TABLE OF CONTENT

Similar documents
TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE OF CONTENT

GT-LPG Max SM. Maximizing LPG Recovery from Fuel Gas Using a Dividing Wall Column. Engineered to Innovate

Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes

LNG UNIT (ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINE)

Qualitative Phase Behavior and Vapor Liquid Equilibrium Core

UNIQUE DESIGN CHALLENGES IN THE AUX SABLE NGL RECOVERY PLANT

ADVANCED PROCESS CONTROL QATAR GAS ONE YEAR EXPERIENCE

EXPERIENCE WITH GDS A FIRST PRINCIPLES INFERENTIAL MODEL FOR DISTILLATION COLUMNS

GASTECH Achieving Product Specifications for Ethane through to Pentane Plus from NGL Fractionation Plants

Simple Dew Point Control HYSYS v8.6

(PROJECT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS)

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ETHANE RECOVERY PROCESSES

Performance Evaluation of Deethanizer Column Using Real Time Optimization

TKP4170 PROCESS DESIGN. PROJECT

10/2/2013. Gas CHEMICAL PLANTS AMMONIA METHANOL UTILITIES TOWN GASS SUPPLIES ENERGY INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES. Power Generation

INTRODUCTION TO SULFURIC ACID ALKYLATION UNIT PROCESS DESIGN

TABLE OF CONTENT

DESIGN AND OPERATING EXPERIENCE FOR ANADARKO S LANCASTER FACILITY

31 st International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Siófok 6 th October 2017

III.P. Recovery and utilization of waste gas in refinery facilities

Improved Amylene Alkylation Economics

Final DRAFT API TECHNICAL REPORT. Carbon Content, Sampling, & Calculation

On-purpose Olefins through CATOFIN -CATADIENE Technologies

HYSYS WORKBOOK By: Eng. Ahmed Deyab Fares.

FIRST-PRINCIPLES INFERENCE MODEL IMPROVES DEISOBUTANIZER COLUMN CONTROL

Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 88A ALKYLATION FOR MOTOR FUELS (February 1993)

Advanced Process Control: Quick and Easy Energy Savings

Hydrate Formation in Chevron Mabee Unit for NGL Recovery and CO 2 Purification for EOR. Abstract

INCREASING THE CAPACITY OF NGL RECOVERY TRAINS. Stéphane MESPOULHES XVI CONVENCIÓN INTERNACIONAL DE GAS Caracas de Mayo de 2004

Estimation of Boil-off-Gas BOG from Refrigerated Vessels in Liquefied Natural Gas Plant

Retrofit for a Gas Separation Plant by Pinch Technology

ABB MEASUREMENT & ANALYTICS ANALYTICAL MEASUREMENT. Ethylene plant production excels with the PGC1000

CCR MEG RECLAIMING TECHNOLOGY: FROM MOBILE UNITS TO THE LARGEST RECLAIMING UNIT IN THE WORLD

HOW TO SELECT BEST MEG RECOVERY UNIT s CONFIGURATION?

Influence of Process Operations on VOC and BTEX Emissions from Glycol Dehydration Units

MOLECULAR GATE TECHNOLOGY FOR (SMALLER SCALE) LNG PRETREATMENT

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

Petrochemcial Manufacturing Reports. Natural Gas Processing 502

Options for Removing Methanol from NGL in an Amine Treater Abstract. Submitted to SOGAT 2017 by:

Measurement made easy

AKAKUS OIL OPERATIONS- LIBYA Gas Utilization& Flare Emission Reduction Project

Improvement of distillation column efficiency by integration with organic Rankine power generation cycle. Introduction

PROCESSING NATURAL GAS Leontev A.A. Vladimirskiy State University named after the Stoletov brothers Vladimir, Russia

Fast Analysis of Extended Natural Gas using the New Transportable INFICON Micro GC Fusion

Flare minimisation via dynamic simulation. Amarnath Singh, Kuyen Li*, Helen H. Lou, J.R. Hopper, Hardik B. Golwala and Sandesh Ghumare

HIGH PUITY CARBON MONOXIDE FROM A FEED GAS ARNOLD KELLER AND RONALD SCHENDEL KINETICS TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA

Biobased materials and fuels via methanol The role of integration

Salt deposition in FCC gas concentration

CORROSION AND FOULING IN SULFURIC ACID ALKYLATION UNITS

WWT Two-Stage Sour Water Stripping

Vapor Pressure Best Practice. COQA June 2017 Meeting St Louis

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Production of Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether

Bitumen Upgrader Residue Conversion to Incremental Synthetic Fuels Products

Global Gasoline, Global Condensate and Global Petrochemical Markets to 2020 and How much naphtha will end up in gasoline blending?

Gas Processing. Speed. Simplicity. Efficiency Modular Gas Processing Plants

Gas Processing. Speed. Simplicity. Efficiency Modular Gas Processing Plants

CORROSION AND FOULING IN SULFURIC ACID ALKYLATION UNITS

A Comparative Study of Propane Recovery Processes

Item Hydrogen Gas Plant

PROCESS MOISTURE ANALYZERS Measuring moisture in gas or HC liquids in hazardous areas

Feasibility Study of Production of Methanol and Dimethyl Ether from Flare Gas. Abstract

Petrochemical Processing

NexantThinking PERP PROGRAM Ethylene PERP

Thomas G. Braga Manager, Research and Development. SulfaTreat, a Business Unit of M I L.L.C. A Smith/Schlumberger Company

Challenges for Processing Oil and Gas from Kazakhstan

Improving H 2 O Measurement in Catalytic Reformer Hydrogen Recycle Streams

Hydrocarbon processing Separation processes - distillation. English version based on the presentation of István Rabi, held on

Training Title GAS PROCESSING, SWEETENING & SULPHUR RECOVERY

Problems at the Cumene Production Facility, Unit 800

with Physical Absorption

EBTAX: The Conversion of Ethane to Aromatics via Catalytic Conversion

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT April 6, Guidance on Estimating Condensate and Crude Oil Loading Losses from Tank Trucks

Minimize Sulfur Pit Vent Contribution to Stack Emissions

OPTIMIZATION OF NATURAL GAS GATHERING SYSTEMS AND GAS PLANTS ABSTRACT

Polimeri Europa Olefin Plant Maximizes Benefits from Advanced Solutions

A crude oil refinery is an industrial process plant where crude oil is processed and refined into different petroleum products (i.e.

Synergies between process energy efficiency and relief loads

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Production of Cumene

CONTROL OF DISTILLATION COLUMN USING ASPEN DYNAMICS

REGULATION OF GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NO. 36/2004 ON OIL AND GAS DOWNSTREAM BUSINESS

Report. Advanced automation technology reduces refinery energy costs P R O C E S S I N G S P E C I A L

RETROFIT OF THE AMERADA HESS SEA ROBIN PLANT FOR VERY HIGH ETHANE RECOVERY ABSTRACT

Natural Gas Processing

Analysis of Different Pressure Thermally Coupled Extractive Distillation Column

Design and optimization of heat integrated dividing wall columns for improved debutanizing and deisobutanizing fractionation of NGL

SIMULATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF A MIXED FLUID CASCADE LNG PLANT IN A TROPICAL CLIMATE USING A COMMERCIAL SIMULATOR

A New Optimisation Based Retrofit Approach for Revamping an Egyptian Crude Oil Distillation Unit

Improving Natural Gas Liquefaction Plant Performance with Process Analyzers

A World of Solutions Visit Product Storage Terminals for Bulk Liquids

PLATEAU PIPE LINE LTD.

ARE PRODUCED WATER EMISSION FACTORS ACCURATE?

Instructor s t Background

MLNG DUA DEBOTTLENECKING PROJECT

PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by NICK KORENS ROBERT W. VAN SCOY. January private report by the PARK, CALIFORNIA

ProMax. Use It. Love It. Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc. BR&E. with TSWEET & PROSIM Process Simulation Software

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD Panipat Naphtha Cracker, Panipat, India

CCS Learning from the LNG Sector

Optimization of Energy Consumption during Natural Gas Dehydration

The Uhde STAR process Oxydehydrogenation of light paraffins to olefins

Transcription:

Page : 1 of 12 Project Engineering Standard www.klmtechgroup.com KLM Technology #03-12 Block Aronia, Jalan Sri Perkasa 2 Taman Tampoi Utama 81200 Johor Bahru Malaysia RECOVERY AND SPLITTER TABLE OF CONTENT SCOPE 2 REFERENCES 2 DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY 2 SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 3 3 BASIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 3 FRACTIONATION AND SYSTEM CONFIGURATION 5 General 5 Fractionation Design Considerations 7 ABSORPTION/STRIPPING 8 Basic Requirements 8 Design Considerations 9 CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION 9 Reboiler Control 9 Advanced Process Control and Optimization 9 APPENDIX A 10 APPENDIX B 11

Page 2 of 12 SCOPE This Project Standards and Specifications covers minimum process design requirements for LPG recovery & splitter Units. It should be expressed that only general process requirements are covered in this Standard and the Unit specific design conditions shall be determined based on the feed analysis and final product specifications during execution of the Unit conceptual design. REFERENCES Throughout this Standard the following dated and undated standards/codes are referred to. These referenced documents shall, to the extent specified herein, form a part of this standard. For dated references, the edition cited applies. The applicability of changes in dated references that occur after the cited date shall be mutually agreed upon by the Company and the Vendor. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced documents (including any supplements and amendments) applies. 1. ASTM (American Society for Testing Of Materials) ASTM-D-2163 ASTM-D-2420 2. GPSA (Gas Processors Suppliers Association) 3. IP (Institute of Petroleum, London) IP 10 (A) July, 1985 DEFINITIONS AND TERMINOLOGY "Engineering Data Book", Vol. 2, Section 17-26, 1987 "Petroleum Measurement Manual", Part 10, "Meter Proving" Absorption - Is a process, which the liquid (absorbent) flows countercurrent to a gas stream for the purpose of removing one or more constituents (absorbate) from that gas. Lean Oil (Absorbent) - Is usually those hydrocarbons which have molecular mass of about 100-180 and maximum final boiling point of 160 C (e.g., Naphtha). Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LP-Gas or LPG) - Any material having a vapor pressure not exceeding that allowed for commercial propane composed predominantly of the following hydrocarbons, either by themselves or as a

Page 3 of 12 mixtures: propane, propylene, butane (normal butane or isobutane) and butylenes including butylenes isomers, as a by-product in petroleum refining or natural gasoline manufacture. Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) - Is the Pressure of the vapor in equilibrium with liquid at 37.8 C (100 F). SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOL/ABBREVIATION APC LPG PFD RVP DESCRIPTION Advanced Process Control. Liquefied Petroleum Gas. Process Flow Diagram. Reid Vapor Pressure. This Standard is based on International System of Units (SI) except where otherwise specified. BASIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1. Process configuration of the LPG recovery Units shall be established based on the following factors and submitted for Company s approval: - feed composition; - upstream Unit process configurations; - ultimate product consumption; - product specifications; - minimum C 3, C 4 and C 5 (if any) recovery. 2. Unless otherwise specified, economical study shall be practiced to justify provision of the absorption/stripping lean oil system if required by the minimum product recovery specification as instructed by the project scope of the work for minimum C 3 recovery. The final process configuration shall be approved by the Company. For C 4 and C 5 the following requirements should be considered. - Minimum C 4 recovery: 98 (vol. %). - Minimum C 5 recovery: 99.5 (vol. %).

Page 4 of 12 3. The Unit product minimum specifications shall be as follows, unless otherwise specified in the project specification. The specifications of finished LPG product shall be as outlined in Appendix A of this Standard. C 3 C 4 C 5 C 2 (vol. %) 0.3 (max.) --- --- C 3 (vol. % ) Balance 0.2 (max.) --- C 4 (vol. %) 3.5 (max.) Balance 1 (max.) C 5 (vol. %) --- 1 (max.) Balance H 2 S (ASTM D-2420) Negative Negative Negative 4. If required by the feed compositions, and product specifications, treating facilities shall be provided. 5. The Unit design throughput shall be based on the sum of maximum flow rates of various feed streams to the Unit when the upstream Units are operating at their design capacities. 6. C 3 and C 4 products must be manufactured separately and each stream must be suitable for LPG blending as per LPG specification shown in Appendix A. 7. Drying facilities for C 3 product shall be provided. 8. Feed surge drum shall be provided to receive all feed streams into the LPG recovery Unit. 9. Unless otherwise specified, the Unit turndown capacity should be 60% of design throughput, without loss of efficiency in fractionation while meeting the product specifications. 10. The Unit design capacity shall be determined based on the Licenser s information on the upstream Licensed Process Units and shall take into consideration the variations resulted in the relevant process Units. 11.One cooler shall be supplied to cool the feed gas from the crude distillation overhead compressor (if any). 12. The following design notes shall be taken into consideration if LPG caustic treating section to be supplied as per feed and product specifications. - Caustic dissolving facilities shall be included if supply of the caustic outside of the Unit battery limit is not feasible.

Page 5 of 12 - Caustic regeneration facilities shall be provided, if economically are justified. - Spent caustic degassing and storage shall be provided. 13.Safety considerations shall be fully complied. 14. Special attention shall be made to the flexibility and ease of operations, equipment interchangeability and optimization. 15.Maximum energy conservation shall be applied. 16. Kettle type reboilers shall be provided to maintain the bottom temperature of the following towers: - deethanizer; - depropanizer; - propane dryer; - debutanizer. FRACTIONATION AND SYSTEM CONFIGURATION General 1. Stabilization tower shall be used where a natural gasoline or stable liquid to be produced [see Fig. 1(a)]. 2. The two-tower system shown in Fig. 1(b) is most commonly used to produce an LPG mixture in the overhead and a natural gasoline product as the bottoms. In this system, the deethanizer must remove all methane, ethane and other constituents not suitable in the two product streams from the second tower. Any material that enters the second tower must necessarily leave in one of the product streams. 3. The three-tower system shown in Fig. 1(c) most commonly produces commercial propane, commercial butane and natural gasoline as products. In this system also, the deethanizer must work properly to remove all constituents that cannot be sold in one of the three products. The sequence of fractionation following the deethanizer may be varied. In the second tower, an LPG mixture could be produced overhead with natural gasoline produced as bottoms. The third tower would then split the LPG into commercial propane overhead and commercial butane as bottoms. This sequence is favored sometimes where the market situation is variable and a market for LPG only exists during a portion of the year. During this period, the third tower would be shut down and not operated.