Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp

Similar documents
Biocompatibility Testing for Medical Devices

Biocompatibility Testing for Medical Devices

NAMSA is a Medical Research Organization (MRO), accelerating product development

Safety Qualification Process and Application of Thresholds. Jim Blanchard PQRI L&E Toxicology Subgroup Principal Scientist Aradigm

ISO Series Biocompatibility evaluation of breathing gas pathways in healthcare applications

Addressing challenges in Drug Development and Quality Control with innovative solutions

BIOCOMPATIBILITY TESTING OF GAS PATHWAYS IN MEDICAL DEVICES

Colorants in Medical Devices:

Design Perspectives on. Drug/Biologic Delivery. Medtronic Neuromodulation. Luis Fesser Deanna Lane Jeanmarie Sales July 16, 2012

Satisfying ISO and US FDA Biocompatibility requirements for Breathing Gas Pathways in Healthcare Application

Introduction to clinical trials Magnus Kjaer

Derivation and Justification of Safety Thresholds

Introduction to clinical trials

From Bench to Bedside. Russ H. Read June 23, 2014

Conducting Successful pre-ind Meetings to Reach FDA Concurrence for Sound 505(b)(2) Development

FUTURE MEANS CREATIVITY

Extractables and Leachables in Early Phase Development

Extractables & Leachables Boston 2019 Ensuring Quality, Safety, Suitability and Regulatory Compliance for Drugs, Biologics and Medical Devices

Extractables and leachables: An Introduction

Drug Impurities: The Good, Bad and Ugly

Validation, Verification and Transfer of Analytical Methods (Understanding and implementing guidelines from FDA/EMA, USP and ICH)

How to Prepare MedDevice Packaging for Regulatory Success A Chemical Characterization (E&L) Perspective

INVESTIGATIONS BOOTCAMP NIBRT (NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BIO-PROCESSING RESEARCH AND TRAINING)

Leachables and Extractables Outlook PODP Accomplishments and Next Steps

BRIEFING. . Over time, 466 may be used less frequently and may be withdrawn.

IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS

Pharmaceutical Toxicology: Toxicology in the Nonclinical Development of Drugs and Biologics. December 3-4, 2012 PERI Training Facility ~ Arlington, VA

Thursday, April 17, :30 pm to 9:00 pm UMass Lowell Emerging Technologies and Innovation Center 40 University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts

Integrating Toxicological Information Effectively Throughout Organizations. Joel Bercu PhD MPH DABT Director, Gilead Sciences

Regulatory expectations on impurities in drug substances - Pavia, October 2, Luisa Torchio Euticals SpA

CTA/NDA Regulatory Landscape in China. Jack Xie, PhD, DABT SOT 2016

Extractable and Leachable Studies of Parenteral Infusion and Transfusion Products

Modern Approaches to Process Understanding

Impurities in Drugs: Monitoring, Safety and Regulation The Israel Chapter of PDA

ontainer Closure Systems

Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Measuring Protein Aggregation of Biotechnology Products

Method Validation Studies How GLP Interacts With Guidance Documents

Speakers Title & Biography

Stability Studies for Pharmaceutical Products (API and finished products)

Harmonizing Standards and Specifications

Project Management for Human Resources

Threshold of Toxicological Concern Initiatives for Medical Devices Richard Hutchinson, DVM, PhD, DABT J&J Global Surgery Group.

From Conversation to Conservation

2019 PDA Biosimilars and Vaccines Conference: Lifecycle Similarities and Challenges Thursday, May 9 Registration Open Continental Breakfast

Experiences with the adoption of the PQRI best practice guidelines when applied to development of an E&L development package for a DPI

2019 PDA Biosimilars and Vaccines Conference: Lifecycle Similarities and Challenges Thursday, May 9 Registration Open Continental Breakfast

2 Day Seminar. Supplier Management for Medical Device Manufacturers 12 RAPS CREDITS. Jun Boston

Introduction to Drug Design and Discovery

Issues in Cancer Drug Development of the Future. Janet Woodcock M.D. Deputy Commissioner/Chief Medical Officer, FDA October 5, 2007

of the TTC Douglas J Ball, MS, DABT

OMICS International Conferences

MAXIMIZING THE VALUE OF CLINICAL TRIALS DATA: A COLLABORATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR DATA STANDARDS GOVERNANCE FROM DATA DEFINITION TO KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

PQRI Research Project Proposal: Reporting and Qualification Thresholds for Leachables in Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Products

Developing a Phase-Appropriate Extractables and Leachables Program

Quality Issues for Clinical Trial Materials: The Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Review

Agreed with W. Cornell Graduate Program and Tri-I

DRUG SAFETY EVALUATION

San Antonio Bay Partnership

Is a Career in the. Pharmaceutical. Check out our online Student Center to find out more:

Regulatory Issues and Drug Product Approval for Biopharmaceuticals

Biocompatibility Testing and Evaluations for Medical Devices

Expanded Access and the Individual Patient IND

Introduction to CMC Regulatory Affairs

Risk Assessments for Host Cell Protein Control Strategies: CDER Experiences

A Generic Industry Perspective on Establishing Impurity Limits And a Corresponding Control Strategy

3M Drug Delivery Systems. April 26, 2011

2. Risk-based compliance was also a key component in the FDA's new approach for dealing with electronic records and signatures: 21 CFR Part 11.

Managing QbD From A CMO Perspective

Extractables, Leachables, & Elemental Impurities 2018 West Coast

Teeramanas Tanaekakarapong, a peritoneal dialysis patient

3M Purification Inc. Technical and Scientific Services Global Support for the Life Science Industry. Global Expertise delivered locally

Biocompatibility evaluation of breathing gas pathways in healthcare applications. Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process

New Drug Product Impurities

Disinfectant Qualification and Cleanroom Disinfection A Step by Step Workshop

NINDS/HEAL Biomarker Programs New Biomarker Initiatives at NIH: Neurological Disorders and Pain

Dealing with Extractables & Leachables from a Regulatory Perspective - Design of Extractables & Leachables Studies - Safety Assessment of Leachables

Why Does a Project Need a Project Manager and a Business Analyst? 1 Powered by POeT Solvers Limited

EBC Series with MassDEP Regional Leadership Commissioner Suuberg and the Northeast Region Leadership Team Hot Issues & Ongoing Challenges

EFFECTIVE CLINICAL TRIALS. NUSAGE PharmEng. Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Training Program. Copyright 2014 NUSAGE-PharmEng.

Strategic Outsourcing for Success

Outsource or in-house? The evolving role of analytical services in pharmaceutical manufacturing

Toxic Pollution from Powerplants: Large Emissions, Little Risk

American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS)

Precision. Proficiency. Proximity.

Analytical Methods Development and Validation

Key multiplicity concepts and principles addressed in the Draft Guidance: Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials

GPhA Fall Technical Conference Nov 2-5, 2015 Bethesda, MD ICH M7 Guidance Overview and Current FDA Perspectives

Acceptable Intake (AI) and Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) Data Sharing Project for Pharmaceutical Impurities

CHANGE CONTROL MANAGEMENT FOR A STABILITY PROGRAM

Current practices on metabolite profiling and quantification in Drug Development at Boehringer-Ingelheim

Reference Standards for Monoclonal Antibodies: Key Challenges Addressed

WELCOME TO THE SCOND ANNUAL: 2016 Waters Corporation 1

LAB EXPERTS AT YOUR SIDE Over twenty years of experience

About Clinical Trials: What They Can Mean For You?

A PMP Among PhDs: Applying Program Management to Biotechnology Research and Commercialization Speaker: Jill Almaguer, PE, MBA, PMP Company: Texas

Documentation requirements for an initial consultation

CMC Considerations for 505(b)(2) Applications. Monica Cooper, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/OPS/ONDQA AAPS Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.

PHARMACEUTICAL TESTING

Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. Guidance for Industry

2019 PDA Biosimilars and Vaccines Conference: Lifecycle Similarities and Challenges Thursday, May 9 Registration Open Continental Breakfast

Transcription:

Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp March 30, 2018 9:30am - 2:30pm Massachusetts Biotechnology Council (MassBio) 300 Technology Square, 8th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Featured Speakers Rosalyn Año Laurence Lister Stephen Doherty, Ph.D. Kevin Connor, Ph.D., DABT Russell Sloboda Bootcamp Coverage The Basics of Biocompatibility Testing Chemical Characterization of Medical Devices: Strategies, Pitfalls, and Points of Consideration Toxicological Risk Assessment Based on Extractable/Leachable Data: Why, When, and How Toxicological Risk Assessment for Breathing Gas Pathway Medical Devices: ISO 10993 and ISO 18562 Tips for a Successful Sponsor-Laboratory Partnership www.toxikon.com

Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp 9:30 10:00: Registration 10:00 10:15: Welcome and Introduction: The Medical Device Approval Pathway 10:15 11:45: The Basics of Biocompatibility Testing The Basics of Biocompatibility Testing Biocompatibility simply refers to the properties of materials being biologically compatible by not eliciting local or systemic responses from a living system or tissue. This presentation will discuss the basics of biocompatibility testing. This presentation will discuss the history and evaluation of biocompatibility. It will explain how to properly classify your device. Then when biological endpoints are applicable for the properly labeled device will be covered. Finally, a high level discussion of each biological evaluation and the various choices will be explained. 11:45 12:15: Lunch and Networking 12:15 1:00: Chemical Characterization of Medical Devices: Strategies, Pitfalls, and Points of Consideration Recent regulatory guidance documents have emphasized the need for chemical characterization of medical devices as part of an overall device assessment. We will examine the types of information available from a chemical characterization and how to get the information you are looking for from the testing. Strategies for study design and execution will be discussed. Common pitfalls and potential shortcomings and how to avoid them will also be presented. 1:00 2:00: Toxicological Risk Assessment Based on Extractable/Leachable Data: Why, When, and How Toxicological Risk Assessment (TRA) has been an important tool in the safety assessment of biomedical devices, providing a chemical-based approach which complements a more traditional testing program largely based on whole animal studies. The need for TRA is growing and in some cases, will be considered as a means of circumventing animal testing in the safety evaluation of devices. TRA is founded on the notion that, if all constituents of a product, including additive, impurities and contaminants, are known, then the safety (or risk) of a product can be assessed based on the toxicology of those constituents, ascertained through extractable / leachable (E/L) studies. However, the E/L analysis can face several pitfalls towards achieving the objectives of risk assessment and current regulatory guidance leaves the analyst having to make many choices based on their own judgment. However, this shortcoming of the data can be avoided with proper study design. Potential pitfalls in the E/L analysis will be discussed together some tested methods for their avoidance, which will be illustrated with case studies. 2:00 2:20: Toxicological Risk Assessment for Breathing Gas Pathway Medical Devices: ISO 10993 and ISO 1856 Breathing gas pathway medical devices such as breathing systems, ventilators, anesthesia systems, nebulizers and oxygen lines come into contact with patients at a particularly vulnerable point and time. Bootcamp Agenda

Bootcamp Agenda Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp As a result, the exposure assessment for these devices is an important step in the evaluation of device safety and needs to be particularly concerned with airborne releases, especially volatile organic compound (VOCs). ISO 10993 and ISO 18562 may both apply; yet in some instances each standard recommends a very different technical approach to the measurement of releasable chemicals and different assumptions for the risk assessment. The key differences in these two methodologies will be illustrated, along with an analysis of how different risk estimates derived using these regulatory guidelines points out the need to justify the use of one over the other. 2:20 2:35: Tips for a Successful Sponsor-Laboratory Partnership With over 40 years of experience and having completed thousands of studies, Toxikon has seen the good, the bad, and the ugly of medical device safety and efficacy testing. With our customers, collectively we ve learned how proper preparation, comprehensive communication, and clear expectations on both sides creates an environment where studies are initiated efficiently and completed effectively. We will facilitate an open discussion sharing what we ve learned about creating a successful partnership between the sponsoring company and the contract laboratory, to help your next project have the best chance for success.

Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp Rosalyn Año Business Development Manager Stephen Doherty, Ph.D. Director of Analytical Chemistry Workshop Faculty Rosalyn has more than 10 years of experience in guiding medical device companies through successful product safety testing strategies. As one of Toxikon s business development managers, she has a track record of controlling study costs through sound risk management techniques, reducing the probability of test failure, and streamlining product development timelines to achieve key milestones ultimately resulting in a high success rate of getting high quality and safe products to market. Rosalyn received her B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Boston University. Laurence Lister Director of Biocompatibility Laurence has over 25 years of experience in every aspect of biocompatibility and toxicology testing. As Toxikon s head of biocompatibility, he is responsible for the direction of the staff of scientists that perform thousands of biocompatibility studies each year. Laurence has authored several papers on the specifics of biocompatibility tests, and is a member of several national and international committees that steer biocompatibility regulation and guidance. Laurence received his B.S. in Biology from Boston College. Stephen has more than 20 years of experience in chemical testing and characterization of medical devices and related products. As Toxikon s director of analytical chemistry, he develops experimental study designs to address client-specific test and regulatory requirements. Dr. Doherty is the author of a number of articles and book chapters on polymer formulation, testing, and applications, and is a frequent presenter on extractable / leachable topics at industry conferences around the country each year. Stephen received his B.A. in Chemistry from Colby College and a Ph.D. in Analytical Chemistry from the University of New Hampshire.

Workshop Faculty Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp Kevin Connor, Ph.D., DABT Director of ToxSMART Consulting Practice Kevin has more than 20 years of experience in toxicology and human health risk assessment within a variety of regulatory frameworks. As head of Toxikon s risk assessment consulting division, ToxSMART, he has managed hundreds of risk assessments for medical devices and consumer products, including assessments under ISO 10993-17. Dr. Connor works closely with Toxikon s analytical laboratories in procuring the most relevant data from extractability leachability (E/L) analyses to best help sponsors develop methods that carefully consider the nature of consumer exposure. Russell Sloboda Study Director ToxSMART Consulting Practice Russell Sloboda is an analytical chemist and risk assessment specialist with 35 years experience. At Toxikon he is responsible for all aspects of toxicological risk assessment as per ISO 10993-17 and ICH M7 guidelines, which includes literature research, exposure modeling, investigation of medical device and drug product manufacturing practice and usage, application of QSAR models to screen chemical toxicity, development of toxicological profiles, and calculation of tolerable intakes based on extrapolation of animal toxicity data. He communicates effectively and provides consulting support in analytical study design, specification of AETs, and response to FDA comments.

Medical Device Preclinical Bootcamp Registration Information: Online: http://go.toxikon.com/medical-device-preclinical-bootcamp Email: info@toxikon.com Venue Information: Massachusetts Biotechnology Council (MassBio) 300 Technology Square, 8th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Directions / Parking: Accessible via the MBTA at the Kendall Square stop, Red Line. Parking available at Technology Square Garage, 595 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA 02139 www.toxikon.com Registration