Corn Agronomy Update

Similar documents
On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Methods The trial was designed as a randomized complete block.

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPENDIX A. Corn Planting Guide

Agronomic Practices for Optimizing Corn Silage Production in Central Minnesota. Royalton, MN February 12, 2009

Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Influence on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains

Evaluation of Plant Density and Row Spacing to Optimize Hybrid Performance. Ty Barten Monsanto Company

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

2012 Organic Soybean Variety Trial

MAIZE GROWERS GUIDE. Table of Contents

2010 Vermont Organic Grain Corn Performance Trial Results

Non GMO Crop Production. Joe Lawrence

Sunflower Seeding Rate x Nitrogen Rate Trial Report

Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.

Current Impact of Changes in Corn Plant Density

Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product

Reduced Rates of Residual Herbicides with Burndown Products Perform Well with Conventional Corn Hybrids

CORN -PLANTER CALIBRATION FOR HIGHEST YIELDS

Manitoba Flax Production

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Institute of Ag Professionals

Result Demonstration Report

MULTI-HYBRID PLANTING MAKING THE MOST OUT OF EVERY ACRE

Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum News

Evaluation of Organic Corn and Popcorn Varieties and Fertilization

Optimum Soybean Seeding Rate when Using Cruiser Maxx and Precision Seeding

So You Want to Grow Corn. Battle River Research Group March

Cotton Cultural Practices and Fertility Management 1

2016 Management Yield Potential

Evaluation of Pumpkin Cultivars and Planting Methods Within a No-till System in West Virginia

A super power in your herbicide and fungicide applications.

Anna Willy and Clair Langlois Research Department, B.C. Grain Producers Association Dawson Creek

Texas Oat Variety Trial Results

OKLAHOMA PANHANDLE CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS, 2008

Evaluating the Impacts of Stripper Stubble on Corn Yields in NW Kansas Year 3 (2008)

OPTIMIZING CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS

I ntroduction. Oat Variety Screening in the Klamath Basin, 1995 R.L. Dovel and G. Chilcote'

SUGARCANE VARIETY FOCUS

Number 209 September 11, 2009

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

Nitrogen Rate Determination for Winter Wheat. Maximizing the Yield of Winter Wheat. Dale Cowan Agri-Food Laboratories

Corn Row Width and Plant Density Then and Now. Lauer, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

1. Wheat stubble burning: Pros and Cons 1 2. Management options for drought-stressed corn 3

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Industrial Hemp Plant Breeding & Harvesting. Biomaterials Back to the Future Conference March 18, 2008

Evaluation of Grain Sorghum Hybrid Varieties in Dryland Farming Conditions in Nueces County

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. CHAPTER 34 Estimating Corn Seedling Emergence and Variability

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Western Illinois University/Allison Organic Research Farm. Tillage/Cover Crop Experiment

Statement of the Problem

Livestock production in

Effects of Rye Cover Crop on Strip-Till Pumpkin Production in Northern Illinois

FIELD CROP MANAGEMENT How to address concerns identified in your Environmental Farm Plan Worksheet #19

DETERMINING THE GROWTH STAGES OF CORN AND SOYBEANS

Maximizing Soybean Yields

County Farm Centre May 2014 Your May issue:

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

2016 Soybean Variety Trial

2013 Flax Planting Date Trial

Introduction Growth Habits and Requirements Recommended Cultural Practices Pest Control Harvesting and Handling...

SOUTHERN STATES HYBRID SEED CORN

Spring Small Grain Seeding Rate Study Donald R. Clark and Jim E. Smith 1 I

Grain Sorghum 101. Copyright 2015 Sorghum Partners All Rights Reserved

2012 Organic Spring Wheat Weed Control Strategies Report

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa

Competitive Effects of Volunteer Corn (Zea mays L.) in Corn. Tye C. Shauck & Reid J. Smeda, University of Missouri

Irrigation Workshop. Brad Rathje, AquaSpy Inc

Crop Production Costs

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 8: Employing Conservation Tillage Practices

Texas Oat Variety Trial Results

Keywords: Phosphorus, sulphur, seed-placed fertilizer, canola (Brassica napus), plant stand, seed yield

Experiences with Kura Clover in Agricultural Systems in Wisconsin

PIONEER BRAND SUPER SWEET SUDAN CENTRAL QLD GROWING GUIDE RESEARCHED, TRIALLED AND TRUSTED. EVERY SINGLE SEED.

TEFF: Old Plant New Use. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Production, Pests, Profitability Neighborhood On-Farm Education for Field Corn and Alfalfa

Cost of Producing Narrow-Row Cotton in Mississippi

Organic Row Cropping Systems, Cover Crops, and Soil Health

BRAZILIAN SEED MARKET NEWS. By MNAGRO

MAIZE PRODUCTION GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Department of Agronomy

POTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE. Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames

NARC MWBC-DUR North Central Montana Off-Station Spring Durum Variety Performance Evaluations

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Potential Grain Yield Using Calculated Components Assume 90,000 kernels/bu and 56 lb/bu; kernel mass = 282 mg

Corn Planter Tune-ups: Why Bother?

Camelina a Potential New Oilseed for Washington, Idaho, and Oregon

Soybean Production Guide

Precision Ag. Back to Basics

2015 Vegetable Fertility Management Trial

2014 GULF COAST UNIFORM CORN HYBRID TRIALS

Quest for 300 Bushel Corn

SF723 (Revised) Barley

Location: Grant County, W. side of Dodson Rd, between Rd 8 and 8.5 NW Soil: Ephrata/Malaga gravely sandy loam Cropping system

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

Phosphorus and Potassium Recommendations for Illinois Crops

Stubble Mulch Judging : Extension Circular

Advanced Crop Science Instructional Framework

P 2 O 5, tonnes. Beausejour Steinbach Winkler Portage Brandon Melita Roblin NW Interlake. % testing low

Transcription:

135 Corn Agronomy Update Pam de Rocquigny, Soils and Crops Branch, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives, Box 1149, Carman, MB R0G 0J0 Email: pderocquig@gov.mb.ca Plant population affects yield by influencing all of the primary corn yield determinants: number of ears per acre, number of kernels per ear, and the weight per kernel. The optimum plant population for a field is determined by many factors, including the environment and crop management practices. According to the Corn Production in Manitoba manual (1999), current plant population recommendations for grain corn are: under normal yield conditions: 22,000 to 24,000 plants per acre under reduced yield conditions: 18,000 to 22,000 plants per acre under optimum yield conditions: up to 28,000 plants per acre In comparison, Ontario recommendations state final plant population should range from 26,000 to 32,000 plants per acre. Advances in plant breeding have made modern hybrids better able to withstand the stresses of high plant populations. As well, increased levels of fertility and improved herbicide weed control measures have helped to realize yield benefits from increasing plant population. Can Manitoba corn producers increase their optimum yield potential by increasing plant population? Are the current population recommendations accurate? Should these recommendations be altered if using narrow row spacing? The Manitoba Corn Growers Association undertook two studies to answer these questions. As well, a plant population survey of producers participating in the Manitoba Corn Growers Association yield competition was done to see if producers are utilizing the current recommendations. I. Plant Population Study Three hybrids of varying CHU ratings were grown at four different plant densities in Carman and Reinland in 2001 and in Graysville and Reinland in 2002. The hybrids were 39W54 (2100 CHU), 39T68 (2250 CHU), and 39A26 (2350 CHU). Each hybrid was seeded at a plant density approximately two thirds greater than the target density and was thinned after emergence to achieve the desired plant densities of 18,000, 24,000, 28,000, and 36,000 plants per acre. The sites were managed to produce a minimum yield of 110 bu/ac. Yield, moisture content at harvest, density, and stem breakage were measured. What We Found Population had a significant effect on yield at three out of the four site years, where an increase in population led to an increase in yield (see Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4). Population had no significant effect on moisture content at three out of the four site years. The only exception occurred at the Reinland 2001 site (Table 2), where increased population led to an increase in moisture content. Population had no significant effect on density at all four site years, indicating an increase in population did not negatively affect grain quality. Population had a significant effect on stem breakage at two of the four site years, where increases in plant population increased stem breakage. Increased stalk breakage at the Reinland 2001 site (Table 2) and the Graysville 2002 site (Table 3) did not translate into decreased yield, indicating the increase in yield due to increasing plant density overcame any yield or harvest losses resulting from stem breakage.

136 Hybrid had a bigger influence on moisture and density than population at all four site years (data not presented). Rather, moisture and density was more influenced by maturity of the hybrid. Generally, no interaction between hybrid and population for yield, moisture, density, or stem breakage occurred at all four site years, indicating all three hybrids responded similarly to increases in population. Table 1: Corn grain yield, moisture content, density, and stem breakage response to plant population treatment effects at Carman, MB (2001). 18,000 129 22.7 57.9 4.6 24,000 137 23.3 57.6 6.5 28,000 139 22.8 57.7 5.3 36,000 142 23.4 57.3 6.2 LSD (0.05) 11.4 1.1 0.5 2.9 Population 0.1431 0.4398 0.2277 0.5424 Table 2: Corn grain yield, moisture content, density, and stem breakage response to plant population treatment effects at Reinland, MB (2001). 18,000 141 20.1 58.4 3.1 24,000 154 20.1 58.4 3.8 28,000 155 19.8 58.1 6.3 36,000 171 21.1 58.0 12.0 LSD (0.05) 8.9 0.9 0.6 3.1 Population 0.0001 0.0390 0.5380 0.0001

137 Table 3: Corn grain yield, moisture content, density, and stem breakage response to plant population treatment effects at Graysville, MB (2002). 18,000 108 22.7 57.9 0.8 24,000 132 22.6 57.3 1.2 28,000 125 23.3 57.4 2.5 36,000 133 23.6 57.2 2.7 LSD (0.05) 10.2 1.1 0.8 1.1 Population 0.0001 0.1926 0.3655 0.0023 Table 4: Corn grain yield, moisture content, density, and stem breakage response to plant population treatment effects at Reinland, MB (2002). 18,000 117 20.4 56.7 1.7 24,000 135 20.2 57.0 1.5 28,000 139 20.9 56.5 2.2 36,000 144 20.8 56.2 2.6 LSD (0.05) 6.2 0.8 0.7 1.5 Population 0.0001 0.2180 0.1618 0.4610 Results indicated Manitoba corn producers might be able to realize an increase in yield by increasing their plant population. The two year study showed that increases in yield were possible up to 36,000 plants per acre without a decrease in quality or an increase in moisture content or stem breakage. The study also showed that the three hybrids studied could handle the increases in population. However, hybrid choice played a large role in determining moisture content at harvest and density. II. Survey of Manitoba Corn Producers In fall of 2003 while sampling for the Corn Yield Competition, final plant populations were measured to get a small picture of what populations Manitoba corn producers are using. What We Found Results from the survey indicated that producers are not using the current recommendations outlined in the Corn Production in Manitoba manual. Instead, the majority of producers are using higher plant populations than what the recommendations state (see Table 5).

138 Table 5: Number of producers utilizing the current plant population recommendations. Current Recommendation Normal Conditions 22,000-24,000 plants/ac Low Yield Conditions 18,000-22,000 plants/ac High Yield Conditions Up to 28,000 plants/ac Not Mentioned >28,000 plants/ac % of Producers (# of producers) 2% (1) 9% (4) 39% (17) 48% (21) III. Effect of Row Spacing on Population With the expansion of corn acres in Manitoba into non-traditional growing areas, questions often arise on the use of conventional seeding equipment for corn production. Producers often wonder what corn populations they should be targeting if they are using narrower row spacing. In 2003, a two-year study was initiated by the Manitoba Corn Growers Association and Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives to determine optimum plant populations for narrow row spacings. The hybrid 39M27 was grown at three different plant densities (24,000, 30,000 and 36,000 plants per acre) in three different row spacings (30, 20 and 7.5 inch) at Carman and Reinland. The sites were managed to produce a minimum yield of 110 bu/ac. Yield (grain and silage), moisture content at harvest, density, stem breakage, and silage quality parameters were measured. Preliminary results indicated that the 20-inch row spacing had the highest yields, followed by the 7.5-inch and the 30-inch (see Table 6). However, when statistical analysis was done, there was no significant difference in yields between the row spacings. When population was examined, there was no consistent trend indicating which plant population was optimum for each row spacing. The results suggest that choosing a plant population based on management and environmental factors is more important than choosing a plant population based on row spacing. Table 6: Corn grain yield response to row spacing treatment effects at Carman and Reinland, MB (2003). Grain Yield (bu/ac) Row Spacing Carman Reinland (inches) 30 149.6 142.8 20 155.5 154.4 7.5 151.0 150.0

139 Revision of Plant Population Recommendations The results from the plant population study indicated that Manitoba corn producers should be aiming for higher plant populations to realize higher yields. The survey conducted in the fall of 2003 provided evidence that in fact corn producers are using higher plant populations than recommended in the Corn Production in Manitoba manual. Therefore, based on research and producer trends, perhaps the recommendations should be as follows: For grain corn: 24,000 to 26,000 plants per acre. Under optimum yield conditions: 26,000 to 30,000 plants per acre. In areas of lower CHU accumulation or lower yield conditions: 22,000 to 24,000 plants per acre. Preliminary results from the narrow row spacing trials indicated producers do not need to modify their plant populations based on row spacing. Choosing a Plant Population - Before Seeding Before corn producers go out and increase their target plant population on their farms, several factors need to be considered. 1. Stalk lodging resistance of hybrid - Under high plant populations, there is often increased incidence of lodging due to a reduction in average stalk diameter. Hybrids with a good reputation for stalk strength can generally handle the shift to higher populations. 2. Seeding date - Benefits from higher plant densities will be obtained when corn is planted early. Later plantings result in larger, leafier plants which leads to more inter-plant competition and is at a greater risk of drought or heat-stress. 3. Field selection - Choose fertile, well-drained fields with good moisture holding capacity. 4. Growing conditions - Ensure conditions in the area can handle an increase in plant population. Factors to evaluate include soil moisture, temperature, and potential pest issues (i.e. increased chance of corn borer infestations). 5. Management practices - Make sure the crop is managed to handle the increase in plant population. Examine the fertility program and pest (weeds, diseases, insects) control measures. 6. Economics - Producers need to consider the economic return of planting more seed. Table 7 outlines the costs involved and the additional bushels required to make it a break-even proposition. Table 7: Number of bushels per acre required to pay for a 4000 seed per acre increase in planting rate for seed corn at various prices. Cost per Cost per Breakeven Bag of Seed 4000 Seeds (bu/ac) $120 $6.00 2.0 $140 $7.00 2.3 $160 $8.00 2.7 $180 $9.00 3.0 Assuming price of $3.00 per bushel

140 But once the producer has decided on what the optimum population is for their farm and the hybrid their growing, the producer now needs to hit the target population. To achieve the target plant population: seed 5-10% more seeds than the target population to account for germination or seedling growth losses fine tune and calibrate planter don t drive too fast as skips can reduce plant populations. What Agronomists and Producers Should Look at After Seeding Although the seeding operation may be done, a little field scouting once the crop is up and growing will help to determine if the producer hit their target or missed the mark. To figure out the actual population, count the number of plants in a row length equal to 1/1000 acre. So, for 30-inch row spacing, count the plants in a 17 4 row. For a 36-inch row spacing, count the plants in a 14 6 row. Multiply that number by 1000 to get the number of plants per acre. Do this several times in a field to get a representative sample. If the producer hit their target population, this part of their seeding operation is going well. If not, the producer should check over the planter (or examine the driver!) to see if anything can be improved upon. In addition to evaluating plant population, also look at the uniformity of emergence and the uniformity of plant spacing within the row. All three factors play a large role in helping get the corn crop off to a good start in optimizing yield potential.