Annual KOSMONT-ROSE INSTITUTE COST OF DOING BUSINESS SURVEY REPORT

Similar documents
Port of Baltimore and Economic Development

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2018: SUSTAINABILITY AND HOUSING DISTRICTS

J.R. DeShazo Juan Matute

BENCHMARKING REPORT CALGARY

Welcome to the East Texas Gas Producers Association

Legislative Trends: Upcoming Increases to Minimum Wage Round-up 2018

Executive Summary COMPARATIVE DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSING COSTS IN 25 WESTERN AND MIDWEST U.S. CITIES. Location Consultants Princeton, NJ

THE NEW WEST COAST DISTRIBUTION HUB

C I R P A C P R E S E N T A T I O N B Y R O N T H O M P S O N J U N E 1 6,

2008 SCHEDULED ELECTIONS (AS OF SEPTEMBER 22, 2008)

NGV Industry Update. Blue Skyways On-Road Subcommittee. June 24, 2008

The Supply Chain Partner You Can Depend On!

2002 SCHEDULED ELECTIONS (As of August 20, 2002)

LEED for Homes in Arizona

COMMUNITY SERVICES ANALYSIS LLC. ECONOMIC IMPACT AND SOCIAL RETURN ON INVESTMENT REPORTS Company Information and Services Summary CSACO OVERVIEW 1

Economic Development Planning, Summary 30

An Analysis of Past and Current Cleantech Legislation in Washington State. By Kevin Flavin, Student at The Evergreen State College

Washington State & Western Climate Initiatives

Councils of Governments (COGs) and Subregions in Los Angeles County

In Hot Water: Climate and Water in the West

Councils of Governments (COGs) and Subregions in Los Angeles County

By 2015, an estimated 40-48% of new nonresidential construction by value will be green, equating to a $ billion opportunity 1.

REFINING Portland, OR І Los Angeles, CA І Houston, TX І Denver, CO

Sebastian Chilco. Focus Areas. Overview. Education

HOOVER POWER ALLOCATION ACT Public Utilities Board January 6, 2012

NORTHGATE DISTRIBUTION CENTER

Click to edit Master title style. Port of Everett Data Overview

City of San Diego, California

States Use Gentle Hand in Taxing Timberland

±51,300 - ±373,160 SF FOR LEASE Q DELIVERY I-15 & SPEEDWAY BLVD. NORTH LAS VEGAS

±51,300 - ±373,160 SF FOR LEASE Q DELIVERY I-15 & SPEEDWAY BLVD. NORTH LAS VEGAS

Stormwater Financing: The Opportunity

POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS IN THE SOUTH

Three steps that can improve your candy sales.

Labor Law Posting Report 2016 Q2. U.S. and Canada Mandatory Updates

Ports Role as Environmental Stewards

INTRODUCTION TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING TOOLS

IN THIS ISSUE. Signs of economic slowing follow blockbuster year for West

ENFORCEMENT AND PERMIT DISTRICTS FPA 2017

BENAROYA CENTRALIA LOGISTICS CENTER

Maria S. Salinas. Maria S. Salinas

BENCHMARKING REPORT EDMONTON

TECHNOLOGY ORDERING SOLUTIONS. imark DROIDPAD ORDERPRO DESKTOP ORDERING

NEVADA STATE FREIGHT PLAN

Getting to the Core Rules and Regulations for Geothermal Development

±95,000 - ±731,561 SF FOR LEASE BUILDING 9 DISTRIBUTION CENTER BUILDING 5 INTERSTATE 15 BUILDING 5 & 9 RECENTLY COMPLETED

7225 S. Kolb RD. T U C s o n, A Z

PROPERTY OVERVIEW HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES LOCATION WHERE BUSINESS HAPPENS

Water Conservation Measures Enacted by Cities in Los Angeles and Orange Counties

Current Trends in Traffic Congestion Mitigation

MCCARRAN COMMERCE CENTER

City of Garden Grove Legislative Advocacy Program

Clean and Secure Energy Actions Report 2010 Update. GHG Policies

Executive Summary. Since its inception, the project has result in the creation of:

Occupational Employment Statistics OES FONT SIZE: PRINT:

Economic Development Background Information

Metropolitan Las Vegas Challenges and Opportunities

Prepared for Greenpeace. September 25, 2009

WM 06 Conference, February 27 March 2, 2006, Tucson, AZ

A Reliable Service Product

LEONARD C. SLOSKY, REA Senior Environmental Scientist. B.A. Environmental Technology Assessment, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1975

Trailblazing Organics Programs

CERTIFICATION AND FINANCING PROPOSAL

THE POSTMATES ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT: How On-Demand Technologies are Fueling the Future of Retail & Commerce in Cities

INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE (11,972-20,043 SF)

ACCOMPLISHMENTS THAT DEMONSTRATE POSSIBILITIES

INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE (12,000-41,348 SF)

2012 Government Affairs and Legislative Program

Cities Partnering with Businesses to Advance Climate Solutions

Nevada 300,000. August 26, 2002 The CAP water in Arizona is allocated each year to cities and industries as follows: Phoenix 113,914

Where is it? Groundwater Replenishment System Map

Federal Water Resources and Resilience Investment Centers

March 17, The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR

Bay Area Core Market Survey Executive Summary

±623,000 expandable to ±820,000 SF 49 Acre Site

what s up at the pump?

Using the New EIFD Tool for Economic Development

What Citizens Want from E-Government Current Practice Research

Emerging Research Needs in Congestion Pricing

History and Background

County of Orange County Executive Office

TRENDS IN ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION, PEAK DEMAND, AND GENERATING CAPACITY IN CALIFORNIA AND THE WESTERN GRID

Adaptation- Municipal Response Photo by Aerofoto

Sub-regions of the. Notes! United States

Chapter 7: Climate Protection Manual Resources

BENCHMARKING REPORT - MONTRÉAL

Blueprint for Economic Prosperity. Dallas Regional Chamber

Resources. oolkit_home.php

SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER BRIEFING Prepared for the Legislative Commission's Subcommittee to Study Water

vv- Department of Los Angeles .. P.Water & Power RESOLUTION NO. MARCIE LEDWARDS General Manager DATE: May 13, 2015 SUBJECT:

High Performance Homes: Savings Potential, Cost Effectiveness and Policy Options

SOUTHERN NEVADA EMPLOYMENT LAND ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 23, 2016

WATER AND WASTEWATER EXPERTS

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW: THE OIL & GAS INDUSTRY in SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Who is Clean Power Alliance?

Michael Gillam Deputy Program Director - Southern California

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

by MARK M. SWEENEY senior principal, McCallum Sweeney Consulting Physical Factors: Site and Infrastructure

Local Consumer Commerce

Transcription:

Annual KOSMONT-ROSE INSTITUTE COST OF DOING BUSINESS SURVEY REPORT 21st annual Kosmont-Rose Institute Cost of Doing Business Survey gathers business fees and a variety of tax rates from 305 selected U.S. cities, focusing on the states where business relocation is the most active. Contacts: Larry J. Kosmont CRE, President & CEO, Kosmont Companies Email: lkosmont@kosmont.com Phone: (213) 507-9000 Josh Rooney, Research Assistant, Rose Institute of State and Local Government Email: jrooney17@students.claremontmckenna.edu Phone: (909) 621-8159 For Additional California City Charts (by County) Contact: Josh Rooney Claremont, CA. [November 14, 2016] - Claremont McKenna College s Rose Institute of State & Local Government today released the 21st annual Kosmont-Rose Institute Cost of Doing Business Survey. The Rose Institute gathered data on municipal and county taxes, fees, and demographics from 305 selected cities in the Western United States. The Survey takes a close look at the cost of doing business in California and eight other states that companies might consider as alternatives to California (Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington). 256 of the cities profiled for the survey are in California. The 2015/2016 Survey contains updated data from 174 cities, collected by Rose Institute researchers. Rankings for each city are divided into one of five convenient Cost Ratings groups: Very Low Cost ($), Low Cost ($$), Average Cost ($$$), High Cost ($$$$), and Very High Cost ($$$$$). Highlights from the 2015/16 Survey Most Expensive Cities Of the 20 most expensive cities surveyed, 13 are located in California; 9 are in Southern California and 4 are in the San Francisco Bay Area. Los Angeles, Portland and San Francisco are the three most expensive metropolitan areas in the western United States. Least Expensive Cities Texas and Washington states do well in the Survey: Six of the 20 least expensive cities are in Texas and five are in Washington. In terms of local costs, Texas stands out as a low cost state, with six cities on the list of twenty least expensive Western cities surveyed. Both of the least expensive cities in California, Brea and Lake Forest, are located in Southern California.

CA a High Cost State: Going Higher in 2017 as Voters Approve Hundreds of New Local Taxes The November 2016 national election included 427 local tax and bond measures in California, of which 343 passed, an astonishing 80% pass rate. Final counts may slightly change approval results but the trend is inescapable; costs are going up in most cities and counties in California, now the fifth largest economy in the world. In total, 2016 election results represent a 56% increase in the number of approved tax measures from the prior election in 2014. Leading the charge on new taxes are 50 approved measures to increase local sales tax rates, 37 approved measures to impose local taxes on marijuana, 22 approved measures to increase or extend parcel taxes, 15 approved measures to increase sales tax for special purposes (mostly for transportation), and 12 measures to increase Transient Occupancy (hotel) taxes. On the sweet side, 3 measures on the taxation of sugared beverages were approved in Albany, San Francisco, and Oakland. Costs for Business to Rise as well as California Moves To a Green Economy California ranked last in Chief Executive Magazine s annual Best & Worst States for Business survey for 10 years straight, and it s about to become more costly for business across the board, observes Larry Kosmont CRE, President of Kosmont Companies, and founding publisher of the Kosmont-Rose Institute Cost of Doing Business Survey. Moving towards a greener economy has become a major focus in the Golden State with numerous statutes encouraged and then signed into law by Governor Brown. The approval of SB 32 mandates that the Air Resources Board ensures current statewide greenhouse gas emissions be reduced 40% below the levels produced in 1990, with a deadline of 2030. This puts the State on an extraordinarily aggressive path to achieve significant carbon footprint reduction, states Kosmont. If SB 32 is the regulatory green club, the carrots might very well be the newly approved tax increment districts called Enhanced Infrastructure District s (EIFDs) and Community Revitalization and Investment Authorities (CRIAs). When California terminated Redevelopment Agencies in 2012, it lost the use of tax increment, its most competitive economic development financing program available in all other states but a scan few. After a 3 year vacuum, the State legislature restored local tax increment districts. Specifically, EIFDs and CRIAs enable local cities and counties to create districts that invest in public-private transactions and concurrently fund infrastructure projects that achieve the State s sustainability agenda on the way to a greener economy. The State supports local government investment in infrastructure, transit priority projects, resource management such as ground water conservation, and trip reducing private projects. These new districts give priority to partnerships between counties and cities and special districts, because more tax increment funds are available for projects when multiple local public agencies contribute their tax increment share to the approved district.

No Escaping Green Economy Legislation California s new climate-reduction requirements are to be implemented across the board, imposing drastic reduction of greenhouse gas emission levels on all sectors including business, cars, utilities and government. These requirements also directly impact real estate. Per SB 350, by 2020, 33% of energy being sold to all buildings over 50,000 square feet must come from renewable sources. By 2030, that increases to 50% from renewable sources. Then there is AB 197, which directly involves the State Legislature in California s Air Resources Board processes, by requiring reports on the emission levels of greenhouse gasses, criteria pollutants, and toxic air contaminants for the entire State broken down by County. Business associations across the State have begun to vocalize their views on California s race to green. The California Trucking Association and California Chamber of Commerce have expressed that existing regulations are already very expensive and the new laws only pile on operating and production costs. The State s march to sustainability is taking on every business and government operation. This is an all-encompassing effort that will cause costs to go up for public, private and non-profit operations. The State may achieve sustainability and greenhouse gas reduction, but it will come at a cost to all sectors, states Kosmont. Based on the 2015/2016 Kosmont-Rose Cost of Doing Business Survey, California cities continue to rank among the most expensive cities in the country to do business, and it is unlikely that California will relinquish its status as a high cost State anytime soon. The State does appear committed to achieving cleaner air and perhaps becoming the environmentally greenest State someday.

The Twenty Most Expensive Cities in the West in 2015 CityName State Retail Fee Total Ad Valorem Property Tax Sales BELL CA $4,386.00 1.55% 9.00% BELLINGHAM WA $17,000.00 2.69% 8.70% BERKELEY CA $12,000.00 1.22% 9.50% BEVERLY HILLS CA $12,500.00 1.23% 9.00% CHANDLER AZ $50.00 3.15% 7.80% CULVER CITY CA $10,060.00 1.08% 9.50% EL SEGUNDO CA $13,048.00 1.24% 9.00% GLENDALE AZ $50.00 3.49% 9.50% INGLEWOOD CA $11,022.00 1.41% 9.50% LOS ANGELES CA $13,200.00 1.22% 9.00% MONTEREY CA $12,041.00 1.05% 8.62% OAKLAND CA $12,000.00 1.41% 9.50% POMONA CA $5,099.50 1.20% 9.00% PORTLAND OR $36,500.00 2.32% 0.00% SAN BERNARDINO CA $7,548.75 1.34% 8.00% SAN FRANCISCO CA $13,500.00 1.19% 8.75% SANTA MONICA CA $12,500.00 1.14% 9.50% SEATTLE WA $21,590.00 1.29% 9.50% TACOMA WA $15,390.00 1.72% 9.50% TUCSON AZ $25.00 4.01% 8.10%

The Twenty Least Expensive Cities in the West in 2015 City Name State Retail Fee Total Ad Valorem Property Tax Sales ABILENE TX $0.00 2.32% 9.50% BREA CA $500.00 0.76% 8.00% CORPUS CHRISTI TX $0.00 2.56% 8.25% DALLAS TX $0.00 0.80% 8.25% EUGENE OR $0.00 1.50% 0.00% EVERETT WA $1,000.00 1.00% 9.50% FEDERAL WAY WA $50.00 1.25% 9.50% FORT WORTH TX $0.00 0.09% 8.25% GRESHAM OR $469.00 1.62% 0.00% HENDERSON NV $5,600.00 1.01% 8.10% HOUSTON TX $0.00 2.68% 8.25% KENT WA $717.50 1.55% 9.50% LAKE FOREST CA $0.00 1.04% 7.75% LAS VEGAS NV $5,600.00 1.15% 8.10% OGDEN UT $987.41 1.00% 6.85% PLANO TX $0.00 2.45% 8.25% RENO NV $7,545.00 0.96% 7.72% SPARKS NV $10,070.00 1.27% 7.72% SPOKANE WA $2,060.00 1.42% 8.70% YAKIMA WA $1,285.20 1.34% 8.20% To learn more about Kosmont Companies, use the following URL: http://www.kosmont.com/ For more information on the Rose-Institute and the Cost of Doing Business Survey, use the following URL: http://roseinstitute.org/