Appendix E. Development of Unit Area Load Export Coefficients

Similar documents
Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan

Simple Method for Estimating Phosphorus Export

Water Resources Element Appendix

Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions

Wisconsin Wastewater Operators Association. Protecting Our Water Resources: The Future Bill Hafs - NEW Water 10/2014

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

Land Application and Nutrient Management

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

The City of Cocoa (City) is located in east

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Mud Lake Lakeshed Assessment

Aquaculture Effluents and the Environment. CS Tucker, Mississippi State University

Efficiency of Urban Stormwater Best Management Practices: A Literature Review

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality: Modeling for TMDL Studies

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

Elin Betanzo July 14, 2015

Evaluation of Leaf Collection Programs as a Means to Reduce Nutrient Loads from Urban Basins in Wisconsin

Ohio EPA s Nutrient Mass Balance Study of Ohio s Major Rivers

Memorandum. To: From: Date: July 10, Cc: Re: Introduction. to control. This time. primarily. excavated

New Practices for Nutrient Reduction: STRIPs and Saturated Buffers. Matthew Helmers and Tom Isenhart Iowa State University

Stormwater Treatment Wetlands

By Richard Smardon PhD Professor of Environmental Studies, SUNY/ESF

In Focus: Managing Urban Stormwater

Effectiveness of Coanda Screens for Removal of Sediment, Nutrients, and Metals from Urban Runoff

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Permit

Appendix A Literature Review - Septic System Performance Criteria, Technologies, and Cost Factors

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

Lake Pepin. TMDL Basics

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION


The Next Generation of Stormwater Management and Site Design. Melanie R. Grigsby, P.E. Stormwater Resource Manager, City of Fort Myers

Edge-of-Field Monitoring

A Summary Guide to the. Rifle River WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN. Know Your Watershed Protect Its Resources

(including Slides from Dick Schwer & Michelle Thompson)

Performance Assessment of an Iron-Enhanced Sand Filtration Trench for Capturing Dissolved Phosphorus

Restoration and Protection of the Water Resources of the Greenwood Lake Watershed in New Jersey

Streamlines V2, n2 (May 1997) A Newsletter for North Carolina Water Supply Watershed Administrators

Implementation of Priority CRP Conservation Practices and Estimated Nutrient Load Reductions

PA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan

Module 14: Small Storm Hydrology, Continuous Simulations and Treatment Flow Rates The Integration of Water Quality and Drainage Design Objectives

Washington State Conference A Perspective on Water Quality Issues across Washington State Strategies and Implementation for Reducing

Chesapeake Bay Pollutant Reduction Plan

Watershed Treatment Model (WTM) 2013 Documentation

Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment. September 1995

Welcome to Round 3 of the Zumbro River WRAPS Meetings Held in Theilman, Oronoco, and Rochester on November 15 and 16, 2016

Regional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010

6. Pollutant Sources in

The Regulatory Framework

Quantifying the Benefits of Stream Restoration

2017 MAWD Project & Program of the Year. Detailed Award Information Form. 3) Watershed District: Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: URBAN STREAM RESTORATION BMP. David Wood Chesapeake Stormwater Network. Lisa Fraley-McNeal Center for Watershed Protection

Modeling Eutrophication Processes in the Delaware Estuary to Link Watershed Efforts to Control Nutrient Impacts

Attachment 10: Updated Nitrogen TMDL Methodology

Long Island: Water Resources. Water Sayings. Water Issues. Water Quality Issues specific to LI Coastal Areas. Agriculture and Water Regulation

C O M P R E H E N S I V E P R O T E C T I O N & R E S T O R AT I O N P L A N. f or th e

Technical Memorandum. Selection of Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) Consolidated TMDL Implementation Plan Comprehensive Baseline Analysis

Overview of Minnesota Agriculture. D.J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota

Maryland Nutrient Management Program

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Memorandum of Understanding for an Adaptive Management Pilot Project in the Yahara Watershed

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

Application of SWAT Model in land-use. change in the Nile River Basin: A Review

INTRODUCTION cont. INTRODUCTION. What is Impervious Surface? Implication of Impervious Surface

9.2 STANDARD CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS

The Clean Water Act Waters of the US Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture?

Walnut Creek Watershed Management Authority. Project Kick Off March 18, 2015

Lake Pepin Watershed TMDL: Looking Ahead. August 2008 Sector Meetings. Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle

History of Model Development at Temple, Texas. J. R. Williams and J. G. Arnold

NRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality

Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development

MODELING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS YIELDS USING THE HSPF MODEL IN THE DEEP HOLLOW WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI

Land Use Change Effects on Discharge and Sediment Yield of Song Cau Catchment in Northern Vietnam

Use of Surrogate Regressions for Computing Continuous Loads for the USGS Great Lakes Tributary Monitoring Network

Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Workshop October 29, Yongshan Wan, Ph.D. P.E. Section Leader Coastal Ecosystems Section

Nutrients and Water Quality in the East Souris River Watershed

APPENDIX H Guidance for Preparing/Reviewing CEQA Initial Studies and Environmental Impact Reports

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. Pottawatomie County, Kansas Stormwater Management Program

Chesapeake Bay Action Plan

Sources and Persistence of E. coli in Inland Texas Streams

Regional and Municipal Stormwater Management Plans

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

Tools to Improve Water Quality

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

CHALLENGING URBAN BMP ASSUMMPTIONS. John Moll, CEO

N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules - Design and Performance Standards. Nonstructural Strategies Assist with Strategy #2; See Page 3

GI BMP Training Program Review Worksheets

Information Requirements Table for Liquid Waste

Medicine Lake Excess Nutrients TMDL project: Water Quality Standards

BMPTRAINS MODEL: A TRAINING WORKSHOP B Y : M AR T Y W AN I E L I S T A, H AR V E Y H AR P E R AN D M I K E H AR D I N.

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

Best Management Practice Fact Sheet 14: Wet Ponds

Climate Change and the Possible Effects to the Vermillion River

FINAL. Appendix D: Newport Bay

Illinois EPA update to DuPage County Watershed Management Section Bureau of Water

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

Doyle Park Reconstruction Project Improving Flood Control Facilities to Meet a TMDL

INTRODUCTION TO HOBBY FARMING AND WATER QUALITY

Transcription:

Appendix E Development of Unit Area Load Export Coefficients

DATE: May 30, 2007 Memorandum FROM: PROJECT: TO: Hans Holmberg CLFLWD John Erdmann, Ph.D., P.E. CC: SUBJECT: Penelope Moskus Summary of Recommended Unit Area Load Values Introduction The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize unit area loads (UALs) of total phosphorus for land use/land cover classifications for use in the watershed and water quality assessment of Comfort Lakes and Forest Lake. Site-specific UALs for the watershed were not readily available; therefore UALs were obtained from available, relevant literature. This memorandum summarizes the recommended values for the study area in the table below, as well as the range of literature values in the tables that follow for each land use. Note that the recommended values can serve as a starting point in the water quality assessment. Model calibration and further discussion of site-specific characteristics of the watershed may result in revisions to the recommended values below. The recommended values are largely based on the Watersheds (MPCA, 2004). Land Use Recommended TP UAL Cropland 0.38 Forest 0.075 Grassland 0.169 Urban High 1.5 Urban Med 1.15 Urban Low 0.91 Golf Course 0.91 Sand & Gravel Mining 0.0 Wetlands 0.0 Corporate Headquarters Ann Arbor, MI 1326 Birch Park Ridge Houlton, WI 54082 715-549-6740 Fax: 715-549-6741 www.limno.com

Data management TQM Preliminary Report Page 2 Land Use: Cropland Watersheds. Appendix C. MPCA. 2004. Nonpoint Source - Stream Nutrient Level Relationships: A Nationwide Study. EPA-600/3-77-105. 1977. Dry Year Average Year Wet Year 0.18 0.22 0.38 0.39 0.69 0.70 > 90% agriculture 0.266 Nutrient Loading Estimates for Lakes. Rast. W. and Lee, G.F. Journal of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 109, No. 2. April 1983. Characteristics and comparative magnitude of non-point sources. Loehr, R.C. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation. Vol. 46, No. 8, August 1974. Rural/agriculture 0.3 Active cropland 0.06 2.9 Cultivated fields - row crop (low animal density) Cultivated fields - mixed farming (medium animal density) 0.25 0.65 0.1 0.2 Estimating Nutrient Loadings of Lakes form Non-Point Sources. EPA-660/3-74/020. 1974. Sources and Transport of Phosphorus in Western Lake Michigan Drainages. Robertson, D.M. Fact Sheet 208-96. 1996. Sources and Transport of Phosphorus in Western Lake Michigan Drainages. Robertson, D.M. Fact Sheet 208-96. 1996. Row crops 1.62 Small watershed 3.13 Large watershed 0.4

Page 3 Land Use: Forest Nonpoint Source - Stream Nutrient Level Relationships: A Nationwide Study. EPA-600/3-77-105. 1977. Nutrient Loading Estimates for Lakes. Rast. W. and Lee, G.F. Journal of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 109, No. 2. April 1983. Characteristics and comparative magnitude of non-point sources. Loehr, R.C. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation. Vol. 46, No. 8, August 1974. Estimating Nutrient Loadings of Lakes form Non-Point Sources. EPA-660/3-74/020. 1974. Protocol for Developing Nutrient TMDLs. EPA 841-B-99-007. US EPA Office of Water. 1999. Sources and Transport of Phosphorus in Western Lake Michigan Drainages. Robertson, D.M. Fact Sheet 208-96. 1996. Loading rates of nutrients discharging from a golf course and a neighboring forested basin. Takao Kunimatsu, Miki Sudo and Takeshi Kawachi. Water Science and Technology Vol 39 No 12 pp 99 107. 1999. Deciduous 0.075 > 90% forest 0.091 Aspen & birch in northern Minnesota 0.05 0.1 0.03 0.09 0.5 0.08 0.18 0.11 0.1 0.133 Land Use: Grassland Protocol for Developing Nutrient TMDLs. EPA 841-B-99-007. US EPA Office of Water. 1999. 0.169 0.13 LimnoTech

Page 4 Land Use: Urban Watersheds. Appendix J. MPCA. 2004. Nonpoint Source - Stream Nutrient Level Relationships: A Nationwide Study. EPA-600/3-77-105. 1977. Low intensity High intensity Commercial /Industrial/ Transportation 0.88-0.94 1.11 1.19 1.45 1.55 > 40% urban 0.347 Nutrient Loading Estimates for Lakes. Rast. W. and Lee, G.F. Journal of Environmental Engineering. Vol. 109, No. 2. April 1983. Characteristics and comparative magnitude of non-point sources. Loehr, R.C. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation. Vol. 46, No. 8, August 1974. Fundamentals of Urban Runoff Management: Technical and Institutional Issues. Horner, R.R., J.J. Skupien, E. H. Livingston, and E. H. Shaver. Terrene Institute and U.S. EPA. 1994. Research on the Design Storm Concept. Marsalek, J. ASCE Urban Water Resources Research Program, TIM No. 33. September 1978. Estimating Nutrient Loadings of Lakes form Non-Point Sources. EPA-660/3-74/020. 1974. Protocol for Developing Nutrient TMDLs. EPA 841-B-99-007. US EPA Office of Water. 1999. High Density Medium Density Low Density Commercial Industrial Low Medium High - commercial High commercial Low High res. High - industrial High Madison, WI (residential High Durham, NC (37% impermeable) Low density High density 0.3 1.1 5.6 1.12 0.56 0.04 1.68 1.46 1.6 3.4 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.3 0.9-14 1.1 1.2 0.55 0.7 LimnoTech

Page 5 Land Use: Golf Course Watersheds. Appendix J. MPCA. 2004. Preliminary Report on Storm Water Runoff from Effluent- Irrigated Golf Courses. Environmental Resource Management Division, Watershed Protection and Development Review Department, City of Austin, TX. Loading rates of nutrients discharging from a golf course and a neighboring forested basin. Takao Kunimatsu, Miki Sudo and Takeshi Kawachi. Water Science and Technology Vol 39 No 12 pp 99 107. 1999. Urban recreational grasses 0.88 0.94 4.38 8.76 3.04 Impact of a Turfgrass System on Nutrient Loadings to Surface Water. King, K., D. Harmel, H. Torbert, and J. Balogh. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 2001. V. 37(3). P. 629-640. 2001. Turfgrass 0.27 0.66 Land Use: Sand & Gravel Extraction 0.0 Land Use: Wetlands 0.0 LimnoTech