N Sentinel: Nitrogen Monitoring for Higher Yields and Greater Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Similar documents
Re-evaluating Phosphorus and Potassium Management for Soybeans

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Cropping System Nutrient Management

Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

2013 Research Report Impact of Cover Crops and Field Corn Stover Removal on Squash Yield.

Nitrogen dynamics of standard and enhanced urea in corn

Nitrogen Rate Determination for Winter Wheat. Maximizing the Yield of Winter Wheat. Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

Agricultural Sources of Biomass

Utilizing farmers changed nitrogen application technologies to demonstrate improved nutrient management practices year 2

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

EVALUATION OF ADAPT-N IN THE CORN BELT. Introduction

wheat N small plot and OFT studies

Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Interpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water

Precision Ag. Back to Basics

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Soil Health & Conservation Strategies. Andrew Barrie OMAFRA Nov 15, 2016

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

Evaluation of Organic Corn and Popcorn Varieties and Fertilization

Phosphorus and Potassium Recommendations for Illinois Crops

Institute of Ag Professionals

Applying Dairy Lagoon Water to Alfalfa

2007 PMR REPORT #ECORSMI2 SECTION E: CEREAL, FORAGE CROPS, and OILSEEDS - Insects

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

COVER CROPS RESEARCH UPDATE. Matt Ruark Ken Albrecht A.J. Bussan Mack Naber Jim Stute Kevin Shelly Heidi Johnson

Nitrogen & Nutrient Strategies for 2014

To 4R or Not to 4R Is There an Option?

Timing of Foliar Applications

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Managing Nitrogen for Corn. Jim Camberato Dan Emmert Bob Nielsen Brad Joern

Sidedress. trogen Uptake. Seasonal Nit. 80% of requirement after V8-10

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Cover Crop Economics. The green behind the green. Jim Stute Rock County UWEX

Mineralization of Nitrogen from Compost

FERTILIZATION AND COVER CROP INTERACTIONS FOR STRIP-TILL COTTON

Nitrogen mangement for organic potatoes. Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

EVALUATION OF THE ILLINOIS SOIL NITROGEN TEST IN THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION i. Abstract. Introduction

2014 Winter Canola Soil Preparation x Fertility Timing Trial

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Use of Pre-sidedress Nitrogen Tests (PSNTs) to Understand Nitrogen Availability after Incorporation of Cover Crops on Vegetable Farms

Fertility requirements for peas and alternative crops. Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

Agricumbia Study. Two Year Fertilization Study of Two Bermudagrass Cultivars. Summary: First Year Results:

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

Recordkeeping Manure and Fertilizer. Marilyn L. Thelen, Educator MSU Extension

Organic Systems Trial. Advisory Group Meeting 2008

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Nutrient Management of Forages and Legumes Crop Pest Management School Bozeman, January 6, 2010

Nitrogen BMPs for horticultural crop production Tim Hartz UC Davis

Sunflower Seeding Rate x Nitrogen Rate Trial Report

Using Nitrate-N Petiole Sap-Testing for Better Nitrogen Management in Vegetable Crops

2015 Vegetable Fertility Management Trial

Liquid Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

On Farm Assessment of Critical Soil Test Phosphorus and Potassium Values in Minnesota. AFREC Year 4 Summary Report 8/31/2014 for

ORGANIC VEGETABLE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

Urea Volatilization and Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers for Small Grains Crop Pest Management School January 6, 2011

Nutrient Management Conference Feb. 7, 2017, St. Cloud, MN Rick Gilbertson Pro Ag Crop Consultants, Inc.

Understanding Salt Index of Fertilizers. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations

SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN FERTILIZER REGIMES FOR SNAP BEANS IN VIRGINIA

University of California Cooperative Extension Kings County Small Grain News. Volume V, Issue 1 March 2008

Michigan Dairy Review

Water and Nitrogen BMPs for Tomato and Watermelon: Water Quality and Economics 1

SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED SPRING WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. B. D. Brown University of Idaho, Parma Research and Extension Center

2017 Farm Management Competition Banquet Report

Sampling, Nutrient Analysis, and Recommendations

Land Application of Biosolids Rules, Regulations and Benefits EPA regulations, under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503 (40 CFR 503) -

Resources Conservation Practices Tillage, Manure Management and Water Quality

Improving Crop Input Use Efficiency Through Use Of Precision Ag Tools John Shanahan, Agronomy Research Manager

Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.

Minnesota Wheat Check- Off

Copper on Winter Wheat Project

2016 Management Yield Potential

Brian Lang, Extension Agronomist, Iowa State University; Kenneth Pecinovsky, Farm Superintendent, Iowa State University Northeast Research Farm

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

La venue de ce conférencier a été rendue possible grâce au soutien financier du ministère de l Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l Alimentation

Nitrogen Transformation Inhibitors and Controlled Release Urea

SF723 (Revised) Barley

Reduced Rates of Residual Herbicides with Burndown Products Perform Well with Conventional Corn Hybrids

Keeping it Green and Growing: An Aerial Seeding Concept

Cover crops, tillage and soil quality. Dr. Joel Gruver WIU Agriculture

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

N and P Placement and Timing of Dryland Winter Wheat Varieties K. J. Larson and L. Herron 1

Business Planning and Economics of Forage Establishment and Cost of Production in Nova Scotia

Is the soybean N credit real? Indiana CCA Conference Indianapolis, December 12, 2017

Determining Fertilizer Formulations

Proceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. philosophy/approach for determining N rate guidelines for corn.

Advanced Crop Science, IV-23

Transcription:

N Sentinel: Nitrogen Monitoring for Higher s and Greater Nitrogen Use Efficiency Purpose: Ontario corn farmers continue to apply the majority of the crops nitrogen (N) needs prior to planting as a broadcast and worked in application of urea and to a lesser extent urea ammonium nitrate (UAN). Little if any management decisions other than yield goal target are used in the selection of N rates. Significant advancements in nitrogen management can be made if we improve upon the current tools used for estimating fertilizer N requirements (Corn N Calculator, Pre- Sidedress Nitrate Testing, manure nutrient analysis, etc.) This improvement can be made by addressing the seasonal or weather impacts on both soil nitrogen supply and crop demand. In previous years OMAFRA Field Crop Unit staff in partnership with producers, agribusiness and SGS labs has conducted an annual one day survey of soil N levels across the province. While this has been of value to a range of users, the single day nature of the soil N levels has limited use as a single point in time measurement when soil N dynamics change quickly with time and climatic conditions. The ongoing intensive monitoring of soil N levels over the early-mid growing season at a number of dedicated locations with up to the minute weather reporting to enable the soil N results to be explained in relation to the weather was thought to be a better way to assess soil N dynamics. Methods: The key elements of this 3 year project include: A) 20 N Monitoring Fields 1. Establish a network of 20 Nitrogen Monitoring Fields across the province that will serve as a gauge for growers to evaluate how seasonal forces are influencing nitrogen requirements. 2. Use multiple soil nitrate sampling dates to more accurately reflect soil N supply at these sites 3. Use detailed weather information to validate N status and crop demands, (i.e. previous research indicated that if growers maintained accurate rainfall records for each corn field from April 10 to June 10 significant adjustments to N rates could be made that enhanced profitability and nitrogen balance). B) Website for Real Time N Monitoring 4. Post all of the project information on the internet for growers to do real-time evaluations of N status and recommendations at these various sites C) Evaluate New OMFRA Recommendation Tools 1

5. Allow growers to evaluate the new OMAFRA recommendation tool which for the first time (March 2015 launch) will integrate the N Calculator with a revised Soil Nitrate testing procedure. 6. The 20 N Monitoring Fields will include various N rates and yield responses to be able conduct end-of-season evaluations on the accuracy of recommendations. In 2015, 8 sites were established in collaboration with UG Corn Research Groups at Ridgetown, Guelph and Winchester. Two replicate treatments of zero and non-yieldlimiting N rate were applied for two hybrids. The required treatments were added to the Ontario Corn Committee (OCC) Corn Performance Trials. Weather INNovations (WIN) of Chatham Ontario partnered on the project and installed automatic weather stations at each location to record weather data continuously over the season. Soil samples were collected from each zero N plot at each location on a biweekly basis starting in mid may. Eight cores were collected to a depth of 30cm (12 ), composited well and packed into soil sample boxes from SGS Labs. Samples were kept cool during transport, held in cooled storage overnight and submitted to SGS labs for nitrate and ammonium assessment. Results: Soil N rates varied widely by location and time during the sampling period. Alma and Exeter values are higher then one would expect (Table 1). Alma was do to an application error where the test area received commercial fertilizer application when it wasn t supposed to. At Exeter, the site was previously winter wheat with a good crop of red clover that was plowed down and obviously supplied added mineralized N. Table 1. Soil N Concentration (ppm) by Timing and Crop Stage Over Location Soil Nitrate Sampling Timing 1 2 3 4 5 Date Range by Site May 1-7 May 21-29 June 4 June 11 June 23-25 Leaf Over Corn Stage Pre-emerge 1-4 4-7 7-8 10-12 Location -------------------------- soil nitrate (ppm) -------------------------- Alma 22.9 19.4 19.5 24.6 64.9 Belmont 11.2 20.0 18.0 19.5 13.7 Dresden 8.7 8.7 36.6 13.5 Elora 9.2 12.2 13.0 21.0 13.7 Exeter 5.3 26.6 19.6 24.1 18.0 Ridgetown 9.3 12.3 25.2 13.2 Waterloo 4.8 9.1 10.5 13.0 8.6 In general note the trend of low initial soil N ppm levels and then building with time, temperature and moisture as the spring progressed. Also note that wet weather in June appears to have reduced the soil N supply towards the later part of the month, just when the crop is really in need of ready access to this nutrient. 2

Table 2a+b. N s and Responses with Delta Estimates and MERNs by Location by Two Hybrids Location Hybrid Hybrid A Nitrogen Corn Delta Response Delta DY N Rec ------ lb-n/ac ------ ----------- yield (bu/ac) ----------- lb-n/ac Alma DKC38-03 13 170 206 238 32 98 Belmont Maizex MZ4107SMX 10 208 160 232 72 140 Dresden Maizex MZ 4525 SMX 10 213 167 272 105 169 Elora DKC38-03 7 170 152 222 70 134 Exeter Maizex MZ4107SMX 10 190 191 217 26 86 Ridgetown Maizex MZ 4525 SMX 10 206 170 250 81 147 Waterloo MZ3484SMX 7 200 115 247 132 189 Location Hybrid Hybrid B Nitrogen Corn Delta Response Delta DY N Rec ------ lb-n/ac ------ ----------- yield (bu/ac) ----------- lb-n/ac Alma P9188AM 13 170 193 219 26 89 Belmont Pride A7270G8 10 208 177 230 54 121 Dresden Pioneer P0216AM 10 213 160 247 87 153 Elora P9188AM 7 170 128 187 59 124 Exeter Pride A7270G8 10 190 193 235 41 107 Ridgetown Pioneer P0216AM 10 206 140 251 112 175 Waterloo P9224AM 7 200 116 229 112 173 3

Table 2 summarizes the fertility levels and yield responses observed at each site. The low N plots at each location had less than 15 lbsn/ac of applied fertilizer N. The non yield limiting fertilizer rate ranged from 170 to 213 blsn/ac. Note the wide range in yield response between the low and high N treatments by location. This highlights the site specific nature of N needs by location, soil type, previous crop and other factors. It suggests that the use of a standard N application rate across all fields is not likely to be economically or environmentally a sound practice. N rates need to be carefully considered for each field situation each year. In interpreting the results note the Delta yield difference between the low and high N rate plot yields. The greater this number the higher the response to N fertilization and the greater the MERN rate of N that is needed to maximize economic returns. Where there is less yield difference between the low and high N rate plots suggests that the natural N pool is contributing a significant amount of available N to the growing crop and thus the response to added commercial N will not be as great. Weather data from automated weather stations was summarized and reported by WIN. An example of the data provided is shown in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 reports temperature and rainfall deviations from the long term average weather data by site. As an example at the Dresden location note the cool June and July and the wet mid June to early July period which likely reduced mineralizable N levels in the soil during this period. Figure 1. Weather Data Collected by Site Automated Weather Station Figure 2 as an example again from Dresden, points out the wet soil conditions in Early July but he steady accumulation of ET despite the weather. 4

Figure 3. Rainfall and Accumulated Evapotranspiration By Site for Growing Season 2015 Summary: Weather is obviously an important variable in impacting the amount of mineralizable N available to the growing corn crop and impacts the amount of commercial fertilizer N that must be supplemented to meet crops needs. The expansion of sites and a better feel for the operational aspects of the project should see a more complete storey evolve over the next two years. Next Steps: This project will continue in 2016 and 2017, expanding from the 2015 8 sites to 20 sites with ongoing weather monitoring and soil N sampling. Acknowledgements: Thank you to GFO for supporting this research and the teams at UG Ridgetown, Guelph and Winchester for their work on plot establishment, N application, and crop harvest. Further thank you to the WIN group for weather data monitoring. Project Contacts: Ian McDonald, OMAFRA, ian.mcdonald@ontario.ca Ben Rosser, OMAFRA, ben.rosser@ontario.ca Ken Janovicek, UG, kjanovic@uoguelph.ca Location of Project Final Report: 5