NRC Research in Emergency Preparedness National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 11, 2017

Similar documents
NAS Beebe Symposium: The Science and Response to a Nuclear Reactor Accident

NATIONAL NUCLEAR REGULATOR

Guidance on the Use of Deterministic and Probabilistic Criteria in Decision-making for Class I Nuclear Facilities

OBJECTIVE 24: POST-EMERGENCY SAMPLING OBJECTIVE

JRODOS : Real-time online decision support system for nuclear emergency management

Accident 1 ~1X. Appendix 4A Effect of Source Term and Plume-Related Parameters on Consequences. Introduction

DSS ARGOS AND RODOS WITHIN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

Transboundary aspects of EP&R in Greece Christos Housiadas Chairman, Greek Atomic Energy Commission (EEAE)

OFF-SITE NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PLAN. SANTA MARÍA DE GAROÑA NPP (BURGOS, SPAIN)

Overview about NERIS-TP and PREPARE

Nuclear Power Plant Incidents

HOW TO FACE CONCERNS OF RADIATION EFFECTS

A Call for Public Safety:

THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORDIC GUIDANCE IN LEVEL 3 PSA. Lloyd s Register: P.O. Box 1288, Sundbyberg, Sweden, SE-17225, and

Ensuring Spent Fuel Pool Safety

NRC Activities. Matthew McConnell Senior Electrical Engineer Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Radiation Protection of the Public and Protection of the Environment

Review of Emergency Preparedness of Areas Adjacent to Indian Point and Millstone

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

RADIATION AND REGULATION IN A POST- FUKUSHIMA WORLD. Allison Macfarlane NCRP Annual Dinner Bethesda, MD March 15, 2015

NEI Draft White Paper. Use of the Generic Letter Process and Alternative Source Terms in the Context of Control Room Habitability

UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES WITH THE PROBABILISTIC ACCIDENT CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT CODE OSCAAR

SAFETY GUIDES. Deterministic Safety Assessment РР - 5/2010 ÀÃÅÍÖÈß ÇÀ ßÄÐÅÍÎ ÐÅÃÓËÈÐÀÍÅ BULGARIAN NUCLEAR REGULATORY AGENCY

FAO/IAEA NARO Technical Workshop Remediation of Radioactive Contamination in Agriculture

Transportation of Radioactive Materials in Ontario Information Package

Research on Integration of NPP Operational Safety Management Performance Systems

Chapter 9D Nuclear/Radiological Events TABLE OF CONTENTS

Environmental Regulator's RWA Syllabus mapped to PHE's RPTS courses. RPTS coverage EA. No

SAFETY REQUIREMENTS IN FRANCE FOR THE PROTECTION AGAINST EXTREME EARTHQUAKES

9 Technical Basis for Emergency Planning - Issue 29

Wisconsin Radiological Emergency Information

GERMAN APPROACH TO ESTIMATE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING A SABOTAGE ATTACK AGAINST NUCLEAR INTERIM STORAGES

UK Framework for Nuclear Safety: Safety Goals and Targets

Power Generation. Ronaldo Jenkins Electrical Engineering Branch Chief Office of New Reactors (NRO)

Frequently Asked Questions: Japanese Nuclear Energy Situation

KOEBERG NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PLAN: TRAFFIC EVACUATION MODEL

Enhancement of Nuclear Safety

Radiation monitoring of contaminated foodstuffs in Poland after the Chernobyl accident

Decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi Site: Status and Continuing Work

Exel(5n. Nuclear Plant Effluent and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs

EPR of Korea and International Assistance

Łukasz Koszuk Atomic Forum Foundation

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

NATURE OF WASTE, DISPOSAL PRACTICES, RADIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND THE ASSESSMENT OF RADIATION EXPOSURE

Ageing Management and Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

Catherine H. Helgeland. Department of Geography. University of Wisconsin Center - Manitowoc County

Short-term Countermeasures in Case of a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency

Risks Associated with Shutdown in PWRs

European level recommendations Sect. in NAcP 2 Generic recommendation for WENRA, Finland participates and follows the work.

General and Specific Characteristics for Model:

Radiological Services Radiation Protection Technician Development Program

(Original signatures are on file with official student records.)

GUIDELINES FOR REGULATORY REVIEW OF EOPs AND SAMGs

Introduction to Level 2 PSA

Reliability Of Atmospheric Dispersion Models Used In Assessing The Impact Of Radioactive Discharges On Food Safety

Radiation Protection Challenges associated with the dismantling of Nuclear Power Plant

S z5a MPC&D July 31, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C

IAEA HONG-KONG IAEA APPROACH ON NUCLEAR POWER INTRODUCTION

Westinghouse Waste Simulation and Optimization Software Tool 13493

OPERATIONAL SUPPORT FUNCTION Emergency Level Notifications. Office of Emergency Management

Strategy of the decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station and revitalization movement of the Hamadori

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: The Work Ahead and How to Succeed

Overview of IAEA's Projects on Safety Goals and Integrated Risk Informed Decision Making

Perception Versus Reality: UCS Views on Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism Risk

Controlled management of a severe accident

The GRS Emergency Centre during the Fukushima NPS Accident: Communicating Radiological Information to the Public

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION TO THE POTENTIAL REPOSITORY AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN

The Evolution of System Safety in the Canadian Nuclear Industry

DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN UKRAINE

Safety principles of radioactive waste management activities and supportive IAEA documents

Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management. 15 July - 3 August, Lecture Notes. I. Mele IAEA, Vienna, Austria

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Eduardo Gallego Nuclear Engineering Department Technical University of Madrid (UPM) In collaboration with: Milagros Montero, CIEMAT

Study on Severe Accident Progression and Source Terms in Fukushima Dai-ichi NPPs

Safety Issues for High Temperature Gas Reactors. Andrew C. Kadak Professor of the Practice

WELCOME TO THE RAMP 2017 FALL USER MEETING

OVER VIEW OF ACCIDENT OF FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPSs AND FUTURE PLANNING TOWARD D&D

Buffalo Niagara Integrated Corridor Management Project. ENTERPRISE Webinar Keir Opie, Cambridge Systematics September 26, 2016

Reflections in Fukushima:

Efficiency Bulletin: Maximizing the Benefit of Portable Equipment

Radiation Contamination after the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident and the Effective Dose Received by the Population of Croatia

A DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF AUXILIARY BUILDING CONTAMINATION AND FAILURE DUE TO A CYBER-INDUCED INTERFACING SYSTEM LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT

TA6-Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment

Modelling NORM in the environment

Consequent Management of Malevolent Use of Radioactive Material

Development of a Data Standard for V&V of Software to Calculate Nuclear System Thermal-Hydraulic Behavior

CAREM-25: a Low-Risk Nuclear Option. Rivera, S.S. and Barón, J.H.

Occupational Radiation Protection in Radioactive Waste Management

27 June 2013 Warsaw, Poland. Platts 8 th Annual European Nuclear Power 2013 Procurement for New Nuclear Programs

Regulatory Issues and Challenges in Preparing for the Regulation of New Reactor Siting: Malaysia s Experience

PG&E Gas Operations. Gas Safety Excellence API 1173

(2) The work for decontamination, etc. refers to the works to remove soil, grass and trees, soil generated in association with the decontamination of

2016 Christopher Kuprianczyk

Assessment of SNF Radiological Risk: Review of Methodology, and Application to a Case Study from USA

WM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

BACKGROUNDER Office of Public Affairs Phone:

Legislative Framework for the Regulation of Decommissioning at Egypt. Prof. Dr. Farouk M. A. Rahman

CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Transcription:

NRC Research in Emergency Preparedness National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 11, 2017 Todd Smith, PhD Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jonathan Barr Nuclear Regulatory Commission Doug Hoell The Cadmus Group, Inc.

Topics NRC Research in EP Study of Offsite Response Organization (ORO) Capabilities and Practices in the Intermediate Phase of a Radiological Emergency Response Modeling EP in the MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS) Study of Evacuation Time Estimates (ETE) 2

ORO Study The NRC seeks to better understand offsite response organization (ORO) capabilities and practices for protective actions in the intermediate phase of emergency response to a nuclear power plant (NPP) incident. Study Areas Identification of radiological hot spots Relaxation of evacuation and relocation orders Food condemnation or embargo Drinking water safety Beyond the 10-mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) Notable observations 3

ORO Study Methodology involved interviews with states, and review of after action reports (AARs) and state radiological emergency plans Characteristic States with Interviewed Percentage of NPPs States NPP States Number of States 30 9 30.0% Number of Operating NPP Sites 60 19 31.7% Number of Operating Reactors 100 33 33.0% Population 264,750,000 88,890,000 33.6% Area (square miles) 1,760,821 524,274 29.8% 4

ORO Study Identification of Radiological Hot Spots Intent and planning Resources Relaxation of Evacuation and Relocation Orders Criteria for relocation, reentry, and return Prioritization for reentry Public information Food Condemnation or Embargo Criteria and establishment of boundaries Disposition 5

ORO Study Water Criteria for potential drinking water contamination Planning, exercises, recent experience Beyond the 10-Mile EPZ Planning considerations Recent experience with evacuations Notable Observations in the Intermediate Phase Leveraging technology Developing partnerships Addressing needs of vulnerable populations and household pets 6

ORO Study NRC will publish NUREG/CR report in 2017 Study Results Identify clear trends on ORO capabilities and practices Share notable observations Provide confidence for modeling assumptions for use in radiological consequence studies 7

What is MACCS? MACCS MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System Probabilistic analysis tool for developing realistic estimates of consequences of nuclear power plant incidents Developed by NRC and Sandia National Laboratory Extensive use by NRC and domestic and international organizations How is MACCS used? Cost-benefit analysis Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Consequence studies Risk-informed decision-making 8

MACCS Radiation Exposure Pathways Modeled in MACCS 9

MACCS Food Chain Data Source Term Emergency Phase Intermediate Phase Long-Term Phase Typical Duration ~ 1 week Weeks to years Months to years Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Protective Actions Evacuation Sheltering Relocation KI Ingestion Relocation Interdiction Decontamination Condemnation Exposure Pathways Cloudshine Groundshine Inhalation Skin Deposition Groundshine Inhalation of resuspended materials Groundshine Inhalation of resuspended materials Food & water ingestion Weather Data Site Data Dose Conversion Factors Output Measures Health Effects Land Contamination Economic Costs Displaced Population 10

Emergency Phase Modeling MACCS Protective actions (evacuation, sheltering, relocation, KI) Cohort timeline (general population, schools, special facilities, evacuation tail, shadow evacuees, non-evacuees) How parameters are informed Evacuation time estimate (ETE) studies and traffic simulation codes MACCS modeling best practices Discussions with state and local authorities 11

MACCS Evacuation Modeling Network Evacuation Model Keyhole Evacuation Model 12

MACCS Potential use of ORO Study Results ORO Study Topics Identification of Radiological Hot Spots Beyond the 10-Mile EPZ Relaxation of Evacuation and Relocation Orders Food Condemnation or Embargo Water Related MACCS Model Early Phase Relocation Models Early Phase Intermediate Phase Relocation and Habitability Assessment Long-term Phase Agricultural Restrictions Long-term Phase Societal Dose Assessment 13

MACCS How to obtain MACCS 14

ETE Study Applied research study to examine topics associated with the modeling and simulation of evacuations and independent verification of the NRC s methodology for ETE development. Study Areas Shadow evacuation analysis Distance of evacuation travel Manual traffic control Determination of variable importance 15

Who is Performing the Study? ETE Study Transportation and evacuation experts at Louisiana State University Timeline 3 year study (August 2015 August 2018) Methodology Model 3 representative sites (small, medium, large population and representative roadway networks) Develop micro-simulation models using commercial software Produce generalized results that reveal effects of the study variables (impact to clearance times) 16

Model Comparison ETE Study TYPICAL EPZ POPULATION MODEL EPZ POPULATION MODEL INTERSECTIONS 0-10 MILE 0-10 MILE 20% SHADOW TRAFFIC SIGNAL STOP SIGN INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTIONS SMALL 0 50,000 7500 3000 10 180 MEDIUM 50,000 200,000 200,000 30,000 230 170 LARGE 200,000 600,000 325,000 60,000 525 350 17

ETE Study Task 1: Impact of Shadow Evacuation Sensitivity of shadow participation rate on clearance times Task 2: Distance of Evacuation Travel Sensitivity of model extent on clearance times Assess travel times outside of EPZ Task 3: Manual Traffic Control (MTC) Simulated MTC vs. signalized intersection control Task 4: Parameters of Importance Sensitivity analysis to determine importance of input and process variables to clearance times 18

Benefits of the ETE study ETE Study Independent verification of NRC s methodology (NUREG/CR-7002) Technical basis for potential enhancements to guidance document Enhance understanding of evacuation dynamics (knowledge management) Enhance NRC s regulatory function 19

Points of Contact Todd Smith, PhD Emergency Preparedness Specialist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)-287-3744 Todd.Smith@nrc.gov Jonathan Barr Senior Reactor Systems Engineer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)-415-1089 Jonathan.Barr@nrc.gov 20