PEI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM MINISTRY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Similar documents
Employee Performance Review

Performance Planning and Development Annual Review Form

Signet s FY 2016/2017 Performance Appraisal Guide. Dallas Field

EMPLOYEE NAME PERIOD COVERED DATE OF PLANNING DATE OF REVIEW JOB TITLE DIV./DEPT. SECTION/UNIT SUPERVISOR

BUDGET ANALYST COMPETENCY PROFILE

Performance Review and Development Guide

Commendable Satisfactory Needs Improvement

JOB DESCRIPTION Branch Operations Supervisor September 2017

COURSE CATALOG. vadoinc.net

MINISTRY OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE, INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING VACANCY NOTICE

Australian Government Department of Human Services

SVP/Chief Information Officer Executive President and CEO Exempt

COMPETENCY PROFILE FOR THE PROFESSIONALS AND TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS GROUP

Manager, Supervisor & CEMA Skill Set Model County of Santa Clara

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS PMP FORM

CAMPUS ADVANTAGE INC. Job Description. JOB TITLE: Corporate Intern

8.Performance Appraisal 1. Performance Appraisal Objectives of Performance Appraisal 2.Advantages of Performance Appraisal Promotion: Compensation:

20 Annual Performance Review

Annual Self Performance Review

Classified Employee Performance Rubric

BOARD CHARTER TOURISM HOLDINGS LIMITED

(Critical) Manages aircraft fleet schedule to maximize aircraft availability and coordinate maintenance scheduling.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS)

Prepared for: Joe Sample 2/2/15

Executive Recruitment Director Application Pack

Conducting a Recruitment and Selection Process Sample Tools, Templates and Operating Guidelines

JOB DESCRIPTION VP of Branch Member Experience September 2017

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA Employee Performance Management System

Ready, Willing and Able The front line change readiness model

Hafan Cymru Job Description

University Human Resources Performance Development Toolkit October 2016

Performance Appraisal

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

MANAGER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENT

OUR PEOPLE, OUR STRENGTH

Job Description Operations Pastor/Director

Research Manager/ Economist (RME1602)

CUNY Evaluation Memorandum - HEO Series

ON-CAMPUS STUDENT EMPLOYMENT SUPERVISOR HANDBOOK A UTEP EDGE EXPERIENCE

Instruction Manual. May 2017 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

Business Improvement District (BID) Manager (Sheffield City Centre)

Performance Feedback and Work Environment Survey

State Technical College of Missouri Job Description

LSUHSC-SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND REVIEW FORM

The Concepts: Team Management Systems

DTR9274O1HJ/TGDTRm5Xgw33Z. Department Survey Sample Department

RESPONDANT: MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REVIEW

OPPORTUNITY PROFILE. Senior Advisor & Council Relations

Job Description: Operations Manager September 2017

December A course in Leadership Development

Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop

Central Kitchen Manager

ICT Support Officer Education and Training Boards Ireland (ETBI) Candidate Information Leaflet

A SUPERVISOR S GUIDE TO THE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM

Assistant Director of Alumni Relations Brownwood, Texas

Ministry of Finance Comptroller General Victoria, BC

Claims/Operations Supervisor One Sitting Assessment Fact Sheet

Providing Pathways to Housing House 1262 Sutton Way, Grass Valley, California (530) hhshelter.org

New York State University Police Police Lieutenant Annual Performance Appraisal Instructions

Job Description. Housing Coordinator Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCVP)

ELECTORAL COMMISSION. Staff Appraisal Form for Officers

University Executive Directive #11-07 Issue Date: May 16, Subject: Management Personnel Plan Revision Date: Approved: President

STAFF SERVICES MANAGER II (SUPERVISORY) STAFF SERVICES MANAGER II (MANAGERIAL) DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTIONAL STATEWIDE

INTERPRETATIVE REPORT

CHAPTER 11 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT EVALUATION SECTION 1 - GENERAL

Advisory Board Members: Sample Board Evaluation Best Buddies Board Evaluation

Internal Audit Policy and Procedures Internal Audit Charter

Executive Council BUSINESS PLAN

Performance Evaluation Form: Goal Setting - Performance Management - Performance Feedback

Performance Management and Evaluation System Manual. Carroll County, Virginia

BOC HONG KONG (HOLDINGS) LIMITED. Mandate of the Remuneration Committee

Head of Public Engagement and Communications

Internal Management Consulting Competency Model Taxonomy

Medford Housing Authority Executive Director Profile Background on the MHA Organizational Design and Governance The Executive Director

YAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS (YBBBS) CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

EMPLOYEE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

CAREER TRACKS. Supervisor Toolkit. FAQ: For Managers

Implementation Guides

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PMS)

Health, Counselling & Disability Services. How to Make the Most out of Your Supervisory Relationship: Advice from Supervisors & Graduate Students

COMPETENCY MODEL FOR SENIOR STREET SERVICES INVESTIGATOR (4285)

Informal observations may occur anytime, formal observations will be scheduled in advance.

Welcome to RULE. The recruitment agency that attracts the best

Mentoring Guidelines and Ideas

WHY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT MATTERS. Kathy Bowersox

This position is in the Joint Office of Strategic Planning. This position is for the Medical School Campus.

Support Supervisor One Sitting Assessment Fact Sheet

SUPERVISE PEOPLE HOW TO THE COMPLETE COURSE ON. We re. coming. to your. Attend and you ll learn how to

DTR72KXREB7/TGDTRN24PERe. Sample Organization Sample Organization

CHAPTER 8. Board-superintendent roles and responsibilities BOARD AND SUPERINTENDENT RESPONSIBILITIES

Head of Finance, Governance and Risk Management in the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) Assistant Director (Professional Accountant Grade I)

Functional Job Code: MGROFGLMACONTINEDUCA Last Modified Date: 02/15/2018 Exemption Status: Exempt Pricing Method: Internal

Candidate Profile for the Position of Chief Financial Officer * * * *

&sharedwin...

OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD (For use in the development of supply chain related job descriptions, performance evaluations, career development plans, etc.

LE MOYNE COLLEGE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT PROCESS

FIRE CHIEF RECRUITMENT BROCHURE

State Compensation Insurance Fund CAREER EXECUTIVE ASSIGNMENT JOB EXAMINATION ANNOUNCEMENT. Senior Vice President of Customer Experience

Mentoring program guidelines

Transcription:

PEI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM MINISTRY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PURPOSE: The Employee Performance Review & Professional Development Plan is a participatory process between the employee and his/her supervisor that allows feedback on employee performance. It links the individual s work plans and performance to the organization s mission and strategic plan. It is a tool to facilitate: a) enhanced communication between the employee and supervisor; b) recognition of employees accomplishments; c) increased accountability through record of performance; d) identification of a professional development plan; and e) joint problem solving in areas requiring improvement. Ideally, feedback is an ongoing process. INSTRUCTIONS: The Employee Performance Review & Professional Development Plan is made up of four parts plus an Evaluation Guide for Performance Reviews. Part 1 is the Employee Performance Review which appraises the employee s performance (and skills/knowledge) in achieving results in areas where the employee has responsibility in meeting specific goals which relate to the overall mission and goals of the Development and Technology Ministry. Part 2 is the Employee Work Plan which outlines the goals and expected results to be achieved over the next performance cycle. The goals should be stated in measurable terms. Part 3 is the Professional Development Plan which identifies areas of training and development to be completed by the employee over the next period which will help them achieve their work plan goals as well as his/her career development interests. Part 4 is the Interview Summary Report which includes comments by both the employee and evaluator as well as a recommendation for a merit/step increase or classification review if applicable. The supervisor/evaluator and the employee meet to review and complete the Employee Performance Review & Professional Development Plan. Parts 1 to 3 can be completed individually and/or jointly by the employee and the evaluator prior to the meeting, depending on the format preferred. Upon completion, Part 4 is completed and signed. A copy is given to the employee and the signed original shall be forwarded to Human Resources. The Employee Work Plan and Professional Development Plan are to be reviewed and updated annually but it is recommended that the supervisor and employee agree to meet periodically throughout the year for feedback and to review progress.

PART 1 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW Employee: Position: Division: Current Classification: Step: Length of Service in Current Position: Supervisor/Evaluator: Period Covered: Leave during last fiscal year: Sick: Special: Training and Development Days: Employee s Role and Responsibilities: Major Goals: List the major goals worked on over last review period. (Set at previous review) Goal #1: Goal #2: Goal #3: Goal #4: Goal #5: Performance Appraisal: Skill/Knowledge/Behaviour Rating* Comments 1 Work planning, organization and achievement of objectives 2 Quality of work 3 Demonstrates sound judgement 4 Demonstrates the ability to gain the respect and confidence of clients/staff 5 Communicates effectively in writing 6 Communicates effectively orally 7 Demonstrates knowledge of area of expertise and uses it effectively 8 Works effectively as a team member and cooperates with supervisors and other staff 9 Overall performance Comments and/or examples of exceptional strengths, accomplishments and/or areas for development: * Ratings: 1= Excellent; 2=Above Average; 3 = Average; 4 = Needs Improvement; 5 = Unsatisfactory See Evaluation Guide for Performance Reviews for areas to consider when determining ratings.

PART 2 EMPLOYEE WORK PLAN Employee Name: The Employee Work Plan outlines goals stated in measurable terms along with expected results which are to be achieved over the next performance cycle. Complete Results Achieved for next review. The employee s goals should be in support of the mission. Goal #1: Goal #2: Goal #3: Goal #4: Goal # 5: Keep copy for ongoing reference; attach completed copy to follow up review.

PART 3 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Employee Name: Identify training and professional development interests which would help in the achievement of work plans, increase present job effectiveness and satisfaction and advance career plans. Consider technical skills, personal development opportunities, career development programs, etc. Training and Professional Development Opportunities: Course Title/Training Opportunity Description Date Completed 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Identify support to be provided by the employer.

PART 4 INTERVIEW REPORT SUMMARY Employee Name: The supervisor/evaluator must discuss with the employee the results of the Employee Performance Review and Professional Development Plan. The employee then records any comments they wish to make. This is an opportunity to get feedback from the employee about interaction with and support from the supervisor as well as for other feedback and suggestions which may contribute towards the organization/work unit running more effectively. Next, the evaluator records comments. The evaluator and employee must sign the report. A copy is given to the employee and the signed original is forwarded to Human Resources. Employee s Comments: Supervisor s/evaluator s Comments: Should the classification be reviewed? Yes No If yes, why? Has the employee successfully completed the 12 month probationary period and is recommended for permanent status? Yes No Is the employee recommended for merit/step increase, if applicable? Yes Current Salary: $ Proposed Salary: $ No Range: $ Classification Level To: $ Step: CEO Approval: Deputy Minister Approval:

EVALUATION GUIDE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS The following considerations are intended to serve as a guide in determining the most appropriate evaluation of each factor on the Employee Performance Review form: 1. Work Planning, Organization and Achievement of Objectives This factor covers the ability to plan one s own work and, for those with supervisory responsibility, the ability to plan the work of others, and the degree to which objectives are achieved. Does the employee rush into things before thinking about what they are trying to accomplish? Does the employee foresee all the main elements of a problem? Does the employee plan logical sequences of work and optimum use of staff at their disposal? available Can the employee adjust his/her plans quickly and effectively when events make a change necessary? Is the employee s work usually complete and thorough? Does the employee achieve or exceed objectives which were set? Is the employee a self-starter? 2. Quality of Work This factor assesses the degree of thoroughness and effectiveness of the work done by the employee. Does the employee usually do assigned work thoroughly or were short cuts frequently taken? Does the employee perform most assigned tasks correctly or were mistakes often made? Does the employee adhere to Corporation policies and procedures? Does the employee often have to do the same job over again due to carelessness? 3. Judgment This factor assesses the extent to which the employee exercises sound judgement. Did the employee analyze problem situations quickly and accurately and sort out the important from the unimportant? Did the employee act or react in a logical and practical manner? Did the employee usually make sound decisions when faced with the need to do so? Was the employee usually correct in estimates of how people and events would turn out? Can the employee s judgement be trusted? 4. Earning Clients Respect and Confidence This factor assesses the degree to which the employee earned client approval. The ability to do so becomes increasingly important as a person s responsibilities increase. Does the employee get along well with clients? Do clients turn to the employee for (or welcome) opinions or ideas? Does the employee annoy clients? Has the employee developed a close relationship with his/her clients? Does the employee bring new clients to the Corporation?

5. Communicating in Writing This factor assesses the employee s ability to write clearly and concisely. This is important to the Corporation, particularly at more senior levels. Is the employee s vocabulary adequate? Are the employee s reports and letters well organized and clear, or do they require considerable revision? Is the employee s judgement good concerning amount of detail required in a report or letter? 6. Communicating Orally This factor assesses the employee s ability to communicate well orally. Do people understand the employee when asked questions or given instructions? On being given information or instruction, does the employee get them correct? Does the employee talk too much? Or too little? Does the employee speak in a well ordered way or tend to ramble? 7. Technical/Professional Knowledge This factor assesses how the employee demonstrates technical and/or professional knowledge and how effectively it is used. Does the employee read relevant journals regularly to keep informed of current affairs related to the Corporation and the employee s role? Does the employee take courses and/or seminars? Does the employee effectively utilize his/her expertise in a practical way in assisting clients? 8. Effectiveness of Relationships This factor assesses the effectiveness with which the employee deals with people. Does the employee enjoy the respect of subordinates, superiors and fellow workers? Does the employee treat subordinates fairly and provide them with effective leadership? Does the employee co-operate fully with other employees? Is work coordinated with that of others when necessary? Does the employee willingly accept direction and constructive criticism from supervisor?