Continuous Simulation Modeling of Stormwater Ponds, Lakes, & Wetlands: A BUILT-IN APPLICATION OF PONDS 3.2

Similar documents
PREDEVELOPMENT VERSUS POSTDEVELOPMENT VOLUME ANALYSIS: An Application of Continuous Simulation Modeling using PONDS Version 3 Software

Continuous Simulation Example Problem

PONDS 3.2 Technical Memo SUBJECT:

Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 3

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION & ASSESSMENT TO ESTIMATE AQUIFER PARAMETERS

PART 1b. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

PONDS 3.2 TECHNICAL MEMO

PART 2D. Section 7.2 of SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10

Hydrologic Study Report for Single Lot Detention Basin Analysis

CVEN 339 Summer 2009 Final Exam. 120 minutes allowed. 36 Students. No curve applied to grades. Median 70.6 Mean 68.7 Std. Dev High 88 Low 24.

Stormwater Retention Pond Recovery Analysis

Permeable Pavement Hydrologic Modeling

Design Example Residential Subdivision

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

Computation of excess stormflow at the basin scale. Prof. Pierluigi Claps. Dept. DIATI, Politecnico di Torino

LAKE LABELLE ENGINEERING REPORT

Applicant s Handbook, Volume II (including Appendices A through F`) is Incorporated by Reference in Rule , F.A.C.

The Effects of Urbanization on Water Supply

Numerical Groundwater Flow Model Report. Caloosa Materials, LLC 3323 Gulf City Road Ruskin, Florida 33570

Istokpoga Marsh Watershed Improvement District (IMWID) Minor Impoundment Project. May 23, 2012

Detention Pond Design Considering Varying Design Storms. Receiving Water Effects of Water Pollutant Discharges

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GREENE COUNTY ASH POND ALABMA POWER COMPANY

PEARCE CREEK CONFINED DISPOSAL AREA MODIFICATION

Modeling the Hydrologic Impacts of Control Structures Utilizing LiDAR, ICPR, and GIS Technologies

Appendix F. Flow Duration Basin Design Guidance

CEE3430 Engineering Hydrology

Estimating the Seasonal High Water Table: A Mix of Art & Science

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT BARRY ASH POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

State Standard. for. Stormwater Detention/Retention

1 THE USGS MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM MODEL OF THE UPPER COSUMNES RIVER

Hydrologic Restoration via LID Retrofit Tracy Fanara, Ph.D. UCOWR Annual Conference, Henderson NV June 18, 2015

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL ASH POND B MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDRO-GEOMORPHIC MODEL FOR THE LAGUNA CREEK WATERSHED

INITIAL INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT MCMANUS ASH POND A (AP-1) 40 CFR

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Outlet Structure Modeling

Evaluation of Current Stormwater Design Criteria within the State of Florida

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN PLANT GASTON GYPSUM POND ALABAMA POWER COMPANY

Hydrogeology 101 3/7/2011

Modeling Techniques for Modeling T Stormwater Pond Sizing to Meet New Criteria in FDEP s State in FDEP s State--wide wide Stormwa u e

Effect of the Underlying Groundwater System on the Rate of Infiltration of Stormwater Infiltration Structures.

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Water Budget III: Stream Flow P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

BMP Design Aids. w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n. o h i o. g o v. Equations / Programs

Stormwater Treatment Practice (STP) Calculator Instructions

Florida s Deranged Hydrology and the National Water Model Challenges and Opportunities

San Antonio Water System Mitchell Lake Constructed Wetlands Below the Dam Preliminary Hydrologic Analysis

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 3 (AP-3) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. Part PLANT MCINTOSH ASH POND 1 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

INFILTRATION FACILITY MODELING

EART 204. Water. Dr. Slawek Tulaczyk. Earth Sciences, UCSC

Stormwater Treatment Measure Sizing and Design Considerations SMCWPPP C.3 Workshop June 21, 2017

INITIAL RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257

GROUNDWATER RECHARGE. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., 2010

Summary of Detention Pond Calculation Canyon Estates American Canyon, California

LID PLANTER BOX MODELING

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

Song Lake Water Budget

Background Information on the. Peace River Basin

4.1 General Methodology and Data Base Development

Stormwater: Too Simple?

Modeling Percolation from Multiple Ponds in Close Proximity Using ICPR. The ASCE Suncoast Branch Water Resources Luncheon Sarasota, Florida

DRAINAGE AND NATURAL AQUIFER GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ELEMENT

Rainwater Harvesting for Enhanced Groundwater Recharge Through Capture of Increased Runoff from Site Development

Sixth Semester B. E. (R)/ First Semester B. E. (PTDP) Civil Engineering Examination

The Texas A&M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory (HMI) Questionnaire

REGULATORY USE OF BROWARD COUNTY S FUTURE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MAP

San Francisco State University Site 1 Vegetated Infiltration Basin Monitoring Report: Rainy Seasons and

RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT DANIEL NORTH ASH MANAGEMENT UNIT MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY

LAKE LABELLE DEWATERING MODEL. AUTHOR Gail Murray Doyle, P.G. September Murray Consultants, Inc 769 Skyview Dr Hayesville, NC

Groundwater 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology

Rhode Island Stormwater Design and Installations Standards Manual

Planning Considerations for Stormwater Management in Alberta. R. D. (Rick) Carnduff, M. Eng., P. Eng. February 20, 2013.

Georgia s Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria The Old, the New, and the Misunderstood

Modeling Infiltration BMPs

Water Resources Management Plan

HYDROLOGIC-HYDRAULIC STUDY ISABELLA OCEAN RESIDENCES ISLA VERDE, CAROLINA, PR

Appendix A. Compliance Calculator Guidance

n4.1 Site Assessment for Runoff Reduction Requirements

CHAPTER FIVE Runoff. Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323) Instructors: Dr. Yunes Mogheir Dr. Ramadan Al Khatib. Overland flow interflow

SILVER SPRINGS/RIVER POLLUTION REDUCTION PROJECT IMPROVING THE WATER QUALITY OF THE SILVER SPRINGS ECOSYSTEM

CASE STUDIES: CENTRAL OFFICE COMPLEX

Stormwater Volume and Treatment Methods Simplifying the Numbers. IAFSM March 10, Presented by: Tom Powers P.E., CFM, LEED AP, CPESC

RETENTION BASIN EXAMPLE

Design of Stormwater Wetlands

But State Regulations Only Do So Much

FROZEN MEET AND GREET AT EPCOT NORWAY PAVILION STORMWATER CALCULATIONS FOR

Groundwater Recharge from Agricultural Areas in the Flatwoods Region of South Florida 1

Chapter 3 Previous Studies

San Mateo Plain Groundwater Basin Assessment Stakeholder Workshop #8 17 APRIL 2018

WinTR-55 Small Watershed Hydrology

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: Internal Memorandum for Levee Design Groundwater Mounding

CHAPTER 4. Hydrologic Analysis

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to describe:

CASE STUDIES: BMPTRAINS MODEL

Transcription:

Continuous Simulation Modeling of Stormwater Ponds, Lakes, & Wetlands: A BUILT-IN APPLICATION OF PONDS 3.2 PRESENTED AT THE SFWMD WORKSHOP PRE-DEVELOPMENT VERSUS POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF VOLUME ANALYSIS WPB HEADQUARTERS/B-1 AUDITORIUM MAY 26, 2000 10:00 a.m. presented by: Devo Seereeram, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer www.iag.net/~devo

SOME OF THE NEW COOL STUFF IN PONDS 3.2 (Sept 1999) # Ability to model submerged discharge structures (i.e., time-variant tailwater effects). # Can now specify rating curves for complicated discharge structures # Generate hydrographs without routing (predevelopment) # User option to route hydrograph with or without infiltration credits. User option to modify initial water level for routed hydrograph. # TODAY S HIGHLIGHTED FEATURE - Generate only (i.e., no pond) or generate/route (with pond) continuous simulation hydrographs for single or interconnected systems

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: WHAT IS IT? # A model which analyzes the day to day hydrology of the system over a long period of time (say 3 to 100 years), taking into account all components of the system s water budget (ground water as well as surface water). # Such a model can predict, on a daily basis, stages, inflows, and discharge rates and volumes (both ground water & surface water components).

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: WHY IS IT NEEDED? # Because of potential water quantity & water quality impacts in volume-sensitive basins, there is a growing concern for regulating cumulative discharge volume from stormwater management systems. This is apart from regulating peak discharge rates. # Useful for predicting predevelopment and postdevelopment wetland hydroperiods. # In land-locked basins, excess cumulative rainfall over a 2 to 3 year period can result in stages which approach or exceed the 100 year flood elevations. Is 210 inches of rain in 3 years more critical than 10.6 inches of rain in 24 hours? How about 23 inches in 3 dry season months such as El Nino gave us during Dec 1997 to Feb 1998? Conventional modeling and current regulatory requirements do not address this type of occurrence which many of us saw first hand in 1994-1996 and late 1997, early 1998.

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: CONCEPTUAL MODELS SIMPLE vs. LESS SIMPLE # PONDS 3.2 can tackle simple as well as complicated continuous simulation models. # What determines if a model is simple or complicated? To help understand this differentiation, let us first visualize the hydrologic components involved in such modeling. # Focus on the parameter diffuse downward leakage.

CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR PREDEVELOPMENT Surface Runoff Rainfall Evapotranspiration Receiving Water Body Diffuse Downward Leakage

CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR POSTDEVELOPMENT RAINFALL RAINFALL Pond Evapotranspiration Inflow from upgradient lakes Net Recharge to Water Table Direct Rainfall Pond Evaporation Evapotranspiration Outfall Pipe Offsite Discharge Water Table Base of Uppermost Aquifer Semi-confining Layer Diffuse Downward Leakage Underlying Aquifer

DEFINITIONS: A open = Area of water surface in pond, varies with stage A c = Area of water surface in pond at control level η = Soil porosity or soil storage S b = Stage at physical bottom of pond = Stage at pond control level S c STAGE AREA FOR MODEL > S c A open S c A c = A open S b º S c [A c - A open ] η + A open < S b A c η How to pick control level for different types of stormwater management systems: Control level Wet Detention Pond With Outfall º elevation of control device (orifice) Wet Detention Pond or Lake Without Outfall º normal water level Dry Pond With Outfall º top of water quality volume Dry Pond or Depression Without Outfall º top of design high water Wetland º seasonal high water table Dry Soil Pond Control Volume Water in pond Saturated Soil k h = horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity of aquifer η = fillable porosity of aquifer Base of aquifer diffuse downward leakage (typ) Hydraulically restrictive soils

CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR NATURAL DEPRESSIONS RAINFALL RAINFALL Limits of Lake Evapotranspiration Inflow from upgradient lakes Direct Rainfall Lake Evaporation Net Recharge to Water Table Evapotranspiration Net Recharge to Water Table Water Table Drain Well Base of Uppermost Aquifer Semi-confining Layer Vertical Leakage to Floridan Aquifer Floridan Aquifer

MODEL FOR COMPUTING DISCHARGE FROM LAKE OR POND TO FLORIDAN AQUIFER - WELL CONNECTED SCENARIO ªh LAKE LEVEL q(t) = (ka/l) ªh(t) ALTITUDE OF POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF FLORIDAN AQUIFER L q A where q(t) = vetical leakage (flow rate) in units ft 3 /day at some time t (days) k = vertical hydraulic conductivity of the materials between the lake bottom and the top of the Floridan aquifer in units of ft//day ªh = difference betweeen the lake level and the level of the potentiometric surface of the Floridan acquifer at time t (days) L = thickness of the materials between the lake bottom and the top of the Floridan acquifer A = cross-sectional area of materials between the lake bottom and the top of the Floridan aquifer (ft 2 ) TIGHTLY CASED WELL CONFINING LAYER FLORIDAN AQUIFER

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: CONCEPTUAL MODELS DIFFUSE DOWNWARD LEAKAGE - THINK ABOUT THIS FIRST # Simple models are those where the vertical recharge rate (aka diffuse downward leakage ) is uniform with time. There are actual sites like this in the areas of very low recharge (for example, East Orange County). # Less simple models are those where the diffuse downward leakage changes markedly with time based on rainfall and the water level (pot surface) in the underlying Floridan aquifer. These models require some calibration to back-compute the daily or monthly recharge rate. All other parameters are known.

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: THE METHODOLOGY # The long-term, continuous simulation model is performed using the PONDS Version 3 computer program (Win95/NT version). This is a MODFLOW-based ground water/surface water interaction model which computes ground water and surface water discharges during and following transient hydraulic loading of a water management pond or lake. # The first step is to create a long-term, continuous simulation hydrograph and the second step is to route it through the stormwater management pond. # This methodology has been used successfully on numerous projects in the Central Florida area.

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: THE ROUTING MODULE # Saturated ground water flow is simulated using a modified (recompiled) version of the USGS MODFLOW computer code. The three relevant modifications to MODFLOW are as follows: < A new subprogram (written by the author) has been included to model non-linear discharge structures such as unsubmerged weirs, orifices, notches, rating curves, etc., and < Irregular surface area vs. stage relationships are modeled by changing the storage coefficient as a function of the water elevation within the limits of the water body. < The computer code has been compressed and optimized such that 40,000+ MODFLOW stress periods can be executed in a reasonable computational time. # Code has been formally approved by the St. Johns River Water Management District (Florida) for routing analyses and it is also used by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (Florida) for permit review purposes.

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: THE HYDROGRAPH # Unlike conventional surface water routing models, the continuous simulation inflow hydrograph includes 3 columns of data: < the elapsed time (in hr), < the flow rate (in cfs) into the water body (which may be positive or negative), and < the recharge rate (in ft/day) to the water table aquifer adjacent to the water body (which may also be positive or negative). # The first two columns of data in the hydrograph are the same as the conventional surface water routing models but the third column is added to model fluctuation of the water table adjacent to the water body.

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: INPUTS TO GENERATE HYDROGRAPH # Surface water inflow: Directly Connected Impervious Area (DCIA) (acres), non-dcia area (acres), CN for non-dcia area. Note CN is automatically adjusted daily based on antecedent rainfall. Also note that precise definition of DCIA is extremely important when modeling small rainfall events. # Evaporation loss & rainfall (daily) # E.T. within non-dcia area of watershed (daily) # Artificial recharge within non-dcia area of watershed

CONTINUOUS SIMULATION MODELING: POND DEFINITION # Stage-area relationship & perimeter of water body # Typical parameters for surficial aquifer system: permeability, porosity, and depth of aquifer (from sitespecific geotechnical report) # Overflow discharge structures (up to 3) # Vertical exchange of water between water body & Floridan aquifer (linear or non-linear relationship established by geotech).