Linking hydrology to erosion modelling in a river basin decision support and management system

Similar documents
History of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold

Event and Continuous Hydrological Modeling with HEC- HMS: A Review Study

126 Sutopo Purwo Nugroho

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

Chapter 3 Physical Factors Affecting Runoff

Definitions 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology

EVALUATING A MULTI-VELOCITY HYDROLOGICAL PARAMETERIZATION IN THE AMAZON BASIN

Hydrology and Water Management. Dr. Mujahid Khan, UET Peshawar

Runoff and soil loss. (Quantification and modeling of watershed discharge and sediment yield) Kassa Tadele (Dr.Ing) Arba Minch University

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Vol. II - Watershed Modeling For Water Resource Management - D. K. Borah WATERSHED MODELING FOR WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Detailed spatial analysis of the plausibility of surface runoff and sediment yields at HRU level in a mountainous watershed in China

A simple model for low flow forecasting in Mediterranean streams

MODELING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS YIELDS USING THE HSPF MODEL IN THE DEEP HOLLOW WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI

Vegetation Management and Water Yield: Silver Bullet or a Pipe Dream?

Joint Research Centre (JRC)

1. Stream Network. The most common approach to quantitatively describing stream networks was postulated by Strahler (1952).

A Heavy Metal Module Coupled in SWAT Model and Its Application

2

CEE3430 Engineering Hydrology

M.L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, M. Anderson, L. Liang, N. Ohara Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis

Uncertainty in Hydrologic Modelling for PMF Estimation

Suspended Sediment Discharges in Streams

Error Analysis and Data Quality

RAINFALL - RUNOFF MODELING IN AN EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED IN GREECE

Theories of Hydrological Connectivity. Mike Kirkby Geography, U. Leeds

URBAN FLOODING: HEC-HMS

Hydrologic Engineering Center. Training Course on. Hydrologic Modeling with HEC-HMS. Davis, CA. Course Description

RAINFALL-RUNOFF STUDY FOR SINGAPORE RIVER CATCHMENT

Alternative Approaches to Water Resource System Simulation

Lessons learnt: summary of experiences and further recommendations

CHAPTER FIVE Runoff. Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323) Instructors: Dr. Yunes Mogheir Dr. Ramadan Al Khatib. Overland flow interflow

Use of SWAT for Urban Water Management Projects in Texas

Application of a Basin Scale Hydrological Model for Characterizing flow and Drought Trend

Chapter 7 : Conclusions and recommendations

GIS Applications in Water Resources Engineering

Yiwen Mei. Summary. Experience. Research Assistant at University of Connecticut

SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRIEND - RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING.

Effects of Antecedent Precipitation Index on the Rainfall-Runoff Relationship

Interest in a Community Model for Operational Delta Forecasting

Flood hazard assessment in the Raval District of Barcelona using a 1D/2D coupled model

Evaluating Hydrologic Response of an Agricultural Watershed for Watershed Analysis

Overview of NRCS (SCS) TR-20 By Dr. R.M. Ragan

Runoff Hydrographs. The Unit Hydrograph Approach

THE RATIONAL METHOD FREQUENTLY USED, OFTEN MISUSED

A REAL TIME FLOOD FORECASTING SYSTEM BASED ON RAINFALL THRESHOLDS WORKING ON THE ARNO WATERSHED: DEFINITION AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS

Phase 1 Part 2 CSO Control Plan Wellington Avenue CSO Facility. Hydraulic Modeling Software Selection

Simulation of Event Based Runoff Using HEC-HMS Model for an Experimental Watershed

WES. Review of Watershed Water Quality Models. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Water Quality Research Program

Outline. Remote Sensing, GIS & DEM for Hydrological Modeling (AV-SWAT) Role of Remote Sensing in Watershed & Water Quality Models

Optimizing a cooling water outfall inside the Maasvlakte 2 port extension - dealing with conflicting requirements

Rainfall - runoff: Unit Hydrograph. Manuel Gómez Valentín E.T.S. Ing. Caminos, Canales y Puertos de Barcelona

Spatial variability of rainfall governs river flow and reduces effects of land use change at landscape scale: GenRiver and SpatRain simulations

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

Factors affecting evaporation 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology. Several factors affect the rate of evaporation from surfaces:

Regionalization of SWAT Model Parameters for Use in Ungauged Watersheds

Using SWAT model to evaluate the impact of community-based soil and water conservation interventions for an Ethiopian watershed

Appendix 4 ADB. IN THE 6 CI's RIVER BASIN TERRITORY - PACKAGE B. Final Report B.2 - Strategic Spatial Planning

Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions

ESTIMATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ON WATER RESOURCES BY USING BILAN WATER BALANCE MODEL

Non-point Source Pollution Assessment of the San Antonio - Nueces Coastal Basin

CEPUDER Peter (1), SHUKLA Manoj Kumar (1), LIEBHARD Peter (2), TULLER Markus (1)

Stormwater Treatment Wetlands

UNIT HYDROGRAPH AND EFFECTIVE RAINFALL S INFLUENCE OVER THE STORM RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH

CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA AND DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL

Climate Change & Urbanization Have Changed River Flows in Ontario

Water management innovation for meeting Climate change effects and European Water Framework Directive targets: Pilot study Lankheet

Ramos MC, Martínez-Casasnovas JA & Balasch JC

Hydrologic Modeling with the Distributed-Hydrology- Soils- Vegetation Model (DHSVM)

Prediction in ungauged basins (PUB) - (still) the holy grail in hydrology. Thomas Skaugen Norwegian Water Resources and Energy directorate, Norway

EVALUATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES RESPONSE TO METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT IN THESSALY, GREECE

APEX-CUTE 2.0 USER S MANUAL. Xiuying Wang and Jaehak Jeong December Updated July 2015

USING ARCSWAT TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE CHANGE ON WATER QUALITY. Adam Gold Geog 591

Measuring discharge. Climatological and hydrological field work

AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENTS

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality: Modeling for TMDL Studies

Water Resources on PEI: an overview and brief discussion of challenges

STORMWATER RUNOFF MODELING IMPACTS OF URBANIZATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Stanley J. Woodcock, Michael Thiemann, and Larry E. Brazil Riverside Technology, inc., Fort Collins, Colorado

Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development

MMEA, WP5.2.7 Mining Deliverable D

THE SPAW MODEL FOR AGRICULTURAL FIELD AND POND HYDROLOGIC SI... SIMULATION

Review of existing simulation based flood frequency frameworks in Greece

The probable maximum flood at the Ukai and Lakhwar dam sites in India

HYDROLOGIC MODELING CONSISTENCY AND SENSITIVITY TO WATERSHED SIZE

Urbanization effects on the hydrology of the Atlanta area, Georgia (USA)

1.6 Influence of Human Activities and Land use Changes on Hydrologic Cycle

INTEGRATION OF MONTE CARLO SIMULATION TECHNIQUE WITH URBS MODEL FOR DESIGN FLOOD ESTIMATION

H. THOMAS & T.R. NISBET Centre for Ecosystems, Society & Biosecurity, Forest Research, UK.

MoRE Results and Modifications

Pre-Treatment Bioretention Cells Bioswales IOWA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL DECEMBER 16, 2015

SCS-CN HYDROLOGIC MODELING OF THE GREAT DISMAL SWAMP WITH HEC-HMS

Estimating Future Floods to Manage Flood Risk

How to write a (benchmark) scien3fic paper in hydrology. Keith Beven

Ata Amini, Thamer Mohammad Ali, Abdul Halim B. Ghazali, Azlan A. Aziz & Shatirah Mohd. Akib

Water Budget IV: Soil Water Processes P = Q + ET + G + ΔS

Management of the Niemen River basin with account of adaptation to climate change

Chapter 6. Hydrology. 6.0 Introduction. 6.1 Design Rainfall

Integrating soakaway infiltration devices in distributed urban drainage models from allotment to neighbourhood scale

Importance of stream temperature to climate change impact on water quality

Transcription:

Integrated Water Resources Management (Proceedings of a symposium held at Davis. California. April 2000). I APIS Publ. no. 272. 2001. 243 Linking hydrology to erosion modelling in a river basin decision support and management system KARL-ERICH LINDENSCHMIDT & MICHAEL RODE UFZ-Environmental Research Centre, Briickslrasse 3a, D-39114 Magdeburg, Germany e-mail: kelfaigm,ufz.de Abstract This paper focuses on the integration of basin sediment transport with a physically-based hydrological model that links the water budget model WaSiM (Water Simulation Model) to the erosion model AGNPS 5. The results of the water budget simulation are then incorporated into the AGNPS_5 model to calculate sediment transport. The surface runoff calculated in WaSiM replaces the SCS curve number runoff calculation in AGNPS_5 to obtain a more accurate and physically-based sediment transport simulation of the basin. Data from a mesoscale river basin in Germany is used to compare two different simulations: (a) WaSiM (TopModel) + AGNPS_5 (sediment only); and (b) only AGNPSji (both SCS curve number runoff and sediment). The results and the advantages/disadvantages of each simulation method are discussed in light of integrated computerized management systems for river basin planning. Key words parameter elasticity; river catchment; sediment transport; soil erosion; water balance INTRODUCTION A description of the hydrological processes and sediment transport is an essential requirement for a river basin management system and will be the focus of this paper. Due to the advancement of wastewater treatment (e.g. biological phosphorus removal) and expansion of treatment plants, there has been a shift from point to nonpoint sources as the major contributor of pollution loading into rivers. Hence, the transport of sediments and nutrients via erosion from land surfaces is a key element for the management of river water quality. Management of the river must include management of land in the basin. Hydrological and sediment transport models have become essential tools for simulating the nonpoint loading from land surfaces to the river and out of the basin. We are using the AGNPS_5 sediment transport model for this purpose. However, surface runoff calculations based on the empirically-based Soil Conservation Service (SCS)-curve number method are replaced with runoff simulations from WaSiM, a physically-based hydrological model. Data acquired from the Lumda River basin in Germany are used to investigate the coupling of the models. WATER BALANCE SIMULATION MODEL (WaSiM) WaSiM (Schulla & Jasper, 1999) simulates the hydrology of river basins. Spatial dimensioning is represented in the model using a grid system with equal-sized

244 Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt & Michael Rode orthogonal cells discretized over the surface of the basin. The basin is subdivided into sub-basins, for which the runoff generation and soil water balance are calculated separately using the TopModel algorithm (Beven & Kirby, 1979), which accounts for both Horton and saturated runoff. Both translation (based on the Manning-Strickler equation) and diffusion (using a linear storage reservoir) water transport concentrate the runoff to the sub-basin outlet. The spatial data required include digital elevation, land use and soil type. At least precipitation and temperature meteorological data are required. More accuracy is attained if global radiation, sunshine hours, wind velocity, relative humidity and vapour pressure are also included in the database. Some of the most sensitive parameters in the TopModel algorithm (Beven & Kirby, 1979) are (Fig. 1): (a) m [m] a recession parameter for base flow; (b) T corr [-] a correction factor for the transmissivity of the soil (these parameters stem from the spatial distribution of saturated areas and are especially important in determining the baseflow Q B [mm per time step] for each sub-basin); (c) Pu ires h [mm If 1 ] a precipitation intensity threshold for generating preferential flow into the saturated zone; (d) K corr [-] a correction factor of the saturated conductivity for vertical percolation taking in to consideration both unsaturated and preferential flow paths; (e) SH max [mm] a maximum storage capacity for the interflow storage; (f) k H [h] a single reservoir recession constant for interflow; (g) r k [-] a scaling of the capillary rise/refilling of soil storage from interflow [0...1] (this parameter is used to quantify the flow Qb uc k [mm] back from the interflow storage into the soil storage); and (h) c w i, [-] a fraction of snowmelt which is surface runoff [0... 11. O, (P < Pu-rch) ETR T ^ Y "f T W ; s h suz j A SB l ài A A & A S G ih- Q-) Fig. 1 Soil model with parameters used for the sensitivity analysis in parentheses (modified from Schulla & Jasper, 1999).

Linking hydrology to erosion modelling in a river basin decision support and management system 245 AGRICULTURAL NONPOINT SOURCE MODEL (AGNPS_5) AGNPS was originally developed to calculate the surface runoff and sediment and nutrient transport from large predominantly agricultural catchments (Young et al, 1989). It is a distributed model in which a mass balance for each cell is carried out followed by a sequential algorithm where transport of water, sediment and nutrients is routed though the cells and channelled to the basin outlet. Empirical formulations are used to describe the components of the model, which include hydrology, erosion and the transport of sediment and chemicals. Erosion is calculated using a modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) (Wischmeier & Smith, 1978). The transport formulations for nitrogen, phosphorus and chemical oxygen demand were adopted from the CREAMS model (Smith & Williams, 1980). The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number method was used to calculate runoff volume Q (mm) from the precipitation P (mm) but modified for German conditions according to Lutz (1984): Q = (P-Ia)xC + -{e- a(p -' a) -1) a where la [mm -1 ] is the initial abstraction depending on the land use and consisting mainly of interception and surface storage, C [-] is the maximum runoff coefficient, and a [mm -1 ] is a proportionality factor. AGNPS overestimates the peak flow rate Q P for German conditions, hence a modified Q P [mv] is used (Rode & Frede, 1997): ^=0.159^ - 8 5 6 G] 0-7 0 0 where A (km 2 ) is the total basin surface area. PARAMETER SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Figure 2 shows the elasticity e (a term borrowed from economics) of each parameter P on the outlet runoff Q, e = (dq/dp)(piq), which is both normalized and nondimensional. After a runoff Qo was calculated using a base parameter set, a parameter value was increased by 10% from which a new runoff Q, was calculated for each time step. The elasticity then becomes: AP Q (P-l.L?) Q Q -O.lÔo As indicated in Fig. 2, the most sensitive parameters (parameters with the highest elasticity on outlet runoff) are m, S max and kn- Hence, only these parameters were used to calibrate the model. The elasticity of m is 1 (Q changes by the same percentage as the change in P) for the spring, summer and autumn but becomes negative and drops towards -1 in the winter months. There is an upward trend from» -Vi to 0 in the elasticity of S max from early spring until late autumn. Then, heavy rains cause an abrupt jump to ~ Vi, after which successive rains force the elasticity to» -Vi. This pattern reflects the increased soil moisture content during the winter compared to the summer conditions. No pattern is evident in the kn elasticity, which sways erratically between -Vi < e < 1 in the winter months with a narrow range of- l A < e < '/2 in the summer period.

Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt & Michael Rode Fig. 2 Parameter elasticities on basin outflow of the most sensitive parameters m, S,. and k,,. 0.1 21.6.92 22.6.92 Fig. 3 Hourly summation of precipitation and simulated and measured hydrographs of hourly basin outlet runoff for the rainfall event 20-22 June 1992.

Linking hydrology to erosion modelling in a river basin decision support and management system 247 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The soil parameters were first calibrated using a one year data set (1 June 1991 31 May 1992) from which the parameters m, S, ax and k/j were set at 0.055 m, 24 mm and 95, respectively. A simulation was then earned out for the entire four-year period 1990-1993 using daily meteorological input values. Except for 1991, a water balance from the simulations for each year (not shown) showed veiy good agreement between the calculated and measured runoffs. The change in storage also varied somewhat due to the high variation in the total precipitation per year. To test the sediment transport, the rainfall-runoff event of 20-22 June 1992 was chosen. The comparison of simulated and measured hourly runoff in Fig. 3 shows a close match between the two curves. The AGNPS runoff volume, peak flow rate and total sediment yield are given in Table 1 using three different runoff volumes calculated using: (a) a modified curve number; (b) surface runoff simulated from WaSiM; and (c) total runoff (surface runoff and interflow) calculated from WaSiM. The field measurements are also included for comparison. Both methods (a) and (c) gave similar results with runoff volume and peak flow rates matching very closely to field measurements. Both overestimate the total sediment yield. Table 1 Comparison of results obtained with AGNPS only and WaSiM-AGNPS coupling. AGNPS only WaSim runoff and AGNPS sed. transport Measured CN Qs Qs + Q, Qa Runoff volume (mm) 3.6 2.5 3.6 3.7 P eak fl ow rate (m 3 s' ' ) 7.9 6.2 7.8 7.4 Sediment yield (tonnes) 319 249 322 195 Qs cell surface runoff; 0/ cell interflow; Q G gauged outflow. CONCLUDING REMARKS Linking a physically-based hydrological model with a sediment transport model gives a more realistic description of the erosion in river basins. This is especially important for basins located in humid climate zones, which is the case for the Lumda River, where saturated runoff plays a more important role. Hence, erosion hot-spots are more accurately identified and landscape changes to reduce sediment transport can be made more confidently. Only one precipitation-rainfall event has been analysed in great depth and further research is required to investigate more events. The elasticity parameter on basin outflow served to make quick and easy comparisons and more indepth interpretation of parameter sensitivities. It was found that parameters directly affecting soil moisture caused the greatest elasticities and variations to the basin runoff throughout the year. REFERENCES Beven, K. J. & Kirkby, M. J. (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Bull. 24(l),43-69. l.utz, W. (1984) Berechnung von Hochwasserabfliissen unter Anwendung von GebietskenngroBen. PhD Dissertation, Karlsruhe University, Germany. Sci.

248 Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt & Michael Rode Rode, M. & Frede, H.-G. (1997) Modifications of AGNPS for agricultural land and climate conditions in central Germany. J. Environ. Oual. 26(1), 165-172. Sehulla, J. & Jasper, K. (1999) Model description of WaSiM-ETl I. Institute of Geography, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. Smith, R. E. & Williams, J. R. (1980) Simulation of surface water hydrology. In: CREAMS, a Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems. USDA Conserv. Res. Report 26( 1 ). Wischmeicr, W. H. & Smith, D. D. (1978) Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses- A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA, Agriculture Handbook no. 537. Young, R. A., Onstad, C. A., Bosch, D. D. & Anderson, W. P. (1989) AGNPS: A non-point source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 44(2), 164-172.