Developing BMP s to Minimize the Water Quality Impacts of Winter Manure Spreading - Amendment

Similar documents
Winter Manure Application

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET. PROJECT TITLE NAME: Developing BMPs to Minimize the Water Quality Impacts of Winter Manure Spreading

Applying Manure---The Right Rate at the Right Time

Determining Soil Moisture and Temperature Condition Effects on Potential Run-Off for Cold Season Manure Application

Monitoring Runoff and Sediment at the Platteville Pioneer Farm

Report for 2001SD1941B: Alternative Conservation Practices to Improve Soil and Water Quality

Manure Applications on Frozen and Snow Covered Soils

Manure Applications on Frozen and Snow Covered Soils

Surface Runoff from Manured Cropping Systems Assessed by the Paired-Watershed Method, Part 1: P, N, and Sediment Transport

Nutrient BMP Evaluation Project: Preliminary Conclusions

Evaluating Soil Phosphorus and Surface Runoff Phosphorus Relationships at the Plot and Watershed Scale

Section 4: Managing the Construction Site

PERMITTING & CONSTRUCTING ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS IN SOUTH DAKOTA. A whitepaper by:

Phosphorus Management on High P Soils

2006 WATER MONITORING REPORT

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: GRAZING MANAGEMENT

Summary of Water Monitoring Data

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (ac.) CODE 590

THE BIG CREEK RESEARCH & EXTENSION TEAM SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF NUTRIENTS ON THE C&H FARM IN BIG CREEK WATERSHED

APPENDIX F. Soil Sampling Programs

A December 18, 2007 article (printed below) from South Dakota State University on the Plant Management Network web site addresses this issue.

2015 Update Mtg: Nitrogen Movement in Cranberry Floodwaters

Downstream Water Quality and Quantity Impacts Of Water Storage Systems in a Mississippi Delta Watershed

Hydrology and Water Quality in the Upper Mokelumne River Hydrologic Unit

Northern Chain of Lakes

Introduction. Manure Management Facts Prioritization and Rotation of Fields for Manure Application. July 2014

Stream Water Quality Assessment of Long Point Gully, Graywood Gully, and Sutton Point: Conesus Lake Tributaries 2015

Nichole M. Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District. May 2, 2012 Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer Groundwater Nitrate Science Forum Abbotsford, CN

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

Robert Morgan. Chi Ho Sham. Beaver Water District. The Cadmus Group, Inc

PENNSYLVANIA PHOSPHORUS INDEX UPDATE

Understanding Nutrient & Sediment Loss at Saxon Homestead Farm - 9. How the project started. Winter 2010/2011

Fairfield Soil and Water Conservation District

EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF COMBINE-HARVEST RESIDUE MANAGEMENT ON SOIL AND WATER QUALITY AND SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN LOUISIANA

University of Wisconsin Discovery Farms Staff 2013 Wisconsin Corn / Soy Expo Wisconsin Dells, WI

Adaptive Watershed Management for Control of Nutrient Loss in the Mackinaw River Watershed. Krista Kirkham and Maria Lemke The Nature Conservancy

Invasive Species Management and Buffer Outreach on Goss Farm, Rye, NH

Wisconsin s Improving Nutrient Management WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection

Lower Fox Watershed Network

REDUCING RUNOFF VOLUME AND CONCENTRATIONS OF PHOSPHOROUS AND ATRAZINE WITH GYPSUM AMENDMENT

This powerpoint has been adapted from a presentation at the Agronomy Society of America meetings in San Antonio, Texas in October 2011.

Addressing Groundwater Quality in Karst Regions

How does the MN P index relate to MPCA policies?

CAFO Permits & Nutrient TMDLs

The Effect of Cover Crops on Surface Water Quality: A Paired Watershed Experiment in the Lake Bloomington Watershed.

Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Discovery Farms Minnesota N and P, what is happened in Farm Fields? Jerome Lensing January 9, 10, 11, 2018 AgVise Labs

Recommendations for regulating phosphorus from livestock operations in Manitoba Manitoba Phosphorus Expert Committee. 2

Nutrient Management Concept to Implementation

Although poultry litter is considered

Part B: Phosphorus Loss Potential due to Management Practices and P Source Characteristics

STRATEGIC PLAN BIG EAU PLEINE RIVER WATERSHED AND RESERVOIR

MINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER. Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District

South Fish Creek Watershed Animal Waste Storage and Management

Reducing Phosphorus Loss to Lake Erie: Application & Timing of Nutrients. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA)

Nutrient Management Examination Competency Areas Individual Specialists

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

3/23/2015. Bunker Silage Storage Leachate and Runoff Management. Bunker Silage Storage. Silage

For over 40 years, soil testing has been a recommended means

Effectiveness Study Dana Morton & Greg McGrath. Upper Deer Creek Regional Stormwater Facility. Features

Groundwater Protection Rule Framework March 2018

Agriculture Initial Inspections Update

Agricultural Chemicals and Groundwater Protection

4R Nutrient Management Plan Worksheet

Modeling the Influence of Agricultural Practices on Watershed Export of Phosphorus

First Flush Water Quality Results 2016

Assessing Whole-Farm Phosphorus Loss from WI Dairy Grazing Farms

Nutrient Management for Vegetable Production

Soil Health, Nutrient Management and the New 590 Standard

Nutrient Application Planning for Pastures with SnapPlus. and. The Wisconsin P Index

U. W. Discovery Farms Winter Manure Spreading: What We Have Learned. What Are Discovery Farms? Farmer Led Program! Eric Cooley U.W.

Success: Producer Implemented Water Quality Improvement in the Driftless Area

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting. June 11, 2018

Erosion Control with Dairy Manure Compost

Liquid Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

How Much Land Will Be Needed for Manure Disposal in a Changing Regulatory Climate?

Dane County Land and Water Resources Land Conservation Division

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

JANUARY Notes. Nutrient Management Tips

Leveraging Resources for Implementing a Successful Nonpoint Source Grant Project

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

Squaw Creek Watershed Management Plan 12/16/2014

Liquid Manure Spreading Activity in the Long Point Watershed, March and April 2005.

CVCA - LID Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment (IPRA) program

beneficial management practices

College of Agricultural Sciences Environment and Natural Resources Institute

MGWA Spring Conference April 19, 2012

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

SHOULD P BE BANNED FROM LAWN FERTILIZER? Wayne R. Kussow 1/ The Agronomic Side

Phosphorus Transport From the Soil to Surface Water

Soil and Water Conservation Research under Intensive Potato Production Systems in New Brunswick

Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

COMPARISON OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY AND YIELDS FROM ORGANICALLY AND CONVENTIONALLY PRODUCED SWEET CORN. Josh Edgell NC State University

How does Manure Application Timing Affect Phosphorus Loss in Runoff?

Environmental Consideration of Dairy Systems

SOIL P-INDEXES: MINIMIZING PHOSPHORUS LOSS. D. Beegle, J. Weld, P. Kleinman, A. Collick, T. Veith, Penn State & USDA-ARS

Transcription:

Developing BMP s to Minimize the Water Quality Impacts of Winter Manure Spreading - Amendment Nathan Brandenburg Jeppe Kjaersgaard Ron Gelderman Todd Trooien Dennis Todey

Project purpose Install and maintain surface runoff monitoring infrastructure. Assess water quality impacts of land application of manure during winter time. Develop management strategies for land application of manure. Provide state-specific information for e.g. a state manure management strategy and the NRCS 590 nutrient management standard. Outreach and education.

Rationale The proposed project is designed to fill some of the knowledge gaps that have been identified in understanding winter manure spreading and impacts on water quality, and to collect runoff data under conditions common to the state. Based on the information gained, we will develop tools to manage manure application in an environmentally responsible manner.

Work Plan 3-year project continuation Monitor surface runoff water quality impacts of winter manure application Monitor nitrate leaching from manure piles to shallow groundwater Explore computer-based modeling to characterize runoff and erosion behavior

Project Advisory Board We have established an advisory board with members from the following organizations: SD DENR USDA-NRCS SD Cattlemen s Association/Cattle Feeders Council SD Farm Bureau Moody County Conservation District East Dakota Water Development District Big Sioux Community Water System we welcome representatives from other organizations

Monitoring infrastructure has been installed at three adjacent watersheds 6-10 acres in size located SE of Colman SD.

Project components Spreading zone identification using GPS Spreading March 4-5 2011 Water Sampler Stage recorder Spreading February 16-17 2012 Water monitoring station during 2011 snow melt

Methods Water exiting the south flume. Water exiting the north flume. Spring 2011 Spring 2012

2 nd Year Improvements Better winterization Heating elements (heat pad) for freezing conditions Not needed this year Game camera monitoring E. Coli sampling

Improvements Game cameras added for constant monitoring. Guide boards to prevent interflow between watersheds.

2 nd Year Progress Dry Winter 2 Snow Events Snowmelt Events [1] February 28 - March 2, 2012 March 5-7, 2012 Rainfall Events May 1, 2012 May 4 May 5-6, 2012 (10 Year 24-Hour Storm) May 26, 2012 [1] Localized melting of snow banks, runoff was not representative across field

2 nd Year Discoveries (so far) Value of eyes on the field Game cameras used to monitor the outflow of the flumes showed us what volume of runoff really occurred. Camera was very useful during freezing conditions Data from the May 5 th event was lost on the stage recorders but recreated using cameras.

Results Overview The number of days having surface runoff from at least one of the watersheds is shown in the table below Number of days with runoff Year From snow melt Pre-planting Growing season 2010* n/a None collected None collected 2011 6 0 3 2012 0 3 0 *The project principal investigator changed in December 2010.

Other Flow Quantities

2011 vs. 2012 Snowmelt Runoff 2011 2012 *Localized melting of snow banks, runoff was not representative across field

2011 vs. 2012 Rainfall Runoff 2011 2012

Snowmelt Runoff Quality TKN TSS South South 2011 [1] : 5 kg/ha 2011 [1] : 10 kg/ha 2012: 0.01 kg/ha 2012: 0.06 kg/ha North North 2011 [2] : 5 kg/ha 2011 [2] : 18 kg/ha 2012: 0.03 kg/ha 2012: 0.1 kg/ha East East 2011 [2] : 20 kg/ha 2011 [2] : 13 kg/ha 2012: 0.006 kg/ha 2012: 0.03 kg/ha [1] Estimation of runoff loss [2] Possible cross contamination between North and East WS kg/ha lb/acre

Rainfall Runoff Quality TKN TSS South South 2011: 0.2 kg/ha 2011: 73 kg/ha 2012 [1] : 5 kg/ha 2012 [1] : 588 kg/ha North North 2011 [1] : 0.4 kg/ha 2011 [1] : 37 kg/ha 2012: 2 kg/ha 2012: 304 kg/ha East East 2011: 0.4 kg/ha 2011: 40 kg/ha 2012 [1] : 8 kg/ha 2012 [1] : 1090 kg/ha [1] Estimation of runoff loss kg/ha lb/acre

In-Field Sediment Movement (May 5)

Contaminant 2011 vs. 2012 Runoff Quality Snowmelt 2011 Snowmelt 2012 Rainfall 2011 Rainfall 2012 ppm ppm ppm ppm TKN 40-130 1-12 2-7 14-16 NH 3 30-60 0.5-3.5 0.25-2 0.8-0.9 NO - 3 5-8 0.25-11 0.5-2 4-14 TP 6-18 0.1-0.8 NA 0.5-0.6 TDP 5-17 0.1-0.8 NA NA TSS 30-190 15-36 50-300 1800-3300

http://www.sdstate.edu/abe/wri/research-projects/winter-manure-spreading.cfm Project description etc. is available at the project website

Best Management Practices Final conclusions can not accurately be determined until more years of runoff and data occurs. Two years with limited runoff data not enough to firmly determine BMPs.

Project continuation We think it is necessary to continue the monitoring to collect meaningful information. Continuing the project will utilize the field installation and monitoring equipment already in place. The land owner is willing to continue. We will continue working with current project partners. Community support

Questions

TKN Data 2011 2012

NH 3 Data 2011 2012

NO 3 - Data 2011 2012

TP Data 2011 2012

TDP Data 2011 2012

TSS Data 2011 2012