BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Prepared by TransPro Consulting July

Similar documents
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Nevin Grinnell Marketing January 10, 2012

2016 Kelowna Regional Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Project Update

CALGARY TRANSIT. Customer Satisfaction Survey 2013 O CTOBER HarGroup M anagement Consultants

METRO SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee February 16, 2006

Calgary Transit Annual Customer Satisfaction Survey

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

OneBusAway. Sharing real-time transit info

Dean Harrison P R E S I D E N T

The new Uber for Business. How to make the most of the new features

Transportation Report to SPC on Transportation and Transit 2017 March 15. ISC: UNRESTRICTED TT Page 1 of 7 ROUTEAHEAD UPDATE

ImageTrac. Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Index Average Industry Results. Seek Opportunities.

2016 UPS How to Click with High-Tech Online Shoppers

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department

Building Brand Community on the Harley-Davidson Posse Ride M740 CORPORATE REPUTATION AND BRAND MANAGEMENT

User Guide. MyRide 1

Quick Intro: Margaret Young, Chief Customer Experience Officer

General Population Survey Summary

Chapter 4. Review Questions. Amy Hissom. Homework #5 Focusing On Customers. TECH Quality Standards. Monday, February 07, 2011

Customer & Community Satisfaction Survey

Safety and Service Delivery Committee. Action Item III-A. January 11, 2018

Mobility on Demand for Improving Business Profits and User Satisfaction

New Zealand NPS Industry Benchmarks

Transit, Intercity Bus, Taxi 8-1

TRANSIT SERVICES Business Plan

The Employee Net Promoter Score: A (new) Metric for Assessing Your Workforce Engagement Profile

2015/16 Public Transport Passenger Satisfaction Survey

store for Buckshaw Village and Euxton

Licence Application Decision

2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey

Madison Metro Transit: Transfer Point Centers. Summary: Description:

WHAT MAKES A GREAT VISITOR ATTRACTION? Visitor Attraction Research (2016)

Transit Service Guidelines

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

ACCENTURE RESEARCH. TRAVEL FLASH RESEARCH CHINA INSIGHTS February, 2018

The Changing Attitudes of Canada s Frequent Business Traveller. Presented by: Dave Pierzchala

Contact: Jessica Maxwell Marketing Director (254)

Client Experience Management

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transit Implementation Guidelines for Small Canadian Municipalities

ANSON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM P.O. BOX 672 WADESBORO, NC

2015 Global State of Multichannel Customer Service Report

A new Aldi store for Bingham A NEW ALDI FOOD STORE FOR BINGHAM MORE CHOICE FOR RESIDENTS IN BINGHAM

TASK 4.1 DRAFT DEVELOPMENT OF BUS SERVICE GUIDELINES. Connecticut DOT 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06111

Kansas Rural Transit ITS Deployment

March 2017 USING PRESTO ON GO TRANSIT

HOLISTIC EVENT IMPACT MEASUREMENT. Value and Impact of the 2014 NFL Pro Bowl in Hawai i Hawai i Tourism Authority Repucom June 17, 2015

City of La Habra Heights Dial-A-Ride

You Have the Data, Now What?

Office of the Director of National Intelligence. IC Annual Employee Climate Survey. April Summary Results

2. OMNITRANS SYSTEM. 2.3 Omnitrans Services. 2.1 Background. 2.4 Traditional Fixed Route Service. 2.2 Omnitrans Mission TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES

HEALTH CARE HIRING HITS BOTTOM LINE

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Mobile Shopping. November Copyright 2012 Lightspeed Research. Proprietary Information. All Rights Reserved.

Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority. Visitor Profile Study Top Line Results Preliminary Summer 2015

The Power of Brand Delivery

Using the Three-Factor Method to Identify Improvement Priorities for Express and Local Bus Services in the Twin Cities

Introduction to Transportation Systems

Performance Level Analyses of Public Transportation Using Importance- Performance Analysis Method

Rural to Urban Intercity Transit User Characteristics Analysis, Demand Estimation and Network Design

Rate Your Ride. Final Report. Presented by

2015 China Marketing Plan. Presented by Brenda He

Does Gen Y want the keys to the car? The changing nature of mobility

ADVERTISING 2016 INFORMATION & RATES. Kim Britton, Marketing Director

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

12 th Annual MetLife U.S. Employee Benefits Trends Study

Paradox between public transport and private car as a modal choice in policy formulation

Rider s Guide. Paratransit Services Transit Division Department of Transportation Broward County Board of County Commissioners. Rev.

Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA)

Moving In the Right Direction. HandyDART Survey Results

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

An Empirical Research on the Penetration Levels for a Call-a- Cab Service in Mumbai

Possible ways to improve public bus transportation in Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Training Manual. Learn all about, YOUR Mahala loyalty bene t CALL US: The PSACLUB is proudly powered by:

JUNE Hong Kong jewellery & gem Fair

Home. Profile Your information. Trip History Forgot where you were? Non-cash Payments Pay your trip with Namba Wallet

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

TRANSPORTATION FACTS. OUR CUSTOMERS: Travel Patterns

2012 Employee Climate Survey. Monica R. Allen, PhD Performance & Evaluation Manager September 18, 2012

TOUCH IOT WITH SAP LEONARDO PROTOTYPE CHALLENGE

North Side Transfer Zone. Public Open House April 16, 2014

MAD MEN: THE DMV VERSION

Operationalizing NPS Benchmarks. How to Use Comparative Data to Drive Customer Experience Success

7) Flexibility is a difficult performance objective to deal with because: 7) A) It just is B) It is difficult to define

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

Improving Customer Satisfaction

Market Need Data on Improving Engagement. Wouldn t it be great to develop new engagement strategy based on real data?

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

A Guide to the Net Promoter Score for Your Business

STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 2 MAY 16, 2017

Bus Passenger Survey - spring 2016 results

Changing the delivery experience for the better. Updating our signature service

Moscow Transport in the Smart City: Current Status and Development Plans

Metro Transit Service Reliability Measures Assessment

CHAPTER 1 COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION BASIC INFORMATION

School Bus Driver and Assistants Job Satisfaction Survey Report

2014 Technician / Service Advisor Survey:

Bus Information Strategy

Transcription:

BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Prepared by TransPro Consulting July 21 2016

County Population: 214,405 ppen i r G. M y h t o Tim utive c e x E y t n u o C Arthur j. Shafer Chair of the Legislature 1996 Dave Ma'hews 2

3 Since 1996, Broome County s Landscape Changed. ü Shifts in Employment Centers ü New Retail Destinations ü Customer Profile has Changed BC Transit Routes Remained The Same Since 1996.

4 In Just The Past Year, BC Transit ü Conducted A Route Evaluation ü Expanded Routes to New Locations ü Increased Frequencies ü Moved Service To Meet Customer Demands ü Kept Fares Stable ü Maintained Workforce ü Increased Customer Satisfaction ü Reduced Costs to Taxpayers by $435,000

Customer Sa/sfac/on Survey Results TransPro Consulting BC TRANSIT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

THE METHODOLOGY Survey was conducted May 3 8, 2016. 522 surveys were completed by customers on board BC Transit buses. Surveys were administered during all service periods throughout the day on weekdays, Saturday and Sunday in quan//es propor/onal to each route s total ridership. Riders were offered a one day pass as an incen/ve for comple/ng the survey. 6

FINDINGS 7

8 Frequency of Use 66% of customers utilize BC Transit service five or more days per week. 80% 70% 66% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 23% 8% 3% 1% 5+ days per week 3-4 days per week 1-2 days per week 2-3 /mes per month Once a month or less BC Transit 8

9 Purpose of Use More than half of customers utilize BC Transit service primarily for travel to/ from work and almost a quarter for travel to/from school. 60% Most Frequent Trip Purpose 50% 51% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 22% 7% 8% 9% 4% Work Educa>on Shopping Leisure/Social Medical Other BC Transit 9

10 Transit Dependence 71% of BC Transit customers indicate they do not have a choice of whether to use BC Transit service. 29% of BC Transit customers are discre>onary riders. Among discre>onary riders, convenience and economics are the most frequently cited reason for using BC Transit service. 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Do you have a choice whether to use BC Transit buses or not? 71% No 29% Yes If so, what is the #1 reason you choose transit? The bus comes so oven it's just as convenient I want to save money It's beuer for the environment I want to support public transit I want to be able to work instead of driving I want to have fun without worrying about driving 1% 5% 12% 16% 29% 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% BC Transit 10

11 Net Promoter Score NPS poses the ultimate question: All things considered, how likely would you be to recommend riding a BC Transit bus to a friend or neighbor?

12 Net Promoter Score The Metric Assesses loyalty and word of mouth favorability among customers Introduced in the Harvard Business Review Allows for performance comparisons between organizations across different business sectors Sample NPS Scores En>ty NPS Apple Inc. 70% Airlines 23% Car Rental Agencies 18% Internet Service Providers 5% Transit Industry 12% 12

13 BC Transit Net Promoter Score 50% 45% 44% 40% 35% 34% 30% 25% 22% 20% 15% 10% Industry Avg NPS 12% 5% 0% Detractors (0-6) Passives (7-8) Promoters (9-10) Likelihood of Recommending BC Transit 13

Customer Importance Factors 14 Service availability (frequency, hours) and price are the most important service factors for customers. 30% 28% 25% 20% 15% 10% 15% 13% 12% 10% 5% 6% 4% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 0% Frequency, Hrs Price Svs Coverage Drivers friendly Time (OTP) Travel time Schedule/Maps Bus Safety Clean buses Comfort (crowding) Real time info Cust Svs Reps 14

Customer Importance Factors 15 Customers selec/ng buses arrive on /me and bus cleanliness had higher NPS scores. Customers selec/ng real /me info, courteous customer service representa/ves and accuracy / availability of schedules and maps had lower NPS scores. 30% 28% Importance 43% NPS 40% 45% 40% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 33% 15% 16% 27% 13% 12% 11% 10% 6% -7% NPS 22% NPS 0% 4% -13% 11% 4% 3% 27% 2% 2% -9% 2% -13% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% Freq, Hrs Price Service coverage Drivers friendly Time (OTP) Travel time Schedule/Maps Bus Safety Clean buses Comfort (crowding) Real-time Info Cust Svs Reps Importance NPS 15

Availability 16 More than 80% of customers are satisfied with BC Transit's service coverage. Less than 73% of customers are satisfied with the service times and frequency. This is an increase over 2014 when 59% of customers expressed satisfaction with frequency. The bus routes are conveniently located for me 81% The buses operate on the days & times I need 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Answering Strongly Agree or Agree 16

17 Time 86% of customers agree that trip times are reasonable. More than 75% of customers agree that buses usually run on time. The bus gets me to my destination in a reasonable amount of time 86% The bus usually runs on time 77% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Answering Strongly Agree or Agree 17

Driver Customer Service 18 85% of customers agree that the buses are well driven. Over 80% of customers agree that the bus drivers are helpful and courteous. The bus is well driven 85% Bus drivers are helpful and courteous 81% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Answering Strongly Agree or Agree 18

Comfort 19 77% of customers agree that buses comfortable. 74% of customers agree that buses are clean. There is enough seating/space on the bus 77% The bus is clean 74% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Answering Strongly Agree or Agree 19

Safety & Security 20 More customers feel safe waiting for the bus than while riding the bus. I feel safe and secure wai/ng for my bus 85% I feel safe riding the bus 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 20

Information 21 83% of customers agree that it is easy to get information about BC Transit's services and schedules. Only 60% of customers agree that it is easy to find out if buses are on schedule. It is easy to get information about BC Transit's services & schedules 83% It is easy to find out if the buses are running on schedule 60% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % Answering Strongly Agree or Agree 21

Customer Service 22 73% of customers agree that when calling BC Transit, their calls are answered properly and Customer Service representatives are helpful and courteous. When I do call, BC Transit Customer Service representatives are helpful and courteous 73% When contacting Customer Service, my calls are answered promptly 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 22

Overall Satisfaction 23 76% of customers express overall satisfaction with BC Transit service. 85% of customers feel that service quality has improved or stayed the same over the past year. Overall Sa>sfac>on Service Quality Over Past Year 60% 50% 49% 70% 60% 60% 40% 50% 30% 20% 19% 27% 40% 30% 20% 15% 25% 10% 2% 4% 10% 0% Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied 0% Gotten worse Stayed about the same Improved

Driving Forward 24

25 ACTION ITEMS Discretionary Riders 29% of BC Transit riders are discretionary. Nationally, Millenials are driving significantly less than previous generations. Millenials are more environmentally conscious, seeking multi-modal transportation choices, and have embraced new technologies that reduce the need for driving, including using apps for public transit schedules and routes. In order to attract more discretionary riders, develop a marketing campaign promoting convenience and financial benefit of transit and target Millenials.

26 ACTION ITEMS Real Time Information & On-Time Performance Survey results show low satisfaction with ability to find out if buses are running on schedule. Perception of On-Time Performance (OTP) has improved since 2014 (62% to 75%) BC Transit does not have the technology to measure OTP. 1. Explore Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) technology. 2. Develop technology for sharing AVL information with customers. 3. Use the technology to be more efficient and improve On-Time Performance. 4. Use the technology to measure On-Time Performance. 5. Use the technology to integrate app technology for customers.

BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Prepared by TransPro Consulting July 21 2016