Session 2 Pump Selection. Mark Markham, P.E. Gresham, Smith and Partners September 14, 2017

Similar documents
AR No. # Efficient Irrigation

Water supply components

FLUID FLOW - PUMPS. Discharge Section. Section. Two main types of pumps: Positive Displacement pumps Centrifugal pumps.

6. PUMPS AND PUMPING SYSTEM

Section 7 Hydraulic Model Development and Evaluation Criteria

Pumps, Turbines, and Pipe Networks. Ch 11 Young

Hydraulics Laboratory Experiment Report

CHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS

AALSO Summary of Formulas needed for Levels I, II and III.

WASTEWATER PUMPING STATION INVENTORY

Section V WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINES

AALSO Proficiency Program Level I, II & III

Module 9 : Sewage And Storm water Pumping Stations. Lecture 11 : Sewage And Storm water Pumping Stations

Pump ED 101. Pump Selection for VFD Operation Part 3 Q / H Pump Down vs Level Control. Introduction. Pump Down vs Level Control

Successfully dosing pipe networks. Kevin Sherman, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE Vice President of Engineering Clearstream Wastewater Systems, Inc.

Application of Variable Frequency Drives for Energy Savings

MEMORANDUM. The general findings of the assessment are as follows:

Contact the Jurisdictional Engineer for materials allowed by each jurisdiction.

Section 5 Design Criteria Domestic Water Facilities

PUMP TECHNOLOGY. Are we making any progress? S. Gopalakrishnan Flowserve Corporation Pump Division Vernon, California. ASME FEDSM May 31, 2001

CHAPTER 6 COLLECTION SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL

Energetic Efficiency Analysis of Water Pumping Installations

APPENDIX G HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE

Learning objectives. Upon successful completion of this lecture, the participants will be able to:

Pumps, Turbines, and Pipe Networks, part 2. Ch 11 Young

SECTION PACKAGE BOOSTER PUMP STATIONS

GREEN THREAD Piping Systems

SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINES

Types of Water Resource Systems. Types of Water Resource Systems. Design of Water Resource Systems. Design for Public Water-Supply

Sag Pipe (depressed sewers, or Inverted siphons) Dr. Sataa A. Al-Bayati(10-11)

Wastewater Flow Monitoring Services

Module 7: Hydraulic Design of Sewers and Storm Water Drains. Lecture 7: Hydraulic Design of Sewers and Storm Water Drains

Pipeline Optimization Program (PLOP)

Lesson 2 Science Concepts. Chemical Characteristics of Water. The Operator as a Chemist

FlowSet. Balancing Procedure

SECTION 4 - DESIGN STANDARDS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

STUDY OF WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK USING EPANET

Piping layout for fire sprinkler system: An overview

HYDRAULIC DEMONSTRATION CHANNEL

CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS OF THE MAINLINE TUNNEL USING ICAP

Municipal Wastewater Flows and Concentrations

3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES

Sanitary Sewer Extensions, Lift Stations, and Force Mains Engineering Report Form. I. General Information. 1. Name of Facility:

MICRO-HYDRO INSTALLATION SIZING Jacques Chaurette eng. January 17, 2008

North and South Plan ALBERT JUNE 2. G:\2013\ \Reports\N and S Water AFC\Cover Page North and South AFC Water Master Plan.docx.

5 Ways to Increase CSD Production

Large piston diaphragm pumps

Facilities Plan. Technical Memorandum No. TM-WW-7 Hydraulic Analysis and Effluent Pump Station

The Impact Wear Behavior of Large Rocks on Slurry Pump Materials and Equipment.

Basic Irrigation Design

HUP. Performance Data. Wholesale Products Page: Section: Performance Data Dated: January RPM: 1550 Discharge: 1" Solids: 1/8" GPM: TDH:

NZQA registered unit standard version 4 Page 1 of 5

Hancor, Inc. Drainage Handbook Hydraulics 3-1

PUMPS FOR INDUSTRY. The Vertical Pump Specialists CONTENTS: Introduction & User List. Product Overview. Vertical Process Pumps...

C. ASSE 1013 Performance Requirements for Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Preventers.

Honeywell Thermal Solutions. Engineering Guide

3- Hydropower. Energy conversion and hydropower principles

PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN

Energy Audits. Presented by: Phil Szabo Taylored Engineering Solutions and Research The Cotton Industries Pump and Energy Specialist

TYPES OF SEWAGE PUMPS. Solids Handling Pumps: Grinder Pumps: Effluent Pumps:

Advanced Grit Removal Technology

Series Sump and Sewage Systems

Modal Analysis as a Tool to Resolve Pump Vibration Issues

Index. Page numbers followed by f indicate figures.

Surge Analysis for the Proposed OSIS Augmentation Relief Sewer Tunnel

CHARACTERIZATION OF PUMPS FOR IRRIGATION IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: POTENTIAL ENERGY SAVINGS

Water Distribution System Calibration Report

DESIGNING PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEMS FOR TOPOGRAPHICALLY CHALLENGING CATCHMENTS: AN ACCOUNT OF THE OPUA PRESSURE SEWER SCHEME

DESIGN OF SEWER SYSTEMS

A Discussion of Natural Gas Pipeline System Efficiency. Gas/Electric Partnership Houston, Texas February 11, 2010

This is only a general checklist; please refer to the CVWD Development Design Manual (DDM) for all requirements and regulations.

EC It Pays to Test Your Irrigation Pumping Plant

Grit Collection & Classification Case Studies

SECTION 18. AMERICAN General Index

The purpose of distribution system is to deliver water to consumer with appropriate quality, quantity and pressure. Distribution system is used to

Design and Fabrication of a Water Lifting Device without Electricity and Fuel

A techno-economical view on energy losses at hydropower dams (case study of Karun III Dam and Hydropower Plant)

Small Oil-Less Centrifugal Compressors: Bringing Energy Efficiency and Reduced Costs to Chiller Plants

DIVISION 5 STORM DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Screening, Definition: The unit involved is called a screen.

Reducing Energy Use and Costs for Pumping Water

SUGGESTED SPECIFICATIONS

METROPOLITAN SEWER DISTRICT LOW PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

A Multi-Faceted Approach to Odor Control for a 28.5-Mile Long Force Main

Fundamentals of Asset Management. Step 1. Develop Asset Registry A Hands-On Approach

ERPN Overhung, End-Suction Process Pump ISO 13709/API 610 (OH2)

WATER SUPPLY: PUMPING STATIONS

Energy Conservation of Boiler Feed Pump by Differential Pressure Auto Scoop Control Method (Audit & Result Analysis)

Chilled Water Distribution Systems. APPA Institute for Facilities Management New Orleans, LA January 19, 2016

SPILL ESTIMATION. Not Just A Guess Anymore

Analysis of Continuous Water Distribution in Surat City using EPANET: A Case Study

Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Controlled Irrigation Pumps Analysis of Potential Rebate

SEMESTER LESSON PLANS (RPS)

Glossary Irrigation Terminology

Phase 1 Part 2 CSO Control Plan Wellington Avenue CSO Facility. Hydraulic Modeling Software Selection

Horizontal and Vertical End Suction Pumps

Sanitary Board of Bluefield Mercer County, West Virginia Tazewell County, Virginia

HYDROMATIC W/D/V-A1 SUBMERSIBLE SUMP/EFFLUENT

PERFORMANCE PIPE DRISCOPLEX 4000/4100 Pipe Water and Wastewater Piping Systems

Transcription:

Session 2 Pump Selection Mark Markham, P.E. Gresham, Smith and Partners September 14, 2017

Quick Refresh System Curves graphically show the relationship between flow rates and associated total dynamic heads (TDH) TDH is the amount of pressure required to push a certain flow rate through a given pipe network TDH is the sum of: Static head loss moving the water from one elevation to another Friction head loss dynamic losses related to flow rate, pipe diameter, pipe length, pipe roughness, fittings

Advanced System Curves Composite Curves Intermediate high point, 2 possible conditions: Pump to high point, gravity down back side (high static, low friction losses) Pump to discharge point, pressure entire length (low static, high friction losses) WHICH ONE GOVERNS? Pressure flow Gravity flow Pressure flow Static Head Static Head Pipe length Pipe length

Advanced System Curves Composite Curves Scenario 1 pump to high point, then gravity flow down to discharge point May have manhole at the top of the hill for free discharge and system ventilation Behaves according to plan as long as the pumping rate is less than hydraulic capacity of gravity system Hydraulic Gradeline Pressure flow Friction Head Gravity flow Static Head Pipe length

Advanced System Curves Composite Curves Scenario 2 pump to discharge point ARV/CAVV at the top of the hill for system ventilation and to prevent unintentional siphoning Behaves according to plan as long as the pumping rate is more than hydraulic capacity of gravity system Friction Head Hydraulic Gradeline Pressure flow Static Head Pipe length

Advanced System Curves Composite Curves Answer: Both scenarios govern, depending on flow rate You must plot both system curves independently, then combine into a composite curve Total Dynamic Head, ft 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Scenario 1 Pump to High Point 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow Rate, gpm Total Dynamic Head, ft 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Scenario 2 Pump to Pipe End 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow Rate, gpm

Advanced System Curves Composite Curves 160 140 Design System Curves 120 Total Dynamic Head, ft 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow Rate, gpm Critical Flow Rate (Avoid)

Advanced System Curves Bracketing It is impossible to predict accurately the hydraulic behavior of a piping system at a given point in time Therefore, we must evaluate a range of hydraulic behaviors by defining a low-head condition and a high-head condition. We can be confident that the system will behave within those boundary conditions.

Advanced System Curves Bracketing Low Head Loss Curve High wetwell level (at start of pumping cycle) Low discharge level (if variable) High Hazen-Williams C-factor (smooth pipe) C = 140 is good for DIP C = 160 may be appropriate for plastic pipe (caution!) High Head Loss Curve Low wetwell level (at end of pumping cycle) High discharge level (if variable) Low Hazen-Williams C-factor (rough pipe) C = 100 is too low for DIP C = 120 is realistic

Advanced System Curves Bracketing Length 1000 ft Diam 6 in 0.50 ft Area 0.20 ft2 Static Head 40 ft C-factor 140 Low Head Loss Curve Flow, Velocity, Static Total Dynamic Dynamic Flow, gpm ft3/sec ft/sec Head, ft Head, ft Head, ft 0 0.00 0.00 40 0 40 100 0.22 1.13 40 1 41 200 0.45 2.27 40 3 43 300 0.67 3.40 40 7 47 400 0.89 4.54 40 12 52 500 1.11 5.67 40 18 58 600 1.34 6.81 40 25 65 700 1.56 7.94 40 34 74 800 1.78 9.08 40 43 83 900 2.01 10.21 40 53 93 1000 2.23 11.35 40 65 105 Total Dynamic Head, ft 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Static Head = 40 ft 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow, gpm

Advanced System Curves Bracketing Length 1000 ft Diam 6 in 0.50 ft Area 0.20 ft2 Static Head 50 ft C-factor 120 Flow, gpm Flow, ft3/sec Velocity, ft/sec Static Head, ft High Head Loss Curve Dynamic Head, ft Total Dynamic Head, ft 160 0 0.00 0.00 50 0 50 100 0.22 1.13 50 1 51 200 0.45 2.27 50 4 54 300 0.67 3.40 50 9 59 400 0.89 4.54 50 16 66 500 1.11 5.67 50 24 74 600 1.34 6.81 50 34 84 700 1.56 7.94 50 45 95 800 1.78 9.08 50 57 107 900 2.01 10.21 50 71 121 1000 2.23 11.35 50 86 136 Total Dynamic Head, ft 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Static Head = 50 ft 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow, gpm

Pump Curves Centrifugal vs. PD

Pump Curves (centrifugal) Shows relationship between head (H) and pumping rate (Q) (inverse of system curves pumping rate increases as head decreases) May also show: Pump efficiency as a function of Q Pump horsepower (brake) as a function of Q and H NPSH R as a function of Q (upcoming session) Performance changes for different impeller diameters and/or pump speeds

Pump Curves (centrifugal)

Pump Curves (centrifugal) Pump Selection Example Use System Curves developed earlier Pump must deliver 600 gpm 160 140 Total Dynamic Head, ft 120 100 80 60 40 (600 gpm @ 84 ft) (600 gpm @ 65 ft) 20 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow, gpm

Pump Curves (centrifugal) 160 140 Q Required = 600 gpm Expected pump performance range 120 Total Dynamic Head, ft 100 80 60 76 ft TDH 65 ft TDH UNACCEPTABLE PUMP SELECTION 40 20 525 gpm 600 gpm Pump provides required Q only when pumping against best case system curve not realistic 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow Rate, gpm

Pump Curves (centrifugal) 160 140 Q Required = 600 gpm Expected pump performance range 120 Total Dynamic Head, ft 100 80 60 84 ft TDH 70 ft TDH 40 20 0 600 gpm 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Flow Rate, gpm 675 gpm GOOD PUMP SELECTION Pump provides required Q at all expected hydraulic conditions

Pump Efficiency More efficient pumps draw less horsepower Less horsepower may mean smaller motor ($Capital) Less horsepower draws less electricity Less electricity saves money ($O&M) HOWEVER Efficiency is not the be-all, end-all criteria for selection Overall pump RELIABILITY is more important Pump downtime, repairs, and PM may dwarf electricity savings over timej

Pump Reliability

Pump Reliability Moral of the story Do not select a pump based ONLY on efficiency Best Efficiency Point flow rate (Q BEP ) is often more important, even at the expense of some efficiency

Example Pump Selection An irrigation pumping station is being designed to transport water from a reservoir to a downstream tank, as shown below. The maximum design flow is 4,000 gpm. Select the pump, given the following: Suction line is 100 ft of 18 diameter ductile iron pipe Forcemain is 5,000 ft of 18 diameter ductile iron pipe Suction Minor Losses 1 x 1.00 for entrance loss 2 x 0.39 for 90 o bend 1 x 0.23 for plug valve Discharge Minor Losses 6 x 0.36 for 90 o bend 1 x 0.22 for plug valve 1 x 1.20 for swing check valve 1 x 0.50 for exit loss El = 6230 ft El = 6127 to 6132 ft 100 of 18 pipe Centerline Pump El = 6122 ft 5000 of 18 pipe fittings and valves

Example Pump Selection Determine pipeline velocities from v=q/a.. v 12 =7.52 ft/s, v 18 =6.68 ft/s Calculate minor losses = Σ 2 Suction Minor Losses Loss Type Qty K S K Entrance 1 1.00 1.00 90 bend 2 0.39 0.78 Plug valve 1 0.23 0.23 Total = 2.01 Suction minor losses: = 2.01 5.04 2(32.2 = 0.8 Discharge Minor Losses Loss Type Qty K S K 90 bends 6 0.36 2.16 Plug valve 1 0.22 0.22 Swing check valve 1 1.20 1.20 Tee (branch flow) 1 1.08 1.08 Exit loss 1 0.50 0.50 Total = 5.16 Discharge minor losses: = 5.16 5.04 2(32.2 = 2.0

Example Pump Selection High Head Loss (C=120) Pipe friction losses: Manning Equation: =..!. "^$.$%& Suction losses at 4,000 gpm: = 3.022 5.04$.(& 100 120 $.(& 1.5 $.$%& = 0.5 H f = friction losses, ft V = velocity, ft/sec L = length, ft C = Manning coefficient D = pipe diameter, ft Discharge losses at 4,000 gpm: = 3.022 5.04$.(& 5000 120 $.(& 1.5 $.$%& = 22.1

Example Pump Selection High Head Loss Curve static head (lowest water level in reservoir): )*+, -*. = /+0,1*2-3+4+5 )782,- 9*-2 )82*,-:;-<*+75 )*+, -*. = 6230 6127 = 103 Total dynamic head required at 4,000 gpm (high head loss): >/ =?@A@BC + BEFG + GBC@BFE >/ = 103+ 0.8+2.0 + 0.5+22.1 = 128.4

Example Pump Selection 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 Total Dynamic Head, ft 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1000 2000 3000Flow Rate, gpm4000 5000 6000 7000

Pump Selection Hydraulic Institute Standards 9.6.3 (2012) Preferred Operating Range (POR) Generally 70% - 120% of Q BEP Optimum Performance Minimal Vibration (Shake) Minimal NPSH Margin (Rattle) Maximum Service Life (Less Roll)

Pump Selection Hydraulic Institute Standards 9.6.3 (2012) Allowable Operating Range (AOR) Defined by manufacturer (not always clear on pump curve) Region outside of POR More Noise (Rattle) More Vibration (Shake and Roll) Reduced Service Life (unhappy client) Do not go beyond AOR limits

POR and AOR, Illustrated 70% of Q BEP BEP Yellow region is AOR by Mfgr 120% of Q BEP

Single Pump Selection AOR/POR Q BEP Efficiency Impeller Size Horsepower 2000 gpm @ 85 ft TDH

Pump Arrangement Series Discharge of Pump 1 connected to Suction of Pump 2 Same pumping rate, doubles head Parallel Pumps 1 and 2 operate independently and discharge to a common manifold Suctions for Pumps 1 and 2 may or may not be common For identical pumps, double pumping rate @ same head For dissimilar pumps, add pumping rates @ same head (if possible)

Pump Curves (centrifugal)

Parallel Pump Selection 180 160 Triplex station (2 duty, 1 standby) must discharge peak flow rate of 660 gpm against the high and low system curves shown. Identify pump selection for the specs. 140 Total Dynamic Head, ft 120 100 80 60 120 ft TDH Rated Duty Point 330 gpm @ 120 ft TDH (AOR) 40 20 330 gpm 660 gpm 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Flow Rate, gpm

Parallel Pump Selection 180 160 Triplex station (2 duty, 1 standby) must discharge peak flow rate of 660 gpm against the high and low system curves shown. Identify pump selection for the specs. 140 120 120 ft TDH Total Dynamic Head, ft 100 80 60 40 20 Rated Duty Point 330gpm @ 120 ft TDH (AOR) 330 gpm Selection Duty Point = Q gpm @ 95 ft TDH. 660 gpm 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Flow Rate, gpm

Pump Selection Considerations Develop system hydraulics for worst/best cases but don t select pumps based on worst case (i.e. C 100) use as a check Make preliminary selection with runout condition within POR Make final selection on the basis of least NPSH R (next session) Avoid speeds greater than 1200 rpm if possible

Questions/Discussion