PNREC 2013 May16th-17th 2013 Spokane, WA

Similar documents
Food Distribution Research Society 2013 October 5 th -8 th 2013 Chicago, IL

FREIGHT P T OLICY RANSPORTATION INSITUTE. Freight Commodity Flows: Selected Washington State Highways

FREIGHT P T OLICY RANSPORTATION INSITUTE. Truck Freight Commodity Flows: US 395 North of Spokane Washington

Washington State Freight Truck Origin and Destination Study: King County

O & D Data. Results. Traffic Increase. Heavier Payloads. Total and Average Value of Freight Payload for Selected Highways

Strategic Freight Transportation Analysis (SFTA): Freight Research and Implementation for the State

Our Mission Today. What is Strategic Freight Transportation Analysis (SFTA)? SFTA s Origins

Survey Methodology for Collecting Freight Truck and Destination Data

Research Projects. Recently Completed Projects. Oregon Department of Transportation Urban Freight Data Collection Study

GRAIN INDUSTRY CHANGES IN WASHINGTON

Projections of Washington-British Columbia Trade and Traffic by Commodity, Route and Border Crossings ABSTRACT

Newsletter FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE FROM THE DIRECTOR. Winter 2017

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

2017 Marine Cargo Forecast and Rail Capacity Analysis

Moving Washington Forward: State and Ports working together for freight mobility in reauthorization

FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE

CONTAINER TERMINAL ACCESS STUDY Year 2003 Update

Completed Many Studies

Dynamics of Wheat and Barley Shipments on Haul Roads to and from Grain Warehouses in Washington State

Assessment of Current Status, Plans, and Preliminary Alternatives for High Capacity Transportation in the I-5 Corridor

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

SR 432 GRADE CROSSING PROJECT. April 28, 2015

Highway Construction Program

Interstate 10 (SR 8)/ SR 200 (US 301) Interchange Interchange Modification Report. APPENDIX E Interchange Concepts Considered

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Chapter 1 Introduction

PORT OF FERNANDINA TRUCK CIRCULATION STUDY

CONTAINER PORT GOALS 10-2

CHAPTER 6 FREIGHT MOVEMENT

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE. The Critical Status of Agricultural Transportation in the Pacific Northwest

Final Recommendations Identification of Improvements, Strategies, and Solutions

State of Idaho Profile

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee December 3, 2014

PROLOGIS GEORGETOWN CROSSROADS

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Puget Sound Gateway Program Phase 1 of the SR 509 Completion Project

Linking Transportation System Improvements To New Business Development In Eastern Washington

Innovations in Urban Freight. Commercial Challenges for the Port of Seattle February 6, 2011

Overview of the Draft Highway Primary Freight Network. November 20, :00 2:30 pm ET Coral Torres Ed Strocko

GREATER CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN

2. Goals and Objectives

Port of Whitman County Request for Proposal for Washington State Grain Train Strategic Plan

Transportation Facility Inventory

Eight County Freight Plan

West Coast Corridors Coalition General Assembly

Highway Construction Program

PROLOGIS GEORGETOWN CROSSROADS

Central Minnesota Regional Freight Forum. May 17, :00 P.M. 5:30 P.M. St. Cloud, MN

Estimating Freight Activity on Major Highways with the Freight Analysis Framework (FAF)

Impact of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) on Washington Highways. Part I: Commodity and Corridor Projections

Central Minnesota. Regional Freight Profile

The Growth Management Act requires the Transportation Element contain the following sub-elements:

Prologis Georgetown Crossroads

Sabbir Saiyed, PhD., P.Eng. Manager, Transportation System Planning

FAST Freight Advisory Committee August 9, Transportation 2040 Update

EXPORT TRENDS IN WASHINGTON STATE: VOLUME 8

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

Goods Movement COLLABORATIVE AND PLAN. Arthur L. Dao, Alameda CTC Executive Director ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. September 17, 2015

Development of the I-70 Corridor of National Significance

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey Use of GIS for Data Collection, Processing, Analyses and Dissemination

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

Rail - What Does the Future Bring?

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

Assessing the Impact of The CETA on Canada s Transportation Network

Newsletter FREIGHT POLICY TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE. Washington State University. Spring 2017 FROM THE DIRECTORS

TRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002

FDOT FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mission, Roles and Responsibilities. Presentation to Eastside Transportation Association April 26, 2011

TRB Panel on the Future of the Interstate

Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model

Richard Ford, Chair* Elmira Forner, Vice Chair. Dan O Neal* Edward Barnes* Bob Distler. Dale Stedman. Carol Moser*

Truck Management ` Strategies in Los Angeles

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

The Dirty Job Of Truck Movement Data Gathering: An Evaluation of Intercept Surveys. Eric Jessup Ken Casavant

Sound Transit is updating its Regional Transit Long-Range Plan, which

Virginia Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridor Designation WebEx Discussion. September 28, 2017, 10:30 12:00

Neal Campbell (WSDOT) Mike Dahlem (City of Sumner) Kirk Wilcox (Parametrix)

Feasibility of an Intermodal Transfer Facility in the Willamette Valley. Final Report December 14, 2016

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #1. The Vision, Goals and Objectives for Rail Transportation in Missouri

FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL SYSTEMS

Jacksonville Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Draft

TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES IN AGRIBUSINESS

Delmarva Freight Plan

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

Mendocino Forest Products Grading For Industrial Land Improvements

Importance of the Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) in Developing the Freight Analysis Framework (FAF)

WISCONSIN TRANSPORTATION TRIBAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 7, 2018 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, P.E.

CITY OF CLE ELUM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN. Prepared by: PROJECT NO E APRIL 2019

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

Transportation & Logistics

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT) 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology

Wilmington-Harrisburg Freight Study. Presentation to the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission April 16, 2003

SIS Policy & Implementation

Transcription:

Jeremy Sage, Freight Policy Transportation Institute Kenneth Casavant, Freight Policy Transportation Institute J. Bradley Eustice, School of Economic Sciences You Zhou, School of Economic Sciences PNREC 2013 May16th-17th 2013 Spokane, WA

Background Why do we need or desire a commodity flow survey? Isn t a national commodity flow good enough? History of Commodity Flows in Washington. Information Needs of Regions throughout the State. Current Survey Effort Taking Place Throughout the State

The Need for a Commodity Flow Survey Prioritizing Infrastructure Investment Not all roads are of equal economic importance. A truck counter might tell us the number on the roadway, but does nothing to understand the value of its cargo. By developing an understanding of the commodities on a specific corridor, we may generate a measure of the wider economic impact of its improvement.

National Datasets Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) Data from 2007 Commodity Flow Survey and other sources. Nationally Based Performs well when considering interregional flows. However, it does not have the capacity to detail the finer flows on smaller roads.

Two Major Origin-Destination Surveys: Eastern Washington Intermodal Transportation Study (EWITS) Strategic Freight Transportation Analysis (SFTA)

Surveys conducted on the roadway around 1990. 28,000 trucks were stopped at 30 locations throughout the state. Conducted Seasonal (Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall) Produced a large database of highway specific information: O-D, Commodity, Volume, payload, configuration, Hazmat, major highways, and minor streets used, etc. FPTI researchers were able to generate 20+ reports for various agencies and Commodity groups throughout the state. However, data quickly becomes aged.

Surveys conducted on the roadway ten years after EWITS (~2004). 29,000 trucks were stopped at 29 locations throughout the state. Used 350+ Lions Club Volunteers as Survey takers. Able to generate a whole new round of reports to jurisdictions throughout the state..but again.data becomes obsolete!

The Economy of Washington is growing and changing. Budgets remain rather tight. Investment must be strategically planned and justifiable. Trucks make up a small percentage of road users, but a large percent of the costs borne due to delays Therefore know how they experience/use the roadways is vital.

Wenatchee Valley US 395 Snoqualmie Pass

Southbound US 395 at Kettle Falls Westbound SR-28 at Rock Island North-,Southbound US-97 and Westbound SR 17 at Brewster Northbound US 97at Blewitt Pass Westbound I-90 at Cle Elum POE Eastbound I-90 at Cle Elum Northbound US 395 at Chewelah Southbound US 395 at Deer Park Westbound US 2 at US 2/US97 Interchange Eastbound SR-28 at Rock Island

Cooperation with the Washington State Patrol s Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Officers (CVEOs) Lion s Club Crews Work around the clock performing 3-5 minute questionnaires with the drivers. Collect between 150-700 surveys per survey day.

How much freight is crossing the Snoqualmie Pass both in tonnage and value of freight? What types of products are crossing the Pass, on a daily, seasonal, and yearly basis? What routes does freight take when Snoqualmie Pass is closed? Which Ports benefit most from Snoqualmie Pass? Is Snoqualmie Pass used primarily for importing or exporting freight? How much does closing the Pass cost the state of Washington s economy? How much does it cost freight companies when the Pass is closed?

Complete only the one column that applies to this trip. No round-trip information, please! Trucks CARRYING cargo: Trucks WITHOUT cargo: Where did you pick-up this cargo? 6) City 7) State/Province 8) Facility: [see Quality Control Notes] a. Trucking yard b. Railroad yard c. River or ocean port d. Airport e. Industrial factory or sawmill f. Agricultural processing facility g. Warehouse/distribution center or post office h. Farm or forest i. Retail store or gas station j. Job or construction site k. Other Where is the destination of your cargo? 6) City: 7) State/Province 8) Facility: [See Quality Control Notes] a. Trucking yard b. Railroad yard c. River or ocean port d. Airport e. Industrial factory or sawmill f. Agricultural processing facility g. Warehouse/distribution center or post office h. Farm or forest i. Retail store or gas station j. Job or construction site k. Other Where did this trip without cargo begin? 6) City 7) State/Province 8) Facility: [see Quality Control Notes] a. Trucking yard b. Railroad yard c. River or ocean port d. Airport e. Industrial factory or sawmill f. Agricultural processing facility g. Warehouse/distribution center or post office h. Farm or forest i. Retail store or gas station j. Job or construction site k. Other Where will your trip without cargo end? 23) City: 24) State/Province 25) Facility: [See Quality Control Notes] a. Trucking yard b. Railroad yard c. River or ocean port d. Airport e. Industrial factory or sawmill f. Agricultural processing facility g. Warehouse/distribution center or post office h. Farm or forest i. Retail store or gas station j. Job or construction site k. Other

Eastbound Facility Origin Trucks Carrying Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Facility Origin Cargo Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Trucking yard 48 13% 58 27% 106 18% Railroad yard 8 2% 3 1% 11 2% River or Ocean Port 18 5% 48 23% 66 11% Airport 3 1% 0 0% 3 1% Industrial factory/sawmill 29 8% 5 2% 34 6% Agriculture processing facility 12 3% 3 1% 15 3% Warehouse/distribution 204 56% 64 30% 268 46% Farm or forest 3 1% 4 2% 7 1% Retail store or gas station 13 4% 11 5% 24 4% Job/construction site 4 1% 1 0% 5 1% Other 24 7% 14 7% 38 7% Total 366 100% 211 100% 577 100%

Eastbound Facility Destination Facility Destination Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Trucking yard 36 10% 49 24% 85 15% Railroad yard 2 1% 0 0% 2 0% River or Ocean Port 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Airport 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Industrial factory/sawmill 10 3% 6 3% 16 3% Agriculture processing facility 9 3% 26 13% 35 6% Warehouse/distribution 165 47% 79 39% 244 44% Farm or forest 6 2% 9 4% 15 3% Retail store or gas station 71 20% 6 3% 77 14% Job/construction site 9 3% 2 1% 11 2% Other 41 12% 26 13% 67 12% Total 349 100% 203 100% 552 100%

Westbound Facility Origin Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Facility Origin Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Trucking yard 56 10% 28 25% 84 12% Railroad yard 4 1% 0 0% 4 1% River or Ocean Port 2 0% 0 0% 2 0% Airport 3 1% 1 1% 4 1% Industrial factory/sawmill 72 13% 7 6% 79 12% Agriculture processing facility 118 21% 6 5% 124 18% Warehouse/distribution 212 38% 34 30% 246 36% Farm or forest 26 5% 1 1% 27 4% Retail store or gas station 4 1% 16 14% 20 3% Job/construction site 1 0% 0 0% 1 0% Other 65 12% 21 18% 86 13% Total 563 100% 114 100% 677 100%

Westbound Facility Destination Facility Destination Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Trucking yard 40 7% 47 41% 87 13% Railroad yard 7 1% 2 2% 9 1% River or Ocean Port 85 16% 5 4% 90 14% Airport 4 1% 0 0% 4 1% Industrial factory/sawmill 38 7% 4 3% 42 6% Agriculture processing facility 16 3% 2 2% 18 3% Warehouse/distribution 230 42% 30 26% 260 39% Farm or forest 11 2% 2 2% 13 2% Retail store or gas station 40 7% 2 2% 42 6% Job/construction site 7 1% 1 1% 8 1% Other 67 12% 20 17% 87 13% Total 545 100% 115 100% 660 100%

Eastbound City Origin Origin City Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Tacoma 42 11% 51 24% 93 16% Seattle 63 17% 52 25% 115 20% Kent 49 13% 18 8% 67 12% Auburn 28 8% 10 5% 38 7% Sumner 30 8% 10 5% 40 7% Puyallup 13 4% 5 2% 18 3% Lakewood 10 3% 4 2% 14 2% Chehalis 1 0% 3 1% 4 1% Fife 13 4% 3 1% 16 3% OTHER 119 32% 56 26% 175 30% Total 368 100% 212 100% 580 100%

Westbound City Origin Trucks Carrying Origin City Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Spokane 53 9% 20 16% 73 10% Yakima 44 7% 11 9% 55 8% Ellensburg 36 6% 6 5% 42 6% Moses Lake 25 4% 4 3% 29 4% Pasco 23 4% 3 2% 26 4% Hermiston 19 3% 4 3% 23 3% Wenatchee 15 2% 6 5% 21 3% Quincy 13 2% 3 2% 16 2% OTHER 376 62% 69 55% 445 61% Total 604 100% 126 100% 730 100%

Eastbound State Destination Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Destination State/Province Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency WA 204 70% 191 90% 395 79% ID 38 13% 2 1% 40 8% OR 21 7% 13 6% 34 7% MT 16 6% 0 0% 16 3% AB 11 4% 1 0% 12 2% CA 0 0% 2 1% 2 0% OTHER 0 0% 3 1% 3 1%

Westbound State Destination Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Destination State/Province Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency WA 562 92% 125 99% 687 93% BC 39 6% 1 1% 40 5% CA 2 0% 0 0% 2 0% OR 2 0% 0 0% 2 0% OTHER 5 1% 0 0% 5 1% Total 610 100% 126 100% 736 100% Westbound City Destination Trucks Carrying Cargo Trucks Without Cargo All Trucks Destination City Count Frequency Count Frequency Count Frequency Seattle 152 25% 29 23% 181 25% Tacoma 95 16% 14 11% 109 15% Kent 68 11% 10 8% 78 11% Auburn 38 6% 16 13% 54 7% Sumner 28 5% 10 8% 38 5% Puyallup 16 3% 7 6% 23 3% Fife 12 2% 1 1% 13 2% OTHER 200 33% 39 31% 239 33% Total 609 100% 126 100% 735 100%

Eastbound Cargo NAICS Number of Trucks Total Cargo Weight (lbs) Average Cargo Weight (lbs) Miscellaneous Manufacturing (339) 71 1,993,894 30,675 Food Manufacturing (311) Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing (312) 51 1,669,476 33,390 32 1,365,785 44,058 Crop Production (111) 23 953,507 41,457 General Merchandise Stores (452) Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (441) Paper Manufacturing (322) 20 635,003 35,278 14 343,300 26,408 13 379,014 29,155 Construction of Buildings (236) 13 569,341 43,795 All others 122 4,891,858 40,097

Westbound Cargo NAICS Number of Trucks Total Cargo Weight (lbs) Average Cargo Weight (lbs) Food Manufacturing (311) 147 6,831,741 48,452 Crop Production (111) 113 6,561,928 58,589 Miscellaneous Manufacturing (339) 69 2,145,191 33,519 Postal Service (491) 26 709,803 33,800 Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing (312) 25 1,390,081 55,603 Paper Manufacturing (322) 18 696,320 38,684 Construction of Buildings (236) 15 562,076 37,472 All others 170 6,514,485 38,321

For more Information: