Glulam Beam Camber. August 2011

Similar documents
Pacific Woodtech Corporation Revised January 26, 2018

Effect of Large Diameter Horizontal Holes on the Bending and Shear Properties of Laminated Veneer Lumber

Temporary Construction Loads Over I-Joist Roofs And Floors

PR-L274 Nordic Structures Revised April 16, 2017

International Beams Revised June 15, 2018

Murphy Laminated Veneer Lumber Murphy Engineered Wood Division Revised January 24, 2017

Murphy Laminated Veneer Lumber Murphy Engineered Wood Division Revised May 30, 2013

IB Series I-Joists International Beams, Inc. Revised June 25, 2014

PinkWood Ltd. Revised June 3, 2015

Joint Evaluation Report ICC-ES (800) (562)

PR-L274C Nordic Structures Revised April 16, 2017

GP LAM Laminated Veneer Lumber Georgia-Pacific Wood Products South LLC Revised March 20, 2015

LP SolidStart I-Joists Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Revised October 6, 2015

KING BEAM 3000 and BOISE GLULAM PR-L313 Boise Cascade Wood Products, L.L.C. Revised May 29, 2017

Tr T e r a e t a e t d e d G l G u l l u a l m a

OUR COMPANY OUR WARRANTY OUR GUARANTEE

Structurlam Products LP Revised August 3, 2018

ICC-ES Evaluation Reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed, nor are they to be

Structurlam Products LP Revised May 23, 2017

PinkWood Ltd. Revised February 3, 2018

Joint Evaluation Report

Joint Evaluation Report

Joint Evaluation Report

Code Compliance Research Report CCRR 0232

Technical Data for. Headers. and Beams

LPI 56 Technical Guide

Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC Revised June 25, 2018

CH. 9 WOOD CONSTRUCTION

Evaluation Report CCMC R Nordic I-Joist Series

GLOBAL LVL HEADERS, BEAMS AND COLUMNS. 1.9E-2850Fb. 1.9E-2850Fb. User guide User guide. lvlglobal.com

Trusted WOOD I JOISTS SECTION: 06 ON WEB i. Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. Copyright 2015

twelve wood construction: materials & beams ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Technical Topics. Wood I-Joist Floors, Firefighters and Fire

Dimensional Changes In Structural Glued Laminated Timber

1¾" VERSA-LAM WESTERN HEAdER GuidE

twelve wood construction: materials & beams Wood Beam Design Wood Properties Timber National Design Specification

twelve wood construction: materials & beams Wood Beam Design Wood Properties Timber National Design Specification

twelve wood construction: materials & beams Wood Beam Design Timber Wood Properties National Design Specification

Warmboard-S Radiant-Floor Heating Panels PR-V180 Warmboard, Inc. Revised February 19, 2018

twelve wood construction: materials & beams Wood Beam Design Wood Properties Timber National Design Specification

LVL Product Guide 2.0E LVL 1.5E LVL

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Reissued September 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in two years.

Norbord TallWall/Windstorm/QuakeZone Rated Sheathing for Use with IRC Energy-Heel Trusses Revised February 20, 2018

Joint Evaluation Report ICC-ES (800) (562)

thirteen wood construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2016 lecture

RoyOMartin TuffStrand and Windbrace 7/16 Performance Category OSB PR-N129 Martco, L.L.C. Revised November 6, 2017

Joint Evaluation Report

Evaluation Listing CCMC L Nordic X-Lam

thirteen wood construction: materials & beams Timber Wood Beam Design Wood Properties

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: SHOP FABRICATED WOOD TRUSSES REPORT HOLDER: BARRETTE STRUCTURAL DISTRIBUTION, INC.

PRODUCT: Structural Insulated Panels (SIP) DIVISION: Wood and Plastics (06) SECTION: Structural Panels ( )

PRODUCT: Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) DIVISION: Wood, Plastics, and Composites (06) SECTION: Structural Panels ( )

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD I JOISTS REPORT HOLDER: NORDIC ENGINEERED WOOD

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD I JOISTS REPORT HOLDER: STARK TRUSS COMPANY, INC.

Allowable Loads for Round Timber Poles

n 24F 1.9E(True) Treated Glulam n Architectural Appearance n Resistant to rot and decay

Power JoIst ADI-40, ADI-60, ADI-80 I-joists

Joint Evaluation Report ICC-ES (800) (562)

A Simple Solution for Meeting

PFC-5804* Reissued February 1, Filing Category: DESIGN Wood

ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California *Revised April 2003

Murphy LVL Limit States Design Guide 2.0 E-LVL 2.2 E-LVL

WOOD I-JOIST AWARENESS GUIDE

TT-006B JULY 2008 TABLE A. ASTM C 627-TESTED ASSEMBLIES NOT LISTED BY TCNA. Tile Adhesive

Roseburg RIGIDLAM LVL Roseburg Forest Products Company Revised May 31, 2018

Installation of Stucco Exterior Finish Over Wood Structural Panel Wall Sheathing

SECTION R614 STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANEL WALL CONSTRUCTION

Technical Notes on Brick Construction Brick Industry Association Commerce Park Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191

Computer Design of Beams, Joists, and Rafters. Lecture Notes

VERSA-LAM 2.0E SPECIFIER GUIDE EASTERN CANADA. Work. Build. Create. 3rd Edition Canada

BROADSPAN. LVL Design Brochure. Design properties for LVL header and beam applications in the U.S. for residential floor and roof systems

Stark Truss Company, Inc. Revised December 14, 2018

Boise Cascade Company Revised June 25, 2018

MAX-CORE I-JOIST DESIGN MANUAL-US

Combination Roof and Floor Beam Module Walk-Through

Training Objectives Module A

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD I JOISTS REPORT HOLDER: LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION

PinkWood Ltd. Revised September 29, 2017

Plywood, Composite Wood Products, High-Pressure Laminates

Field Notching and Drilling of Laminated Veneer Lumber

Introduction to Cambering

Listing Report: MUR Reissue Date: 12/07/17 This report is subject to annual review

Commercial Design Manual for I-Joists. The GREEN. Building. Solution

Third Avenue New York, NY. Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 13, Michelle L. Mentzer.

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD I-JOISTS REPORT HOLDER: PACIFIC WOODTECH CORPORATION

Determining Allowable Design Values for Wood

Fundamentals of Wood Design and Engineering

Universal Beam and Universal Column sections subject to pure bending are all Class 3 semi-compact or better.

DESIGNING TO REDUCE FLOOR VIBRATIONS IN WOOD FLOORS

6.0 TUTORIAL. Cascade Consulting Associates, Inc. PO Box 1617 Corvallis, Oregon 97339

DESIGN GUIDE AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR TIMBER ONLY COMPOSITE FLOOR SYSTEMS

S TRUCTURAL W OOD D ESIGN

PERFORMANCE STANDARD CONSIDERATIONS FOR I-JOISTS USED IN RESIDENTIAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE DESIGN PROCESS INVOLVING METAL PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES

International Beams, Inc. Revised June 20, 2018

Standard for Performance-Rated Cross-Laminated Timber

Transcription:

T E C H N I C A L N O T E Glulam Beam Camber August 2011 One of the most important design qualities of wood framing is its resilience under load. Wood s unique stiffness makes wood floors comfortable to walk, work and stand on. These qualities also contribute greatly to wood s excellent damping characteristics, thus giving wood-framed structures the ability to absorb impact loadings. The size and span capabilities of sawn lumber beams are generally limited by the physical characteristics of the timber supply. Consequently, stiffness, or deflection under load, at the relatively short spans commonly used with sawn lumber beams is seldom a governing factor in the design of these wood structural elements. With the availability of glued laminated timber (glulam), it is possible for architects and engineers to design wood members in large sizes and long lengths. Design professionals recognize that for long spans, design is often controlled by deflection limits rather than by beam strength. One way to reduce the adverse aesthetic effect and structural significance of beam deflection is through the use of camber. Camber is an initial curvature built into a fabricated member such as a glulam which is opposite in direction to the calculated deflection which will occur under gravity loads. The use of camber in glulam beams also gives the designer the ability to negate the possible adverse effects of long-term deflection or creep which may occur with wood members. While this Technical Note provides a discussion of camber, it is important to recognize that building codes do not require this technique for deflection control. It is only one option available to the designer. Other design techniques for providing deflection control include specifying beams of greater stiffness than otherwise would be required, increasing slope for roof drainage to minimize possible effects of ponding, or limiting spans such that deflection is not a controlling design consideration. In some situations, especially in construction applications where the framing elements are rarely subjected to specified design live loads and the deflection due to dead loads is minimal, camber may not be necessary. In such applications, camber designed into a beam may never relax. In floor construction this can cause a permanent, unwanted crown and, in multi-story applications it may increase the difficulty of framing successive floors during construction. As a general rule, if noncambered sawn lumber beams have traditionally performed well in a given application, then cambering is probably not required when a glulam having equivalent or greater stiffness is substituted. Residential garage door headers and floor beams are good examples of uses where camber may not be necessary.

2 CONTROLLING DE FLECTION Building code limits on beam deflection were first imposed in the early 1900s to prevent the cracking of brittle plaster ceilings. The deflections determined for this serviceability requirement remain as the basis for the allowable deflections listed in building codes today. Building code requirements aside, the appearance of a sagging floor or roof beam does not instill structural confidence in the eye of the beholder. While a sagging beam may have sufficient strength to support its design loads, it may be perceived as being under designed and may adversely affect the acceptance of the overall building design. Glulam is generally the only engineered wood beam that can be cambered. In addition to the aesthetic reasons mentioned above, there is a structural reason for limiting deflection in large flat roofs. This is to prevent ponding which may occur when water collects in a depression in a flat roof. As water builds up in a depression, the load on the supporting members increases. This causes additional deflection which permits more water to accumulate. Once initiated, this cycle can continue until a roof failure occurs. Ponding is more prevalent in areas where roofs are designed for low live-to-dead-load ratios. Roofs designed for snow loads are typically stiffer and have a greater ability to resist ponding than similar roofs designed only for relatively light construction loads. A general guideline for determining if provisions to prevent ponding are necessary is to compute the deflection of the member in question under a uniform load of 5 lbf per sq. ft. If the resulting deflection is equal to or greater than 1/2 inch, this is an indication that ponding is a potential problem and beam camber combined with other positive means to insure drainage should be used. This simplified procedure should not be substituted for a detailed engineering analysis to control ponding of low slope or flat roofs. CAMBER RECOMMENDATIONS Calculated beam deflection is used to assess compliance with specifications, the building code and to specify beam camber. This calculated deflection is measured from a plane connecting the beam supports. When camber is built into the beam, the built-in deflection is above this plane. The code-specified deflection limit may be measured from the plane connecting the supports to a point below that plane. When camber is not required to prevent ponding, a cambered beam, just as one without camber, may be permitted to deflect below the plane connecting the supports by the amount permitted in the code. This is acceptable provided that the beam is not over-stressed and adjacent construction (such as plaster walls or ceilings), machinery and objects connected to or resting on the beam are not adversely affected by this deflection. For most roof beam applications, the glulam industry recommends the use of 1-1/2 times the calculated dead load deflection to arrive at camber specifications. This amount of camber is generally sufficient to allow the beam to deflect back to near level after many years under sustained dead load. For floor beams, the recommended camber is 1.0 times the calculated dead load deflection. In addition to cambering for deflection induced by dead load, roof beams in simple-span applications may also be cambered to provide the industry recommended slope of 1/4 inch per foot to insure proper drainage. When this is done, the required camber for slope is calculated and added to the dead-load camber described above. This becomes the total camber, which can be built into the beam during fabrication.

3 CAMBER TOLERANCES Because of the variability of mechanical and physical properties in all wood products and manufacturing associated tolerances, a cambered glulam beam will not always be manufactured with exactly the camber specified. In addition, moisture changes can also affect the camber of any specific beam. For these reasons, a certain degree of variability associated with any target camber is allowed and should be expected. Section 4.2.2 of ANSI/AITC A190.1 Structural Glued Laminated Timber gives the tolerances for camber or straightness of a glulam as: Up to 20 feet, the tolerance is plus or minus 1/4 inch. Over 20 feet, increase tolerance by 1/8 inch per additional 20 feet or fraction thereof, but not to exceed 3/4 inch. This variability in camber is generally so small with respect to beam length that it is undetectable to the human eye and has little or no effect on beam performance. The camber for beams is often specified as inches of camber. It may also be specified as a radius of curvature. Thus specified, the offsets at various points along a beam of any length can be represented by a single number. The circular arc formed by this method closely approximates the actual deflected curvature of the beam under load. The beam is thus fabricated with a built-in mirror image of the expected deflected curvature. Table 1 is a precalculated deflection/radius-of-curvature table used by fabricators. This table can be used to specify a camber radius based on a given span and calculated deflection. Calculating Beam Camber As an alternative to using Table 1 to specify camber, the following formula may be used to calculate the approximate radius of curvature, given the beam span and camber desired. R = 3L2 2 Where: R = approximate radius of curvature (ft) L = span (ft) = desired camber (in.) See Figure 1 for a graphic representation of beam camber parameters. An example of the use of radius of curvature to specify beam camber is given as follows: Calculate the required camber for a glulam roof beam for the following design conditions: Glulam beam size = 6-3/4 in. x 27 in. E = 1.6 x 10 6 psi I = 11,072 in. 4 Span = 48 ft Dead load = 120 plf Beam weight = 44 plf Dead load deflection = 5wL4 1,728 384 EI w = dead load + beam weight (lb/ft) L = beam span (ft) E = Modulus of Elasticity (psi) FIGURE 1 BEAM CAMBER PARAMETERS L = Span (ft) Cambered Beam = Camber (in.) R = Radius of Curvature (ft)

4 I = Moment of Inertia (in. 4 ) Dead load deflection = 5(120 + 44)(484 )(1,728) = 1.11 in 384(1.6 x 10 6 )(11,072) Recommended camber = 1.5 x 1.11 = 1.66 in. Radius of curvature (R) required: From Table 1, R 2000 = 1.73 in. for 48 ft span - or - by calculation: R = 3(48)2 = 2,082 ft 2(1.66) Note that a camber radius of 2,000 feet would provide a camber of 1.73 inches and should be considered for this case. CANTILEVERED BEAMS The cambering of cantilevered beams is a subject that is often misunderstood. While it is theoretically possible to specify camber for each span section of single and double cantilevered beams, it is, in most cases, not practical. If the camber does not relax, a beam with an S shaped camber for a cantilever (or W shaped camber in the case of a double cantilever) can severely impact roof drainage and can even cause ponding over the outside supports. Ponding over the supports can lead to bearing or support failures and subsequent roof leaks. For most typical cantilever-length to main-span-length conditions, the preferred method is to camber only the span length between the supports, leaving the cantilevered portion uncambered. This will generally insure good drainage of the roof system. If unusually long cantilever lengths are used, a further analysis of member deflection and camber is warranted. Based on this analysis, the designer may choose to specify individual camber values for both the interior beam span and the cantilever span. STOCK BEAM CAMBER While the ability to pre-camber glulam beams is a distinct advantage for many longer span applications, it can be a disadvantage in applications where too much camber can cause jobsite framing problems. This can happen when a stock beam is specified with too great a camber. Stock beams are glued laminated timbers that are manufactured for inventory by a stocking distributor or dealer. Theses are typically supplied to the distributor in long lengths and cut to length as ordered by the contractor or end user. Most stock beams are used in residential construction in combination with other wood products such as dimension lumber or I-joists which are not cambered. Therefore, it is important that stock beams be supplied with the right amount of camber to be compatible with other non-cambered framing members. In order to eliminate the effect of having too much camber, EWS manufacturers typically supply stock beams with either zero camber or with a camber radius of 3,500 feet or flatter. In some areas, a camber radius of 2,000 or 3,000 feet may be available. As shown in Table 1, a camber radius of 3,500 feet provides an actual camber of 1/4 inch for a span of 24 feet. Since most residential floor beam and header applications have spans of less than 24 feet, camber will typically be less than 1/4 inch and this amount of camber should be virtually unnoticeable.

5 As previously noted, the manufacturing tolerance for camber is plus or minus 1/4 inch for beams up to 20 feet in length and increases by 1/8 inch per additional 20 feet of length or fraction thereof, not to exceed 3/4 inch. The amount of camber manufactured into stock beams is often dependent on the geographic region of the market and can vary from region to region. Since the degree of camber in stock beams may be almost imperceptible, it is very important that contractors be aware of the TOP stamp which is placed on the compression side of the beam by the manufacturer to insure proper installation and performance of these members. TABLE 1 CAMBER (INCHES) BASED ON RADIUS AND BEAM SPAN (FEET) (a) Span ft Radius, ft 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 10 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 12 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 14 0.29 0.25 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 16 0.38 0.32 0.27 0.24 0.21 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.08 18 0.49 0.41 0.35 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.19 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10 20 0.60 0.50 0.43 0.38 0.33 0.30 0.24 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 22 0.73 0.61 0.52 0.45 0.40 0.36 0.29 0.24 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.15 24 0.86 0.72 0.62 0.54 0.48 0.43 0.35 0.29 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.17 26 1.01 0.85 0.72 0.63 0.56 0.51 0.41 0.34 0.29 0.25 0.23 0.20 28 1.18 0.98 0.84 0.74 0.65 0.59 0.47 0.39 0.34 0.29 0.26 0.24 30 1.35 1.13 0.96 0.84 0.75 0.68 0.54 0.45 0.39 0.34 0.30 0.27 32 1.54 1.28 1.10 0.96 0.85 0.77 0.61 0.51 0.44 0.38 0.34 0.31 34 1.73 1.45 1.24 1.08 0.96 0.87 0.69 0.58 0.50 0.43 0.39 0.35 36 1.94 1.62 1.39 1.22 1.08 0.97 0.78 0.65 0.56 0.49 0.43 0.39 38 2.17 1.81 1.55 1.35 1.20 1.08 0.87 0.72 0.62 0.54 0.48 0.43 40 2.40 2.00 1.71 1.50 1.33 1.20 0.96 0.80 0.69 0.60 0.53 0.48 42 2.65 2.21 1.89 1.65 1.47 1.32 1.06 0.88 0.76 0.66 0.59 0.53 44 2.90 2.42 2.07 1.82 1.61 1.45 1.16 0.97 0.83 0.73 0.65 0.58 46 3.17 2.65 2.27 1.98 1.76 1.59 1.27 1.06 0.91 0.79 0.71 0.63 48 3.46 2.88 2.47 2.16 1.92 1.73 1.38 1.15 0.99 0.86 0.77 0.69 50 3.75 3.13 2.68 2.34 2.08 1.88 1.50 1.25 1.07 0.94 0.83 0.75 52 4.06 3.38 2.90 2.54 2.25 2.03 1.62 1.35 1.16 1.01 0.90 0.81 54 4.37 3.65 3.12 2.73 2.43 2.19 1.75 1.46 1.25 1.09 0.97 0.87 56 4.70 3.92 3.36 2.94 2.61 2.35 1.88 1.57 1.34 1.18 1.05 0.94 58 5.05 4.21 3.60 3.15 2.80 2.52 2.02 1.68 1.44 1.26 1.12 1.01 60 5.40 4.50 3.86 3.38 3.00 2.70 2.16 1.80 1.54 1.35 1.20 1.08 62 5.77 4.81 4.12 3.60 3.20 2.88 2.31 1.92 1.65 1.44 1.28 1.15 64 6.15 5.12 4.39 3.84 3.41 3.07 2.46 2.05 1.76 1.54 1.37 1.23 66 6.54 5.45 4.67 4.08 3.63 3.27 2.61 2.18 1.87 1.63 1.45 1.31 68 6.94 5.78 4.96 4.34 3.85 3.47 2.77 2.31 1.98 1.73 1.54 1.39 70 7.35 6.13 5.25 4.59 4.08 3.68 2.94 2.45 2.10 1.84 1.63 1.47 (a) Industry accepted manufacturing tolerance on camber is ±1/4 inch for lengths up to 20 feet with an increase in tolerance of 1/8 inch per additional 20 feet of length or fraction thereof, but not to exceed 3/4 inch.

Glulam Beam Camber We have field representatives in many major U.S. cities and in Canada who can help answer questions involving APA trademarked products. For additional assistance in specifying engineered wood products, contact us: APA HEADQUARTERS 7011 So. 19th St. Tacoma, Washington 98466 (253) 565-6600 Fax: (253) 565-7265 PRODUCT SUPPORT HELP DESK (253) 620-7400 E-mail Address: help@apawood.org DISCLAIMER The information contained herein is based on APA The Engineered Wood Association s continuing programs of laboratory testing, product research and comprehensive field experience. Neither APA, nor its members make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the use, application of, and/ or reference to opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations included in this publication. Consult your local jurisdiction or design professional to assure compliance with code, construction and performance requirements. Because APA has no control over quality of workmanship or the conditions under which engineered wood products are used, it cannot accept responsibility for product performance or designs as actually constructed. Form No. S550G/Revised August 2011