIS, USDA

GENERIC HACCP MODEL FOR IRRADIATION. Developed: June 5-7, 1996 College Station, TX. Submitted to. USDA, Food Safety and Inspection Service.

Industry Research Needs

High Pressure Pasteurization of meat products

Hazards Occur: Foodborne Illness Statistics. Pathogens Commonly Associated with Fresh Produce: How Can They Be Controlled?

REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING

Use of Microbial Data for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Verification Food and Drug Administration Perspective

Report #3 Short-term temperature abuse of cooked but not shelf-stable meat and poultry products

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) User s Guide

Post Processing. Processing Contamination Control. Timothy Freier, Ph.D. Cargill RMC, 2007

Microorganisms are everywhere

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) User s Guide

ABCs of Validation. Ruth L. Petran. Corporate Scientist, Food Safety 03 April 2012

POU Ozone Food Sanitation: A Viable Option for Consumers & the Food Service Industry

FOOD SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Food Safety Plan Workbook

DESTRUCTION OF SELECT HUMAN PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN MUSHROOM COMPOST DURING PHASE II PASTEURIZATION

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2016 Biennial Conference for Food Protection

Trends in Thermal Processing Pasteurization and Commercial Sterilization

CODE OF HYGIENIC PRACTICE FOR REFRIGERATED PACKAGED FOODS WITH EXTENDED SHELF LIFE CAC/RCP 46-(1999)

REVISED SEPTEMBER 2016 Commercial Processing Example: Shrimp (farm raised), Cooked and Frozen

Introduction. Seafood HACCP Alliance Training Course 3-1

Hazard Analysis Worksheet

Kill-Step Validation for Food Safety

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures. Policy Name: Food Service Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) Plan

Electrolyzed Water. Oklahoma State University

THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF HACCP

Sample Food Safety Plan HOT SMOKED SALMON

Scientific information for validation of EMO chilling and freezing requirements August 2003

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON. D.C. TIME/TEMPERATURE GUIDELINES FOR COOLING HEATED PRODUCTS

ADVANCED.fst FOOD SAFETY TRAINING IN CANADA PRETEST

Food Safety Plan Workbook

Puritan Environmental Sampling Kit (ESK )

USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2012 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection

Pathogen Reduction: a food safety priority

Department of Food Science University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706

INDUSTRY INFORMATION SESSION Agenda

Starting on the Right Track

Report BerryMeat. Antimicrobial effect for different preparations from 8 plants during storage at 18 C for 1½ year. Flemming Hansen.

HACCP Principles & Application Guidelines

Interpretation of Microbiological Test Results. Nicola Elviss FW&E Microbiology Network June 2010

Sample Food Safety Plan MEETS BC REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS MIXED GREEN SALAD

Continuous Food Safety Innovation as a Management Strategy : Private Sector Perspective

The Prerequisites Program includes:

The next preventive control category to be discussed during this course is the sanitation controls.

The next preventive control category to be discussed during this course is the sanitation controls.

Modified NEBRASKA FOOD CODE - Nebraska Department of Agriculture. wvvmagrne.gov/regulations/foods/09_food code.pdf

Biofilms 101 Remediation Strategies in Meat Processing

Ohio Department of Agriculture and Ohio Department of Health. Ohio Uniform Food Safety Code Rule Updates 2016 Training

Validation of Hot Water and Lactic Acid Sprays for the Reduction of Enteric Pathogens on the Surface of Beef Carcasses

PRODUCT PROTECTION PROGRAM

Guidelines for the Production of Uncooked Comminuted Fermented Meat (UCFM) Products

Top of Mind Regulatory Issues. Norm Robertson VP, Regulatory Services The Meat Institute February 1, 2017, IPPE

Best Practices for Using Microbiological Sampling

The Role of Predictive Microbiology in Microbial Risk Assessment

While the previous chapter helped describe the process for conducting the hazard analysis and determining which hazards require a preventive control,

Narrative. Description of Process: REVISED JUNE 2017 Commercial Processing Example: Shrimp (Wild), Cooked, Frozen. ABC Shrimp Company, Anywhere, USA

Control of Listeria monocytogenes at the Retail Level. Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science Pennsylvania State University

Microbiological specifications

PRINCIPLES OF THERMAL PROCESSING

INTRODUCTION. Food industry challenges

USDA NEW POULTRY INSPECTION SYSTEM: WHAT ARE THE MAJOR ISSUES?

No bare hand contact with RTE foods or pre- approved alternate procedure properly followed

Updated Restaurant Data Collection Form Matches FoodSHIELD Database

Industry Best Practices

Transcription:

2005 PUBLICATION 458-501 Safe Processing of Meat and Poultry Jerky Scott Daigle, Meat Laboratory Manager, Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech Joseph Eifert, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech Introduction Preserved through dehydration, jerky is a nutritious shelfstable product that has been enjoyed for generations. On January 6, 1999, the USDA-FSIS final rule for the implementation of the pathogen reduction performance standards for Salmonella became effective for small and very small meat and poultry processors. Under these rules, establishments producing ready-to-eat beef and poultry products were required to achieve 6.5 and 7.0 log 10 reductions, respectively, of Salmonella spp. Log stands for logarithm, which is the exponent of 10. A log reduction refers to one decimal reduction or a 90 percent reduction in numbers of recoverable bacteria in food. In other words, a 1.0 log 10 reduction reduces the number of bacteria by 90 percent; a 2.0 log 10 reduction reduces the number by an additional 90 percent, and so on. In the fall of 2003, the United States Department of Agriculture s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) became concerned that processors were not effectively heat-treating jerky to kill pathogenic bacteria. Numerous jerky producers were only using the moisture-protein-ratio (MPR) to determine if the jerky was adequately dried. Jerky must have an MPR of 0.75:1 to meet the standard of identity for jerky. Standard of identity does not relate to processing a product safely. It ensures that a product contains a specific composition and that the name of the food reflects that composition. It defines what may be in the food and what cannot be in the food using the prescribed name. The MPR of 0.75:1 does not necessarily verify that the proper water activity (A w ) was attained to control pathogen growth. Water activity measures the amount of available water for microbial growth and should not be confused with the relative humidity of a cooking system. Relative humidity is a measurement of how much moisture is in the air. To prevent pathogen growth after safe processing, jerky should have a water activity <0.85, which can inhibit growth of important bacterial pathogens, including Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. To enable small jerky processors to manufacture a safe product this publication has referenced several sources for determination of an adequate lethality treatment on jerky. During processing, a lethality treatment must be included to control, reduce, or eliminate the biological hazards identified in the processor s Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) program. Additionally, FSIS requires processors to heat jerky with humidity prior to dehydrating. Cooking and drying times and temperatures alone are not considered a lethal process. Without humidity the product will dry, and bacteria can become more heat resistant. To produce the required 6.5 log 10 reduction of Salmonella in cooked beef products, processors may refer to Appendix A of the Compliance Guidelines for Meeting Lethality Performance Standards for the Production of Certain Meat and Poultry Products (http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ OPPDE/rdad/FRPubs/95-033F.pdf). To achieve the 7.0 log 10 reduction of Salmonella in cooked poultry products, processors may refer to the recently published Time-Temperature Tables for Cooking Ready-to-Eat Poultry Products (http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oppde/ rdad/fsisnotices/rte_poultry_tables.pdf). Jerky Processing The important steps that processors should use to prepare jerky that is microbiologically safe are listed below. 1) Strip preparation Wash hands thoroughly with soap and hot water for at least 20 seconds before and after handling raw meats. Clean work surfaces, avoid cross contamination of raw and cooked meat. www.ext.vt.edu Produced by Agriculture and Extension Communications, Virginia Tech Virginia Cooperative Extension programs and employment are open to all, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, veteran status, national origin, disability, or political affiliation. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Patricia M. Sobrero, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Clinton V. Turner, Interim Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg. VT/014/0705/100/ /458501

Use clean equipment and utensils. Keep all meat or poultry refrigerated (<40ºF). Always thaw frozen meat in the refrigerator, not at room temperature. Slice whole muscles or reform ground meat into uniform strips. 2) Marinating Soak meat in water and selected seasonings of choice. Marinate meat in the refrigerator. Do not save and reuse marinade. Do not combine poultry and beef during marinating. 3) Lethality Step (Required by FSIS) If the jerky is heated in an adequately humid environment and the internal temperature of the jerky strips reaches the appropriate temperature for the corresponding time, the process would be valid. Regardless of the final internal temperature, adequate humidity should be incorporated during the heating process. If Appendix A in the Compliance Guidelines for Certain Ready-to-Eat Meat and Poultry Products is used, a 90 percent relative humidity must be achieved during the heating stages to an instantaneous internal temperature of 160ºF. The American Association of Meat Processors has compiled several smokehouse schedules in a Special Report Jerky Compliance Guidelines Compliance vs. Guidance (http://www.aamp.com/ regulatory/documents/validatingthesafetyofyourjer kyprocess.pdf) to help processors comply with these compliance guidelines. Establishments may use alternative lethality processes. FSIS will only accept alternative lethality processes as being valid if they prove to have an effective log reduction through research or supporting documentation. Some examples of these processes are in Table 1. To achieve a 90 percent relative humidity during heating, FSIS suggests the following: A) Close the oven dampers. This provides a closed system and prevents moisture loss. B) Place a wide, shallow pan of hot water in the oven. A high water temperature translates to more humid- Table 1: Research on alternative lethality processes for meat and poultry jerky Processing Method Ground beef inoculated with L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium Beef jerky strips inoculated with E. coli O157:H7 Beef loin strips inoculated with E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium Meat and poultry strips and reformed jerky Lethality Treatment Cured and heated in mechanical convection oven to 160ºF Heated in dehydrator at 125ºF, 135ºF, 145ºF, 155ºF Heated in marinade on a hot plate to 160ºF Heat in 90% relative humidity to 160ºF Humidity Added? No* Drying Treatment 140ºF for 6 hr in dehydrator No* 10 hr, 9 hr, 7 hr, 4.5 hr in dehydrator Yes 140ºF until acceptable A w is attained 2 Final A w Reduction of Tested Pathogens 0.69 Salmonella reduced 4.9 logs and Listeria reduced 3.2 logs N/m** N/m** <0.85 or 0.70 if exposed to air All processes produced at least a 5 log unit reduction Reduction of 5.0, 5.6 and 5.9 log units for E. coli O157:H7, L. mono. and S. typhimurium, respectively Salmonella spp. reduced 6.5 7.0 logs *These studies did not incorporate humidity which is now a necessary part of the lethality step. **Not measured Reference JA, MA, Ruth, AR, 1997 Buege, D, 2004 JA, MA, 1996 Yes 140ºF for 10 hr in dehydrator USDA- FSIS, 2004

ity being introduced during the heating stage. If no evaporation occurs, this would indicate that a relative high humidity was not maintained in the oven. C) Preheat the jerky to 160 F in the marinade or another solution, such as water, before placing it in the oven. This will provide an immediate reduction of greater than 5 log 10 of Salmonella spp. and E. coli O157:H7. The times and temperatures listed in Appendix A in the Compliance Guidelines for Ready-to-Eat Meat and Poultry Products could also be used for preheating. 4) Drying Following the lethality step, the product has to be dried to comply with the MPR standard and stabilized to ensure the control (prevent the growth) of pathogens. A meat product with a A w <0.85 is usually considered shelf stable and not able to support the growth of microorganisms. Jerky in contact with air should have a A w <0.70 to control mold growth. If the water activity is greater than 0.70, additional control measures such as vacuum packaging or the incorporation of a pillow pouch package or gases to exclude oxygen should be used to prevent mold growth. 5) Packaging/storage Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs) for the processing facility should ensure that the product is properly handled to prevent contamination. Monitoring the Process 1) Meat temperature A calibrated food thermometer should be used to validate that the jerky reached the appropriate internal temperature. An example of thermometer calibration to 32ºF is shown in Figures 1a, 1b, and 1c. The thermometer should be placed lengthwise in the jerky to measure the internal temperature of the jerky. Cutting a strip of jerky large enough for a thermometer to completely fit in it should suffice (Figure 2). Since a thicker strip takes longer to heat up, the thinner strips will have reached the appropriate internal temperature needed for safe processing. Internal temperature could be measured during the whole process, but it is critical to measure it towards the end of heating to ensure the proper temperature was reached. Figure 1a: A mix of crushed ice and water can be used to calibrate a thermometer. Figure 1b: Correctly calibrated thermometer in a mix of crushed ice and water. Figure 1c: Adjusting a thermometer for calibration. Figure 2: Correct thermometer placement to measure the internal temperature of a jerky strip. 3

2) Relative humidity A calibrated wet-bulb thermometer should be placed in the oven to measure relative humidity during the lethality step. This can be constructed by wrapping a wet, moisture-wicking cloth around a dry bulb thermometer (Figures 3a and 3b). To ensure an accurate wet-bulb temperature the cloth encompassing the wet-bulb thermometer needs to be in constant contact with the pan of water during the heating cycle. Use a wet-bulb thermometer in combination with a dry-bulb thermometer to calculate the relative humidity. The use of a wet bulb thermometer is especially important for production at high altitudes or areas of low humidity. A wet- and dry-bulb temperature difference greater than 4.5ºF will result in a relative humidity less than the required 90 percent. 3) Water activity Product samples should be collected during the drying process to evaluate how fast the jerky is drying, but especially at the end to ensure that the proper A w has been reached for stabilization. Collecting several finished product samples (2.0 to 3.0 grams each) and analyzing them with an approved water activity instrument will allow processors to evaluate the jerky stabilization. For a fee, processors can send their samples to an analytical food laboratory for measurement if they do not have a method to measure water activity. Additional Pathogen Interventions Regardless of the intervention, a lethality step is still mandatory. Antimicrobial treatments before or after marinating have produced greater pathogen reductions than heating alone. Applying a 5 percent acetic acid dip before marinating can decrease the bacterial load. As an additional precaution, reheat the dried product in a 275 F oven for 10 minutes after the initial heating and drying cycle. This has the potential to further reduce Salmonella levels by approximately 2 logs from the level of reduction achieved during the initial heat step. Summary 1) Following strip preparation and marinating, a lethality step must be included in jerky HACCP plans. 2) The lethality step must be validated to achieve 6.5 and 7.0 log 10 reductions to meet the lethality performance standards for Salmonella spp. in beef and poultry. Other pathogens that should be considered reasonably likely to occur and be addressed are Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and E. coli O157:H7. 3) FSIS suggests heating the strips in 90 percent relative humidity to an internal temperature of 160ºF. Alternative lethality steps will be accepted provided they are valid for producing a sufficient log 10 reduction for the pathogens of concern. 4) Following the lethality step, the strips need to be dehydrated to meet the product s MPR and to reduce the A w <0.85 to inhibit pathogen growth. If the product is in contact with air, the water activity needs to be <0.70 to prevent mold growth. References Association of Food and Drug Officials. 2004. Guidance for Processing Beef Jerky in Retail Operations. Available at: http://www.afdo.org/afdo/upload/beefjerky.pdf. Figures 3a and 3b: Constructing a wet-bulb thermometer. 4

Buege, D. 2004. Validating the Safety of Your Jerky Process. Available at: http://www.aamp.com/regulatory/ documents/validatingthesafetyofyourjerkyprocess.pdf. Calicioglu, M., Sofos, J.N., Samelis, J. Kendall, P.A., and Smith, G.C. 2003. Effects of acid adaptation and modified marinades on survival of postdrying Salmonella contamination on beef jerky during storage. Journal of Food Protection 66(3):396-402. Faith, N.G., Le Contour, N.S., Alvarenga, M.B., Calicioglu, M., Buege, D.R., and Luchansky, J.B. 1998. Viability of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground and formed beef jerky prepared at levels of 5 and 20% fat and dried at 52, 57, 63 or 68 degrees C in a home-style dehydrator. International Journal of Food Microbiology 41:213-221. J.A., M.A., Rose-Morrow, R.A., and Shewfelt, R.L. 2001. Home-style beef jerky: effect of four preparation methods on consumer acceptability and pathogen inactivation. Journal of Food Protection 64(8):1194-98. J.A., M.A., and Ruth, A.R. 1997. Fate of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella species in ground beef jerky. Journal of Food Protection 60(9):1139-1141. Nummer, B.A., J.A., M.A., Kendall, P., Sofos, J.N., and Andress, E.L. 2004. Effects of preparation methods on the microbiological safety of homedried meat jerky. Journal of Food Protection 67(10): 2337-2341. United States Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service. 2004. Compliance guideline for meat and poultry jerky produced by small and very small plants. USDA-FSIS, Washington, D.C. Available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/pdf/compliance_guideline_ Jerky.pdf. Wenther, Jay B. 2004. Special Report Jerky: Compliance Guidelines Compliance vs. Guidance. American Association of Meat Processors. Available at: http://www. aamp.com/regulatory/documents/aampspecialreport_ 000.pdf. J.A., and M.A. 1996. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella typhimurium during preparation and storage of beef jerky. Journal of Food Protection 59(12):1336-1338. 5