Road Vehicle Automation: Let s Get Real

Similar documents
Opportunities and Challenges for Implementation of Automation in Road Transportation

Connected and Automated Vehicle (CAV) Systems: Potential Impacts on Future Interstate Highway System

Connected and Automated Trucks: What and When?

TRB Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation

CONNECTED AUTOMATION: DISRUPTIVE TRANSFORMATION. Jim Barbaresso HNTB Fellow and Senior Vice President Intelligent Transportation Systems

Pennsylvania TESC. 7 December Alan Toppen, P.E.

Assessment of Key Road Operator Actions to Support Automated Vehicles 16 June 2017

Smart driving, smart working

SAE J3016 REVISIONS & SAE ADS/ADAS STANDARDS

Road Markings for Machine Vision NCHRP Project (6) Update to AASHTO SCOTE June 2016

Connected and Automated Vehicles and the Future of Transportation. Dean Gustafson, P.E., PTOE State Operations Engineer April 25, 2017

AdaptIVe Current Status

Florida s Automated Vehicle Initiative

Building a Safety Case for Automated Mobility: Smart Cities and Autonomous Mobility Getting There Safely

Public-Private ITS Initiative/Roadmaps 2017

L3PILOT Workshop on Automation Pilots on Public Roads, Brussels, 18 May 2017

Centralized Infrastructure-Assisted Management for Mixed Traffic at Transition Areas

Scenario Planning for the Future: Highlighting Connections to New Technologies

Preparing our Roadways for Connected and Automated Vehicles. 70th Annual Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Bob Edelstein

ITS NEWS. Building Southern California s Goods Movement System for the Next Century. Gateway Cities. I-710 Zero Emissions Freight Corridor

From Advanced Active Safety Systems to Automated Systems: From to and beyond. Dr. Angelos Amditis Research Director I-Sense, ICCS

Connected vehicles and other advanced safety features can be effective in reducing, and maybe eliminating, these fatalities.

What is ADAS? Agneta Sjögren Volvo Technology

Los Angeles Region s Connected/Automated Vehicle Efforts

January 25, 2017 New Technology: The Future of Automated Vehicles and the Impacts on the Transportation Industry

Development of Safety Principles by automation level. Levasseur Tellis Ford Motor Company. CAMP - AVR Consortium Proprietary 1

TESTING HIGHLY AUTOMATED VEHICLES IN CANADA. Guidelines for Trial Organizations

Position Paper on Policy and regulatory needs, European harmonisation

Cooperative Automated Transportation (CAT)

Position Paper on New shared and automated mobility services

Innovation in Lean Times Jerry A. DiMaggio TRB, Washington DC SHRP2 Implementation Coordinator

A Classification of Driver Assistance Systems

March 2, Dear Deputy Administrator Williams:

Federal Highway Administration Cooperative Automated Vehicle (CAV) Update

Human Factors What have we found? What s the next?

Blanco 1 MIXED-FUNCTION AUTOMATION IN NATURALISTIC SETTINGS

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Toward Zero Deaths (TZD): a National Strategy on Highway Safety. Tracie Leix, P.E. Safety Programs Unit Manager Michigan Department of Transportation

THE IMPACT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY FLARES ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR

PARKING 2030 SMARTER

Driver Assistance and Autonomous Driving

FHWA Sustainability and Resilience

2015 ATSSA Traffic Expo Report

P2 - Public summary report

Simulation enables validation of automated driving

Autonomous vehicles. Preparing for the changing mobility ecosystem

USDOT Connected Vehicle Research Program Vehicle-to-Vehicle Safety Application Research Plan

2016 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Support Initiatives

Developments in Cooperative Intelligent Vehicle- Highway Systems and Human Factors Implications

Collaborative Research for Safe Connected Automated Driving AMAA Conference, Berlin

Automation and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Ken Leonard ITS Joint Program Office NASTO 2017

Peer Review of Behavioral Competencies for AVs. University of California PATH Program. February 2016

System-level impacts of selfdriving. vehicles: terminology, impact frameworks and existing literature syntheses

Client Alert. Automated Vehicles 3.0: Preparing for the Future of Transportation. Key Points. DOT Programs and Policies

LaRA Update The French Program La Route Automatisée

Life in the Fast Lane: Evolving Paradigms for Mobility and Transportation Systems of the Future

CITYMOBIL ADVANCED ROAD TRANSPORT FOR THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Connected Vehicles Reference Architecture and Tools

Intelligence That Moves the World

Connected and Automated Vehicles:

TRB Future of the Interstate February 23, 2017

North Texas Tollway Authority

FTA s Strategic Transit Automation Research (STAR) Plan

The Convergence of CAVs with Transport Infrastructure

Florida s Automated Vehicle Initiative

Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) 2. Revised Safety Research Plan: Making a Significant Improvement in Highway Safety.

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

#H2020TransportInfo. WP 2017 Call: Automated Road Transport (ART) 3 topics

Special Events Planning

DISRUPTIVE FORCES AT WORK

Development Tools for Active Safety Systems: PreScan and VeHIL

Are We Ready for Autonomous and Connected Vehicles?

AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS 2.0. A Vision for Safety

Summary of Workshop Hajime Amano

AVL DMS Automation & BlueTooth for Arterial Travel Time March 27, 2013

AVL List GmbH (Headquarters) Autonomous Driving. Validation and Testing - Challenges. Dr. Mihai Nica, Hermann Felbinger. Public

APA Policy Principles for Autonomous Vehicles

Statement of. Chris Spear, President and CEO. On behalf of: AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. (ATA)

Implications of Automated Vehicles for Long-Range Planning in the GGH

Disruptive Technologies Opportunities for the Asphalt Industry

Florida s Automated Vehicle Initiative

Automation in the long-haul Challenges and opportunities of autonomous heavy-duty trucking in the U.S.

Moving Freight An update on road freight network access

Transit Wireless & ITS. Barry Einsig

Public Report. 1.0 Purpose. 2.0 Recommendation. 3.0 Executive Summary. 4.0 Input From Other Sources. Community Services Committee

Disciplina: Gestão da Mobilidade Urbana. Aulas Teóricas. Sistemas Inteligentes de Transportes. Docente: Vasco Reis Prof. Responsável: Rosário Macário

Automated Driving Law and Policy Bryant Walker Smith

Title Subtitle. Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium Session 1-D, Asset Management Meeting and Performance Measures I August Date 19, 2015

Spanish Initiative for the Automation in Urban Transport: AutoMOST

Driving Toward the. Use of Autonomous Vehicles in the Concrete Ready Mix Industry. The Past. The Future. The Present

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Policy and Planning Actions to Address Connected and Automated Vehicles. Wednesday, November 8, :00-3:00 PM ET

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

8: Transportation Demand &

Sustainable Transportation & Land Use Integration Study

SIP-adus: Field Operational Tests and Regulatory Issues

SAFETY TARGETS AND THE STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN (SHSP)

Visual Performance and Safety Benefits of Adaptive Curve Headlighting Systems

Code of Practice. EUCAR Annual Conference th November 2018, Brussels. Robert Martinez v. Bülow, BMW Group

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation

Tuesday, November 10, Artificial Intelligence

Transcription:

Road Vehicle Automation: Let s Get Real Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley March 2017 1

Outline Diversity of automation levels The safety challenges Rates of change in vehicles and infrastructure When may some of these capabilities become available? How should we prepare? Don t believe what you read (on this topic) in the media 2

Taxonomy of Levels of Automation Driving automation systems are categorized into levels based on: 1. Whether the driving automation system performs either the longitudinal or the lateral vehicle motion control subtask of the dynamic driving task (DDT). 2. Whether the driving automation system performs both the longitudinal and the lateral vehicle motion control subtasks of the DDT simultaneously. 3. Whether the driving automation system also performs object and event detection and response. 4. Whether the driving automation system also performs DDT fallback. 5. Whether the driving automation system can drive everywhere or is limited by an operational design domain (ODD). 3

Example Systems at Each Automation Level (based on SAE J3016 - http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201609/) Level Example Systems Driver Roles 1 Adaptive Cruise Control OR Lane Keeping Assistance 2 Adaptive Cruise Control AND Lane Keeping Assistance Traffic Jam Assist (Mercedes, Tesla, Infiniti, Volvo ) Parking with external supervision Must drive other function and monitor driving environment Must monitor driving environment (system nags driver to try to ensure it) 3 Traffic Jam Pilot May read a book, text, or web surf, but be prepared to intervene when needed 4 Highway driving pilot Closed campus driverless shuttle Driverless valet parking in garage 5 Ubiquitous automated taxi Ubiquitous car-share repositioning May sleep, and system can revert to minimum risk condition if needed Can operate anywhere with no drivers needed 4

5

Intentional Mis-Uses of Level 2 Systems by ordinary drivers Mercedes S-Class Infiniti Q50 6

PATH Automated Platoon 1997 Demo (Level 4 automation in protected lane) 7

CityMobil2 La Rochelle Demo 2015 Level 4 Urban Shuttle, Infrastructure Protection 8

Limited Pace of Change in Transportation Consider useful lifetimes of investments in: Roadway infrastructure decades Vehicles years Personal electronics months Essential differences: Capital intensity Safety criticality Cost of making (and fixing) a mistake 9

The Safety Challenge Current U.S. traffic safety sets a very high bar: 3.4 M vehicle hours between fatal crashes (390 years of non-stop 24/7 driving) 61,400 vehicle hours between injury crashes (7 years of non-stop 24/7 driving) How does that compare with your laptop, tablet or smart phone? How much testing do you have to do to show that an automated system is equally safe? RAND study multiple factors longer times How many times safer does it need to be? 10

Traffic Safety Challenges for High and Full Automation Systems Extreme external conditions arising without advance warning (failure of another vehicle, dropped load, lightning, ) NEW CRASHES caused by automation: Strange circumstances the system designer could not anticipate Software bugs not exercised in testing Undiagnosed faults in the vehicle Catastrophic failures of vital vehicle systems (loss of electrical power ) Driver not available to act as the fall-back 11

Needed Breakthroughs Software safety design, verification and validation methods to overcome limitations of: Formal methods Brute-force testing Non-deterministic learning systems Robust threat assessment sensing and signal processing to reach zero false negatives and nearzero false positives Robust control system fault detection, identification and accommodation, within 0.1 s response Ethical decision making for robotics Cyber-security protection 12

Personal Estimates of Market Introductions ** based on technological feasibility ** Everywhere General urban streets, some cities Campus or pedestrian zone Limited-access highway Fully Segregated Guideway Color Key: Level 1 (ACC) Level 2 (ACC+ LKA) Level 3 Conditional Automation Level 4 High Automation Now ~2020s ~2025s ~2030s ~~2075 Level 5 Full Automation 13

Fastest changes in vehicle capabilities: Regulatory mandate to force progress Source: Gargett, Cregan and Cosgrove, Australian Transport Research Forum 2011 90% 6 years (22 years) 14

Historical Market Growth Curves for Popular Automotive Features (New cars) (35 year scale) 15

Big Unresolved Questions (1/2) How safe is safe enough? How can an AV be reliably determined to meet any specific target safety level? What roles should national and regional/state governments play in determining whether a specific AV is safe enough for public use? Should AVs be required to inhibit abuse and misuse by drivers? How long will it take to achieve the fundamental technological breakthroughs needed for higher levels of automation? 16

Big Unresolved Questions (2/2) How much support and cooperation do AVs need from roadway infrastructure and other vehicles? What should the public sector role be in providing infrastructure support? Are new public-private business models needed for higher levels of automation? How will AVs change public transport services, and to what extent will societal goals for mobility be enhanced or degraded? What will be the net impacts of AVs on vehicle miles traveled, energy and environment? 17

How should we prepare? Install cooperative infrastructure for I2V communication (5.9 GHz DSRC) at traffic signals Support regulations that balance public safety and encouraging innovation Seek early deployment opportunities for first generation systems (e.g., automated shuttles in well protected environments) Support infrastructure investments to segregate automated vehicles from other road users Local governments identify their point person for vehicle automation (cutting across traditional agency stove-pipes) 18

Media Hype is Rampant 19

What did U.S. DOT really say? NHTSA will consider initiating rulemaking to address whether the definition of driver in Section 571.3 should be updated in response to changing circumstances. 20