MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Similar documents
North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

Decision Rationale. Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus for the Sassafras River, Cecil and Kent Counties, Maryland 4/1/2002

Chapter Seven: Factors Affecting the Impact of Nutrient Enrichment on the Lower Estuary

Wisconsin River. Hardest Working River In the Nation

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Modeling Eutrophication Processes in the Delaware Estuary to Link Watershed Efforts to Control Nutrient Impacts

FINAL. Appendix D: Newport Bay

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Water Quality Monitoring Report. Tom Ash Assistant Director Water Management Division October 16, 2014

Planning Targets. For WQGIT Review Draft November 7, 2017

EXISTING AND READILY AVAILABLE DATA

Delaware River Basin Commission

Murky Waters. More Accountability Needed for Agricultural Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay

Marina del Rey Enhanced Watershed Management Program Plan

Clean Water Act: A Summary of the Law

Illinois EPA update to DuPage County Watershed Management Section Bureau of Water

Ta r-pa m l i c o Ri v e r

Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Implementation Plan for Sewage Facilities Planning

PA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) TMDL Plan

GULF OF MEXICO - SEGMENT 2501

MARK CREEK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

(including Slides from Dick Schwer & Michelle Thompson)

IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES: PHASE I TMDLs FOR TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN THE DELAWARE RIVER ESTUARY

WWF SHRIMP AQUACULTURE DIALOGUE Effluent impact assessment:water quality monitoring vs nutrient budget

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

Maryland s Final 2016 Integrated Report of Surface Water Quality

Phase II WIP Background & Development Process. February 2011

South Venice Water Quality

Washington State Conference A Perspective on Water Quality Issues across Washington State Strategies and Implementation for Reducing

Annual Report Maryland 319 Nonpoint Source Program State Fiscal Year 2016

Water Chemistry. Water 101

TMDL Report Dissolved Oxygen for Coral Creek East Branch (WBID 2078B)

Technical Memorandum. Selection of Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) Consolidated TMDL Implementation Plan Comprehensive Baseline Analysis

Water Quality Improvement Plan Provision B.2 Submittal: Priority Water Quality Conditions

Climate Change, Marsh Erosion and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

Numeric Nutrient Criteria Development

Water Quality Study In the Streams of Flint Creek and Flint River Watersheds For TMDL Development

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Chronic Stream Pollution in a CAFO Rich Watershed in Duplin County, NC

Lake Pepin Watershed TMDL: Looking Ahead. August 2008 Sector Meetings. Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle

Proposed Data layers for PCB Resource Center

APPENDIX C Technical Approach Used to Generate Maximum Daily Loads

West Virginia s Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan

Council of Governments

Clean Water Act Methods Update Overview of Proposed CWA Method Update Rule and Other Method Activities. NEMC July 2015 Adrian Hanley, U.S.

Municipal Stormwater Management Planning

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

Pennsylvania s Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan

CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL ACTION PLAN ( MS4 General Permit)

ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information

Gull Lake CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES

Baltimore City Department of Public Works

Finding Data Gaps: Compiling and Interpreting Existing Data

Welcome to Round 3 of the Zumbro River WRAPS Meetings Held in Theilman, Oronoco, and Rochester on November 15 and 16, 2016

9. Evaluation Mechanisms

Index of Watershed Indicators: An Overview

Regional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010

WILLAMETTE RIVER AND COLUMBIA RIVER WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION MODEL

3 Water Quality Overview Data Reviewed Watershed Conditions Figure 1 Water Quality Criteria

UPDATE OF BALTIMORE REGION TOXICS WORKSHOP (Aug 3) AND REGIONAL CASE STUDIES OF NOVEL PCB REMEDIATION

Watershed Existing Condition Report for the Potomac River Watershed

Status and Trends of Water Quality in Wisconsin s Lakes, Streams, and Rivers

The ABCs of TMDLs for Stakeholders. Bruce Zander, EPA 28 September 2005 Webcast

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

TMDLs: An Agency s Perspective California Marine Affairs & Navigation Conference Panel Discussion

Water Resources Element Appendix

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

Protecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues

Chapter One: Introduction

APPENDIX F. Receiving Water Conditions, Potential Impacts of MS4 Discharges, and Priority Water Quality Conditions in the San Dieguito River WMA

Chapter 4 Watershed Goals and Objectives

Grand River Monitoring

The Mekong River Report Card on Water Quality ( )

Total Solids (TS) - material remaining after evaporation of sample liquid

Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District Six Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan

3 Objectives 3 Ob jec tives

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Lake Magda Nutrient TMDL FINAL

314 CMR 4.00: MASSACHUSETTS SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

James River Alternatives Analysis June 23, 2005

CORSICA RIVER PRELIMINARY WATERSHED AUDIT. Opportunities To Build Upon A Highly Successful Watershed Restoration Campaign CORSICA RIVER CONSERVANCY

Appendix A Literature Review - Septic System Performance Criteria, Technologies, and Cost Factors

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

The Myakka River. Presented to the Myakka River Management Coordinating Council January 9, 2009

Hamilton Harbour. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

Lisa Prcin Research Associate Watershed Coordinator Texas A&M AgriLife Research at Blackland Research & Extension Center

ECOSYSTEMS, WATERSHEDS AND POLLUTION CONTROL REVIEW

Qian Zhang (UMCES / CBPO) Joel Blomquist (USGS / ITAT)

2016 New Jersey Integrated Water Quality Assessment Methods FINAL

Biological Uplift in Stream Restoration Projects. September 20, Presentation by: Wetlands and Waterways Program

FINAL 2012 BACTERIA AND TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR THE RED RIVER, OKLAHOMA (OK311100, OK311200, OK311210, OK311510, OK311600, OK311800)

Nutrient Loading: NAWQA Regional SPARROW model

February 28, Re: N.J.A.C. 7:8 Stormwater Management Rules. Dear Commissioner Martin:

Task 1: Framework for a Reexamination. Falls Nutrient Strategy

6. Pollutant Sources in

Functional Uplift Based Stream Assessment & Restoration Design

Read: Case Study: America s First River : A Success Story Summarize the story of the Hudson River and PCB s:

Transcription:

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000 1-800-633-6101 Martin O Malley Governor Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor November 6, 2009 Shari T. Wilson Secretary Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Dear Marylander: The intent of this letter is to solicit readily available data and/or information to support the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) addressing a number of water quality impairments in the Potomac River Region. Specifically, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) is looking for data and information that would be helpful in addressing nutrient, sediment, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), heptachlor epoxide, and debris/floatables/trash impairments in the Potomac River and its tributaries. The attached Table 1 lists 8-digit watersheds and their associated impairments for which MDE is currently seeking data. Figures 1-5 display maps of the Potomac River Basin and its 8-digit watersheds. If you are aware of available data and/or information pertaining to the above-referenced impairments for the Potomac River Region, please view this correspondence with care. The federal Clean Water Act requires states to monitor the quality of their waters. For those waterbodies failing to meet the established water quality standards, states are required to develop TMDLs. A TMDL specifies the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, and shows how pollutant loadings can be allocated among point and non-point sources. MDE is responsible for establishing TMDLs in Maryland. Federal guidance requires states to use the best readily available data for their TMDL studies. In addition, states are required to involve the public in establishing TMDLs and typically conduct a 30-day public comment period to meet this requirement. After public review, TMDLs are submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. Once approved, the TMDL provides a basis for developing a watershed strategy to achieve water quality standards. MDE is beginning to develop TMDLs for water quality impairments associated with nutrient, sediment, PCBs, heptachlor epoxide, and debris/floatables/trash in the Potomac River Region. If you have or are aware of data or information that would support the development of TMDLs for the referenced impairments, please respond to the enclosed data solicitation notice. Thank you for your attention to this mailing. If you have any questions regarding this activity or MDE s TMDL Development Program, please contact me (410-537-3937; mchatham@mde.state.md.us), or visit our web site at http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/waterprograms/tmdl/index.asp. Sincerely, Melissa Chatham TMDL Outreach Coordinator Science Services Administration

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Data Solicitation Notice in Support of Developing Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for Nutrient, Sediment, Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB), Heptachlor Epoxide, and Debris/Floatables/Trash Impairments in the Maryland Potomac River Basin Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act requires Maryland to: (1) identify waters, known as water quality limited segments (WQLSs), where technology-based effluent limitations and other required controls cannot achieve water quality standards; (2) for each listed water, establish Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for pollutants preventing the attainment of water quality standards; and (3) offer an opportunity for public review and comment on the proposed TMDLs. TMDLs to address a number of impairments throughout the Potomac River Basin are currently being planned (for details see Table 1). Locations of the Potomac River Basin 8-digit watershed are presented in Figures 1-5. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) would appreciate your assistance in obtaining all best readily available data and other information that would benefit the development of TMDLs for nutrient, sediment, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), heptachlor epoxide, and debris/floatables/trash impairments in the specified watersheds of the Maryland Potomac River Basin (see Table 1). Please consider these steps in responding to this solicitation: MDE would like to make sure that your information is considered, while minimizing your response effort. If you have already provided relevant information to another unit of the State government, other than MDE s TMDL Development Program, simply let us know when, with whom, and what type of information has been shared. MDE is interested in documents or datasets that provide information regarding water quality conditions associated with the aforementioned impairments. Please refer to Table 2 for key sampling parameters. MDE is looking for data in all media including surface water, groundwater, soil, fish tissue, and sediments. MDE is also interested in information regarding the causes and sources of the impairments in the waterbodies of interest, and any other information you believe might be relevant. Please do not limit your data to only the listed impairments MDE seeks all available water quality data for the Potomac River Basin. Information regarding sampling methodologies, design, conditions (i.e., time of day, weather conditions during and preceding the sampling), sampling locations (i.e., geographical coordinates, maps), peer review, detection limits, and quality assurance procedures applied would also be very beneficial. Please include such information where available. 2

Thank you for your participation in this endeavor. Please mail your data and/or information (preferably final and in electronic format) by December 6, 2009 to the following address: Melissa Chatham TMDL Technical Review Coordinator MDE - Science Services Administration 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 540 Baltimore, MD 21230-1718 If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Melissa Chatham (410-537-3937; mchatham@mde.state.md.us). You may also wish to visit MDE s Web site at http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/waterprograms/tmdl/index.asp. 3

Year Listed Potomac River Basin Table 1. Summary of Impairments Covered by this Data Solicitation Watershed Name 8-digit Watershed Number 1996 Potomac River (Monocacy River to Chain Bridge) 02140202 Nutrients 1996 Potomac River (Monocacy River to Chain Bridge) 02140202 Sediments 2002 Anacostia River (Non-tidal Northeast & Northwest Br.) 02140205 PCBs Impairment 2002 Anacostia River (Non-tidal) 02140205 Heptachlor Epoxide 2006 Washington Metro Anacostia River (Non-tidal) 02140205 Trash/Debris 2006 Anacostia River (Tidal Fresh) 02140205 Trash/Debris 1996 Rock Creek 02140206 Nutrients 1996 Rock Creek 02140206 Sediments 1996 Cabin John Creek 02140207 Sediments 1996 Seneca Creek 02140208 Sediments 1996 Lower Monocacy River 02140302 Nutrients 1996 Middle Upper Monocacy River 02140303 Nutrients 1996 Double Pipe Creek 02140304 Nutrients 1996 Catoctin Creek 02140305 Nutrients 1996 Potomac River/Washington County 02140501 Nutrients Upper 1996 Potomac River/Washington County 02140501 Sediments 1996 Antietam Creek 02140502 Nutrients 1996 Lower North Branch of Potomac River 02141001 Nutrients Upper North Branch 1996 Lower North Branch of Potomac River 02141001 Sediments 4

Figure 1. Maryland Potomac River Basin 5

Figure 2. Maryland Washington Metro Potomac River Basin 6

Figure 3. Maryland Middle Potomac River Basin 7

Figure 4. Maryland Upper Potomac River Basin 8

Figure 5. Maryland Upper North Branch Potomac River Basin 9

Table 2. Key Parameters of Interest Impairment Type Nutrient/ Sediment PCBs Heptachlor epoxide Debris/Floatables/ Trash Parameter Total Persulfate Nitrogen Total Suspended Solids/Sediment Particulate Organic Nitrogen Suspended Sediment Concentration Dissolved Organic Nitrogen Turbidity Ammonia Geomorphic Studies Nitrate and Nitrite Secchi Disk Total Phosphorus ph Dissolved Organic Phosphorus Specific Conductance Orthophosphate Temperature Particulate Organic Phosphorus Stream Flow BOD, 5-day Salinity COD Conductivity Dissolved Oxygen Geometry (channel geometry, bathymetry) Total Alkalinity Meteorological Information Chlorophyll a and other epiphyton Fish Community Data Algal Community Data Benthic Community Data Sediment Load Physical Habitat Information Water quality PCB concentrations (water column, sediment, etc.) Fish tissue PCB concentrations Soil PCB concentrations Total Organic Carbon (particulate and dissolved) PCB atmospheric deposition information PCB containing equipment storage sites Information about PCB spills Any other relevant information about potential PCB sources Toxicity Test Information Water quality heptachlor epoxide concentrations (water column, sediment, etc.) Fish tissue heptachlor epoxide concentrations Soil heptachlor epoxide concentrations Any other relevant information about potential heptachlor epoxide sources Toxicity Test Information Trash monitoring data Trash cleanup data Trash remediation project data 10

Department of the Environment Facts About TMDLs What is a TMDL? A TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) is an estimate of the maximum amount of an impairing substance or stressor (pollutant) that a waterbody can assimilate without violating water quality standards. This total load includes pollutants that come from the end of a pipe (point sources), stormwater runoff and groundwater flow (nonpoint sources), and a "margin of safety" that provides a cushion needed because of uncertainties associated with estimates. A TMDL also may include an allowance for future increases in pollutant loads due to changes in land use, population growth, and the expansion of business activity. What are the benefits of TMDLs? Maryland s cultural heritage is closely tied to its rivers, coastal waters and the Chesapeake Bay. The seafood industry, recreational activities and the quality of life for Maryland s citizens depend on the quality of our waters. Maryland s waters are currently managed through the use of water-quality-based permits," which place limits on the discharge of wastewater to ensure receiving waters will remain fishable and swimmable. As part of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Maryland also has defined upper limits on the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus that may go into the Bay. TMDLs formalize these procedures for setting upper limits on pollutants and will create a lasting framework to ensure clean waters for generations to come. Why is Maryland developing TMDLs? All states are required by the federal Clean Water Act to consider the development of TMDLs. Every two years, states must submit a prioritized list of waterbodies that do not meet water quality standards or will not meet the standards after all technology-based pollution controls are in place. Technology-based controls, defined under the Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 130.7(b)(1)(i-iii), are the basic pollution controls for point sources and nonpoint sources that are uniformly required by federal, state or local law. What waterbodies are currently on the TMDL list? In accordance with Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, the State develops a list of impaired waterbodies, commonly referred to as the 303(d) List, which is part of its Integrated Report (IR) of Surface Water Quality. The 303(d) List identifies the impaired waterbodies and the impairing substances (e.g., nutrients, sediments, fecal coliform bacteria) for which TMDLs should be developed. Across the State, there are approximately 134 watersheds that are impaired by one or more substances. Maryland s most recent IR was approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on September 8, 2008. What are the steps in developing a TMDL? The first step in the TMDL process is to identify waterbodies that are impaired and should have TMDLs. This involves assessing existing water quality information collected by a variety of monitoring techniques. If the existing water quality information demonstrates that water quality standards are being met, a Water Quality Analysis (WQA) may be conducted. The WQA is used to support moving the waterbody from the impaired 11

section to the meets standards section of the IR for the specified pollutant. If the data demonstrate that an impairment exists then TMDL development continues, using computer modeling. Computer modeling is used to estimate pollutant loadings to the waterbodies and water quality impacts of the pollutant loadings under varying conditions, such as low stream flows. The modeling is used to estimate the amount of pollutants waterbodies can assimilate without violating water quality standards. Once this maximum pollutant load (TMDL) is defined, it must be allocated between point and nonpoint sources, accounting for a margin of safety and future allocation. The allocation will balance equity and cost considerations, and may involve innovative approaches such as trading between different pollutant sources. The public, affected dischargers, regional agencies, and local governments will be involved in the TMDL development process. How do TMDLs fit into Maryland's existing water quality efforts? Many of Maryland s existing efforts to protect and restore water quality will help the State meet its TMDL goals. Some examples include Maryland s Tributary Strategies for Nutrient Reduction, the Gunpowder Watershed Project, the Coastal Bays of the National Estuaries Program, the Baltimore Harbor Toxics Regional Action Plan, and a variety of pollution prevention efforts. The waters identified for TMDLs are also at the core of Maryland s Clean Water Action Plan. In many ways, Maryland s ongoing effort to reduce nutrients entering the Chesapeake Bay has been very similar to a TMDL process. Stakeholders and researchers recognized water quality problems, set an achievable goal, and then identified specific controls for point and nonpoint pollution sources intended to achieve the goal. This is the essence of a TMDL. How can TMDL goals be achieved? A TMDL improves water quality when the pollutant allocations are implemented, not when a TMDL is established. When the State or EPA identifies a water quality impairment on a Section 303(d) List and then establishes the TMDL, we begin a water quality-based process to ensure that the TMDL is not exceeded. Section 303(d) does not establish any new implementation requirements beyond those mechanisms that exist elsewhere in State, local, Tribal, or Federal law. These mechanisms include state and local permitting and regulatory authority, and voluntary efforts under the Chesapeake Bay Agreement that are supported by technical and financial assistance. Maryland has one of the most comprehensive, multi-level, community-based estuary restoration programs in the country. We are committed to building on our existing efforts and believe that a combination of voluntary commitments and regulatory procedures is the best course to take in Maryland. Additionally, programs exist that provide technical and financial assistance to control and allocate pollutant loads. Examples include cost share programs for nutrient removal at municipal wastewater treatment plants, low-cost loans from the State s revolving loan program, grants for stormwater retrofits, cost share grant funds for stream restoration, agricultural cost share programs, agricultural technical assistance programs, and acid mine drainage remediation assistance. For more information on Maryland s TMDL Program, contact the Maryland Department of the Environment, Science Services Administration at (410) 537-3902, or access MDE s web page at www.mde.state.md.us/tmdl. Last updated: October 29, 2008 12