Overview of the Habitat Conservation Plan

Similar documents
Natural Community Conservation Planning Act California Fish and Game Code Section

Proposed Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the California Tiger. Salamander and California Red-Legged Frog, Sonoma County, California

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Portland District

Habitat Conservation Plan Template

Definitions. Final Major Amendment to the CVMSHCP August 2016

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010

WELCOME to the Southern Edwards Plateau Habitat Conservation Plan Environmental Impact Statement. Public Meetings

HCP Development: Key Aspects of Conservation Planning

Availability of the Draft Midwest Wind Energy Multi-Species Habitat Conservation

Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for Sierra Pacific Industries Forest Practices in the

6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Consultation and Requirements Federal Endangered Species Act. Chapter 6 Consultation and Coordination

DRAFT SSHCP CHAPTER 8: MONITORING & ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT

IC Chapter 19. Abandoned Mines

[FWS R8 ES 2014 N213; FXES F2 145 FF08ECAR00] Orange County Transportation Authority, Orange County, California; M2 Natural

[FWS R8 ES 2017 N107; FXES FF08ECAR00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Incidental Take Permit

Solano Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan

SITING OF ENERGY FACILITIES IN OREGON EFSC Standards in Oregon Administrative Rule

Guidelines for Preparing a Compensatory Mitigation Plan


COMPENSATORY MITIGATION AND THE MITIGATION RULE. USACE, Jacksonville District

8.1 Introduction. 8.2 Description of Alternatives. Chapter 8 Alternatives Analysis

Habitat Conservation Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail; Kroll Parcel, Community of

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Galveston District

California WaterFix (Alternative 4A)/Recirculated Environmental Analysis Frequently Asked Questions

Goals of This Orientation

Compensatory Mitigation Regulation ( Mitigation( Rule )

Long-term Management Plan For The Mitigation Bank

Long-term Management Plan For The Mitigation Bank

Coachella Valley MSHCP and Other Land Use Regulations Affecting Development in the Desert

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Mitigation and Conservation Banking- An Economic Market

Draft South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS

* For applicants utilizing bank for compensatory mitigation requirements, information below is not applicable.

Three Federal Pesticide Injunctions for Protection of Endangered Species

Eligibility Requirements and Procedures for Risk-Based Remediation of Industrial Sites Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A to

[FWS-R1-ES-2012-N181; FXES F2-123-FF01E00000] Proposed Safe Harbor Agreement for the Northern Spotted Owl, Skamania,

Endangered Species Act

Appendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

[FWS R1 ES 2016 N023; FXES FF01E00000] Oregon Department of Forestry; Proposed Safe Harbor Agreement for the

Overview of Recent Developments in California Environmental Laws

Species at Risk Act Permitting Policy

BASIC PRINCIPLES AND MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

ATTACHMENT 2A- Issues Tentatively Resolved Decisions from the Board of Supervisors Hearing on September 11, 2007

EXHIBIT B. Service Areas. Aquatic Resource Service Area. Vernal Pool Service Area. Service Area Narrative

Coachella Valley MSHCP

Draft Environmental Assessment and Proposed Renewal and Amendment to the Barton

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan Regional General Permit #18. Training and Workshop for Co-Permittees April 5, 2016

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OWL CREEK GRAVEL PIT EXPANSION U.S. FOREST SERVICE

Lower Sacramento / Delta North Region: CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Exploring a Habitat-Based Approach to Imperiled Species Management

OBTAINING A SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OR ENHANCEMENT PERMIT: Navigating the Process

July 13, 2012 TRANSMITTED VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Matrix of Major Environmental Laws and Regulations Provisions Related to Components of an Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis 1 2

Regulatory Guidance Letter 93-02

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION AT A GLANCE

Appendix Q Conceptual Mitigation Plan for Impacts to Wetlands and Other Waters of the United States

ARROYO GRANDE CREEK HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS September 27, 2011

Habitat Banking Business

DRAFT. October 11, 2011 MEMORANDUM

FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship

INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AGREEMENT ON MITIGATION BANKING WITHIN THE REGULATORY BOUNDARIES OF CHICAGO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Mitigation Banking Instrument Outline For Proposed Mitigation Banks Within the State of Missouri (January 2010)

Overview of the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. October 22, 2009

The Endangered Species Act

The Santa Rosa Plain Conservation Strategy

CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Exchange (GHG Rx) Briefing for C-AGG March 5, 2014

Table Table 7.2 Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION

TOWN OF WAYLAND MASSACHUSETTS CONSERVATION COMMISSION

Operational Policy Statement

Biological Resources and Development Permitting

ESA INFORMATION GUIDELINES FOR THE REGULATORY PROGRAM

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

12501-SPD REGULATORY PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF MITIGATION RATIOS South Pacific Division

10.0 Environmental protection, follow-up and monitoring

16.1 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts

General Decision Number: CA /02/2015 CA3. Superseded General Decision Number: CA State: California

APPENDIX P ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS ON THE NATOMAS BASIN HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN REPORT

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, WETLANDS, STORMWATER & FLOODPLAIN REGULATORY COMPLIANCE FOR ENERGY AND UTILITIES

Wildlife Habitat Restoration and Improvements FY 2007 Project

NDCEE. Ecosystem Banking Best Practices. Elizabeth Keysar, NDCEE/CTC. National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Wetland / Stream and Conservation Banking in the US: An Illustration of Biodiversity Offsets Driven By Regulation

Center for Natural Lands Management

Three copies (one original and two copies) of your completed NOI should be submitted to:

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Instructions for the South Pacific Division Nationwide Permit Pre- Construction Notification (PCN):

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District PRECONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORM

DECISION MEMO FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION HOLY JIM CREEK CROSSING REPLACEMENT

Loss of Central Valley Vernal Pools

19 GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS

NATIONWIDE PERMIT 31 Maintenance of Existing Flood Control Facilities Effective Date: March 19, 2017 (NWP Final Notice, 82 FR 4 )

County of Yolo Agricultural Mitigation Program Policy Options for Increased Mitigation Ratios California Mitigation Summit March 5, 2015

APPENDIX N Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

VIBRANT AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY LANDUSE ORDINANCES AND POLICIES

Appendix B Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report

SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION LANDFILL PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE. ADEM Form

NOXIOUS WEED REGULATORY GUIDELINES. Noxious Weeds in Aquatic Critical Areas: Regulatory Issues. What are Aquatic Critical Areas?

HOUSE BILL lr0052

1.1 Introduction Overview. Chapter 1 Introduction. Table of Contents

Transcription:

Overview of the Habitat Conservation Plan June 27, 2007 The Relationship between HCPs and Incidental Take Permits (ITP) A habitat conservation plan or HCP must accompany an application for an incidental take permit. Incidental take permits are required when non-federal activities will result in take of threatened or endangered species. The purpose of the habitat conservation planning process associated with the permit is to ensure there is adequate minimizing and mitigating of the effects of the authorized incidental take. The purpose of the incidental take permit is to authorize the incidental take of a listed species, not to authorize the activities that result in take. 1

HCPs- A Common Conservation Strategy Nationally as of 2001, over 447 HCPs have been completed that protect over 516 species Today 116 HCPs have been approved in our region (California & Nevada) Range of the CA Tiger Salamander HCPs- A Common Conservation Strategy Many Jurisdictions have implemented or are in the process of developing an HCP including: San Joaquin County Contra Costa County Orange County San Diego County Riverside County San Diego Gas & Electric Yolo County Sacramento County Placer County Solano County Red counties indicate regional HCPs 2

HCPs and Incidental Take Permits Who needs an Incidental Take Permit? Any non-federal entity whose otherwise lawful activities will result in the take of a listed species. How can one determine the presence of listed species on a property? A Service authorized biologist may conduct surveys to determine presence or absence. What is the benefit of an HCP and Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for a private landowner? The HCP process allows take as long as the landowner is complying with the terms and conditions of the ITP. The landowner is provided with assurances that no additional resources will be required as long as the HCP is properly implemented. A regional scale HCP, with the County as the applicant assuming the cost of its development, will provide these benefits to constituents in a process that is open to public input and participation. 3

Service s Permit Decision What criteria must an HCP meet in order for an incidental take permit to be issued [50 CFR 17.22(b) and 17.32(b)] 1. Take must be incidental to otherwise lawful action 2. The HCP specifies that impacts will be minimized and mitigated for the maximum extent practicable 3. Applicant will ensure adequate funding for the conservation plan 4. Take will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the species 5. Applicant will provide procedures to deal with changed and unforeseen circumstances 6. Any other measures required by the Secretary/Director 4

Components of an HCP Components are spelled out in the HCP Template issued by Fish & Wildlife Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions (65 FR 35242, June 1, 2001) Components of an HCP Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation and Minimization Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star 5

Components of an HCP: Biological Goals: The desired outcome for covered species as a result of implementing the conservation program. These goals should be broad guiding principles for the operating conservation program; they are the rationale behind the minimization and mitigation strategies (e.g., maintain a viable population in the conservation area). Biological goals are not meant to be a repeat of the conservation measures, but rather what the conservation measures are established to achieve. Objectives: Measurable targets for achieving biological goals Components of an HCP Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star 6

Covered Activities: A Description of all activities which may result in take of covered species including those that may result in short-term and long-term impacts and direct and indirect impacts. The list of covered activities should be detailed and include the duration, frequency, and location of the activity. Components of an HCP Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star 7

Biological Impacts and Take Assessment Anticipated impacts to biological resources, e.g., vegetation communities, wildlife, and plant species, resulting from covered activities that include short and long term impacts. Assessment should include: 1. Direct and Indirect Impacts 2. Anticipated Estimation of Take of Wildlife 3. Effects on Critical Habitat 4. Cumulative Impacts 5. Anticipated Impacts of the Taking Components of an HCP Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation and Minimization Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives 8

Mitigation Mitigation can include: 1) measures to avoid impacts 2) measures to rectify/restore the affected environment; or 3) measures to compensate for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. Mitigation should be commensurate with the take. Mitigation should address specific needs of the species involved and be manageable and enforceable. Mitigation measures may take many forms, such as: Mitigation: Forms Preservation (via acquisition or conservation easement) of existing habitat Enhancement or restoration of degraded or a former habitat Creation of new habitats Establishment of buffer areas around existing habitats Modifications of land use practices, and restrictions on access. 9

Minimization Measures Minimization: Measures that minimize project impacts to covered species. Methods include: Education program for project workers Plant or animal relocation Timing restrictions Vehicle speed limits Prohibitions on pets Banning pesticides & other toxic substances Components of an HCP Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star 10

Monitoring- Three Types There are three types of monitoring: (1) Compliance monitoring- tracks the permit holder s compliance with the requirements specified in the HCP, implementing agreement (IA), and permit (2) Effects monitoring- tracks the impacts of the covered activities on the covered species (3) Effectiveness monitoring- tracks the progress of the conservation strategy in meeting the HCP s biological goals and objectives (includes species surveys, reproductive success, etc.). Components of an HCP Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star 11

Adaptive Management Purpose: To allow flexibility in management practices when additional scientific information becomes available or proposed management alternatives are seen to be superior during the implementation of the HCP. Adaptive management should identify and address uncertainties and incorporate previously agreedupon alternatives to address those uncertainties. Adaptive Management The monitoring program will periodically assess the information necessary to utilize a feedback loop that links implementation if shortcomings are evident to previously agreed-upon alternative strategies. This process provides the permittee with flexibility in management practices and the assurance that once they have agreed to participate, they can utilize management strategies previously agreed upon. 12

Components of an HCP Components are spelled out in the HCP Template issued by Fish & Wildlife Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star 13

Changed Circumstances What are they? Changed circumstances are defined as changes in circumstances affecting a species or geographic area covered by an HCP that can reasonably be anticipated by plan developers and the Service and for which contingency plans can be prepared. If additional conservation and mitigation measures are deemed necessary to respond to changed circumstances and these additional measures were already provided for in the plan s operating conservation program, then the permittee will implement those measures as specified in the plan. Changed Circumstances What kind of Changed Circumstances will be included?: Listing of new species Natural catastrophes that normally occur in the area within the HCP boundary (e.g. earthquake prone, fire, or hurricane) Invasive species outbreak Photo courtesy of Larry Hunt 14

Unforeseen Circumstances What are they? Unforeseen circumstances are defined as changes in circumstances that result in a substantial and adverse change in status of the covered species in the area covered by the HCP that could not reasonably be anticipated by plan developers and the Service at the time of the HCP s development. Photo courtesy of Larry Hunt Unforeseen Circumstances- No Surprises Assurances A fundamental benefit of the Section 10 HCP conservation strategy that Section 7 does not possess are those derived from the No Surprises Assurances. The No Surprises Rule describes the obligations of the permittee and the Service. Its purpose is to provide assurances that no additional land restrictions or financial compensation will be required for species adequately covered by a properly implemented HCP, in light of unforeseen circumstances, without the consent of the permittee. If the Service determines that additional conservation and mitigation measures are necessary to respond to the unforeseen circumstances, these measures must be as close as possible to the terms of the original HCP and must be limited to modifications within any conserved habitat area or to adjustments within lands or waters that already set-aside in the HCP s operating conservation program. Any additional measures will be voluntary. 15

Components of an HCP Components are spelled out in the HCP Template issued by Fish & Wildlife Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star Funding The HCP will specify all costs associated with implementing the HCP, including the conservation strategy (minimization and mitigation measures), management, monitoring, and reporting, and changed circumstances. Cost estimates will be represented in the form of a one-time, reoccurring (e.g. annual) cost and a total of these costs 16

Funding: Sources A description of the sources of funds used to implement the HCP (e.g. assessment of fees, appropriated moneys, taxes, etc.) will be developed. The description will also include the funding mechanism (e.g. endowment, letter of credit, etc.) that will be used to ensure that all of the activities associated with implementing the HCP are adequately funded. Funding: Mechanism and Assurance Funding must be guaranteed. Options for guaranteed funding: Mitigation in place prior to take/project impacts occurring Mitigation is phased-in as the take/project impacts occur Posting of a bond or letter of credit Establishment of an endowment or other trust fund. 17

Components of an HCP Components are spelled out in the HCP Template issued by Fish & Wildlife Biological Goals and Objectives* Biological Impacts & Take Assessment Mitigation: Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Monitoring* Adaptive Management* Changed/Unforeseen Circumstances (Application of No Surprises Policy) Funding Alternatives * In 2000, the Five Points Policy was added to HCP protocol with revisions and additions. These additions are denoted with a star Alternatives The Endangered Species Act requires that alternatives to the taking of species be considered and reasons why such alternatives are not implemented be discussed. A Description of alternative actions to the taking of the species will be considered (e.g., change in project footprint or location that would change the impact to the covered species). 18

HCP Implementation Agreement (IA): Legal document for implementing the provision of the conservation plan signed by all responsible parties Contract that defines and delegates powers, rights, and responsibilities Creates institutional framework for implementing the conservation plan among the County, USFWS, and third party managing entity (if applicable) So what does all this mean to you, the committee? The CSC s role: The committee s role will be defined and reevaluated throughout the process. Some parts of the plan will need direct input from committee members (e.g. adaptive management provisions, etc.), while other parts will require review of written sections. 19

Parts of the Plan that the Committee will have direct input: Scope of the HCP Covered Species Development of Mitigation Programs Development of Adaptive Management practices Development of a Monitoring Report System * Items listed here are by no means an exhaustive list This concludes our presentation: Overview of the Habitat Conservation Plan Part II Questions? 20