The Adjustments in the Oil Market: Cyclical or Structural? Bassam Fattouh Oxford Institute for Energy Studies APRIL 21, 216, SOUTH AFRICA
After Period of Relative Stability, Oil Price falls Sharply Brent Price, $/barrel 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Jan-211 May-211 Sep-211 Jan-212 May-212 Sep-212 Jan-213 May-213 Sep-213 Jan-214 May-214 Sep-214 Jan-215 May-215 Sep-215 Jan-216 After trading above $1 dollars/barrel, the oil price started falling sharply in 214 and reaching low levels of below $3 in January this year Source: EIA, World Bank The 214 price fall has been sharp, even when compared to previous episodes of sharp price declines in the 198s, 199s and most recently in 28 following the global financial crisis
Supply-Demand Imbalance and Rising Stocks EIA Estimates of Implied Stock Change, mb/d 3 2.5 OECD overhang relative to 5yr avg., mb 18 Crude Products 12 2 1.5 1 6.5 (6) Q1 214 Q2 214 Q3 214 Q4 214 Q1 215 Q2 215 Q3 215 Q4 215 Q1 216 Q2 216 Q3 216 Q4 216 (12) 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Since 214, global supplies have been exceeding global consumption and the world has been adding stocks every month with international organizations expecting this to continue for the rest of 216 Source: EIA, Energy Aspects Crude stocks currently well above the 5-year average; products stocks are also above the 5-year average mainly due to increase in diesel stocks (and more recently gasoline)
Is this Cycle Different? At the start of the cycle, wide belief of relatively fast rebalancing and rapid price recovery based on: Non-OPEC supply falling sharply especially in the US (assumptions: US shale most responsive and most fragile part of the supply curve) OPEC cutting supplies to stabilize the market Low oil prices induces a positive shock to the world economy and generate strong demand responses to help absorb the surplus (though with a lag) Why did not expectations of faster adjustment materialize? Has there been a fundamental shift in the adjustment process? Is it different this time round? Key to answering the question of whether we have entered a world of low oil price for much longer / a new global oil order or oil prices rising sooner than later Wide macroeconomic implications
The Non-OPEC Investment/Supply Response in a Low Price Environment
The High Oil Price Environment Generated Strong Supply Responses Y/Y change in US Liquid Supply (Crude and NGLs), kbd 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2-44 48 983 1,27 1,684 1,85 21 211 212 213 214 215 Y/Y Change in Non-OPEC (EX-US) Oil Supply, mb/d 2.5 ROW non-opec US 2. 1.5 1..5. (.5) (1.) 4Q1 7Q1 1Q1 13Q1 Shale transformed the oil supply prospects for the US constituting a key supply shock to the rest of the world After few quarters of negative y/y growth, non-opec supply outside the US rebounded benefitting from record investments due to the high oil price environment Source: EIA, Energy Aspects
Fundamental Shifts in Trade Flows Total US Crude Oil Imports, mbd 1.5 US Crude Oil Imports from Nigeria, mbd 1.2 9.5.8 8.5 7.5.4 6.5 1 11 12 13 14 15 16. 1 11 12 13 14 15 US crude oil imports fell to below 7.5 mb/d helping the US improve its trade balance Source: EIA, Energy Aspects Some of the traditional exporters to the US shut from the US market forcing them to divert exports and compete in other markets (mainly Asia)
Deep Cuts in Capex in Response to Fall in Oil Price Global Capex estimates, $ billion Region 216E 215E 214A + / - % United States 72.2 114.6 158.1 (42.3) (36.9%) US Independents Intn. 8.5 13.6 21. (5.1) (37.5%) Canada 22.4 3.1 36.8 (7.7) (25.5%) Mexico 14.5 18. 24.6 (3.5) (19.4%) Asia Pacific 78.7 96.2 116.9 (17.5) (18.2%) Majors International 77.3 95.7 17.5 (18.4) (19.3%) Russia/FSU 37.9 33.2 43.9 4.6 13.9% Latin America 35.7 47.8 53.2 (12.1) (25.3%) Europe 27.6 34.5 45.1 (6.9) (19.9%) Middle East 37. 39.9 4.7 (2.9) (7.3%) Africa 16.5 2.1 23. (3.6) (17.8%) Other 8. 1.7 1.4 (2.7) (25.%)... International.3.4.5 (.1) (15.7%) Global Capex 436.4 554.4 681.1 (118.) (21.3%) Source: Energy Aspects
But Many Projects Sanctioned in High Oil Price Environment Coming on-line in 215, 216 and 217 Non-OPEC Upstream Oil Projects Pipeline, kb/d, 216 (more than 25 kb/d) 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Non-OPEC Upstream Oil Projects Pipeline, kb/d, 217 (more than 25 kb/d) More than 2 mb/d of new projects coming online in 216 sanctioned during the period of $1 + environment The pipeline of new projects starts slowing down in 217 but sill close to 2 million b/d and will help offset declines in non-opec supply Source: Energy Aspects
Non-OPEC Supply in Key Areas Non-OPEC Supply, North America, mb/d Non-OPEC Supply, Latin America, mb/d 1.25.8.6.4.2 Canada US.2.15.1 Colombia Brazil -.2 -.4 -.6 -.8-1 -1.2 Canada Mexico US Mexico 215 216.5 -.5 -.1 -.15 Brazil Other Colombia Other 215 216 Source: Argus Media
Non-OPEC Supply in Key Areas.3 Non-OPEC Supply, Asia, mb/d Non-OPEC Supply, FSU, mb/d.25.2.1 Other Vietnam Malaysia China Austrlaia Malaysia Other.2.15.1.5 Russia Russia -.1 -.2 China -.5 Kazakhistan Azerbijan Kazakhistan -.3 Austrlaia Vietnam -.1 -.15 Azerbijan -.4 215 216 -.2 215 216 Source: Argus Media
Most of Projections of Supply Growth have Been Revised Downward Petrobras Production Forecast, mb/d Canada Production Forecast, mb/d Some of the key growth centers such as Brazil are feeling the pinch. Brazil has already reduced its capex and revised downward its production target to 2.7 mb/d of liquid production by 22 And Canada s oil production has been revised downward substantially as many projects get postponed or cancelled Source: Energy Aspects, Petrobras, Canadian AssociaVon of Petroleum Producers
Source: EIA The North Sea Investment and Output Dynamics
Decline Rates Accelerating in Some Mature Areas UK Liquid Production, mb/d 1.9 Mexico Oil Production, mb/d 3.6 3.4 1.4 3.2 3..9 2.8 2.6.4 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 2.4 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 Source: PEMEX, Energy Aspects The decline rates in some of the mature areas such as the UK will accelerate in a low price environment as investment in the high oil price environment fades In Mexico large investments are needed to reverse the heavy declines Source: Energy Aspects, IEA
The US Shale Supply: A Very Different Investment Cycle Average lead times between final investment decision and first production for different oil resource types Years 6 5 4 3 2 Qatar Iran Saudi Algeria Nigeria Arabia Venezuela Norway Brazil Russia Canada 1 China Iraq United States 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Conventional onshore Tight oil Offshore shallow water Offshore deepwater Reserves developed (billion barrels) Extra-heavy oil and bitumen Source: IEA The investment cycle for US shale is different with the time lag between Final Investment Decision (FID) and first production is a fraction of that for conventional and deep offshore fields
Very Different Profiles of Production and Decline Rates 12 Bakken vs. pre-salt well count (no of wells) Bakken (LHS) Pre-salt (RHS) 5 Sample Well Production Profile Sample well production profile 1 8 4 3 Kboe/d 1 8 Gulf of Mexico* Bakken Shale (right axis) Kboe/d.6.5 6 4 2 2 1 6 4 2.4.3.2.1 5 7 9 11 13 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Source: Wood Mackenzie *Subsalt Miocene. Bakken Source: and BDEP, pre-salt ANP, Brazil NDIC, achieved Energy Aspects similar production growth but the investment profile and the number of wells to achieve that growth fundamentally different So are the decline rates which are much more prominent in shale wells compared to conventional fields Source: Energy Aspects, BP
Shocks from Credit Markets Can Impact Production Cash flow from operations have not been large enough to cover to cover capex with the shortfall increasing in recent years. The shortfall has been financed by debt (bank loans, bonds); leverage of US shale producers has risen sharply over the years with debt service as a hare of operating cash flow reaching high levels Source: EIA
US Shale has been the Fastest to Respond on the Supply Side US Rig Count US Crude Oil, y/y, kb/d 1, 8 6 4 2 Mar 15 Jun 15 Sep 15 Dec 15 Mar 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 -4 214 215 Q1 215 Q2 215 Q3 215 Q4 October November December The decline in the rig count in the US has been sharp as US shale producers cut capex and shift strategy from growth maximization to operating within cashflow Despite efficiency gains and cutting cost and increase in production from the GOM, y/y growth has been slowing down with the EIA predicting sharp y/y declines in 216 Source: EIA
Efficiency Gains But Also High-Grading, Lower Cost of Services and Hedging Monthly Well Completion in North Dakota 25 2 15 1 5 Non-core counties Core counties WTI, $/bbl (RHS) 12 1 8 6 4 2 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 US shale has proven to be more resilient than originally expected with efficiency improvements and lower costs of services bringing down the the break-even cost But part of the improvement is also related to highgrading as rigs moved from non-core area to core areas with higher IP Source: Energy Aspects, EIA
Very Different from the Dynamics of non-opec Supply in the 198s Oil Production Growth, Selected Countries y/y change, kbd Oil Production Growth, non-opec and FSU y/y change, kbd 1 2 8 15 6 1 4 2 5 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199-2 -5-4 -1-6 Norway UK Mexico Brazil -15 Non-OPEC FSU High cost producers such as the North Sea and Mexico with long-term investment cycles led the way but production started slowing down and eventually turned negative in key supply centers Strong Non-OPEC supply growth preceding price fall in 1986 but the dynamics within non-opec shifting Source: BP
The OPEC (non)response
OPEC Has Been a Major Source of Supply Growth Key Areas of Growth in OPEC, y/y kb/d, 215 7 Potential Iran oil Output, mb/d 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 215 216 Iraq Saudi Arabia Angola UAE Iraq Saudi Arabia Angola UAE Iran (low) Iran (high) OPEC has been the major source of supply growth in 215 with Iraq and Saudi Arabia alone adding more than 1.1 mb/d In 216, Iran and Saudi Arabia constitute the major source of uncertainty on the supply side Source: Energy Aspects, IEA, MEES
Saudi Arabia and the Role of the Swing Producer Saudi Arabia Oil Production, mb/d Saudi Arabia production vs Quota ( b/d) 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 - Saudi Arabia not willing to cut output unilaterally; shaped by the mid 198s events when its attempt to protect the price resulted in loss of large volumes of production and market share Source: BP, OPEC In 1998, SA reacted by increasing production and did cut output but only after agreement with other OPEC and non-opec members has been reached; took long time to forge such an agreement
Bringing Back Iraq and Iran into the Quota System Challenging Iraq Oil Production, mb/d 4.4 Iran Oil Production, mb/d 4. 4. 3.6 3.5 3.2 2.8 3. 2.4 2. 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 2.5 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 Source: IEA, EIA, Reuters, Bloomberg, Platts, Energy Aspects So In 215, Iraq, a low cost producer, has been the major source of supply growth adding more than 65, b/d Source: Energy Aspects, MEES How much and how fast can Iran increase its export is a major source of uncertainty facing Saudi Arabia and the wider market 3. Fig 41: UAE oil output, mb/d F
US Shale Supply Response Introduces New Set of Uncertainties Table 2: Optimum strategy in the short run (falling market) Figure 4: Tree diagram of the whole game in presence of uncertainty induced by US shale oil Elastic US supply (game 1) Inelastic US supply (game 2) Other-OPEC members cut output Other-OPEC members do not change output Other-OPEC members cut output Other-OPEC members do not change output SA cuts output -C, -C -A, SA cuts output A, A C, B SA does not change output, -A, SA does not change output B, C, Under complete information about shale response in a rising price environment, there is a single and efficient solution to the game Under uncertainty about US shale response, it is better off for Saudi Arabia to assume that shale supply curve is elastic and not to cut production (the losses are even larger if other OPEC members don t cut and US supply proves to be elastic )
Producers Pursuing a Market Share Strategy Saudi Arabia Oil Exports, mb/d 8.2 7.8 7.4 7. 6.6 6.2 216 215 214 212 Jan Mar May July Sep Nov In the absence of agreement on cuts and the wide range of uncertainties, Saudi Arabia is seeking to maintain market share and to keep exports above 7 mb/d; in winter, exports could jump Saudi Arabia has succeeded in maintaining its share in key markets in Asia in face of very tough competition Source: Energy Aspects, EIA
Iraq s Oil Sector Challenged Iraq Rig Count New and Old Production Plateu, mb/d 1 Field Operator New Plateau Was Finalized? 9 West Qurna-1 ExxonMobil 1.6 2.825 Yes Zubair Eni.85 1.2 Yes 8 West Qurna-2 Lukoil 1.2 1.8 Yes 7 Rumaila BP 2.1 2.85 Yes (July 14) 6 5 Halfaya PetroChina.4.535 Yes (July 14) Majnoun Shell 1-1.2 1.8 decision delayed to 217 Gharaf Petronas unknown.23 No 4 Jul-13 Sep-13 Nov-13 Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Mar-15 May-15 Jul-15 Sep-15 Total *7.15-7.35 11.24 Iraqi rig count has halved and the government is facing serious fiscal pressures and security challenges Iraqi government has been forced to revise downwards it production target negotiating with oil companies new production plateaus and reducing investment Source: Baker Hughes, Barclays
The Demand Response in the Low Price Environment
Oil Demand Strong Has Been Strong Global Oil Demand, y/y change, kb/d Oil Demand Growth 215, y/y change, mb/d 2,5.5.45 2,.4.35 1,5.3.25 1,.2.15 5.1.5 -- 14Q1 14Q2 14Q3 14Q4 15Q1 15Q2 15Q3 15Q4 16Q1 16Q2 16Q3 16Q4. US Europe Middle East China India Other Asia Oil demand has been stronger than initial expectations in 215 driven in part by cheaper oil prices Sources of demand growth have become more varied with China being an important but not the only engine of oil demand growth Source: EIA
Change in the Dynamics of Products Demand China s diesel/gasoline demand, mb/d Diesel exports, mb/d 4..32 3.5.24 3..16 2.5 2. Gasoline.8 1.5 Diesel 11 12 13 14 15 16. 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 In China, gasoline demand has outperformed that of diesel as the economy continues to rebalance from investment towards consumption Source: Energy Aspects China s diesel exports have jumped to a record level as demand growth for diesel slows down and topping refineries given licenses to import crude and export products
Indian Oil Demand India s Oil Demand, y/y growth, mb/d Vehicle ownership and penetration (cars plus two-wheelers).4 Fuel oil Diesel Gasoline.3.2.1. (.1) 12 13 14 15 16 Source: PPAC, Govt of India, Energy Aspects In India, gasoline sales have seen a sharp rise almost doubling from the 29 level and in 215 India contributed to oil growth demand as much as China (.3 mb/d) Personal vehicle ownership in India has been increasing especially for two wheelers Source: Energy Aspects, OIES
US Oil Demand US Gasoline Demand, kb/d, Moving 12-month Average Moving 12-Month Total Vehicle Miles Traveled, Million Miles 9,2 9,1 9, 8,9 8,8 8,7 8,6 8,5 8,4 Jan-1 May-1 Sep-1 Jan-11 May-11 Sep-11 Jan-12 May-12 Sep-12 Jan-13 May-13 Sep-13 Jan-14 May-14 Sep-14 Jan-15 May-15 Sep-15 32 315 31 35 3 295 29 285 28 26-1-1 26-9-1 27-5-1 28-1-1 28-9-1 29-5-1 21-1-1 21-9-1 211-5-1 212-1-1 212-9-1 213-5-1 214-1-1 214-9-1 215-5-1 Gasoline demand in the US has been rising benefiting from cheap gasoline at the pump and improvement in job prospects Americans are also driving more and for longer distances Source: EIA
Oil Prices: Lower for Longer? Or Higher Sooner Than Later?
The Case for Lower Oil Prices For Longer High level of crude and products stocks would put a cap on the oil price Many sources of supply that could come back to the market (Libya, Iran) Cooperation to cut or freeze production not feasible (OPEC no longer functional; on the contrary maxing production and competing for market share) Cost deflation structural and efficiency measures would accelerate Demand growth will ease (the world of lows + climate change concerns) Short and long-term impacts US shale responds fast in a higher oil price environment putting a cap on the oil price
(1) Demand Growth Expected to Weaken as Global Economy Slows Down World: OE growth forecasts for 216 % growth 5.5 Growth in Demand, y/y mb/d.4 4 3 2 Jun-15 Dec-15 Feb-16.3.2.1 215 216 1 US Europe ME China India Other Asia World Japan Eurozone US Emerging markets -.1 Source : Oxford Economics/Haver Analytics -.2 Economic growth in different regions continue to be revised downward affecting demand growth Slowing oil demand growth in most countries and regions particularly Latin America Source: Oxford Economics, EIA
Why Has the decline in Oil Price Failed To shock more? Increase in Domestic Energy Prices in SA Old Price New Price Percentage Increase (%) Natural Gas ($/mmbtu).75 1.25 67 Ethane ($/mmbtu).75 1.75 133 Gasoline ($/Litre) (High Grade).16.24 5 Gasoline ($/Litre) (Low Grade).12.2 67 Diesel Transport ($/ Litre).67.12 79 Diesel Industry ($/ Barrel) 9.11 14.1 55 Arab Light Crude ($/ Barrel) 4.24 6.35 5 Arab Heavy Crude ($/ Barrel) 2.67 4.4 65 Kerosene ($/barrel) 23 25.7 12 Oil exporting countries cutting spending and introducing reforms to rationalize spending Oil exporting countries cutting spending and introducing reforms to rationalize spending Source: World Bank, APICORP
ST vs LT: The Income Effect Remains Strong Even After Accounting for Improvements in Efficiency World Energy Intensity Car Ownership and GDP per Capita, 213 Oil intensity (barrels per millions of 25 U.S. dollars of GDP) Coal intensity (tons per millions of 25 U.S. dollars of GDP, right scale) 1, United States 1,1 2 8 Japan 1, 9 8 19 18 17 16 Cars per thousand people 6 4 2 India Brazil Russia 7 6 5 12 198 84 88 92 96 2 4 8 12 Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration; World Bank, World Development Indicators; and IMF staff calculations. 15 14 13 China 2 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 Log GDP per capita Sources: International Road Federation, World Road Statistics; and IMF staff calculations. Note: Size of bubble represents population in 213. Cars per thousand people for India is from 212. Oil intensity has fallen sharply in recent years globally But mitigated by income effects; car ownership is strongly linked to improvements in income Source: IMF
Climate Change Policy Responses and Energy Demand Decline in world energy intensity World energy demand % per annum Billion toe % 1965-214 1994-214 -1% -2% -3% Fastest 2-year average -4% Thousands 25 2 15 1965-214 1994-214 Base case Flat demand Base case 214-35 Flat demand The period 1994-214 has seen some of the biggest improvements in global energy intensity Source: BP 1 5 1965 2 235 Assuming even faster declines in the world s energy intensity in the next two decades, energy demand will continue to increase (including oil
In Most Base Cases, Oil Demand Will Continue to Rise Carbon emissions Changes in intensity Billion tonnes CO 2 4 Non-OECD OECD 3 IEA 45 % per annum % % -1% 1965-85 Energy intensity -1% 1994-214 -2% Base case 214-35 -3% 2 Carbon intensity 1-2% IEA 45 213-4 1965 2 235-3% Carbon emissions can be reduced both by improvements in energy intensity and carbon intensity (mainly changing the energy mix) Source: BP The Base Case included massive improvements in both; to reach IEA s 45 scenario, you need even further drastic improvements
The Case for Higher Oil Prices Sooner Rather Than Later Demand will continue to grow at its historical trend in part encouraged by low oil prices Cuts in investment are so deep that they will have big impact on future supplies both inside and outside the US The ability of the US shale supply respond in a higher oil price environment is constrained Geopolitical deterioration and unplanned outages will increase Decline rates in mature fields will accelerate When activity picks up, cost of services will go up Should not exclude the possibility of producers agreement on output
Unplanned Upstream Outages Rising 4 3 2 Unplanned upstream outages, mb/d Non-OPEC OPEC Nigerian Oil Output, mb/d 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1 1.7 13 14 15 16 Upstream outages have been on the rise in recent months led by countries like Nigeria, Venezuela, Iraq, Colombia, and Libya Source: Energy Aspects, IEA 1.5 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 Especially in weak states where dependency on oil revenues is very high