Post-Disaster Safety Evaluations Using ATC-20/45

Similar documents
BUILDING OCCUPANCY RESUMPTION EMERGENCY INSPECTION PROGRAM

Seismic Design and Performance of Metal Buildings

Recent Experience from Buildings Equipped with Seismic Monitoring Systems for Enhanced Post-Earthquake Inspection

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PREPAREDNESS AND ASSISTANCE TRUST FUND ARC 4496 Evaluation Questionnaire

3.5 Tier 1 Analysis Overview Seismic Shear Forces

Post-earthquake emergency assessment of building damage, safety and usability Part 1: Technical issues

Post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment. John Osteraas, PhD, PE Exponent Failure Analysis Associates

RAPID STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Structural Engineering

Mitigation Measures for Natural Hazards

Performance of Buildings During the January 26, 2001 Bhuj Earthquake. Abstract

Enhanced Rapid Post-Event Assessment of Buildings

SEISMIC LOSS ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING TALL STELL BUILDINGS IN LOS ANGELES

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF LOW-RISE PRE-ENGINEERING BUILDINGS WITH TILT-UP AND MASONRY FAÇADE WALLS DURING THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES IN NEW ZEALAND

AMERICAN RED CROSS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACADEMY Presented by Michael J. Griffin, P.E. Principal CCS Group, Inc.

MASTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL EARTHQUAKE PRONE BUILDINGS POLICY

STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT

LATERAL DRIFT DESIGN IN COLD FORMED STEEL WALL SYSTEMS

SEISMIC CODE EVALUATION ST. LUCIA Evaluation conducted by Myron W. Chin

EXPLORATION OF DIFFERENT RETROFITTING OPTIONS FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS IN KATHMANDU

EARTHQUAKE PRONE BUILDINGS POLICY

Project Findings: Appendix 2

INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND TESTING OF A SEISMIC RETROFITTED STEEL DECK TRUSS BRIDGE

State Requirements for a S.E. to Design Structures

3. CLASSIFICATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF DAMAGE

Chapter 1: Application and Administration

Details for Exterior Brick Masonry Veneer Supported by Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses

Thesis Proposal. Nasser Marafi. Center & Facility Service Building. St. Joseph Hospital of Orange Patient Care. Proposal

Report on Building Damage in Central Ibaraki Prefecture by The 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake Released on April 3, 2011

Seismic Rehabilitation of Selby Condominium Complex, Montreal (Quebec), Canada

ECMC Skilled Nursing Facility Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis AE 481W Thesis Proposal Dr. Ali Memari January 13 th, 2012

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Structural Assessment Report 2118 Milvia Street Berkeley, California

INITIAL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT REPORT (SIAR)

SEISMIC DAMAGEABILITY ASSESSMENT PROBABLE MAXIMUM LOSS REPORT

TOWN OF ROTTERDAM RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Ext. 395 Needed to Obtain Permit:

SAN FRANCISCO S COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN FOR SEISMIC SAFETY

Importance Category and Seismic Restraint

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 05, 2016 ISSN (online):

Retrofit of an Existing Hospital to Immediate Occupancy Standards. One Year Later. Degenkolb Engineers

Johns Hopkins Graduate Student Housing. Thesis Proposal. 929 North Wolfe Street Baltimore, Maryland Brad Oliver Structural Advisor: Professor Memari

Wall Bracing. Part 1: Basic Components for Code Compliant Bracing

The designer shall also submit additional information required by the University as described and underlined below.

Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using pushover analysis

REPORT PREPARED FOR Monterey Avenue Palm Desert, CA Peters Canyon Rd., Suite 140, Irvine, CA IDS Project Number 11.

Table 1. Study region population, households and building exposure by county

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER

ON DRIFT LIMITS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT DAMAGE LEVELS. Ahmed GHOBARAH 1 ABSTRACT

NON-LINEAR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS

The Building Codes A.R.E. Building Design and Construction Exam Prep

2016 Port of San Francisco Building Code

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

Seismic Design Requirements

REPORT ON PREPARED FOR N. Grand Avenue Walnut, CA

Copyright. magazine. CFS Load Bearing Construction

Supplemental Concrete Tilt Up Retrofit Plan Check Correction Sheet (2014 LABC)

ATC-72 of the PEER Tall Buildings Initiative: Interim Guidelines on Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings

In-situ Out-of-Plane Airbag Testing of Infill Masonry Cavity Walls

Project Findings: Appendix 2

Structural Inspection

HOUSE REPAIRS & RENOVATIONS BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

Shake-table test on a four-storey structure with reinforced concrete and unreinforced masonry walls

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

SEAOC Blue Book: Seismic Design Recommendations 1959 to 2008

INTRODUCTION OF A PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN

Structural Inspection Report

IBC 2006 & ASCE 7-05 Structural Provisions. Martin Johnson, SE & Todd Erickson, SE June 14, 2007

4.2 Tier 2 Analysis General Analysis Procedures for LSP & LDP

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION PHONE Residential Accessory Structures

Structural Comparison between Pan Joist Concrete and Steel Frame Systems for UMCP Student Housing Building B

CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO EARTHQUAKES

Residential Inspector s Guide: Building and Energy based on the 2009 International Residential Code Chapters 1-11

Trends in the Seismic Design Provisions of U.S. Building Codes

TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP BUILDING PERMIT PROCEDURES

VULNERABILITY. A Presentation to the Global Earthquake Model Workshop Trinidad. By R. Clarke, Dept Civil & Environmental Engineering, UWI

CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination

ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING) VOL. 9, NO. 1 (2008) PAGES 1-13

Using seismic isolation systems for retrofitting historic buildings

2018 APPENDIX B BUILDING CODE SUMMARY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (EXCEPT 1 AND 2-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES)

EARTHQUAKE- PRONE BUILDINGS POLICY

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF STRUCTURAL MASONRY

Project Address: Name of Person Completing Form:

SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS: CURRENT WALL-TO-SLAB CONNECTIONS

FEMA-310. Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings, 1998

DEFINING RIGID VS. FLEXIBLE NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

one structural behavior, systems and design Course Description Course Description Syllabus & Student Understandings statics mechanics of materials

Individual Truss Marking Is it a Building Code Requirement?

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF DORMITORY BUILDINGS WITH SOFT STOREY AND FLOATING COLUMNS

CIVIL BREADTH Exam Specifications

Design of buildings using EC8

IBC Structural Provisions: A Better Alternative

THE INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING ON DISASTER RECOVERY: PRIORITIES FOR LIMITING DOWNTIME

Technical Report 3. Alyssa Stangl Structural Option Advisor Dr. Linda Hanagan L A J O L L A C O M M O N S P H A S E I I O F F I C E T O W E R

ARTICLE 987. PD 987. PD 987 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 14, (Ord.

Transcription:

Post-Disaster Safety Evaluations Using ATC-20/45 Presented by: Drew Martin, P.E., S.E. September 2, 2015 2015 APWA International Public Works Congress and Exposition Funded and Updated By: Office of Emergency Services State of California Project Officers Richard Andrews, Richard K. Eisner Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development State of California Project Officer Neal Hardman Federal Emergency Management Agency Project Officers Laurie R. Friedman, Marilyn R. MacCabe Structural Engineers Association of Washington Reid Middleton, Inc. Presentation Overview Introduction Seismology/Faults/Loads ATC-20/45 Posting System Structural Basics/Load Path Evaluation Procedures Rapid Evaluation and Assessment Program (REAP) Disaster Damage Exercises Wood, Masonry, Concrete, Steel 1

Post-Disaster Recovery Efforts Seismology and Faults 2

How We Measure Earthquakes Richter Scale (Mr) Richter Magnitude 4 6 8 Energy Increase 1000 1000 Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale (MMI) MMI VI Windows broken. Books off shelves. Weak plaster cracked. MMI VII Damage to weakest masonry. Weak chimneys broken. Fall of plaster, loose bricks, tiles, un-braced parapets. MMI VIII Damage to weak masonry, partial collapse. Frame houses moved on foundations. Pacific Ring of Fire Source: USGS USGS U.S. Seismic Hazard Map X Phoenix, AZ 3

Plate Boundaries Basic Fault Types Normal Fault Basic Fault Types Reverse Fault 4

Basic Fault Types Strike-Slip Fault Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Simulation Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Simulation 5

Strike Slip Fault Earthquake Simulation Why ATC-20/45 Post Disaster 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake, San Francisco: Over 150,000 buildings impacted 30 Building inspectors and 15 Civil or Structural Engineers Over 3,000 buildings per inspector 10 buildings per day per inspector = 1 year! 2005 Hurricane Katrina, Gulf states: 1.3 million housing inspections over 1 year 108,333 inspections per month 3561 inspections per day! 99 million cubic yards of debris clean up 1 square mile x 96 feet tall! 2012 Hurricane Sandy, NYC 80,000 hurricane damaged buildings inspected in 30 days 2700 inspections per day! Posting System 6

Principal Safety Concerns Collapse Falling hazards Other hazards Basic Approach Right to inspect Observe expected damage Quickly assess unexpected damage Methodically evaluate structure Utilize checklists and safety criteria Exercise Judgment in assessing risks from damage Communicate risks to public with posting system Collect and report damage data to jurisdictions Inspection Procedures 1. Survey of the building exterior. 2. Examine the site for geotechnical hazards. 3. Inspect structural system from inside building. 4. Inspect for nonstructural hazards. 5. Inspect for other hazards. 6. Complete forms and post building. 7

Posting System INSPECTED (Green): Appears safe for lawful occupancy No control on use or occupancy LIMITED ENTRY/RESTRICTED USE (Yellow): Some restriction on use, can be area, use, time, or function Control of restrictions are by tenant/owner UNSAFE (Red): No access or use of structure Entry controlled by jurisdiction Inspected Observed damage, if any, does not appear to pose a safety risk Unrestricted lawful entry, occupancy, and use is permitted Inspected 8

Inspected Limited Entry/Restricted Use Some risk from damage in all or part of building Restricted duration of occupancy areas of occupancy usage Restrictions enforced by property tenant, owner, or manager Limited Entry/Restricted Use 9

Limited Entry/Restricted Use Unsafe Falling, collapse, or other hazards Does not necessarily indicate demolition Owner must mitigate hazards to satisfaction of jurisdiction to gain entry Jurisdiction controls and enforces entry Unsafe 10

Unsafe Unsafe Unsafe 11

Changing a Posting Correct mistake or oversight Significant aftershock Significant weather (wind and flood) Hired re-evaluation and repair Posting Should Be timely Be consistent Be visible Carry authority of jurisdiction Structural Basics/ Load Path 12

Structural Basics Walls and frames Redundancy Ductility/Brittleness Degradation of structural Strength Stiffness Stability Dynamic Affects Structural Basics Structural Basics 13

Structural Basics Structural Basics Structural Basics 14

Structural Basics Structural Basics Structural Basics 15

Structural Basics Structural Basics Structural Basics 16

Structural Basics Structural Basics Structural Basics 17

Structural Basics Structural Basics Cracking at Girder-Column Connection Structural Basics 18

Structural Basics Structural Basics Buckled Steel Diagonal Member Structural Basics 19

Structural Basics Structural Basics Structural Basics 20

Structural Basics Structural Basics Structural Basics 21

Structural Basics Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Levels Windshield Rapid Detailed Engineering Assess scope of damage in jurisdiction Assess more obvious and smaller buildings Closer assessment of difficult buildings Consultant engaged by owner 22

Evaluation Steps Examine entire outside of building Examine ground for distress Enter if safe and continue inspection Discuss observations; evaluate by criteria Post building Inform occupants of hazards Rapid Evaluation Evaluate and post buildings with most obvious conditions Recommend detailed evaluation for questionable buildings Rapid Evaluation Criteria Collapse, partial collapse Building or story noticeably leaning Severe racking of walls, obvious severe damage Chimney, parapet or other falling hazard Severe ground displacement or foundation damage Other hazard present 23

Make Notes for Possession Retrieval Access Exits Corridors Stairways Rapid Evaluation Criteria Rapid Evaluation Criteria 24

Rapid Evaluation Criteria Detailed Evaluation Careful exterior and interior visual examination by most qualified team Follows rapid evaluation when required Important for essential facilities Detailed Evaluation Criteria Vertical load capacity not significantly decreased Lateral load capacity not significantly decreased No falling or other hazards present No evidence of foundation damage or ground displacement Main exits are useable No other unsafe condition 25

Detailed Evaluation Criteria Detailed Evaluation Criteria Detailed Evaluation Criteria 26

Detailed Evaluation Criteria Fixed Equipment Checklist Detailed Evaluation of Essential Facilities Health care facilities Police and fire stations Jails and detention centers Emergency operations centers High occupancy shelters Other facility types? 27

Pre-Event Actions at Essential Facilities Pre-arrangements made with local jurisdictions Reference information and drawings on site Facility-specific inspection procedures BORP (Building Occupancy Resumption Program) REAP (Rapid Evaluation and Assessment Program) REAP with SMS (Seismic Monitoring System) Dubai Burj Khalifa Dubai World Trade Center Naval Hospital Bremerton Naval Medical Center San Diego Delta Pier Support Facility, Bangor Naval Hospital Twentynine Palms SWFPAC Facilities, Bangor Pre-Event Actions at Essential Facilities Pre-arrangements made with local jurisdictions Reference information and drawings on site Facility-specific inspection procedures BORP (Building Occupancy Resumption Program) REAP (Rapid Evaluation and Assessment Program) REAP with SMS (Seismic Monitoring System) Naval Hospital Bremerton Naval Medical Center San Diego Delta Pier Support Facility NMCSD Facility Overview Largest Navy Healthcare Facility 70 Acre Campus Construction 1986 (1979 Code) 6000 Personnel, 500,000 Population Served 6 Stories, Gross area of Buildings 1, 2 & 3 equal 1.2M SF, Welded Steel Moment Resisting Frame $500M Facility Valuation 23 Buildings on Campus, 2.5M SF 28

REAP Development Timeline REAP Field Materials Overview REAP Post-Earthquake Evaluation Field Manual (Volume 1) Program Flow Chart & Assessment Plan Post-Earthquake Evaluation & Assessment Forms Building Descriptions NMCSD Campus & Building Layout Maps Building Pre-Event Photographs Recommended Emergency Equipment List REAP Background ATC 20-1 Field Manual (Included in Volume 1) ATC 20-1 Placards REAP Assessment Plan 29

REAP Reference Drawings Volumes 2 to 4 Seismic Monitoring System (SMS) SMS Provides Real-Time Building Response Data Immediately Following an Event Building Response Data is Invaluable in Determining Structural Condition Aspects of SMS Real-time monitoring and evaluation of structural response Immediate structural evaluation using pre-defined trigger values Building condition reporting and posting recommendations Time-histories for use in further analysis by structural engineer Works in conjunction w/ REAP SMS Concept PC Internet Data Acquisition Unit (DAU) Cellphone 30

SMS Concept Equipment records site and building response Estimated Displacement Time- History is computed from the recorded acceleration data SMS Concept Drift Ratios are computed and compared to predetermined trigger values Ties Together PBEE and ATC-20 Posting System Standard of Care Rapid evaluation initial posting (Note: Preliminary information; follow REAP Steps) SMS Concept 31

GUI Building-by-Building Status GUI Building s Floor-by-Floor Status Wood Frame Structures 32

Wood Frame Structures Single-family residential Multi-unit residential and commercial Wood Frame Construction Wood Frame Full Scale Shake Table 33

Wood Frame Shake Table Aftershock Wood Frame Construction Wood Frame Construction 34

Wood Frame Construction Wood Frame Construction 35

36

Masonry Structures Masonry Construction Un-reinforced brick masonry bearing Un-reinforced concrete block masonry bearing wall buildings Steel frame with masonry in-fill buildings Reinforced masonry buildings Masonry Construction 37

Roof and Floor to Wall Connections Masonry Construction Bearing Wall Unreinforced Masonry 38

Heritage Buildings Masonry Construction - Gables Heritage Buildings 39

Concrete Structures 40

Concrete Construction Structural walls or frames Cast-in-place or pre-cast Combinations of the above Structure Discontinuities Concrete Wall Construction 41

Concrete Construction URM Buildings 42

43

44

45

46

Concrete Frame Construction Concrete Construction 47

48

Tilt Up Concrete Construction 49

Roof to Wall Connections 50

Precast Concrete Construction 51

Steel Structures Steel Frame Construction Multi-story fire resistive frame Pre-engineered light frame Steel Frame Construction 52

Steel Frame Construction 53

54

Steel Frame Construction Post-Disaster Safety Evaluations of Buildings (ATC-20/45) Presented by: Drew Martin, P.E., S.E. September 2, 2015 APWA 2015 International Public Works Congress & Exposition 55