UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

edit subtitle style 1

edit subtitle style 1

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC USE OF MICROBIAL PATHOGEN COMPUTER MODELING IN HACCP PLANS

United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. is revising the United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef (beef standards) to

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES BACKGROUND

Cost Control Systems. Conclusion. Is the District Using the Cost Control Systems Best Practices? Internal Auditing. Financial Auditing

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION. January 8, Mr. Ron Foster, CEO. P.O. Box 457. Dear Mr. Foster:

Audit Engagement Fixed Assets Follow Up Audit

NR CHECKLIST Rev. 1. QAM IMP References NBIC Part 3, 1.8 Y N Y N a. Organization. Company Name/Certificate Number: Page 1 of 26

REPORT 2014/137 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of management of expendable inventory in the African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 7 ON-CALL POLICY/PROCEDURES

White Paper: Food Safety Enforcement and Inspection Actions and Terminology

Z'S BEES EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Quality Control Manuals

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures

Report on Inspection of KPMG Auditores Consultores Ltda. (Headquartered in Santiago, Republic of Chile)

OFFICE OF THE CITY AUDITOR Long Beach, California

Retail Payment Systems Internal Control Questionnaire

Report on Inspection of KAP Purwantono, Sungkoro & Surja (Headquartered in Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia)

Modernization of Meat Inspection in Swine Status for USA

PAYROLL CHECK-OFF AUDIT

PART 6 - INTERNAL CONTROL

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT BRAYS ISLAND PLANTATION COLONY, INC. Brays Island is a Drug-Free Workplace

Timekeeping Procedures

Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (AC 00-56)

INVENTORY MANAGEMENT POLICY Approved March 14, 2017

Report on Inspection of KPMG AG Wirtschaftspruefungsgesellschaft (Headquartered in Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany)

DEVELOPING A FOOD DEFENSE PLAN A GUIDE

Livestock Information Management System (LIMS) SADC SPS CC Meeting, 29 January 2014, Gaborone, Botswana

Report on Inspection of Deloitte LLP (Headquartered in Toronto, Canada) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Guidance Document. A guide to HACCP systems in the Meat Industry. Volume March 2017

Bulk Metals Qualified Suppliers List for Distributors (QSLD) Criteria and Provisions

CONTROL OF MONITORING AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT

ZOLL Document Number: 90E0004 Page 5 of 15 Maintenance of Quality Records

VDH Procedures for Certification and Standardization of Food Inspection Staff Division of Food and Environmental Services

CORP Appendix A CORPORATE POLICY. Attachments: Related Documents/Legislation: Revenue Administrative Policy

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

I-9 Process Guide. Alka Bahal, Esq. Partner & Co-Chair Corporate Immigration Practice

CITY OF SAUK RAPIDS Application for Employment

Washington Meal Period and Rest Break Policy and Acknowledgement Form

Instructions for Supplier Survey

INQUIRY Swift Beef Company, Establishment 969G Export of Ineligible Beef to Japan

Microsoft Dynamics GP2010 Inventory Year-End Closing Checklist

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL

CHAPTER 5 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONTROLS

MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

January 8, Dear Valued Customer:

Appendix B. Sanitation Performance Standards

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Internal Audit Report. Contract Administration: 601CT Contracts TxDOT Internal Audit Division

Report on Inspection of Deloitte & Associes (Headquartered in Neuilly-sur-Seine, French Republic) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Report on. Issued by the. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. June 16, 2016 THIS IS A PUBLIC VERSION OF A PCAOB INSPECTION REPORT

BASIC EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION PILOT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

INS QA Programme Requirements

Instructions for Completing Competitive Carrier Line Count Report FCC Form 525

Time & Attendance Management. An Overview

Company LOGO C B T. An Educational Computer Based Training Program

HFTP Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals

Whether you take in a lot of money. or you collect pennies

Internal Control Questionnaire and Assessment

Modification History. Unit Descriptor. Application of the Unit. Licensing/Regulatory Information. Pre-Requisites. Employability Skills Information

ABC Company Recommended Course of Action

BIG BEEF MEAT INSPECTION REPORTS. These inspection reports were obtained by the Kansas City Star under the federal Freedom of Information Act.

WHAT TO DO DURING AN IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) VISIT

WAREHOUSE SUPERVISOR

College of Engineering and Computer Science Dean's Office

Subpart C_Roadway Worker Protection

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FAA DRUG ABATEMENT PROGRAM INSPECTION GUIDE

Colorado Meal Period and Rest Break Policy and Acknowledgement Form

Whether a Poultry Slaughter or

TTC AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT NO.

Manifest Information. Types of Manifests. Universal Hazardous Waste Manifest

MEAT SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM (MSQA)

CONTROLLER S OFFICE. Cash Handling Procedures Guide. Prepared by: Bryan Dadey Assistant Controller

John G. Surak PhD Surak and Associates Clemson, SC

Supervision of Persons who are not Limited Certificate Holders

Report on Inspection of Grant Thornton Auditores Independentes (Headquartered in Sao Paulo, Federative Republic of Brazil)

Human Resources Guide to Completing the Revised Employment Eligibility Verification (I-9 Form)

Accounts Payable-Vendor Partnership

Guide to Internal Controls

Internal Operating Procedure ISO 9001:2008 SOC NEVADA LLC

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE 35065

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR ANIMAL QUARANTINE & CERTIFICATION SERVICES

Job Descriptions Room Division Front Office Agenda

Maschmeyer Concrete Company of Florida EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Internal Audit Report. Professional Engineering Procurement Services (PEPS) Consultant Procurement Process TxDOT Internal Audit Division

Mentors and Partners for Candidates in the Induction Program to Clear a Preliminary Single Subject, Multiple Subject, or Education Specialist

EMPLOYEE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

MEATPRO PROCUREMENT AND PAYMENT. Procurement and Payment MEATPRO

Approved Supplier Guidance

NORTH WASCO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 21

Desk Audit of. Based on Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidelines FTA-IT

APPENDIX "K" Amtrak/BLET Engineer Training Agreement. I. ETP Candidate Selection Process, Pay Rates & Allowances

Leave of Absence Policy

Internal Control Questionnaire and Assessment

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC FSIS NOTICE 52-09 8/5/09 ANTE-MORTEM VERIFICATION OF LIVESTOCK OFFERED FOR SLAUGHTER BY THE ESTABLISHMENT DO NOT IMPLEMENT THIS NOTICE UNTIL AUGUST 16, 2009. I. PURPOSE This notice provides inspection program personnel (IPP) with instructions on how to verify and reconcile the number of animals presented for ante-mortem inspection with the number of animals passed for slaughter and then slaughtered. II. GENERAL Establishments are required to present livestock for ante-mortem inspection on the day of slaughter (9 CFR 307.2(a), 9 CFR 309.1(a)). The establishment identifies those animals that need ante-mortem inspection to IPP (e.g. PHV, CSI, FI). However, there is not a uniform method of presenting these animals to IPP. The establishment needs to do so in a manner that will allow IPP to conduct and document that ante-mortem inspection has been performed (e.g., through use of a pen card or drive sheet). This documentation is necessary to facilitate IPP s verification of the number of animals presented for ante-mortem inspection and to reconcile that number with the number of animals slaughtered. IPP are to request a document (e.g., a pen card or drive sheet) from the establishment that provides sufficient space for IPP to record the following: 1. the date ante-mortem inspection was performed, 2. the pen/lot number, 3. the number and slaughter class of livestock in the pen/lot that were offered and passed ante-mortem inspection, 4. the time ante-mortem inspection was performed, and 5. the IPP s signature or initials. DISTRIBUTION: Electronic NOTICE EXPIRES: 8/1/10 OPI: OPPD

If IPP do not receive this document, then the animals are not sufficiently offered for slaughter (9 CFR 309.1(b)). Accordingly, they cannot effectively perform ante-mortem inspection and thus are not able to pass the animals for slaughter. IPP are to advise the establishment that the IPP are unable to conduct ante-mortem inspection because the establishment has not provided an appropriate document. NOTE: All IPP who conduct AM inspection should have successfully passed the February 2009 humane handling training module. III. IPP PROCEDURES FOR VERIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF LIVESTOCK OFFERED FOR ANTE-MORTEM INSPECTION A. IPP are to periodically verify the accuracy of the number of livestock presented for ante-mortem inspection recorded by the establishment on the pen card or other document. 1. The frequency that this verification is to be performed is to be determined through discussions by the IIC with the Frontline Supervisor (FLS). It is to be based on the establishment s history of accurately recording the number of livestock on the document (e.g., pen card, drive sheet) that is presented to IPP. 2. Verification is performed after the establishment has identified and presented livestock for ante-mortem inspection with a pen card or other document. 3. If the count reveals that the number provided by the establishment is accurate, then IPP are to complete ante-mortem 4. If the number of livestock provided by the establishment is inaccurate, then IPP are to: a. ask establishment personnel to present a pen card with the correct number or cross-out the incorrect number and write in the correct number; b. initial the changes on the pen card that were made by the establishment; and c. complete ante-mortem 5. If the establishment personnel refuse to make the correction, IPP are to discontinue ante-mortem IPP are to: a. retain the livestock by taking a regulatory control action according to 9 CFR 500.2 (a) (3); b. issue an NR to the establishment describing that the establishment refused to provide accurate information for the efficient conduct of ante-mortem inspection and enter the correct number of livestock in the NR; and c. use PBIS code 06D02 and cite 9 CFR 307.2 in the NR. 2

IV. IPP PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING ANTE-MORTEM INSPECTION A. IPP are to perform ante-mortem inspection, account for animals that pass antemortem inspection, and follow the instructions for identifying, controlling and accounting for livestock that do not pass ante-mortem inspection, as described in FSIS Directive 6100.1 Ante-Mortem Livestock Inspection. 1. IPP are to inspect and pass those livestock found to be healthy on antemortem 2. IPP are to request that establishment personnel segregate livestock that need further examination by the PHV from livestock that have passed ante-mortem NOTE: Animals are to be segregated in a humane manner. 3. IPP (the PHV or under PHV supervision) are to condemn livestock found dead in the pen and tag them as US Condemned. These livestock are accounted for by using the Identification Tag Ante-Mortem form (FSIS Form 6150-1). 3. IPP are to account for the number of livestock in the pens. If livestock are removed from the pen (e.g. deads, livestock segregated for PHV examination), then IPP are to: a. request that establishment personnel correct the number of livestock written on the pen card by crossing out the number presented and entering the new total, and b. initial the change. B. After ante-mortem inspection is completed, IPP are to record on the pen card or other document provided by the establishment, the time that ante-mortem inspection was performed and are to sign or initial the document. Once this is done, ante-mortem inspection is complete, and the livestock may be driven to slaughter. C. For livestock segregated for examination by a PHV: 1. PHVs are to examine the livestock and make one of the following dispositions for these segregated livestock: CFR 309.18), or a. passed for normal slaughter, b. passed for slaughter but tagged, or handled, as a U.S. Suspect animal (9 c. condemned and tagged as a U.S. Condemned animal. 3

2. PHVs are to account for the segregated livestock by using: a. a pen card (or other documentation) for those animals passed for normal slaughter; or b. FSIS Form 6150-1, Identification Tag Ante-Mortem form, for those animals that are U.S. Suspected or U.S. Condemned. V. IPP VERIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING THAT LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTERED AT AN ESTABLISHMENT HAVE RECEIVED ANTE-MORTEM INSPECTION A. IPP are to verify that only livestock that have passed ante-mortem inspection are moved to slaughter. The IIC, in consultation with the FLS, is to determine at what frequency IPP will need to perform these duties. 1. Periodically throughout the slaughter day, but no less than once per shift, IPP are to verify that livestock being driven to slaughter have received ante-mortem 2. IPP are to perform this verification by observing livestock handlers driving livestock from the holding pens to the slaughter area and then verify that: a. the establishment s documentation (e.g., pen card or other document) is matched to the animals being driven to slaughter; and b. the documentation has an IPP signature or initial and time that indicates ante-mortem was performed. NOTE: IPP can conduct this activity as part of the Humane Activities Tracking System (HATS) verification. However, verification of animal handling, over time, is not to be limited to the post ante-mortem inspection location. B. IPP are to verify that the number of livestock slaughtered (during a slaughter shift) is no more than the number of livestock that have passed ante-mortem The postmortem location for this verification procedure is to be determined by the IIC at the establishment. It will vary from establishment to establishment. IPP are to perform this verification by: 1. Periodically throughout a slaughter shift, at postmortem inspection for a particular lot, tally the number of livestock receiving ante-mortem inspection using the establishment s documentation (e.g., pen card or other document); and 2. Comparing this number with the establishment s total for the number of livestock slaughtered in that lot. The establishment s running total for livestock slaughtered may be recorded by the establishment, for example, on drive sheets (or drive cards) or using automatic counters. (The method will vary between establishments.) C. IPP are responsible for reconciling, on a random basis, the number of animals 4

receiving ante-mortem inspection with the number of animals slaughtered during a shift. This verification is to be performed at least weekly for each shift. 1. IPP are to reconcile during their normal tour of duty, the total number of animals that received ante-mortem inspection with the total number of animals slaughtered for a shift. IPP are to reconcile these numbers by: a. determining the number of livestock that were eligible for slaughter by examining and totaling the number of livestock on verified documentation (e.g., pen cards and other documents) and the completed Identification Tag Ante-Mortem forms (FSIS Form 6150-1) for that shift; b. comparing this number to the establishment s total number of head slaughtered; and c. determining whether there are discrepancies. 2. If IPP find that there is a discrepancy, then IPP are to discuss with establishment management why the numbers do not agree and determine how to reconcile these figures. IPP are to inquire whether any documentation maintained by the establishment will assist in determining the correct numbers. 3. If FSIS personnel determine that livestock were slaughtered without antemortem inspection, then IPP are to follow the instructions in FSIS Directive 6100.1 for livestock not receiving ante-mortem 4. If there is reason to suspect that animals have been slaughtered without receiving ante-mortem inspection, IPP are to retain the associated carcasses and parts in accordance with 9 CFR 500.2 (a) (3), and contact the district office immediately to discuss any further actions they are to take. VI. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTE-MORTEM INSPECTION The original, or a copy, of the documentation used by the establishment (e.g., pen card or other document) in presenting the animals for ante-mortem inspection is to be collected by IPP on a daily basis. IPP are to keep the ante-mortem information in the FSIS inspection office for one week following the end of the respective slaughter week. Refer questions regarding this notice to the Policy Development Division through askfsis at: http://askfsis.custhelp.com or by telephone at 1-800-233-3935. Assistant Administrator Office of Policy and Program Development 5