Trickling Filters and Rotary Biological Contactors

Similar documents
Figure Trickling Filter

TRICKLING FILTERS by Dr. Moazzam Ali Khan

CHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS

Water and Wastewater Engineering Dr. Ligy Philip Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

American Water College 2010

Chapter 2: Conventional Wastewater Treatment (continue)

Constructed Wetlands

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes TRICKLING FILTERS ROTATING BILOGICAL CONTACTORS (RBC)

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

MARPAK modular biomedia WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Biological Wastewater Treatment

Fixed-Film Processes

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Module 20: Trickling Filters

Biofilm Reactor Technology and Design

Education on Common Household Sewage Treatment Systems Found In Allen County, OH

MBBR Wastewater Treatment Processes

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Integrated Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) System for Additional Nitrification at the Coldwater WWTP

FAYOUM CITY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, DEVELOPMENT STAGES, CASE STUDY

BioWin 3. New Developments in BioWin. Created by process engineers.. for process engineers

Module 19 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater. Lecture 24 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater

Oxygen Transfer - RBCs

Case History: Anaerobic and Aerobic Treatment of Textile Wastes at South Carolina Textile Plants. Introduction

Trickling Filter Technology for Treating Abattoir Wastewater

CEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

ENV 4001: ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING. University of South Florida

BIO-NET / SESSIL Separate Purify Preserve

TWO YEAR CASE STUDY OF INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS) AT BROOMFIELD, CO WWTP West 124th Street Broomfield, CO 80020

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Activated Sludge Process Control:

International Joint Commission Water & Wastewater Treatment Best Management Practices Forum Monday, March 26, 2012 Wayne State University, Detroit MI

LABORATORY PROJECT: IMPACT OF VARIABLE LOADING ON A FIXED FILM REACTOR VERSUS A SUSPENDED GROWTH REACTOR

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

SESSIL TRICKLING FILTERS

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Large Wastewater Treatment Plants Prague, Czech Republic, 2003 COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Certification Training

ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS*

TROUBLESHOOTING OF NITRIFICATION UPSETS AT PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

2/22/2011. Presentation Outline. Overview of Wastewater Aeration. Basic Equation. Some Acronyms. dc dt. dc dt TDS BP T C L

19. AEROBIC SECONDARY TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER

EFFECT OF DISTRIBUTION NOZZLES ON TRICKLING FILTER PERFORMANCE

INTRODUCTION OF THE IC REACTOR IN THE PAPER INDUSTRY

Module 22 : Sludge Management

A Hybrid Constructed Wetland System for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

Blending RAS and AquaPonics: Engineering Flexibility Into Fish & Plant Production Systems

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Aerobic Treatment Units

Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment Overview

Sixteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC , Istanbul, Turkey 1

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

Deliverable Report of processes specifications anaerobic waste water purification process of mechanical pulping production

Low-cost Options for Treating Faecal Sludges (FS) in Developing Countries

COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE (IFAS), MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (MBR) AND CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE (AS) PROCESSES

WASTE WATER T*R*E*A*T*M*E*N*T T*E*C*H*N*O*L*O*G*I.E

SAF SAF SUBMERGED AERATED FILTER THE PARTNER OF CHOICE

Chapter ANAEROBIC TREATMENT BY METHANOGENESIS

Triplepoint Environmental

Chapter 11. Secondary Clarifiers

STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL STUDY OF 339 MLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AT AMBERPET

Primary Clarifier Odor Control Replacing Nitrates with D.O. Kevin Jacobs, P.E. ECO Oxygen Technologies

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

AMMONIA VOLATILISATION IN WSP: A CASCADE OF MISINTERPRETATIONS?

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

The Effect of Bio-Domes and Bio-Shells on Algae

Puraflo Peat Fiber Biofilter with Pad Dispersal -Chesapeake Bay Panel -April 27, Anua

Improving Septic Tank Performance by Enhancing Anaerobic Digestion NOWRA Onsite Wastewater Mega-Conference

Walker Process Equipment

Enviro Arabia 2007 (Bahrain)

Prof. Arunabha Majumder. School of Water Resources Engineering Jadavpur University

INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND LIFE SCIENCES IN FALENTY DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS

Technical Memorandum-Low Cost Retrofits for Nitrogen Removal at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Upper Long Island Sound Watershed

final report Water quality improvement strategy for a processing site

Analysis of Residential Subsurface. SF constructed wetlands. Performance in Northern Alabama

Dr Martin Peter *, Joachim Scholz & Victor Ferre. Contents

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

City of Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant. Redlands, CA LOCATION: Carollo Engineers; CH2M HILL MBR MANUFACTURER: COMMENTS:

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS

PARAMETER ACCEPTABLE OPTIMUM

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

SAF SAF SUBMERGED AERATED FILTER THE PARTNER OF CHOICE

Activated Sludge Treatment Extended Aeration (EA) and Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) Systems

Domestic grey water treatment and recovery to meet up the standards of characteristics of irrigation water

CHAPTER 5 WETLAND SYSTEMS

A Case Study from EP3: Pollution Prevention Assessment from a Cattle Hide Tannery. HBI Pub. 10/31/94

General Information on Nitrogen

Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids (Sludge)

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Page 1 Chapter 30 - Occupational Licenses and Registrations

Transcription:

Trickling Filters and Rotary Biological Contactors CE - 370 1 Trickling Filters Definition: a biological process in which the microorganisms are attached to the filter media Trickling filters are composed of: Influent pipe Rotary distribution Filter bed Underdrain system Effluent pipe At downstream, a sedimentation tank is used to remove microbial growth that sloughs from the medium Medium Crushed stone, Large gravel, Slag, Plastic, and redwood 2 1

3 Typical Trickling Filter 4 2

Trickling Filter 5 Classifications of Trickling Filters Trickling filters are classified into: Low-rate or standard-rate rate Intermediate-rate rate High-rate Super-rate rate Classification is according to: Organic loading Unit liquid loading Recycle employed 6 3

Low-rate or Standard-rate rate Filters Organic loading = 0.08 to 0.32 kg BOD 5 /m 3 -day Unit liquid loading = 1 to 4 m 3 /m 2 -day Bed depth = 1.5 to 3 m Recycle is employed at times when flow is not enough to turn the rotary distributor (night time) Usually single-stage BOD 5 removal = 90 to 95 % Effluent BOD 5 = 12 to 25 mg/l Can achieve better nitrification than high-rate filters Media volume is much greater than high-rate filters 7 Intermediate-rate rate Filters Organic loading = 0.24 to 0.48 kg BOD 5 /m 3 -day Unit liquid loading = 4 to 10 m 3 /m 2 -day Bed depth = 1.2 to 2.4 m Recycle may or may not be employed on continuous basis, it is employed at times when flow is not enough to turn the rotary distributor (night time) May be single-stage or two-stage BOD 5 removal = 85 to 90 % Effluent BOD 5 = 20 to 30 mg/l 8 4

High-rate Filters Organic loading = 0.32 to 1.0 kg BOD 5 /m 3 -day Unit liquid loading = 10 to 40 m 3 /m 2 -day Bed depth = 1 to 2 m Recycle is employed continuously May be single-stage or two-stage BOD 5 removal Single-stage = 75 to 80 % Two-stage = 85 to 90 % Effluent BOD 5 Single-stage = 40 to 50 mg/l Two-stage = 20 to 30 mg/l Can not achieve a highly nitrified effluent 9 Super-rate rate Filters Organic loading = 0.80 to 6.0 kg BOD 5 /m 3 -day Unit liquid loading = 40 to 200 m 3 /m 2 -day Bed depth = 4.5 to 12 m Recycle is continuous Medium is always synthetic plastic (most common) or redwood Plastic media has a specific surface area (surface area per unit volume) that is from 2 to 5 time that for stone media Microbial growth is proportional to surface area Can achieve a nitrified effluent at low loadings 10 5

Single Stage Trickling Filter Two Stage Trickling Filter 11 Trickling Filters Energy cost per mass of BOD 5 removed is less than that of activated sludge Super-rate filters can be used ahead of activated sludge (for high-strength wastewater) To reduce the BOD loading for the activated sludge process. Single-stage and two-stage trickling filters are upgraded by adding activated sludge process or a shallow polishing pond downstream 12 6

Mechanisms in Biological Filtration Tank is filled with solid media (Rocks or Plastic) Bacteria grow on surface of media Wastewater is trickled over media, at top of tank As water trickles through media, bacteria degrade BOD Bacteria eventually die, fall off of media surface Filter is open to atmosphere, air flows naturally through media Treated water leaves bottom of tank, flows into secondary clarifier Bacterial cells settle, removed from clarifier as sludge Some water is recycled to the filter, to maintain moist conditions 13 Trickling Filter Process 14 7

Bacteria Removal 15 16 8

17 Filter Performance Kinetic Equations The rate of organic removal per interval of depth is proportional to the remaining concentration of removable organic matter: - dl/dd = kl dl is an increment of remaining organic concentration dd is an increment of depth L is the remaining removable organic concentration (BOD) Integrating above equation gives: (L D / L) = 10 -kd L D = removable ultimate first-stage stage BOD concentration at depth D L = removable ultimate fist-stage stage BOD concentration applied to the bed k = rate constant D = depth of bed, ft (m) 18 9

Kinetic Equations For low-rate filters and flow of 1.88 to 5.61 m 3 /m 2 - day k = 0.574 Removable fraction = 90% For high-rate filters operated at flow 18.8 m 3 /m 2 -day k = 0.494 Removable fraction = 78.4% The following equation was developed for temperature correction: k 2 = k 20. 1.047 (T 2-20) k 2 is rate at T 2 ; k 20 is the rate at 20 C 19 Kinetic Equations Another performance equation was developed based on the specific rate of substrate removal (-1/X)(dS/dt) = ks (1/X)(dS/dt) = specific rate of substrate utilization, mass/(mass microbes)(time) (ds/dt) = rate of substrate utilization, mass/(volume)(time) k = rate constant, volume/(mass microbes)(time) S = substrate concentration, mass/volume 20 10

Kinetic Equations Re-arrange and integrate (S t /S 0 ) = e -k Xt k = rate constant X = average cell mass concentration, mass/volume S t = substrate concentration after the contact time t, mass/volume S 0 = substrate concentration applied to the filter, mass/volume X is proportional to the specific surface area of the packing, A s (m 2 of the surface per bulk m 3 of the volume) X ~ A s 21 Kinetic Equations The mean contact time, t, for a filter is given by: t = CD Q n L t = mean contact time D = depth of filter Q L = unit liquid loading or surface loading C, n = experimental constants 22 11

Kinetic Equations From the previous equations S t KA D / Q S 0 = e m s S t = substrate concentration in the filter effluent, mass/volume S 0 = substrate concentration applied to the filter, mass/volume K = rate constant A s = specific surface area of the packing, area/volume D = filter depth Q L = unit liquid loading or surface loading m, n = experimental constants n L 23 Kinetic Equations Value of n Depends of the flow characteristics through the packing Usually between 0.5 to 0.67 The equation can be further simplified by combing KA s m S t KD / S 0 = e n Q L K is the new rate constant K is between 0.01 and 0.1 K can be obtained from pilot-scale plant 24 12

Kinetic Equations To correct K for temperature K T = K 20 1. 035 ( T 20 ) K T = rate constant at temperature T, C K 20 = rte constant at 20 C T = temperature, C 25 Kinetic Equations A more common kinetic equation for filter with stone media is: S S t 0 = 1 + C 1 D Q 0.67 0.50 L S t = BOD 5 in the filter effluent, mg/l S 0 = BOD 5 in the wastewater discharged on the filter bed, mg/l C = 2.5 for USCS units and 5.358 for SI units D = filter depth, ft (m) Q L = unit liquid loading, MG/acre-day (m day (m 3 /m 2 -day) 26 13

Study Examples 17.1, 17.2, and 17.3 27 Flowsheets for Intermediate- and High-Rate Trickling Filter Plants 28 14

29 Operational Problems Less problems than activated sludge processes Problems Floating sludge may be encountered if anaerobic conditions occur within the settled sludge Presence of fly that breed in the filter Can be controlled by allowing the medium to stay submerged Odor when low-rate filters are employed and wastewater is stale when it reaches the plant 30 15