Introduction and Methodology

Similar documents
Your Family s Carbon Footprint

Climate Change: The Debate

Climate Change and Waste Reducing Waste Can Make a Difference

Chapter 2. Climate Change: Scientific Basis

Making a Difference One Watt at a Time

In 2011 burning of fossil fuels provided 83% of mankind s energy resource while nuclear electric power provided 9%, and renewable energy 8% (1).

CALIFORNIA EDUCATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE

Wake Acceleration Academy Earth & Environmental Science: Semester B Note Guide Unit 2: Earth s Changing Climate

Development of the National System for the GHG inventory preparation Preparation GHG Emissions for National Communications Difficulties with data

Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming Case Study

What Exactly is a Greenhouse Gas?

PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 1990 & 2007 CARBON INVENTORY BASELINE ASSESSMENT

Lecture 2: Greenhouse Gases - Basic Background on Atmosphere - GHG Emission and Concentration Rise - California Regulation (AB32)

Energy and Greenhouse Gas Solutions Hawai i Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile 1990 and January 30, 2009

Teaching Time: 1 hour and 15 minutes

1.1: Human population growth presents challenges

Greenhouse gas emissions during the 2003 World Summit

GORAI LANDFILL GAS PROJECT- A CASE STUDY

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE

Overview of environmental aspects of cogeneration

CLIMATE CHANGE AND ACID RAIN. Mr. Banks 7 th Grade Science

Agriculture and Carbon Offsets Policy

CLIMATE CHANGE E DUC ATIO NA L R ESO UR C E FOR TEACHERS AND FACILI TAT OR S

3/5/2012. Study Questions. Global Warming. Weather: daily temperature and moisture conditions Climate: long-term weather patterns

Rapid population growth. Ch 24 Human OverPopulation. The Logistic Growth Model. Population Growth. The most populous nations

Vulnerabilities to Climate Change Impacts and Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in East Asian Cities

The Energy and Carbon Footprint of Water Reclamation and Water Management in Greater Chicago

Published by: UNDP Kosovo This study was initiated by UNDP Kosovo and UNDP Bratislava Regional Center.

USDA GLOBAL CHANGE FACT SHEET

Carbon Audit Report for Yau Lee Construction Company Limited

Energy Efficient Environmental Solutions

BIOMASS. Leann Baer Brooke Edwards Nisarg Joshi Josh Olzinski

Updated State-level Greenhouse Gas Emission Coefficients for Electricity Generation

GLOBAL WARMING IS HAPPENING GLOBAL WARMING WILL BE VERY HARD TO STOP (By John B. Wheeler, member Potomac River Association)

Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors Info Sheet

Energy Conservation vs. Energy Efficiency

Climate Action Plan GHG Emissions Inventory

Chapter 19: Global Change

What is our community s carbon footprint?

Human Activity and Climate Change

Ireland s Provisional Greenhouse Gas Emissions

City of Pasadena Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Global warming. Models for global warming Sand analogy

Printing and Writing Papers Life- Cycle Assessment Frequently Asked Questions

Climate Change Frequently Asked Questions Scrambled Information Source: EPA Climate Change FAQ

Best Practices Learned from Greenhouse Gas Reporting

Explaining and Understanding Declines in U.S. CO 2 Emissions

M. T. I. Cabaraban & S. S. Paclijan Department of Chemical Engineering, Xavier University Ateneo de Cagayan, Philippines. Abstract

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sources Amy Banister, Sr. Dir. Air Programs

City of Santa Clarita Climate Action Plan Final Report

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES: The RECYCLING of MATERIALS through living organisms and the physical environment.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BODIES PROVIDING GREENHOUSE GAS VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION

Global Warming. By Daisy Richmond, Kristi Wyrobek, Leah Gross, and Linnea Sorlien

Marin County Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan October 2006

REDUCTION OF CARBON FOOTPRINT IS NECESSARY TO SAVE ENVIRONMENT

Teacher Guide Climate Change: The Debate A Structured Controversy

Key performance indicators to underpin Scottish climate change policy

Japan s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fiscal Year 2013 (Final Figures 1 ) <Executive Summary>

Presented on October ACI NA Environmental Pre Conference

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DEC Policy. This policy should be used by DEC staff in their review of an EIS when:

Georgia IS HUMAN ACTIVITY A SUBSTANTIAL CAUSE OF GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE? ARGUMENTATIVE Task: Copyright 2014 by Write Score, LLC

CTUP. Norman W. Garrick

Analysis of the American Opportunity Carbon Fee Act

Is Your City Really Sustainable? A Tale of Jinan City Using Quantitative Low- Carbon Eco-city Tools

U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions in 2009: A Retrospective Review

National Revision- Global Issues- Climate Change

Pre-lab Homework Lab 10: Global Warming Prior to lab, answer the following questions to help you become prepared for the lab.

What Size Is Your Footprint?

THE INTRODUCTION THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT

NRRI Colloquium July 11, 2015 Answering Questions about Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Sector

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children Native American Proverb

3.5 Energy, Greenhouse Gases, and Climate Change

Climate change and the ocean. Climate change and the ocean. Climate change. Greenhouse effect. Greenhouse effect.

Lesson 1b: The Greenhouse Effect and Climate Change

NEW BRUNSWICK AND CLIMATE CHANGE

The Social Cost of Carbon

Water Vapor from Thermoelectric Power Plants, Does it Impact Climate? DOE/NETL-2008/1319

Climate Change and Power Supply Solutions: LFGE / MSWE Project development in Nigeria

PSD Background Presentation

The Role of Agriculture and Forestry In Emerging Carbon Markets

innovative policy solutions

Future emissions of air pollutants in Indonesia: SO 2 and NO x

Reliant on fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas)

OPPORTUNITIES FOR MITIGATION OF METHANE EMISSIONS IN CHINA

Clean and Secure Energy Actions Report 2010 Update. GHG Policies

MANUAL FOR REDD PROGRAM

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Coal Mine Gas. Utilization Principles

San Diego County Greenhouse Gas Inventory. An Analysis of Regional Emissions and Strategies to Achieve AB 32 Targets. Other Fuels Report

Comparative analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from major cities of India

of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all greenhouse gases not and Sinks: , U.S. commitments.

Estimated Global Temperature and Growth Rate since Estimated global mean temperature

A carbon footprint is the measurement of total greenhouse gas emissions caused directly and indirectly by a person, organisation, event or product.

What is climate change? - BBC News

Air Permitting for Major Sources/Title V (Part 2)

The Earth s Changing Climate

Climate Change. Some solar radiation is reflected by Earth and the atmosphere. Earth s Surface

Land Securities Science-Based Carbon Reduction Targets

The Cycling of Matter

Mr.Yashwant L. Jagdale Scientist- Horticulture KVK, Baramati (Pune)

Transcription:

Introduction and Methodology Greenhouse gases are gases that trap heat in the atmosphere. The primary greenhouse gases and their sources are: Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ): Principal greenhouse gas; emitted through the burning of fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, coal), solid waste, trees and wood products, and other chemical reactions Methane (CH 4 ): Emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil; Also result from livestock and other agricultural processes and from the decay of organic waste in solid waste landfills Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O): Emitted during agricultural and industrial activities, as well as during the combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste Fluorinated Gases: Emitted from a variety of industrial processes i Levels of global emissions of greenhouse gases are rising fast. According to a report by the Global Carbon Project, an international collaboration of scientists, global emissions increased 5.9 percent in 2010 when compared to 2009. This increase, representing a half billion extra tons of carbon, was the largest jump in any year since the Industrial Revolution. The report showed that the combustion of coal made up more than half of the growth in emissions. ii The United States is the second largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, emitting 1.5 billion tons of carbon compared to China s levels of 2.2 billion tons of carbon. iii Increasing levels of greenhouse gas emissions are of particular concern since greenhouse gas emissions contribute to an increase in the average temperature of the earth. Rising temperatures in turn may cause changes in weather, sea levels, and land use patterns. iv Given the trend toward increasing global emissions and the effects such emissions can have, it is important to monitor greenhouse gas emissions and reduce these emissions for the health and safety of future generations. As a major land owner, water utility owner, building owner, employer, fleet operator, and service provider, the City of Dallas recognizes its carbon footprint. In 2006, the Mayor of Dallas signed the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement which is a commitment by U.S. mayors to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 7% below 1990 levels by the year 2012. In order to measure the City s progress with meeting this agreement, the City conducted its first greenhouse gas inventory using a baseline year of 2005. Results from this first inventory showed that the City was on track to meet this. The 2005 baseline greenhouse gas inventory also reported on greenhouse gas emissions from community sources. In 2011, the City conducted a second inventory of municipal and community-wide sources using the baseline year of 2010. The results of this report are shown on the following web pages, where we present the 2010 GHG emissions inventory and compare it with the 2005 inventory. In addition, we also present the projected emissions 1

for years 2012, 2015 and 2020 for the City of Dallas based on planned expansions, and for the Dallas community based on population growth and demand for energy sources such as electricity, fuel oil, and natural gas. Throughout this report, the Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions are reported in metric tons. The table below shows the different models and data sources used in the report to estimate GHG emissions. Source Type Electricity Consumption Fuel Oil Consumption Natural Gas Consumption On-Road Mobile Sources Non-Road Mobile Sources Solid Waste (Landfill Site) Model Used (for 2010 Estimates) Emission factors from U.S. Energy Information Administration and EPA Website U.S. Energy Information Administration s website U.S. Energy Information Administration s website MOVES 2010a (U.S. EPA) NONROAD2008a (U.S. EPA) LandGEM v3.02 (U.S. EPA) The sections of this report include: - 2010: GHG Emissions by Emissions Source for City Operations (pg 3) - 2010: Community-Wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions (pg 4) - Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from City Operations: 2005 and 2010 (pg 5) - Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Community Operations: 2005 and 2010 (pg 7) - Results and Forecasting Future Emissions (pg 10) 2

2010: GHG Emissions by Emissions Source for City Operations City Operations:2010 GHG Emissions Source Metric Tons/Year Electricity - Public Facilities 116,370 Electricity - Water Utilities 136,418 Electricity - Street Lights 29,891 Natural Gas 14,888 Mobile Sources 104,993 City Operations Total 402,560 3

Community-Wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Community-Wide Emissions: 2010 GHG Emissions Source Metric Tons/Year Electricity 10,714,678 Natural Gas 1,961,833 Fuel Oils 181,092 Transportation 3,939,248 DART - Public Transit 99,579 Solid Waste 332,957 Community-Wide Total 17,229,388 4

Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from City Operations: 2005 and 2010 In this section we compare the results from the 2005GHG inventory results with the results obtained for the year 2010. The pie-charts compare the GHG emissions by emission source for the year 2005 and 2010, from City operations. In the 2010 inventory, we have included stationary and non-road equipment that are sources of GHG emissions in the Love Field airport. Non-road equipment was not reported by the Executive airport. In the table below, we see that the emissions from electricity consumption are lower in the year 2010 because the City of Dallas used 40% of energy generated by renewable energy sources. Purchasing such a large percentage of renewable energy has particularly helped the City reduce the overall GHG emissions as well. Despite these differences in the modeling approach, estimated GHG emissions are within our expectations considering factors such as improvements in technology (resulting in lower emissions from the City s mobile sources inventory) despite an increase in equipment population (16% increase in nonroad and on-road equipment population). Improved methods implemented in emission estimation tools (such as updated NON-ROAD 2008a model, and the new MOVES 2010a) may also contribute some variability in the 2010 emission estimates in comparison to the 2005 estimates. For example, MOVES2010a implements a more robust approach in order to estimate on-road vehicle emission that includes emission variability due to differences in link speed and road type. In addition, MOVES2010a includes emission during startup and idling. Emissions due to such operations and factors are not included in the Mobile 6 model used in the 2005 estimates. City Operations: GHG Emissions Source 2005 (Metric 2010 (Metric Percent Tons/Year) Tons/Year) Change Electricity - Public Facilities 166,751 116,370-30% Electricity - Water Utilities 329,233 136,418-59% Electricity - Street Lights 31,933 29,891-6% Natural Gas 22,881 14,888-35% Mobile Sources 106,017 104,993-1% City Operations Total 656,815 402,560-39% 5

Comparison of City of Dallas GHG Emissions by Emission Source: Years 2005 and 2010. 6

Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Community Operations: 2005 and 2010 In this section we compare the results from the 2005 inventory results with the results obtained for the year 2010. The pie-charts compare the community level GHG emissions by emission source for the years 2005 and 2010. In the table below, we see that the 2010 GHG emissions from community level electricity consumption are lower than the emissions from electricity consumption in the year 2005.This may be because of the decrease in the City s population (a 6% decrease in population from 2005 to 2010). In addition, emissions from electricity generation used in this work (2010 estimates) are based on updated emission factors as published in the US EPA website and are made available here (http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/index.html). The 2005 estimates used an emission factor of 1.42 lb/kwh, the updated emission factor used in this work (developed by the US EPA) was 1.25 lb/kwh. Increased use of renewable energy sources and energy efficient household appliances (such as energy star products) are also suspected to have helped reduce community emissions from conventional energy sources (such as electricity generation) in 2010 in comparison to the year 2005. We also note that the 2010 Greenhouse gas emission estimates from the solid waste site were estimated using US EPA model: LandGEM v3.02, USEPA recommended model to estimate emissions from solid waste sites. The 2005 inventory work estimated emissions from the solid waste site to be 152,938 metric tons based on the assumption that 25% of the Landfill Gas (LFG) and about 55% of the methane was unrecovered from the solid waste site. The difference between the unrecovered LFG and methane was then used to estimate the unrecovered carbon dioxide (GHG emission). Using LandGEM v3.02 model, GHG emissions from the solid waste site during 2005 was estimated to be 305,857 metric tons. Community Wide Emissions: GHG Emissions Source 2005 (metric 2010 (metric Percent tons/year) tons/year) Change Electricity 12,043,444 10,714,678-11% Natural Gas 1,733,583 1,961,833 13% Fuel Oils 226,984 181,092-20% Transportation 4,042,345 3,939,248-3% DART - Public Transit 98,523 99,579 1% Solid Waste 305,857* 332,957 9% Community Wide Total 18,450,736 17,229,388-7% 7

- Emission estimated using MOVES 2010a model. The 2005 inventory work reported the emissions from DART (public transit) to be 66,419 metric tons, an estimate derived based on the volume of fuel used. * - Emission estimated using LANDGEM v3.02 model. The 2005 inventory work reported that the solid waste GHG emissions were 152,938metric tons; an estimate derived using empirical equations. 8

Comparison of Community Level GHG Emissions by Emission Source: Years 2005 and 2010. 9

Results and Forecasting Future Emissions The figure shown below illustrates the projected City and Community level emissions. The emissions plotted for the years 1990, 2005 and 2010 are actual estimates, while the estimates for 2012, 2015 and 2020 are projected emissions. The projected City emissions are based on expected growth rates. For example, facilities growth projections were provided by City departments. Community emission projections from natural gas and fuel oils, DART, and solid waste are calculated based on projected population, and based on the per capita level emission in the year 2010. The estimated GHG emissions from City operations during 2010 were 402,560 metric tons. This amount is approximately 33% less than the emissions during the year 1990. Clearly, the City of Dallas has already attained the goal of emissions of 7% less than the emissions during the year 1990 by 2012. The main driving factors that may have helped attain this goal are (1) the purchase of renewable energy sources (at 40%) for the City s electricity consumption, and (2) the energy efficiency improvements in the power generation sector. We also note that there are planned expansions for some of the City s facilities. Therefore, it is important to note that unless the City continues to invest in energy efficiency improvements (including the planned green building initiatives etc. that are included in the projections), along with additional investments to garner energy from renewable energy sources, it may be difficult to attain GHG emissions lower than the 2010 levels in the future years. 10

Projected City and Community Level Emissions with Actual Estimates for Years 1990, 2005 and 2010.Note: Numbers in red font indicate community emissions and purple font indicate City emissions. i Environmental Protection Agency ii New York Times, Carbon Emissions Show Biggest Jump Ever Recorded, December 4, 2011 iii New York Times, Carbon Emissions Show Biggest Jump Ever Recorded, December 4, 2011 iv Department of Energy 11