DRPK-005

Similar documents
CE Marking RoHS Test Report. WLL Report: 15WB C Rev. 0. Dec. 25, 2015

Guideline regarding analysis on Fujitsu Group specified chemical substances

Test Report. No. CANML Date: 26 Dec Page 1 of 6.

Test Report. MDL Element. Other Polymers and metals Composite material Polymers material

Test Report No Dated 27 Jul 2017

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 26 Feb Page 1 of 9.

Test Report No. CRSSA/ /17 Date : 27/11/2017 Page: 1 of 7 CRS Ref. CRSSA/17/2932/Insulflex

Test Report No CH07 Date: July 20, 2018 Page 1 of 10

Test Report No CH10 Date: July 16, 2018 Page 1 of 10

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 03 Jan Page 1 of 10.

Test Report No CH11 Date: July 20, 2018 Page 1 of 10

Test Report. No.SZR Date: Feb. 28, 2017 Page 1 of 10

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 18 Apr Page 1 of 12.

Test Report No. CRSSA/ /17 Date : 04/01/2018 Page: 1 of 5 CRS Ref. CRSSA/17/3272/Toray

ICP Test Report Certification Packet

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 09 Jan 2015 Page 1 of 7

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 18 Apr Page 1 of 10.

Test Report No CH14 Date: June 30, 2017 Page 1 of 10

Test Report. Report No.: BST Y-1RR-4 Date: Sep. 10, 2015 Page 1 of 5 :GUIZHOU HAOTIAN OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 25 Sep Page 1 of 10.

Test Report No CH23-R1 Date: July 25, 2017 Page 1 of 10

Test Report No.: GZ /CHEM Date: MAY 18, 2011 Page 1 of 7

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 13 Oct Page 1 of 9.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 21 Sep Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 29 Sep Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 25 Mar Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 21 Nov Page 1 of 6.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 02 Nov Page 1 of 5.

Panasonic Group Chemical Substances Management Rank Guidelines Analysis Method of Level 1 Prohibited Substances

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 30 Sep Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 03 Jan Page 1 of 10.

Test Report No CH20 Date: June 30, 2017 Page 1 of 10

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 30 Sep Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 09 Feb Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. EBG SHENZHEN LTD.. 5-6F,BLDG 23,SCIENCE & INDUSTRY PARK AREA,NAN TOU,SHENZHEN.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 18 Apr Page 1 of 12.

Test Report. No. SZARR Date: Aug. 16, 2017 Page 1 of 14

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 27 Feb Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 05 Jan Page 1 of 10.

Test Report No.: GZ /CHEM Date: APR 02, 2011 Page 1 of 8

Analysis of steel and its alloys using the GB/T standard and an Agilent 5100 ICP-OES in dual view mode

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 03 Dec Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 16 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 11 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 16 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 16 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 16 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 26 Apr Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 16 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 25 Sep Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 30 Jan Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 24 Aug Page 1 of 5.

Determination of Elemental Impurities in Graphite-based Anodes using the Agilent 5110 ICP-OES

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 11 Jul Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 14 Dec Page 1 of 6.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 13 Mar Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 15 Aug Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 21 Mar Page 1 of 9.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 29 Aug Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 17 Mar Page 1 of 6.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 20 Feb Page 1 of 5.

Verification Result :.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 24 Oct Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 30 Jan Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 06 Sep Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 08 Sep Page 1 of 5.

Analysis of Mineral and Heavy Metal Content in Beverages Using the Teledyne Leeman Labs Prodigy Plus ICP-OES

Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 23 Mar Page 1 of 6.

SM001+SM P P P3

No. KA/2012/31622A-02 Date 2012/04/11 Page 2 of 6 Test Result(s) PART NAME No.1 Test Item(s) Cadmium (Cd) Lead (Pb) Mercury (Hg) Sum of PBBs Monobromo

Test Report. No. CANML Date: 06 Dec Page 1 of 9.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 29 Nov Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 19 Apr Page 1 of 9.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 06 Jan Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 15 Jan Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 08 Dec Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. The following sample(s) was/were submitted and identified on behalf of the clients as : Mosfet homogeneous materials.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 11 Jan Page 1 of 9.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 19 Dec Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. CANML Date: 20 Jan Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 25 Sep Page 1 of 10.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 06 Apr Page 1 of 6.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 10 Jul Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 27 Mar Page 1 of 6.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 06 Apr Page 1 of 7.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 30 Sep Page 1 of 7.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 14 Jul Page 1 of 12.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 19 Dec Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. CANEC Date: 20 Jan Page 1 of 8.

Test Report. No. SHAMLP Date: 28 Mar Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAMLP Date: 24 Dec Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SZXEC Date: 20 Feb Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SHAEC Date: 12 Jun Page 1 of 5.

Test Report. No. SZXEC Date: 20 Feb Page 1 of 5.

Transcription:

1114 Seaco Avenue Deer Park, TX 77536 Ph: (713) 844-3200 Fax: (713) 844-3330 Report of Analysis Submitted By: Address: Contact: Item No.: Client Ref. No.: Date Received: Testing Period: Country of Origin: Performers Coating 10 Henderson Drive West Cadwell, NJ, 7006 U.S.A. Aneta Bogdanova See PO#: 02/02/2007 02/15/2007 Sample Description Product Sample ID ID: Vueguard 901 WC ID: Vueguard 901 AG Gloss 54 ID: Vueguard 901 AG 5 HP ID: Vueguard 901 AG 5 N2 ID: Vueguard 801-001 -002-003 -004-005 Page 1 of 9

Results: SEE ATTACHED SHEETS Approved By: Date: This report has been reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and comparison against specifications when available. The reported results are only representative of the samples submitted for testing. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without written approval of the laboratory. Page 2 of 9

Product Description: -001 ID: Vueguard 901 WC Page 3 of 9

-002 Product Description: ID: Vueguard 901 AG Gloss 54 Page 4 of 9

Product Description: -003 ID: Vueguard 901 AG 5 HP Page 5 of 9

Product Description: -004 ID: Vueguard 901 AG 5 N2 Page 6 of 9

-005 Product Description: ID: Vueguard 801 Page 7 of 9

Qualifiers: ppm ND NA Parts per million Non Detected Not Applicable Reference: Samples have been tested for hazardous substances according to the EU Directive 2002/95/EC on the Restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS) and subsequent amended directives. Test Methods: Test Cadmium (Cd) content (ISM_RoHS_Metals2) Lead (Pb) content (ISM_RoHS_Metals2) Mercury (Hg) content (ISM_RoHS_Metals2) Chromium (Cr) content (ISM_RoHS_Metals2) PBBs (ISM_RoHS_GCMS) PBDEs (ISM_RoHS_GCMS) Bromine (Br), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Mercury (Hg), Chromium (Cr) content () Reporting Limit 10 ppm 10 ppm 100 ppm 10 ppm 50 ppm 50 ppm 20 ppm (Estimated) Test Method With reference to USEPA 3052, by microwave digestion and determined by ICP-OES With reference to USEPA 3052, by microwave digestion and determined by ICP-OES With reference to USEPA 3052, by microwave digestion and determined by ICP-OES With reference to USEPA 3052, by microwave digestion and determined by ICP-OES With reference to USEPA 3540C, by solvent extraction and determined by GC-MSD With reference to USEPA 3540C, by solvent extraction and determined by GC-MSD RoHS Pre-screening The technique used for the pre-screening analysis is a wavelength dispersive X-Ray fluorescence spectrometer. The analysis is semi-quantitative and all failures must be analyzed on different instrumentation, for example ICP-OES. Chromium VI (Cr6+) content (EPA 3060A_RoHS) 10 ppm With Reference to USEPA 3060A & 7196A, by alkaline digestion and determined by UV-Vis. The test method is only qualitative. Note: Chromium VI was verified as elemental chromium and can be speciated as Chromium VI upon request. Page 8 of 9

Tests Conducted: Detailed test information: 1. Test for Cd/Pb/Hg/Cr contents Sample preparation 0.2 g samples are placed in microwave digestion vessel and add digestion reagent. Digest samples by microwave apparatus. If insoluble precipitates are produced, dissolve samples totally by taking appropriate digestion reagent. Transfer the digestive solution into a 25ml volumetric flask. Make up with deionized water. Analysis Analyze Cd, Pb and Hg contents by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) or similar equipment. Element Cd Pb Hg Cr Wavelength (nm) 228,214 220,217 253,194 Gas for plasma Argon Argon Argon Argon 2. Test for Chromium (VI) content ( upon request) Sample preparation 2.5 g samples are placed in Erlenmeyer flask. Add digestion solution and heating at hot plate. Adjust the ph of the solution to 7.5+0.5 and transfer the solution to volumetric flask. Make up with deionized water. Add diphenylcarbazide solution into extract. Adjust the ph of the solution to 2.0+0.5 and make up with deionized water. Analysis Analyze the mixture by using UV-Vis spectrophotometer with wavelength set at 540 nm. 3. Test for PBB/PBDE contents Sample preparation 2 g samples are extracted by Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane/methanol solvents for 16 hours. Reduce the extract to about 5 ml. Transfer the extract into a 25ml volumetric flask and make up with methanol. Analysis Analyze by Gas Chromatography-Mass Selective Detector (GC-MSD). 4. Quality Control Calibration curve Each test needs to have new calibration on the day it was run. At least 3 points calibration is used for routine analysis. The correlation coefficient of the calibration curve (r2) should be greater than 0.995%. Method blank Method blank is analyzed per batch of samples. The method blank value should be less than 10% of the reporting limit. Duplicate Analysis Duplicate analysis should be performed at least per batch of samples. The acceptance limit of duplicate analysis is normally set at 10%. Spike Analysis Spike analysis is performed for each batch of samples. The recovery of the spike standard should be within 80-120%. Page 9 of 9