CDOT s Life Cycle Cost Analysis

Similar documents
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement

AMERICA RIDES ON US KEYS TO A SUCCESSFUL ALTERNATE BIDDING PROCESS

Pavement Management Systems

AMERICA RIDES ON US LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS: A POSITION PAPER

603 - ASPHALT PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS SECTION 603 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Introduction. Key Words: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA), Bridge Pile Repair, RealCost, BridgeLCC, BLCCA

Design of Illinois Tollway Composite Pavements

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

COLD-IN-PLACE RECYCLING

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Background of Existing Facility 3. Proposed Work 4

Connecting South Dakota and the Nation SDDOT Pavement Research Update

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NON-NHS BRIDGE R&R POLICY

CHAPTER 10 PAVEMENT DESIGN AND REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS

Opportunities with Concrete Pavements

4-07 Asphalt Treated Permeable Base (ATPB)

LADOTD Construction Specifications: Parts II, III & IV MARK MORVANT, P.E. ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, RESEARCH

Robinette and Epps 1

Probabilistic Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavements

SUPERPAVE FACT SHEET

Maintenance & Rehabilitation. Treatments. Crack Sealing. Sealant Types. Asphalt Pavement Preservation: Identification of Alternative Treatments

Performance of Aggregate Base Course Pavements in North Carolina

Quality Improvement Series 126. Energy Conservation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Production

Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow

Presented by PA V E M E N T M A N A G E M E N T S Y S T E M S. The Washington State Experience

Cold In-Place Recycling

ASPHALT: INNOVATION & SOLUTIONS. Bill Rosener Executive Vice President Asphalt Paving Association of Iowa

Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, Texas

The Role of Pavement Preservation in Asset Management

ITEM 275 PORTLAND CEMENT TREATED MATERIALS (ROAD MIXED)

Full Depth Reclamation

ITEM 6 CONCRETE CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS

Sustainable Pavements. Gina Ahlstrom Senior Pavement Engineer Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction

Selecting Projects for Accelerated Bridge Construction

Why Should Every Day Count For You?

Pavement Update Track: Engineering

Highway Cost Index Estimator Tool Final report PRC 17-73

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

How to Select the Appropriate Pavement Rehabilitation Option. David Rettner, PE American Engineering Testing, Inc.

The Illinois Tollway s Use of Composite Concrete Pavements with Greener Concrete for Improved Sustainability

A Review and Recommendations for Canadian LCCA Guidelines

Computer-Aided Maintenance Management

Sandstone Curb Replacement Standards

Innovative Sustainable Pavement Solutions

What is it? What is Granular Base Stabilization ti (GBS)? Emulsion Full Depth Reclamation Process

Pavement Design. TTP Orientation Seminar 2011

San Francisco Bay Area Green Initiatives. Theresa Romell, Principal Planner/Analyst, Metropolitan Transportation Commission October 12, 2016

Typical Dynamic Modulus Data for HMA Mixture and EMC SQUARED Stabilized Aggregate Mixture

A Contractor s Look at the Changing World of Asphalt Technology

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CONCRETE CROSSWALK INDEX TS SCOPE...3

CHAPTER 10: PAVING. Refer to page 548 of the 2016 Spec book or page 573 of the 2018 Spec book for material specifications under G.

Introduction to Asphalt Pavement Design and Specifications

Cold Foam In-Place Recycling (CIR)

Perpetual Pavement Demonstration

HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENT

Environmental Benefits of Using Recycled Materials

USING REMAINING SERVICE LIFE AS THE NATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURE OF PAVEMENT ASSETS

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY DIVISION

ADOT s Use of RAP in Asphaltic Concrete

MPC REPORT NO Evaluating the Impace of QC/QA Programs on Asphalt Mixture Variability

PCCP Pavement Structures, 3D Modeling and Machine Control

An Overview of Low Cost Pavement Alternatives in Canada

FHWA Cooperative Agreement Subtask. Longitudinal Joints Intelligent Compaction

Pavement Design. TTP Orientation Seminar 2017

Pavement Management Systems PMS PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW. Dr. Nick Vitillo

JANUARY 4, 2017 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN. (Estimated Cost: $4,600,000) Bids J D WILLIAMSON CONSTRUCTION CO INC $3,799,476.25

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

CHESSIE BIKE-PED TRAIL - PHASE I TRUESDELL AVENUE TO KIAWANIS TELEDYNE PARK

Asphalt Rubber Surface Treatment & SAMIs in Pavement Preservation

EINRIP. Specification and Construction Issues

Conditions of Paved Roads in Carbon County, Wyoming

CDOT Cold In-Place Specifications and Construction

DOTD Pavement Research Facility

Pavement Design Guide November 2002

Plantmix Asphalt Industry of Kentucky Winter Meeting February 10, 2011

SD F. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Implementation Plan Study SD Final Report

Geosynthetic Pavement Interlayers

Materials Selection in Pavement Design. Flexible Pavements

ASSET MANAGEMENT GUIDE

National Superpave Status Present & Future

An Economic Analysis Methodology for Project Evaluation and Programming

elcap and PaveM: California's Network and Project Level Quantification Tools

Performance Based Practical Design. An FHWA Perspective

National Trends in Pavement Design

TC3 AASHTO Technical Service Program for Training

For the past several years, the Colorado

Asphalt Guidelines. Courtney Rousseau, P.E. Lloyd Consulting Group, LLC

Assessing the Life Cycle Benefits of Recycled Material in Road Construction

Implementation of HERS-ST in Iowa and Development/Refinement of a National Training Program

THE STRENGTH AND STIFFNESS MODULUS OF THIN LAYER HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURE

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Application to an airport pavement

Establishing Hot Mix Asphalt Mixing and Compaction Temperatures at the Project Level

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers

Inverted Pavement VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY S EXPERIENCE

MIDLAND COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

The Bituminous Report

Section 25 Aggregate Subbase

Transcription:

CDOT s Life Cycle Cost Analysis 40 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference and Equipment Show February 28 th, 2013 Jay Goldbaum CDOT Pavement Design Program Manager Sunday, March 17, 13

CDOT s Life Cycle Cost Analysis 40 th Annual Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference and Equipment Show February 28 th, 2013 Jay Goldbaum CDOT Pavement Design Program Manager Sunday, March 17, 13

Basics of a CDOT Life Cycle Cost Analysis A Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is used to support the pavement type selection Compares pavement types and rehabilitation work over a 40 period Sunday, March 17, 13

Basics of a CDOT Life Cycle Cost Analysis A Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is used to support the pavement type selection Compares pavement types and rehabilitation work over a 40 period Sunday, March 17, 13

When does CDOT run a LCCA Prepared for all new, reconstruction, or surface treatment projects with at least $2,000,000 in material costs for the roadway features i.e. hot mix asphalt, aggregate base course, subgrade soils, shoulder work, etc. Sunday, March 17, 13

When does CDOT run a LCCA Prepared for all new, reconstruction, or surface treatment projects with at least $2,000,000 in material costs for the roadway features i.e. hot mix asphalt, aggregate base course, subgrade soils, shoulder work, etc. Sunday, March 17, 13

LCCA Process YES 1. Develop preliminary design for typical section. 2. Perform life cycle cost analysis of typical sections. Is one type clearly superior? Greater than 10% NO 3. Evaluate secondary factors by Pavement Type Selection Committee (PTSC). 4. Select preliminary pavement type. NO 7. Select final pavement type and applicable thickness. YES 6. Is detailed design reasonably close to typical section design used in the analysis? 5. Perform detailed pavement design. Sunday, March 17, 13

LCCA Process YES 1. Develop preliminary design for typical section. 2. Perform life cycle cost analysis of typical sections. Is one type clearly superior? Greater than 10% NO 3. Evaluate secondary factors by Pavement Type Selection Committee (PTSC). 4. Select preliminary pavement type. NO 7. Select final pavement type and applicable thickness. YES 6. Is detailed design reasonably close to typical section design used in the analysis? 5. Perform detailed pavement design. Sunday, March 17, 13

LCCA Factors Used By CDOT Initial Construction Costs Annual Maintenance Cost Design Costs Pavement Construction Engineering Costs Traffic Control Cost Periodic Rehabilitation Costs User Costs Sunday, March 17, 13

LCCA Factors Used By CDOT Initial Construction Costs Annual Maintenance Cost Design Costs Pavement Construction Engineering Costs Traffic Control Cost Periodic Rehabilitation Costs User Costs Sunday, March 17, 13

Types of Distributions Used by CDOT Triangular Normal Most Likely Average Standard Deviation Minimum Maximum The data should be as accurate as possible Sunday, March 17, 13

Types of Distributions Used by CDOT Triangular Normal Most Likely Average Standard Deviation Minimum Maximum The data should be as accurate as possible Sunday, March 17, 13

Discount Rate The discount rate reflects the time value of money CDOT s current rate is 2.8 percent Standard Deviation of 0.18 percent Sunday, March 17, 13

Discount Rate The discount rate reflects the time value of money CDOT s current rate is 2.8 percent Standard Deviation of 0.18 percent Sunday, March 17, 13

Impact of the Discount Rate For example, if we need $1,000,000 in 15 years we would need almost $661,000 in today s dollars using the 2.8 percent rate $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 $0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Years Using a 5.0 percent rate, we would need about $481,000 Sunday, March 17, 13

Impact of the Discount Rate For example, if we need $1,000,000 in 15 years we would need almost $661,000 in today s dollars using the 2.8 percent rate $1,000,000 $750,000 $500,000 $250,000 $0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Years Using a 5.0 percent rate, we would need about $481,000 Sunday, March 17, 13

Statewide Cost Data

Statewide Cost Data

Statewide Cost Data

Statewide Cost Data

Annual Maintenance Cost

Annual Maintenance Cost

Project Cost Preliminary engineering is about 8 to 20 percent with an average of around 18 percent Construction engineering is currently 20.02 percent Traffic control is about 10 to 18 percent with an average of around 15 percent Sunday, March 17, 13

Project Cost Preliminary engineering is about 8 to 20 percent with an average of around 18 percent Construction engineering is currently 20.02 percent Traffic control is about 10 to 18 percent with an average of around 15 percent Sunday, March 17, 13

Performance Life

Performance Life

User Cost

User Cost

User Cost Output

User Cost Output

User Cost Distribution

User Cost Distribution

CDOT Spreadsheet

CDOT Spreadsheet

CDOT Spreadsheet

CDOT Spreadsheet

FHWA RealCost Program www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/lcca

FHWA RealCost Program www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/lcca

RealCost Charts

RealCost Charts

Next Step When the alternatives are within 10 percent at the 75 percent probability level, they are deemed to be equal The Project Engineer can chose to have the project evaluated by the Pavement Type Selection Committee or use alternate bidding Sunday, March 17, 13

Next Step When the alternatives are within 10 percent at the 75 percent probability level, they are deemed to be equal The Project Engineer can chose to have the project evaluated by the Pavement Type Selection Committee or use alternate bidding Sunday, March 17, 13

Pavement Type Selection Committee Sunday, March 17, 13 Both industries review the input data Industry comments supported by data would be considered by the PTSC to adjust the LCCA If the LCCA is still within 10 percent, secondary factors such as project extensions, future maintenance and rehabilitation work, that are in alignment with the project s or Regional goals will be used to decide the type of pavement The PTSC makes a recommendation to the Chief Engineer

Pavement Type Selection Committee Sunday, March 17, 13 Both industries review the input data Industry comments supported by data would be considered by the PTSC to adjust the LCCA If the LCCA is still within 10 percent, secondary factors such as project extensions, future maintenance and rehabilitation work, that are in alignment with the project s or Regional goals will be used to decide the type of pavement The PTSC makes a recommendation to the Chief Engineer

Alternate Bid Sunday, March 17, 13 Two sets of plans are developed with HMA and PCCP bid by the square yard Initial construction costs are removed from the LCCA Both industries review the input data Industry comments supported by data would be considered to adjust the future work in the LCCA The net present value of user cost, maintenance, and rehabilitation work are added to the bid price

Alternate Bid Sunday, March 17, 13 Two sets of plans are developed with HMA and PCCP bid by the square yard Initial construction costs are removed from the LCCA Both industries review the input data Industry comments supported by data would be considered to adjust the future work in the LCCA The net present value of user cost, maintenance, and rehabilitation work are added to the bid price

Any Questions???

Any Questions???