Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost. Project 1 Treatment Cost

Similar documents
Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project

Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project

Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project. Water Treatment Project

Review For Final Exam. Review For Final Exam

Rectangular Basin = Volume, gal (Length, ft) x (Width, ft) x (Height, ft) x7.48 gal/cu.ft.

Water Treatment Math

Water Treatment Math

Water Treatment. Water Treatment. Water Treatment. Water Treatment. CIVL 1101 Introduction to Filtration 1/15

Oregon Operators Conference Operator Math Workshop Module II

How Far Can You Push Your Filters? Optimization Lessons

MATHEMATICS FOR WATER OPERATORS

1 American Water College

CEE 371 Water and Wastewater Systems

Start and Finish Dates: You will have 90 days from this date in order to complete this course

VWEA Operations Challenge Roanoke, VA July 14, 2016

Amherst, MA, Drinking Water System

Math for Water Operators

ADVANCED WATERWORKS MATHEMATICS

ADVANCED WATERWORKS MATHEMATICS

Lake County WTP Improvements and Capacity Increase. OTCO 9 th Annual Water and Wastewater Workshop. Nick Pizzi Aqua Serv

EW-90 MONTHLY OPERATIONAL REPORT DATA INSTRUCTION SHEET

DW Module 21: Chemical Addition Answer Key- Revised Oct 2015

ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION. BOD5 mg/l mg/l TSS mg/l mg/l NH3-N mg/l mg/l

THIS POLICY DOES NOT HAVE THE FORCE OF LAW

Do Son Water Treatment Plant Hai Phong, Vietnam

AALSO Proficiency Program Level I, II & III

Introduction. Spokane River DO TMDL: Proposed Restrictions. Waste Load Allocation: Based on 50µg/l Total P - Seasonal (Mar Oct) for final TMDL

Renovation of the Filters at the Soldier Canyon Filter Plant in Fort Collins, Colorado

Utility Partner Data Report

Understanding Pretreatment. WesTech Engineering, Inc. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Dipti Shah, Town of Gilbert Tuesday, January 25, 2011

THE CURRENT USE OF HOLLOW FIBRE ULTRAFILTRATION AS PRE-TREATMENT FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS

CE 370. Filtration. Overview of the Process Location in the Treatment Plant

Water Utility Science Water Math and Hydraulics 050. Name: Date:

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

Seasonal Source Water Quality and Treatment Challenges Town of Newburgh s Chadwick Lake Filtration Plant

AALSO Summary of Formulas needed for Levels I, II and III.

HIGH RATE TREATMENT AS PART OF THE SOLUTION FOR WET WEATHER FLOWS JUNE

Comparing Carbons for Disinfection Byproduct Control. Maggie H. Pierce, EI Sara N. Gibson, PE Mark M. Bishop, PE David S.

AIR SCOUR DEMONSTRATES FILTER PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS IN QUEEN LANE WATER TREATMENT PLANT

9. The specific gravity of water at 10 C (50 F) at sea level is a. 100 b. 10 c d

We Know Water. Hydrotech Discfilter Pure Performance WATER TECHNOLOGIES

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MATHEMATICS

Environmental Engineering I Jagadish Torlapati, PhD Fall 2017 MODULE 3 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CONTROL PARAMETERS QS = VX F M

Water Treatment Exam Review - Grade 3 Course Syllabus

Reclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology

MONTHLY OPERATION REPORT (MOR)--ALL WATER SYSTEMS

Concentration-Time (CT) Assessment Theory and Application Examples. Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Utility Partner Data Report

BASIC MATH HANDBOOK. For Class I & II Water Operators

Comparison of Three Wet Weather Flow Treatment Alternatives to Increase Plant Capacity

WEFTEC.06. Lake Okeechobee, Actiflo, peroxone, surface water, Cyanobacteria

GRADE 1. MULTIPLE CHOICE 2-POINTS EACH Add how many missed in questions 1-55, multiply by 2 =

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

Introduction to Water Distribution Pomona FairPlex July 2008 Day 8. Math. Student Handbook. CW Wulff Associates

MWUA 92 nd Annual February Meeting & Trade Show

Sulfur Modified Iron: A Versatile Media for Ex Situ Water Treatment

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

TREATMENT PLANT OPERATOR TRAINEE Examination Study Guide

FILTERS. specifically designed for Ballast Water Treatment TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. Vol. 2

Evaluation of Wastes from the East St. Louis Water Treatment Plant and Their Impact on the Mississippi River

Industrial Pretreatment WT - Intakes

Iron/Manganese Package Plant Pre-Engineered Ground Water Treatment. Village of Bolivar, NY

Pacific Northwest Clean Water Association. Water Reuse A multifaceted resource

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) FLEXSTORM Inlet Filter

NELSONVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS

PERMIT TO OPERATE SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA TELEPHONE (831) FAX (831)

ENVE EXAM II Help Session DCC pm

Rinconada Water Treatment Plant Reliability Improvement Project (RIP) Filter Pilot Study

Settled Sewage. Tap Water. CaO. Pond Effluents 23 M 95 M

DW Module 22 Inorganic Removal Basics Answer Key

PUR-1241 ADDENDUM NO. 2 INVITATION TO BID GREENSAND FILTER SYSTEM AT ELK RIDGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT

Trident. Package Water Treatment System

Summary of Flint s Implementation of Veolia s Recommendations

St. John the Baptist Parish

Water Treatment Plant Phase 1 Upgrades CMAR Selection Pre-Submittal Meeting

SECTION 6.0 DESIGN CRITERIA, LAYOUTS, & HYDRAULICS

Georgia Power Plant McDonough-Atkinson NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised May 2018

City of Loveland Water System

Dave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc.

Dave Diehl Applied Technologies, Inc.

City of Enderby Water Treatment Plant

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER FROM WASTEWATER EFFLUENT: PILOT TEST EXPERIENCE AT THE MIAMI DADE SOUTH DISTRICT WWTP

FUNDAMENTALS OF GRANULAR MEDIA FILTRATION. Gordon Williams, PhD, PE East Bay Municipal Utility District

CoHemis International Conference Green Communities June

A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation (CPE) Approach to Addressing HABs

Preparing for Technical Training: Essential Skills for Water/Wastewater Operators

Preparing for Technical Training: Essential Skills for Water/Wastewater Operators

Compressible Media Filter (Schreiber Fuzzy Filter)

CEE 371 Water and Wastewater Systems

Pilot Testing and Evaluation of Three Filtration Technologies for the Eugene / Springfield Wastewater Treatment Plant

CEE 371 May 14, 2009 Final Exam

April 2008 USE DESIGNATIONS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. for

Ohio Section AWWA NW District Fall Meeting April 20, City of Delaware Water Plant Improvements

DRINKING WATER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATON

BSEN Wastewater Final Report. Aquaponics Design. Group leader: Olivia Elliott. Group members: Elizabeth Bankston, Ann Nunnelley, Eric Vogt

IMPACT OF CALCIUM HYDROXIDE ON THE EQUIPMENT AND PROCESS OF OIL SANDS TAILINGS TREATMENT

Filter Inspection and Optimization Case Studies

CEE484 Decentralized and Onsite Wastewater Management and Reuse. Homework Assignment #6 Due in class on May 16, 2007

FORMULAS - MANITOBA CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS (Revised January 2006) AREAS CIRCUMFERENCE VOLUMES

Transcription:

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems 1/ The objective of this project is to utilize, within given constraints, a prototype water filter system to design a full-scale system. The effectiveness of the filter design will be evaluated by the yearly operational and maintenance costs. Group Problem - Treatment Consider a prototype system with the following characteristics: 1. coagulant dosage of mg/l. flowrate 1,000 ml/min 3. run time of 60 minutes 4. inches of anthracite and 4 inches of filter sand. replace filter material once every five years 6. 4 prototype sedimentation tanks Compute the total yearly cost of this system The weight of coagulant (kg) required per gallon of treated water is estimated as: mg 3.8 L kg wt kg c = gal 6 L gallon 10 mg 9.4610 kg gal The number of coagulation and flocculation units, NCF, required are: 0% Factor of Safety NCF 10 (gpd) 10 gpd 6 1. NCF 4.8 or units The total yearly cost of the coagulation and flocculation system for 0 MGD is: $,000 CF year - kg 10 gal 36 days $0.40 9.46 10 gal day year kg $401,30 Step 1 - Compute the prototype sediment tank retention time t p. tp 3 gallon Volumetank 360 in. 1.6 gallons 3 31in. Four tanks are in operation 41.6gallons ml L gallon 1,000 minute 1000ml 3.8 L 3.6 min

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems / Step - The full-scale treatment flowrate Q ST (gpm) per sedimentation tanks is: Step 3 - The effective flowrate Q SE (gpm) in a sedimentation tank is:,000 gallons QST 3,1 gpm 3.6 min Q SE 60 minutes 3,1 gpm 90 minutes,11 gpm Step 4 - The number of full-scaled sedimentation tanks, NS, required to handle the daily volume is estimated as: 0% increase for cleaning 10 gpd day NS 1.,11 (gpm) The operation and maintenance costs per tanks is $3,000/tanks The yearly costs per sediment tank is: $3,000 S 8 tanks tank.8 tanks or 8 tanks $80,000 Step 1 - Convert the average flowrate through the prototype filter (the 3. inch diameter prototype filter has an area of 0.0668 ) into a prototype filter loading rate Q F (gpm/ ). Q F 1,000mL L gallon 1 minute 1,000mL 3.8 L 0.0668 Step - The full-scale treatment flowrate Q FT is: QFT gpm 3.9 1,000 3,9 gpm 3.9gpm /

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems 3/ Step 3 - Considering that each filter is inoperable during backwashing, the effective flowrate Q E is: Step 4 - The number of full-scaled filters NF required to handle the daily volume is estimated as: Q FE 60 minutes 3,9 gpm 90 minutes,63 gpm 0% increase for backwashing 10 gpd day NF 1.,63 gpm 6.3 filters or filters The yearly cost per filter is: The yearly cost for anthracite is: Material replaced every years $,000 F filters filter $,000 FM A $9.0 NF in. 3 1,000 1 in. The yearly cost for filter sand is: FM S $.90 NF 4in. 3 1,000 1 in. $,1 $,3 $4,90 FM Total Treatment System Total Treatment System Total $401,30 $80,000 $,000 $4,90 Coagulation Sedimentation Filtration Filtration Media Total $1,11,

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems 4/ Group Problem - Treatment How would your cost change if you increased your flowrate to 1,100 ml/min and remaining variables were: 1. coagulant dosage of mg/l. run time of 60 minutes 3. inches of anthracite and 4 inches of filter sand 4. replace filter material once every five years. 4 prototype sedimentation tanks The weight of coagulant (kg) required per gallon of treated water is estimated as: mg 3.8 L kg wt kg c = gal 6 L gallon 10 mg 9.4610 kg gal Compute the total yearly cost of this system The number of coagulation and flocculation units, NCF, required are: 0% Factor of Safety 10 gpd 6 1. NCF 10 (gpd) The total yearly cost of the coagulation and flocculation system for 0 MGD is: $,000 CF year - kg 10 gal 36 days $0.40 9.46 10 gal day year kg NCF 4.8 or units $401,30 Step 1 - Compute the prototype sediment tank retention time t p. tp 3 gallon Volumetank 360 in. 1.6 gallons 3 31in. Four tanks are in operation 41.6gallons ml L gallon 1,100 minute 1000ml 3.8 L 1.4 min Step - The full-scale treatment flowrate Q ST (gpm) per sedimentation tanks is:,000 gallons QST 3,493 gpm 1.4 min

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems / Step 3 - The effective flowrate Q SE (gpm) in a sedimentation tank is: Q SE 60 minutes 3,493 gpm 90 minutes,39 gpm Step 4 - The number of full-scaled sedimentation tanks, NS, required to handle the daily volume is estimated as: 0% increase for cleaning 10 gpd day NS 1.,39 (gpm).16 tanks or 8 tanks The operation and maintenance costs per tanks is $3,000/tanks The yearly costs per sediment tank is: $3,000 S 8 tanks tank Step 1 - Convert the average flowrate through the prototype filter (the 3. inch diameter prototype filter has an area of 0.0668 ) into a prototype filter loading rate Q F (gpm/ ). Q F 1,100mL L gallon 1 minute 1,000mL 3.8 L 0.0668 $80,000 4.31gpm / Step - The full-scale treatment flowrate Q FT is: QFT gpm 4.31 1,000 4,31gpm Step 3 - Considering that each filter is inoperable during backwashing, the effective flowrate Q E is: Q FE 60 minutes 4,31 gpm 90 minutes,900 gpm

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems 6/ Step 4 - The number of full-scaled filters NF required to handle the daily volume is estimated as: 0% increase for backwashing 10 gpd day NF 1.,900 gpm. filters or 6 filters The yearly cost per filter is: $,000 F 6filters filter $40,000 Decrease of one filter From 1,000 ml/min flowrate The yearly cost for anthracite is: The yearly cost for filter sand is: FM A FM S Material replaced every years $9.0 NF in. 3 1,000 1 in. $.90 NF 4in. 3 1,000 1 in. $1,900 $,360 $4,60 FM Total Treatment System Total $401,30 $80,000 $40,000 $4,60 Coagulation Sedimentation Filtration Filtration Media Total Treatment System Total $1,13,6 Comparison of Treatment System Flowrate (ml/min) 1,000 1,100 Flocculation $401,30 $401,30 Sedimentation $80,000 $80,000 Filtration $9,90 $44,60 Total $1,11, $1,13,6

CIVL 111 Water Treatment - Yearly OM Problems / Comparison of Treatment System Comparison of Treatment System What if we plotted the cost of the system for various coagulant dosages and flowrates? What would you expect? Flowrate Any questions?