Title: PSU Take-Home Training for Professional Standards: Good Agricultural Practices

Similar documents
Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

FSMA S PRODUCE SAFETY RULE

Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk My Risk Land is fenced virgin. Land has been used for prairie that has not been

Developing a Plan for Third-Party Audits. Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

Module 2: GAPs Field Practices

Matt Lollar & Bob Hochmuth University of Florida/IFAS Extension

FSMA Produce Rule Summary for Midwest Orchards

Food Safety Basics for Small Farms. Jennifer Sowerwine, ESPM Dept. UC Berkeley

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Proposed Sec. 105 Produce Rule

Part 3 House Packing Facility

Land # Section, Number Question Doc Points Page # 1 General, #P-1 A documented food safety program that

Filling in the: G ood A gricultural P ractices

California. California. Food Safety Guidelines. Food Safety Guidelines

Food Safety Plan. Name of Farm/Orchard. Farm mailing address City State Zip Code. GPS coordinates (optional) Longitude Latitude

Module 1: Introduction to Produce Safety

...A Farm to Institution Initiative

Pecan Production and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

Farm GAP Policy Manual (for compliance with Primus Labs GAP Audit version Rev.1)

Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Growers. Water

Introduction The Safe Food Risk Assessment

BAMCO Food Safety Guidelines

Introduction The Safe Food Risk Assessment

Food Safety Plan. (Farm name) DRAFT

Farm GAP Policy Manual (for compliance with Primus Labs GAP Audit version Rev.1)

Good Agricultural Practices & Good Handling Practices Program. Water Quality Issues Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

TOMATO BEST PRACTICES MANUAL

Preparing for the Farm-Ranch Audit

New England Farm Plan: General Questions, Farm Review, Field Harvesting and Packing

Food Safety Training April 8 th and April 29 th, 2017

Food Safety Modernization Act. Final Rules

Food Safety Modernization Act Oklahoma Training Programs. Lynn Brandenberger Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture

GAP / GHP Audits. Bernie DiBattista NYS Dept. of Agriculture & Markets Albany, NY

HARMONIZED FOOD SAFETY STANDARD: PART 1: FIELD OPERATIONS AND HARVESTING (Version 3)

GAPS, FSMA and the Produce Rule

2014 RIGAP Program Guidelines

What Initiated the Need for a Food Safety Plan

What s New with the FSMA Rules? Co-Sponsored by:

Scale of difficulty 1 very easy -- 5 very difficult. What do you think it will cost to change? YES NO N/A

FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH SEMINARS

FSMA Produce Safety Rule Basics for Tree Fruits

Good Agricultural Practices. Food Safety Plan. for. Name of Farm/Orchard

RE: PETITION FOR REGULATIONS TO ADDRESS PRODUCE SAFETY

This is a Grower Manual for Documentation for a USDA GAP audit Part 1

FOOD SAFETY PROGRAM JANUARY 30, 31 & FEBRUARY 1

Community Alliance with Family Farmers

Minimizing microbial contamination in primary production of fruits, vegetables, herbs and spices

Food Safety Audit Harvest Crew v07.04

Food Safety Audit. Ranch v06.11 * Foreman/Contact:

A basic GAP program for keeping pecans safe & wholesome

GGAP Applicable Regulations for HPSS

Costco Produce Addendum for Harvest Crew Audits

Broccoli Produce Safety Part I: Produce Safety Overview Elizabeth A. Bihn, Ph.D. Produce Safety Alliance, Director Cornell University Part II: Post

Developing a Plan for Third-Party Audits. Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs)

Key Points - Fresh Market Tomatoes

SENATE BILL No Introduced by Senator Florez. February 7, 2007

Overview of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) for Fruit and Vegetable Growers Cary L. Rivard, Ph.D. Dept of Horticulture Kansas State University

New Mexico Department of Agriculture Produce Safety Division S. Espina Las Cruces N.M

Food Safety Audit Ranch V07.04 Rev. 1

Amy Schober Food & Nutrition Service, Office of Food Safety Mike Morrelli Agricultural Marketing Service Christina Conell Food & Nutrition Service,

Unannounced Audit. USDA Food Safety Audit California Cantaloupe Advisory Board Audit Verification Checklist Packinghouse/Cooler

Produce Safety Tips, FSMA for Produce Growers. Londa Nwadike Extension Consumer Food Safety Specialist Kansas State University/University of Missouri

Food Safety for Direct Sales

The grading rubric for this assignment is attached to the lesson.

USDA GAP/GHP and HGAP Recertification: Guidance for Producers

Food Safety Begins on the Farm: A Grower Self Assessment of Food Safety Risks. U-Pick Operations U-PICK OPERATIONS

BUY LOCAL, BUY SAFELY!

What is the Food Safety Modernization Act and how will it affect you? Elena Rogers Area Specialized Agent, Food Safety- Fresh Produce

Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol for the Fresh Tomato Supply Chain Open Field Harvest and Packing Checklist

PrimusLabs.com Sub Contracted Audit (63717) Ranch v06.11 *

Food Safety Modernization Act and Good Agricultural Practices An Update for Produce Growers

Food Safety Audit Ranch V07.04 Rev. 1

Preparation Sheet to Assist in Developing a GAP Program Relating to PrimusLabs Ranch/ Farm Audit Version 07.04

The Potential for Food Contamination and Resulting Foodborne Illnesses Exists!

General Checklist Implementation of a Food Safety Program

Good Agricultural Practices for Produce Growers

GAP and Its Impact on Us as Growers. Rich Bonanno UMass Extension

General Questions (Implementation of a food safety program, traceability, and worker health and hygiene)

Part 3 House Packing Facility. Receiving

LHodges GAP for Vegetable Growers 1

Agricultural Water for Production Overview

Minneapolis Public Schools Farm to School Site Assessment Form Products Growing for MPS:

Part 2 Field Harvest and Packing. Field Sanitation and Hygiene (55 pts.) Field Harvesting and Transportation (130 pts.) 185 Points Possible

Creating a Customized Food Safety Plan

Garden Food Safety Producing and selling/donating safe produce from your garden.

USDA Good Agricultural Practices Good Handling Practices Audit Verification Checklist

Costco Produce Addendum for Packinghouse, Cooler, Cold Storage and Processing Facility Audits

PRODUCT: Blueberries PAGE 1 of 12 PLANT NAME: Berry Town ISSUE DATE 6/1/2017 ADDRESS: 123 Blue Blvd. Brooksville, FL SUPERSEDES 5/30/2016

Example Food Safety Plan. Florida Citrus Operation. Updated April 15, The development of a Food Safety Plan with Good Agricultural Practices

Good Agricultural Practices Water in Field and Packing Shed

Costco Produce Addendum for Packinghouse, Cooler, Cold Storage and Processing Facility Audits

Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol for the Fresh Tomato Supply Chain, 2019

Fundamentals of Creating a Colorado Farm Food Safety Plan

OECS GAP CERTIFICATION PROTOCOL FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES

Food Safety Programs and Auditing Protocol for the Fresh Tomato Supply Chain Open Field Harvest and Packing

Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) & FSMA Produce Safety Rule Overview

What is Practical Produce Safety?

CDC STATISTICS FOOD SAFETY MODERNIZATION ACT (FSMA) (FSMA) RULEMAKING PROCESS AND HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS 02/12/13

How is this crop irrigated?

Costco Produce Addendum for Packinghouse, Cooler, Cold Storage and Processing Facility Audits

Transcription:

Title: PSU Take-Home Training for Professional Standards: Good Agricultural Practices Credit: 0.5 Hours Codes: 2600, 2620 Edition: 2015 Materials Needed: Iowa State Checklist for Retail Purchasing of Local Produce; handouts for participants https://store.extension.iastate.edu/product/checklist-for-retail-purchasing-of-local- Produce Good Agricultural Practices Presenter Notes: Slide 1: Cover slide Notes to instructor: Welcome participants to this training session. Slide 2: Notes to instructor: Review the learning objectives with the participants. Slide 3: GAPs are based on the Food and Drug Administration s Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. This guidance document (also known as the GAPs guidance) addresses microbial food safety hazards and good agricultural practices common to the growing, harvesting, washing, sorting, packing and transporting of fruits and vegetables. https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinfor mation/ucm064458.htm Slide 4: Much of FDA s original guidance is now mandatory under the Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule. The Produce Safety Rule went into effect in

early 2016 and includes mandatory standards for the safe growing, harvesting, packing, and holding of fruits and vegetables grown for human consumption. The Produce Safety Rule incorporates Good Agricultural Practices into its key requirements. The Produce Safety Rule may not apply to all farms, and certain farms may be eligible for an exemption based on their size and amount of annual sales. Regardless of whether a farm is required to follow the Produce Safety Rule, they should be practicing GAPs. Slide 5: Developing and implementing good agricultural practices for the planting, growing, harvesting, packing and transporting of fruits and vegetables helps to minimize the risks associated with fresh produce. GAPs are food safety practices for fruit and vegetable production. Your school food safety plan, which is based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles, is a similar program. Both are based on implementing proactive food safety practices aimed at preventing, reducing, or eliminating hazards. The next slides will introduce you to the eight areas, or principles, of a GAPs audit as outlined in the Food and Drug Administration s guidance for the fresh produce industry. This is a brief GAPs overview that will help you understand the food safety risks through the farm to fork process, and will provide you with the basic concepts you would need to have a conversation about GAPs with your suppliers. If you are required to apply GAPs concepts and practices in your school district through purchasing or school gardens, additional training is recommended. Slide 6: The first GAPs principle relates to water quality. The quality of water, how and when it is used, and the characteristics of the crop influence the potential for water to contaminate produce. Grower practices should protect and maintain water quality. Practices that reduce the risk of contamination from agricultural water include: ensuring that wells are properly constructed and protected, treating water, and using application methods that avoid or reduce water-to-produce contact, such as drip irrigation, low volume sprays or underground irrigation. Agricultural water sources must also be tested for microbial quality, using tests for indicators of fecal contamination such as E. coli. Records of these water tests must be maintained, and frequency of testing is based on risk. Municipal water: Test results are acquired from the local water authority annually or tested by the operation at least annually. Well water: Tested one time during the growing season, if fecal coliforms are present, further actions are required.

Surface water: Tested 3 times during the growing season, first at planting, second at peak use, third at or near harvest. If fecal coliforms are present action required. Post-harvest water is required to meet microbial requirements of the U.S. EPA drinking water. Slide 7: Agricultural water includes water used for irrigation, cooling, frost protection, application of fertilizers and pesticides or other pre-harvest purposes. Typical sources of agricultural water include municipal water, wells, rivers, streams, irrigation ditches, open canals, lakes, ponds and reservoirs. In some areas, agricultural water comes from surface waters, rivers, streams, and canals that travel some distance before reaching the produce field. Growers do not have control over factors that affect surface waters such as animal production, manure runoff, rainfall amounts, and septic system leakage. Water is sometimes used when harvesting produce, such as baby lettuces, to keep the product hydrated. Water used to wash produce must be meet drinking water quality requirements. During GAP audits, growers are asked how and when water is used, and for what crop (s). Auditors will look for potential sources of contamination in and around the water source and ask to review records. If the water is from a municipal water source, a copy of the municipality tests or certification of the quality is acceptable as verification of water quality. Slide 8: The second GAPs principle is biological, chemical, and physical risks that may result from current and past land uses such as animal operations, previous building sites or dumping grounds. Another consideration is whether or not the land is prone to flooding. The FDA considers crops that are contacted by flood water to be adulterated and they cannot be sold for human consumption. In addition to the grower s own farm, nearby or adjacent land uses need to be considered. Whether the surrounding land is occupied by private homes, animal production farms, manure storage, composting areas, chemical storage areas, or wooded areas, there is potential for food safety risks to be present. Contamination of crops, soil, and water has resulted from leaking septic tanks, runoff from animal production operations, and fecal deposits from animals that enter fields. Slide 9:

Principle three is worker health and hygiene, and training. Just as foodservice workers health, hygiene and training are essential to your food safety program, field workers personal hygiene is critical to the farm s food safety program. GAPs require that field workers follow food safety practices that are similar to food service employee food safety practices. These practices include training workers on how and when to properly wash hands. Workers should also be trained to not handle produce when they are ill. If field workers are required to wear gloves, the workers must remove their gloves, wash their hands and put on new gloves every time that their gloves have been contaminated. Clean, well maintained toilet and handwashing facilities should be provided for field workers, close to where they are working. These workers should only eat or smoke in designated areas. Training helps workers recognize a food safety risk when they see it and encourages them to do something about it. Records should be kept of all training sessions. Training and verifying that workers are following good hygiene practices can reduce the risk for a foodborne outbreak. Slide 10: GAPs principle four is the use of manure and/or compost. Use of raw manure is of greater risk than composted or aged manure. As pathogens can survive in the soil, it is important to maximize the time between applying raw manure and planting and harvesting to minimize the risk of produce contamination. If manure is not handled properly, pathogens could be introduced into the soil or onto the plant or produce. Farmers should keep logs to document how manure or compost is handled and when it is applied. Logs are reviewed during audits to ensure that the farm is following recommended composting procedures. The location of stored manure on a farm is a concern because runoff after a rain could cause pathogens to spread to crops in fields. Farmers need to consider where they store manure to prevent runoff from reaching crops. Stored manure piles should be covered to help prevent spread into crop areas by the wind. Slide 11: Principle five is wildlife and animal management. Wild and domestic animals are a food safety concern because animal feces can be a source of pathogens. Animals can spread contamination around fields as they move. Farmers should use methods to limit or

prevent wild or domestic animals from entering produce fields, such as fences or noise deterrents. It is important to monitor and document animal activity in the field and to conduct field assessments prior to harvest. Growers should train workers to monitor for animal activity in production fields. Farmers and workers should be diligent to monitor and prevent animal activity in the fields, especially near harvest time in order to avoid harvesting crops that may have been contaminated by animal feces. Slide 12: Principle six is sanitation and postharvest handling. Any surface that touches produce is a potential source of contamination. Such surfaces include equipment, belts, rollers, brushes, tables, bins, sinks, tools, and the hands of workers. Surfaces that contact produce should be easily cleaned and sanitized. Harvest bins/containers and equipment should be properly maintained, cleaned and sanitized on a regular basis. Any bins/containers that are stored outside should be cleaned and sanitized before being used for produce. It is easy for bins/containers to become contaminated in the field from contact with dirt. Bins/containers are commonly stacked on top of each other. When dirt or contamination sticks to the bottom of a bin that is stacked on top of another bin, the bin below it also becomes contaminated. Before the produce leaves the field, as much dirt and mud as possible should be removed from the produce and contact surfaces. Slide 13: Principle number seven is transportation. Produce is transported from the farm, through the supply chain, to your back door. Produce travels on trucks, ships, trains, and planes during distribution. Preventing cross contamination and maintaining temperatures for quality and safety are top priorities. Produce should be protected from potential contamination by workers while loading and unloading the product. Trucks should be loaded to prevent damage to fresh produce. If the outer skin of produce is broken, it becomes more susceptible to contaminants. Vehicles should be clean and operators should be aware of what was transported previously. A vehicle that recently transported chickens, for example, would not a good vehicle for transporting produce as there could be contaminants remaining in the truck bed. Good quality, intact produce is most resistant to microbial contamination and growth. Maintaining temperatures that promote optimum product quality also helps to reduce the risk of microbial hazards. Slide 14:

The eighth GAPs principle is traceability. Traceability means that food items, including produce, can be traced back to its source. The ability to trace a product, one step forward and one step back is critical in the event of a food recall. There are often many steps in a food supply chain, so each group including growers, distributors, and packing houses, are responsible for knowing where they got the product from, and where they sent the product to. Growers should maintain a recordkeeping system with date of harvest, farm location; the field where produce was harvested, the pack date, and who handled the produce from farm to receiver. Buyers should be aware that in some cases produce is repacked with produce from several farms before being distributed. This is a common practice with tomatoes since they are repacked to meet customers color requirements. This process makes traceability more difficult. The fresh produce industry is aware of the traceability and recall concerns of buyers. In recent years, large produce growers and distributors have implemented electronic bar code tracking to improve traceability. Some industry trade groups are developing technologies (such as bar codes, stamps, stickers, tags, etc.) to identify the source of produce and software to assist retailers in providing more accurate traceability to the grower/packer level. Notes to instructor: See Best Practices for Ensuring Traceability of Fresh Produce: http://www.nfsmi.org/documentlibraryfiles/pdf/20110822025525.pdf Slide 15: Most buyers require farmers to pass a GAPs audit in order to sell product to their company because they want to make sure that they are purchasing safe food. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and many private third- party audit companies provide GAPs audits. GAPs auditors use an audit checklists based on the FDA s GAPs guidance document to verify a grower s food safety program. GAPs audits enhance product marketability, and it makes good business sense to provide the safest food possible to your customers. Most farmers are already following food safety practices; their biggest challenge is the documentation, and some struggle to afford the cost of the audits. Slide 16: How can you verify growers GAPs food safety practices? If the district buys from an organization that requires farmers to obtain a GAPs audit, then the school district does not have to review the audit forms and document that on

farm food safety practices are being followed although, it doesn t hurt. Districts that purchase directly from the farm may choose to require a GAPs audit. If you are purchasing produce through a distributor, the distributor usually requires farms to have a GAPs audit, and will have verification available for you to review. You may want to talk to farmers in your area to find out how many local farms are GAPs audited. If most farms in your area are not GAPs audited you may limit your buying options and competition by requiring a GAPs audit. You may still want to work with those farms to purchase produce, but it may take them some time to go through the steps to become GAPs audited. Local farmers who are not GAPs audited, but who want to sell product to the schools, may opt to conduct a self-audit of their farm using one of the checklists, such as the assessment tool available from Iowa State University. Self-assessment checklists, like the one developed by Iowa State University Extension, are designed to foster a conversation about food safety between the farmer and the buyer. School districts may give the checklist to the farmer, or make a site visit to the farm, and talk through the questions like an interview. It consists of five major areas based on Food and Drug Administration s (FDA) eight GAP principles. Visiting the farm and discussing GAPs will help the farmers to understand the importance of farm to fork safety for your schools, and may also help to strengthen your relationship. Notes to instructor: The USDA website at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/amsv1.0/gapghp has a list of farms and companies that have passed GAPs audits. You can search by location, commodity, company name and audit type. Slide 17: This list provides a few GAPs resources available. Additional information is available from your state department of agriculture or local health department. Many states also offer workshops for farmers and may have cost-share programs available through USDA grants to help farmers pay for GAPs audits. Farm-to-school organizations and other farmers already involved and implementing GAPs may provide help or training. USDA GAPs Audit Program website provides the GAPs audit checklist, a list of growers and companies that have passed a USDA GAPs audit and the USDA GAPs Audit Program User s Guide. Iowa State University Extension online store website offers a free copy of the Checklist for Retail Purchasing of Local Produce. The checklist provides a list of specific questions for retail foodservice buyers to ask growers of fresh produce.

Penn State University website provides information on GAPS, how to write a food safety plan, how to get your farm audited and other helpful resources. UC Davis Produce-Pre-harvest website provides information on GAPs, commodity specific food safety practices and GAPs training opportunities. Slide 18: GAPs Activity Notes to Instructor: Hand out the Iowa State Checklist for Retail Purchasing of Local Produce to participants or small groups of participants. You should now have an Iowa State Checklist for Retail Purchasing of Local Produce. I want you to imagine that you have gone to visit a farm that you are considering purchasing from. They do not have a GAPs audit certification, so you are going to visit and talk with the farmer to find out about their Farm Practices. We will look at a series of slides. Imagine you are seeing these things as you walk around the farm. As you show each slide, ask your class the question on the presenter notes below. Ask your participants to supply answers based on what they learned in the presentation or see on their Checklists. Make sure that you cover the key points in the Tell section, if they have not supplied the answers themselves. Once you have covered the points, move on to the next slide. Slide 19: Picture of open wellhead, over-turned bucket used to protect. Would you be concerned if you saw this while visiting a farm that supplied you with produce? If so, why? Yes, the well head is open and exposed; an over-turned bucket is being used to temporarily protect the well head. The exposed well head is vulnerable to contamination. Water is a pathogen carrier, with the exposed well head the well water may be contaminated by rain water pooling around wellhead, humans, animals, or chemicals. Well casings should be inspected at beginning of and throughout the growing season to ensure lines are clear and not likely to introduce microbial risks to crops receiving the

water. This may require repairing broken equipment. Well water should be tested routinely and treated as necessary. Slide 20: Picture of cows in pond. Would you be concerned if you saw this while visiting a farm that supplied you with produce? If so, why? Yes, surface water sources, such as ponds, lakes, rivers, reservoirs, and canals, should be assessed to determine if wildlife or adjacent land uses pose any contamination risk. Surface water is more likely to be contaminated by human and animal fecal material than ground water because it is open to the environment. Feces from animals such as cattle and deer are known to harbor pathogens including E.coli. Even if the farmer is not using this pond as his water source, this water may flood or have runoff, causing it to come into contact with other water sources and ultimately produce. Slide 21: Picture of cows grazing on hillside above crop fields. Would you be concerned if you saw this while visiting a farm that supplied you with produce? If so, why? Yes, cows grazing on hillside above crops, leaving the crops exposed to runoff. Crop fields may be contaminated by pathogens in cow manure, by rain washing manure down hillside, birds, equipment or wind spreading pathogens to crops, or wild animals spreading raw manure by walking through cow grazing area then into crop fields. Slide 22: Picture of deer in corn field. Wild animals should be restricted from growing areas. What should the farmer do if this happens?

Monitor and document animal activity in the field and conduct a field assessment before harvesting the field. If animal feces are found in the field workers should not harvest crop in that part of the field. The farmer should also take preventative measures to prevent the deer from entering in the future. Slide 23: Picture of flooded corn field. Is this land suitable for growing crops? Maybe. You need to ask the grower if the land is frequently flooded. They should be able to answer this question and provide documentation of when the land was previously flooded if this is the case. It may be that the field has never flooded before, or rarely floods (once every 100 years). Flooding is the flowing or overflowing of a field with water outside a grower s control. Pooled water, after a rainfall that is not reasonably likely to cause contamination of produce is not considered flooding. Flood water could be contaminated with raw sewage, farm run-off or other contaminants, so if the farm floods frequently, it is probably not suitable land for growing crops. To avoid these risks, do not eat produce that has come in contact with flood water. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that if the edible portion of the crop is exposed to flood waters, it is considered adulterated and should not be sold for human consumption. Slide 24: Picture of harvest tote directly on ground. Would you be concerned if you saw this while visiting a farm that supplied you with produce? If so, why? Yes, harvest tote is directly on the ground. Harvest totes are considered food contact surfaces that come in direct contact with produce and should be kept clean. Dirt caked on the bottom of tote may contaminate produce when totes are stacked on top of each other. Slide 25:

Picture of pick-up truck delivery of local peaches. Would you be concerned if you received your delivery of peaches from this truck? If so, why? There is probably no reason for concern. This produce is loaded in back of an enclosed pick-up truck so that it is not exposed to the elements and potential contamination. The truck bed is clean. Peaches are picked in the morning, when it is cooler and packed in new, clean baskets. The peaches are then loaded and delivered to the school. They seem to be packed in a way that will minimize the risk of physical damage. Even though these local farmers are using a different transportation method than you might be used to, it doesn t mean that it is not safe. The peaches will be served the next day. Peaches that travel short distances and will be used next day do not need to be refrigerated. If peaches were shipped from a further distance or will be stored for 1-5 weeks then they should be kept refrigerated at 32 F to maintain maximum product quality. Slide 26: Picture of workers taking a break in the field. Would you be concerned if you saw this while visiting a farm that supplied you with produce? If so, why? Yes, workers are sitting in the field and on harvest containers eating. There needs to be a designated area away from the production area for the workers to eat and smoke to avoid produce contamination. Slide 27: Picture of workers harvesting romaine. Would you be concerned if you saw this while visiting a farm that supplied you with produce? If so, why?

No, it appears that workers are following good hygiene practices. You need to ask the grower what they require in their food safety program. Does their plan require that workers wear clean aprons, hairnets, beard nets, arm/sleeve protectors and gloves, reusable or disposable? If gloves are used, workers should wash hands before putting on gloves. Gloves, arm/sleeve protectors and aprons should be removed and hung up or placed on a clean surface when workers go on break or to use the toilet. It is recommended that when you visit a farm to verify their food safety program that you observe the workers and watch when they take a break. Do they wash their hands as required? Do they remove their gloves, aprons and arm/sleeve protectors before using the toilet? Where do they put their gloves, aprons and arm/sleeve protectors while on break? Slide 28: In summary, GAPs help farmers provide safer food. GAPs minimize food safety risks. Work positively with your local farmers to help them understand why on-farm food safety practices are important to the success of your school s purchasing program and the safety of your students. Thank you for your participation. That concludes our presentation on Good Agricultural practices.