Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in the Beas Basin & Possible lessons for future management of the Ganga Adebayo Adeloye Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
MICCI: Overview of Beas Basin Study Projected Climate Change (CC) will influence Temperature, Rainfall & ET with implications for: Irrigation Water Supply/Demand River s Discharge & Reservoir s Inflow Performance of Water Infrastructures e.g. Reservoirs Hence, study has included: Assessment of climate change effects and uncertainty on Beas river flows & Pong Reservoir performance in irrigation water supply. Assessment of climate change effects on crop yields in the basin. Field experiments to characterise crop-soilwater interactions. 2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Inflow/Release (Mm 3 ) Beas River Basin & Pong Reservoir Catchment area 12561 km 2 Snow catchment 780 km 2 Active storage capacity 7291.22 Mm 3 Use Hydropower (396 MW), Irrigation (1.38 Mha) 3000 2500 Inflow Irrigation release Runoff highly influenced by the snow melt from the Himalayas Pong Reservoir - Major water infrastructure for irrigation water supply to Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana & Rajasthan 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Month 3
Climate Change: GCM Projections for Beas basin CMIP5 Projections of Rainfall and Temperature changes No. of GCM Experiments (Total = 127) RCP 2.6: 29 RCP 4.5: 38 RCP 6.0: 22 RCP 8.5: 38 4
Climate Change: GCM Projected changes Time slice Mean (& SD) of change 95% limits ΔT ( o C) ΔP (%) ΔT ( o C) ΔP (%) 2011-2040 1.84 (0.66) 2.84 (13.02) [1.73, 1.96] [0.58, 5.10] 2041-2070 2.94 (0.96) 2.77 (14.33) [2.77, 3.11] [0.28, 5.26] 2071-2100 3.90 (1.67) 5.51 (15.90) [3.61, 4.19] [2.74, 8.29] Investigation ΔT : 0 to +5 o C ΔP : -10 to +20% CMIP5 5
HYSIM Simulated Climate change Impacts: Annual Runoff (MCM) 6
HYSIM Simulated Climate change Impacts: seasonal Runoff (MCM) 7
01-Jan 01-Feb 01-Mar 01-Apr 01-May 01-Jun 01-Jul 01-Aug 01-Sep 01-Oct 01-Nov 01-Dec Pong Reservoir: Optimised basic Operational Rule Curves Max. Storage 8000 URC Over Supply (Supply Demand) 6000 Storage, Mm 3 4000 LRC Full Supply (Supply Demand) 2000 No Supply 0 Dead Storage Month 8
Pong Reservoir: Simulated Performance Time Reliability Volume Reliability Vulnerability Adeloye AJ, Soundharajan B, Ojha CSP, Remesan R. (2015) Water Resources Management. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1171-z 9
Pong Reservoir: Summary of Simulated Performance & Climate Change Performance Index CC causing increased inflow CC causing reduced inflow Comments Time Reliability (R t ) 80; hence OK Volume Reliability (R v ) 88; hence OK Vulnerability (η) 0.5; too high and beyond tolerable limit for users. 10
Pong Reservoir: How to reduce the Vulnerability? Water Hedging - deliberate reduction in releases during normal periods, which is then used to reduce shortfall (or vulnerability) during low flow periods: - Constant, Single stage hedging - Constant, 2-stage hedging - Seasonally varying, Single stage hedging - Monthly varying, Single Stage hedging 11
01-Jan 01-Feb 01-Mar 01-Apr 01-May 01-Jun 01-Jul 01-Aug 01-Sep 01-Oct 01-Nov 01-Dec Pong Reservoir: Optimised Single stage Hedgingintegrated Operational Curves Max. Storage 8000 URC Over Supply Storage, Mm 3 6000 4000 Critical storage LRC Full Supply Supply limit = 83% 2000 0 No Supply Dead Storage Adeloye et al. (2015) Water Resources Management. DOI:10.1007/s11269-015- 1171-z Month 12
With hedging No hedging Pong Reservoir: Simulated Performance with hedging Time Reliability Volume Reliability Vulnerability Adeloye AJ, Soundharajan B, Ojha CSP, Remesan R. (2015) Water Resources Management. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1171-z 13
Summary: Effect of Managed Hedging Hedging causes the time-based reliability to worsen significantly. Hedging causes only very modest reduction in the volume reliability Hedging has most profound effect on the vulnerability: All the resulting vulnerability indices were < 0.25 with hedging for all the climate change effects. CAUTION: BUT HOW RELIABILE ARE THESE ONE-OFF ASSESSMENTS => UNCERTAINTY CONSIDERATIONS 14
Pong Reservoir: Uncertainty in Planning Characteristics Storage Capacity Time-Reliability Volume-Reliability Resilience Vulnerability Sustainability Soundharajan B, Adeloye AJ, Remesan R. (2015) Proc IAHS. DOI: 10.5194/piahs-371-49-2015 15
Summary: Effect of Uncertainty Reservoir capacity highly variable under climate change effects. Reservoir capacity quantiles for drier scenarios are much larger compared to wetter conditions. Performance indices in general, highly variable, however reliability least variable. 16
Agriculture: SWAT simulated crop yield (summer corn) specific regions Taluk: Seraj [Mandi] Taluk: Rait [Kangra] T mean = 17.8 o C Taluk: Nadaun [Hamirpur] T mean = 20.9 o C Kangra Kullu Hamirpur Mandi T mean = 31.8 o C The decrease in yield intensifies with increasing mean temperature (i.e. greatest decrease in Hamirpur and smallest in Mandi) 17
Agriculture: SWAT simulated crop yield (Basin wide) RCP8.5 (2011-2040) Summer crop production is decreasing and winter crop is increasing with rise in temperature These results highlight the need for farmers to adopt temperature resistant varieties to cope with future climate change or move production to cooler land 18
Field Experiments: 2012-2015 Kurukshetra Maize & Wheat Hamirpur Maize & Wheat Roorkee Maize, Wheat & Berseem Ghazipur Wheat & Rice Parameters observed: Moisture depletion in root zone root depth plant height leaf area index Irrigation meteorological parameters Soil characteristics To obtain data for evaluation of root water uptake numerical models at different geographical locations. Calibration & Validation of root water uptake model 19
Beas & Ganga River Basins: Facts & Comparison Ganga Basin Beas Basin * Number with storage capacity >100 Mm 3 20
Ganga River Basin: Possible Research Agenda Characterising the uncertainties in climate change impacts on the basin water availability for better decision making. How much buffering capacity do Ganga water resources systems have for coping with projected climate change effects on water availability for irrigation, and how can this capacity be harnessed? Ice/Glaciers: What is the effect of significant/complete disappearance of glaciers in the long-term on the water resources balance of the Ganga? 21
Ganga River Basin: Possible Research Agenda contd. How best can water be conjunctively used for irrigation without compromising/jeopardising either compartment of the hydrologic cycle? Water Quality/Pollution: Pollution is a threat to water availability, especially in relation to Arsenic & Nitrate contamination from intensive agricultural practices. Can better predictive tools and/or low-cost treatment options for this be developed? Crop yields: How will crop yields be impacted by climate change and water availability in the Ganga Basin? 22
And finally... THANK YOU??Questions?? for further information about MICCI, visit http://web.sbe.hw.ac.uk/sites/micci/ Acknowledgements MICCI Project Partners 23