Bird Response to Wildlife Enhancement Silvicultural Treatments

Similar documents
What s New in NH Northern Hardwoods Silviculture the wildlife habitat elements

Many of Missouri s forest landowners are interested

UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY

Appendix 1: Indicators for Forest Target

Managing Birds in New York Kristi L. Sullivan, Extension Associate, Cornell Department of Natural Resources, Ithaca, NY

Predicted Responses of Wildlife to Silvicultural Treatments with special focus on Pine Oak Hemlock Types

SILVICULTURE & WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT

Maintaining and enhancing wildlife habitat

Biodiversity & Forestry By Dawn Burke

Managing for a healthy sugarbush in a changing climate

ACORN WOODPECKER (Melanerpes formicivorus)

Ontario Hardwood Overview. Hardwood Tour Oct.19-21

FOREST MANAGEMENT FOR NEW YORK BIRDS

AVIFAUNA AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION IN CARMEL VALLEY, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1

Low-intensity fire burning on the forest floor. High-intensity crown fire

Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands

Silviculture with Birds in Mind. Options for Integrating Timber and Songbird Habitat Management in Northern Hardwood Stands in Vermont

A brief introduction to general terms and concepts related to the forestry learning objectives

THE EFFECTS OF VEGETATIVE DISTUBRANCE ON WINTER RIPARIAN BIRD POPULATIONS: A MULTINOMIAL ANALYSIS by

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

Are forest remnants in managed landscapes of the Eastern Canadian boreal forest suitable breeding habitats for cavity nesting birds?

Establishing Native Warm Season Grass and Legume Buffers for Water Quality and Wildlife Habitat Enhancement in Agricultural Landscapes

Peter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab

Responsible Forest Management IS Wildlife Management

Northern deciduous forest as wildlife habitat. Tom Paragi Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fairbanks

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

AMPHIBIANS AND FISH. Darren Fong Aquatic Ecologist, National Park Service. Emily Burns Director of Science & Education, Save the Redwoods League

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

Mar 19 Vegetation Structure: Controls, Patterns, Consequences

Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1

Principles of Wildlife Ecology & Management Maryland Woodland Stewards Training Workshop

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Mechanical Site Preparation

Visual Management System and Timber Management Application 1

Forestry. A Big Thanks

Fixed-Radius Point Counts in Forests: Factors Influencing Effectiveness and Efficiency 1

Province Integrated Resource Management Project

HEALTHY FORESTS FOR GOLDEN-WINGED WARBLER NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE WORKING LANDS FOR WILDLIFE FY17-21 CONSERVATION STRATEGY

Wildlife implications across snag treatment types in jack pine stands of Upper Michigan.

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Developing forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:

RESTORING OLD-GROWTH FEATURES TO MANAGED FORESTS IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO

Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

A Case Study of Habitat Conservation Plans and the Protection of Snags and Coarse Woody Debris on Industrial Forest Lands 1

COPPICE SILVICULTURE: SOME ALTERNATIVES AND APPLICATIONS

APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES

Telegraph Forest Management Project

Specialist Report for the Mountain Top PCT CE ~Silviculture~ Chris Roy, Forester March 15, 2015

Appendix C. Activity Codes

The Safe Harbor Program for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers in North Carolina

SINGLE-SPECIES VERSUS MULTIPLE-SPECIES APPROACHES FOR MANAGEMENT

Change Monitoring Inventory

COOPERS ROCK STATE FOREST FORKS OF SCOTT RUN PISGAH PROJECT SILVICULTURAL PRESCRIPTION & OVERVIEW FOR MULTIPLE USE MANAGEMENT

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Shortleaf Pine-Bluestem Restoration

Quality Response of Even-Aged 80-Year-Old White Oak Trees ter Thinning

Characteristics of Five Climax Stands in New Hampshire

A Landscape Perspective on Pheasant Biology and Habitat Needs

MANAGED FOREST LANDS STEWARDSHIP FORESTRY PLAN

Wildlife Resources Report

Birds with Silviculture in Mind Birder s Dozen Pocket Guide for Vermont Foresters

Big Hill Insect and Disease Project Proposed Action

Assessing Ice and Snow Storm Damaged Forest Stands

Section 12. Crowns: Measurements and Sampling

Pros and Cons of Salvage and Restoration Operations

Habitat Stewardship Series n e w h a m p s h i r e w i l d l i f e a c t i o n p l a n

UNIT LESSON PLAN RX-310, INTRODUCTION TO FIRE EFFECTS. 2. Identify how fire and other disturbances function within and across ecosystems

BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSIDERATIONS IN MANAGED FORESTS

CARBON FORESTRY WORKSHOP

Chapter 13 Private Native Forestry: River Red Gum

Forest Descriptions and Photographs of Forested Areas Along the Breaks of the Missouri River in Eastern Montana, USA

Nettle Patch Vegetation Management Project

Silviculture for Washington Family Forests

APPLYING SELECTION SYSTEM SILVICULTURE

Wood Thrush. Appendix A: Birds. Hylocichla mustelina. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Birds-216

Holter Ridge Thinning Study, Redwood National Park: Preliminary Results of a 25-Year Retrospective 1

Plantation Forestry: A Global Look

December Abstract

A Land Manager's Guide to. Improving Habitat for Forest Thrushes

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

Wildlife Management Concepts

INTENSIVE GROUP SELECTION SILVICULTURE IN CENTRAL HARDWOODS AFTER 40 YEARS I. Leon S. Minckler 2

CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT

Curbing greenhouse gas emissions will reduce future California bird loss

WOODLOT LICENCE W1900 WOODLOT LICENCE PLAN TERM 10 YEARS. August, 2007 to August, 2017

Forests on the Ground

Appendix F : Comment Period Input and Forest Service Responses

Draft Wildlife Resource Report

Diameter-Limit Cutting and Silviculture in Northeastern Forests: A Primer for Landowners, Practitioners, and Policymakers

The Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee (UMRCC) The UMRCC Wildlife Technical Section Randy Urich, Gary Swenson and Eric Nelson

2/24/2009. The factors that determine what type of forest will grow in a region are temperature precipitation growing season soil land forms

THE STATUS OF VERMONT FOREST BIRDS: A Quarter Century of Monitoring

TRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS

Spring Bird Communities in the Southern Washington Cascade Range

MANAGING YOUR WOODLAND FOR. White-tailed Deer

VEGETATION PATTERNS IN A FOREST UNDERSTORY

Central Texas vegetation: the role of fire

Red Hill Restoration

Transcription:

Bird Response to Wildlife Enhancement Silvicultural Treatments Daniel Twedt U. S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

Forest Management Desired Forest Conditions for Wildlife

Desired Stand Conditions Reduced basal area Patchy canopy cover (reduced and with gaps) Understory developed Emergent trees Cavity & den trees Stressed/dead/dying trees Vines & cane present

Stand Conditions (Primary Management Factors) Forest measurement Desired Stand Condition Conditions that may warrant management Canopy cover 60 70 % >80% Mid-story cover 25 40 % <20% or >50% Basal area 60 70 ft 2 /acre >90 ft 2 /acre with > 25% older age class Tree stocking 60 70 % <50% or >90%

Stand Conditions (Secondary Management Factors) Forest measurement Desired Stand Condition Conditions that may warrant management Dominant trees >0.5 / acre <0.25 / acre Under-story cover 25 40% <20% or >60% Regeneration (advanced intolerant) 30-40% of area <20% of area Coarse woody debris >200 ft³ / acre <100ft³ / acre Small cavities (< 10 diameter) Den trees (> 10 diameter) Standing dead / stressed trees >4 visible holes / acre <2 visible holes / acre >1 visible hole / acre <1 visible holes / acre >6 stems / acre >10 dbh <4 stems / acre >10 dbh >2 stems/ac >20 dbh <1 stem/ac >20 dbh

Desired Landscape Condition (>10,000 acres) Habitat Type Proportion of area Forest Cover 70 100 % - Managed forest 70 95 % - Regenerating forest <10 % Passively managed forest 5 30 % Shrub/scrub <5 % At any point in time 35 50% of area would meet DSC

Forest Management Options Even-aged Clear cuts Shelterwood Seed tree Results Little overstory Even canopy Bird species change Mostly shrub species Uneven-aged Thinning Group selection Patch cuts Single tree selection Results Overstory remains Uneven canopy Bird species stable Priority species increase

Forest Management Options

Desired Stand Conditions Conditions achieved though: Clustered or Variable-Retention thinning That result in: Retained and protected dominant trees Open canopies that promote understory proliferation Patch-cuts wherein shade-intolerant tree species (e.g. oaks) regenerate

Uncut Thinned Thinned with patches

Stand Conditions Parameter Control Treated Canopy Cover (%) 94 80 Basal Area (ft 2 /acre) 140 96 Understory Cover (%) 59 78 Advanced Regeneration 42 585 Dead Trees (stems/acre) 10 4 Crown Projection Area (ft 2 ) 322 366 Stem Diameter (QMD inch) 13 13 6 years post-harvest

Stand Conditions Parameter Control Treated Canopy Cover (%) 94 80 Basal Area (ft 2 /acre) 140 96 Understory Cover (%) 59 78 Advanced Regeneration 42 585 Dead Trees (stems/acre) 10 4 Crown Projection Area (ft 2 ) 322 366 Stem Diameter (QMD inch) 13 13

Treatments intended to benefits bears, migratory songbirds, and resident game species. Are treatments effective? How do breeding and wintering birds respond to silviculture treatments

Silviculture & Bird Densities THINNED Thinned 1 13 years post-treatment (most <6 years) Thinned with patches UNCUT THINNED Uncut WITH PATCHES

Breeding Bird Densities 23 stands: 25m 50m 100m 9 thinned, 9 uncut, 5 patch-cut 6 point-counts / stand 3 visits / year for 2 years

Breeding Bird Densities (Similar Densities Treated and Control) Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Carolina Wren 3.5 birds / ha Yellow-throated Vireo Northern Cardinal Hooded Warbler Blue Jay Downy Woodpecker Great-crested Flycatcher Northern Parula Red-bellied Woodpecker Wood Thrush <0.1 birds / ha

Breeding Bird Densities (Similar Densities (Neutral response Treated and?) Control) Prothonotary Warbler 0.88 birds / ha 0.05 birds / ha Swainson s Warbler

Breeding Bird Densities (Negative response: birds / ha) Species Treated Control Acadian Flycatcher 3.4 4.6 Tufted Titmouse 2.3 3.1 Carolina Chickadee 1.0 1.3 Summer Tanager 0.6 1.0 Red-eyed Vireo 0.4 0.7

Breeding Bird Densities (Positive response: birds / ha) Species Treated Control Orchard Oriole 0.22 0.04 Red-headed Woodpecker 0.11 0.06 Kentucky Warbler 0.19 0.06 Eastern Towhee 0.66 0.12 Yellow-breasted Chat 1.06 0.01 Eastern Wood-pewee 0.24 0.16

Breeding Bird Densities (Positive response: birds / ha) Species Treated Control Indigo Bunting 1.91 0.92 White-eyed Vireo 1.83 1.03 Brown-headed Cowbird 1.48 1.20

Temporal Response

Detections Years post-treatment

Detections Years post-treatment

Detections Years post-treatment

Breeding Bird Densities Temporal Effects Species Apex Duration Red-headed Woodpecker 1 8 Eastern Wood-pewee 3 10 Orchard Oriole 5 11 Brown-headed Cowbird 7 12 White-eyed Vireo 8 16* Swainson s Warbler 16* 28* * Exceeds span of years evaluated

Winter birds -250 m line transects -2 transects per stand Thin Patch Uncut Species 16 16 14 Abundance 105 172 70 Thin: Rusty Blackbird & Red-headed Woodpecker Patch: Swamp and White-throated Sparrows, Common Grackle, & American Goldfinch Uncut: Golden-crowned Kinglet & American Robin

Constant Effort Netting

Constant Effort Netting 50 Treated Contol Daily Captures 40 30 20 10 0 May June July August

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Winter Captures Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Thin Patch Uncut Captures / 100 net hours

Captures / 600 net-hours 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 INBU YBCH 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Years Post Treatment

Captures / 600 net-hours 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 NOCA WEVI 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Years Post Treatment

Captures / 600 net-hours 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 HOWA SWWA 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Years Post Treatment

Recommendations Treatment severity >50% canopy retained Embedded in matrix of treatment ages (0 13 yrs) Patch-cuts up to 3 acres Treatment extent DFC recommendation of 30% area non-treated Treatment Intervals 12 16 years for most species >20 years for some species

Priority Birds Methods West Coast Option! Ecologically Appropriate Landscape Context Thinning = > Understory Multiple Tree Species Retention of Forest Structure How Much and Where Snags and Downed Wood Bird Response

Questions?