Appendix D Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing Technical Report on Noise

Similar documents
COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT

3.12 NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ACOUSTIC FUNDAMENTALS

APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT

FIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

APPENDIX 3.11-A NOISE ANALYSIS DATA

TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 12 Noise

4.10 NOISE. A. Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Acoustics

Noise Impact Study for Hyatt House in Davis, California

4.7 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS OF NOISE AND VIBRATION

APPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment

1. Introduction Noise Analysis Results Figures. List of Tables

4.7 NOISE. Introduction. Decibels and Frequency. Perception of the Receiver and A-Weighting

MnDOT GREATER MN STAND ALONE NOISE BARRIER PROGRAM

Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment

NORTH GILROY NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS URBAN SERVICE AREA AMENDMENT EIR NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT GILROY, CALIFORNIA

9.0 Noise and Vibration

APPENDIX 5.12-A PROJECT NOISE ANALYSIS: ARTESIAN SUBSTATION

FEDERAL BOULEVARD (5 TH AVENUE TO HOWARD PLACE) PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE STUDY TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS

Gisborne District Council

E. NOISE AND VIBRATION

4.3 NOISE Environmental Setting. Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise

12 November Ms. Winnie Lam Project Manager L.F. George Properties 159 El Camino Real Millbrae, CA 94030

Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission Proposed City of Elk Grove Sphere of Influence Amendment (LAFC # 09-10) Recirculated Draft EIR

Evaluation of noise impacts associated with a proposed commercial retail project typically includes the following:

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York Page 14-1 Staten Island Supreme Courthouse Project Draft EIS

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis

ARTICLE VII - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING Section 7-10

Place Vanier Édifice AEFO

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario

Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts

Fence and Wall Requirements

PALO VERDE MESA SOLAR PROJECT

12-1 INTRODUCTION 12-2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

NIGHTTIME ILLUMINATION

4.9. Noise and Vibration

Noise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area

ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE

The existing land use surrounding North Perry Airport can be described as follows:

Introduction. Section 3.10 Noise Fundamentals of Noise. Decibels and Frequency

This page intentionally left blank

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

To: Hyoksang Kwon, COBE Construction From: Joshua Marcley, Mei Wu Acoustics

Noise Compatibility Program Update

Highway Traffic Noise: Analysis and Abatement Guidance

15.1 INTRODUCTION CONTEXT

SECTION 5 EXCEPTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

LYNN BUILDING DEPT. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1:00 APPLICABILITY PAGE 1 SECTION 2:00 GENERAL DEFINITIONS PAGE 1, 2 & 3

4.7 NOISE Setting

Zoning Permits 11-1 ZONING PERMITS

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7047) City Council Staff Report

B-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Uses allowed in the B-2 Community Commercial Business District are subject to the following conditions:

WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS APPLICATION

ARTICLE 4 SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS

SECTION 832 "C-P" - ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

Section 10 - Airport Business Zone (Titanium Park)

ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW (ADR) An applicant s guide to the process

NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO

Appendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment

WILSON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: WIND ENERGY

4.5 NOISE EXISTING SETTING TECHNICAL BACKGROUND. Acoustic Fundamentals

Recommended Locations for Sound Barriers

Commercial Medical Marijuana Operation Design Guidelines

TOWN OF ROTTERDAM RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Ext. 395 Needed to Obtain Permit:

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

ARTICLE XII RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK REGULATIONS

UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD

One and Two Family Additions

Draft Noise Study Report

APPENDIX 7 - AIRPORT NOISE AND DE VE LOPMENT CONTROL

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

NYU Core: Post-EIS Façade Improvement Acoustical Assessment

RESOLUTION NO.15- The Planning Commission of the City of La Habra does hereby resolve as follows:

INTENT OBJECTIVES HISTORIC DESIGNATIONS

Permit Requirements: Building Codes: The City of Clanton has adopted the following codes which are enforced by the Building Department:

Law enforcement on proactive protection of noise and vibration pollution for

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT

ORDINANCE NO. _5063. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz ordains as follows: SECTION I

Noise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON

a. Structures subject to section Architectural & Site Design Standards must comply with the following additional fencing standards:

The requirements set forth in this Section shall govern the construction and/or installation of all Renewable Energy Systems:

Summary of Regulations and Permits for Fences and Walls

Noise Impact Assessment Hamburg Crossings Hamburg, New York. Prepared for Benderson Development 570 Delaware Avenue Buffalo, New York 14202

Phil Pogledich, Senior Deputy Counsel, Yolo County; Petrea Marchand, Consero Solutions

ARTICLE 987. PD 987. PD 987 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 14, (Ord.

This section describes sound and noise in the area of the Proposed Project. The potential noise impacts and alternatives are also discussed.

WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS

ORDINANCE NO. Adopted by the [AGENCY] [DATE] ADOPTING A WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM

ARTICLE 16 - WIND ENERGY CONVERSION FACILITIES

FENCES. This hand out is for REFERENCE ONLY. For more details see specific code sections.

9.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined, for purposes of Section 9, as follows:

CHAPTER R-6,000 Single-Family Residential. 6,000 Square Foot Minimum Lots

City of Richmond Zoning Ordinance Page 12-1

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION PHONE Residential Accessory Structures

SIGNS (OR )

Enhancing Acoustic Performance through the use of Window Shade Fabric White Paper

MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT

MAINE MEDICAL CENTER

Transcription:

Appendix D Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing Technical Report on Noise

Environmental Prepared for: City of San Rafael Community Development Department 1400 5 th Avenue, 3 rd Floor San Rafael, CA 94901 Prepared by: AECOM One Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 December 2015 Technical Report Noise Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing

TECHNICAL REPORT ON NOISE ANDERSEN DRIVE AT-GRADE CROSSING Prepared for: City of San Rafael Prepared by: AECOM One Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 December 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Project Description... 1 Acoustic Fundamentals... 4 Sound Properties... 4 Sound and the Human Ear... 5 Sound Propagation and Attenuation... 7 Noise Descriptors... 7 Negative Effects of Noise on Humans... 8 Regulatory Setting... 11 Federal Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Laws... 11 State Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Laws... 11 Governor s Office of Planning and Research... 11 Local Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Ordinances... 12 City of San Rafael General Plan... 12 San Rafael Code of Ordinances... 13 Existing Conditions... 19 Existing Noise-Sensitive Receptors... 19 Existing Noise Sources... 19 Impacts and Mitigation Discussion... 20 References... 26 Exhibits Exhibit 1: Project Site Exhibit 2: Typical Noise Levels Tables Table 1: Subjective Reaction To Changes In Noise Levels Of Similar Sources... 5 Table 2: Summary Of Land Use Noise Compatibility Guidelines... 12 Table 8.13-1: General Noise Limits... 15 Table 8.13-2: Standard Exceptions To General Noise Limits... 17 Table 3: Day-Night (L dn ) Noise Levels At 50 Feet From Track Centerline... 21 Table 4: Comparison Of Train Noise Level With Ambient Noise Level... 21 Table 5: Construction Phases, Equipment, Anticipated Duration Of Use, And Calculated Noise Levels... 24 Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing i Technical Report Noise

Acronyms and Other Abbreviations Caltrans Calveno CEQA CHABA CNEL cy db dba DD EPA FHWA FRA FTA Gpm hp Hz In/sec lbs/sq.ft L dn L eq Lmax Lmin L n Lv mm/sec RCNM RD RMS SCADA SENL VdB μin/sec California Department of Transportation California Vehicle Noise California Environmental Quality Act Committee of Hearing, Bio Acoustics, and Bio Mechanics Community noise equivalent level Cubic yards Decibels A-weighted decibels Doubling of distance Environmental Protection Agency Federal Highway Administration Federal Railroad Administration Federal Transit Administration s Gallons per minute Horsepower Hertz Inches per second Pound per square foot Day-night average level Equivalent sound level Maximum sound level Minimum sound level Percentile-exceeded sound level Velocity Level in decibels Millimeters per second Roadway Construction Noise Model Road Root Mean Square Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Single-Event [Impulsive] Noise Level Vibration decibels Micro inch per second Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing ii Technical Report Noise

INTRODUCTION This Technical Report includes a summary of applicable regulations and a description of the existing noise sensitive uses in the vicinity of the proposed site for the Andersen Drive At Grade Crossing project area. Typical noise levels for various non-transportation noise sources are included in this analysis pertaining to construction activities associated with the project. This Technical Report also provides quantitative noise levels for transportation noise sources associated with train passbys operating warning horns in the analysis area. Calculated and predicted operational noise levels associated with the project will be analyzed at sensitive receptors in close proximity to the project site, and mitigation measures are discussed where applicable. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located in the southwestern portion of the City of San Rafael, see Exhibit 1 for project site design. The proposed improvements are within the southernmost portion of the SMART rail alignment. All improvements will occur within existing City and SMART ROW. Land uses to the north of the proposed Andersen Drive at-grade crossing include a shopping center, auto sales centers, and the RV Park of San Rafael. Industrial uses are located immediately southeasterly of the proposed crossing, forming a boundary between Andersen Drive and the singlefamily residences south of Woodland Avenue. The San Rafael city limit/marin County line is located immediately east of the proposed Andersen Drive crossing. The selected design for the Andersen Drive crossing would retain the existing 11 degree roadway and track geometry, and would restrict train speeds to 15 miles per hour through the crossing, which would be enforced by the railroad's Positive Train Control (PTC) system. Active grade crossing warning devices would be installed as part of this option and would include cantilevered flashing lights and automatic gates at both the northbound and southbound approaches to the crossing. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic would be separated from rail and vehicular traffic, and would be channelized to at-grade crossings located north and south of the vehicular crossing. To provide additional roadway capacity southeast of the crossing, Francisco Boulevard West would be restriped from one to two lanes between Andersen Drive and the US 101 southbound ramps. In addition, southbound Andersen Drive would be widened and striped to provide two lanes between Francisco Boulevard West and Bellam Boulevard. These additional lanes would provide emergency storage so that vehicles could proceed forward and clear the railroad crossing and the adjacent intersection. As a primary means of addressing the challenge associated with this location, SMART would modify the operation of commuter rail service to permanently restrict the speed of trains through and approaching the grade crossing to 15 miles per hour. When implemented, this speed restriction would be enforced by SMART's Positive Train Control system, so that any train would be forced to reduce speed before it reached the near edge of the at-grade pedestrian crossings that are planned for the north and south sides of Andersen Drive. The clear sight distance approaching the crossings in both directions would be in excess of 1,000 feet, twice the distance required for the train to come to a full stop from 15 miles per hour. This restricted approach speed, combined with the clear sight distance to Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 1 Technical Report Noise

101 San Rafael URS Oakland CA 12/9/2015 USER eli_popuch PATH L:\Projects\GIS\Projects\City_of_San_Rafael\02_Maps\02_Map_Production_and_Reports\CEQA\Exhibit1_ProjectArea.mxd Ross Kentfield San Rafael A n d e r s e n D r B l o s s o m D r Larkspur Map Location 101 Project Area 580 0 1 Miles San Pablo Bay San Rafael Bay San Francisco Bay Woodland 0 500Feet RV Park of San Rafael A ve 12 Woodland Ave. 11 Woodland Ave. Fr ancisco Blvd W A u b u r n S t Project Area Auburn Ander sen Dr St 1 inch = 200 feet 1:2,400 G a r y DATA SOURCE AECOM, 2015, ESRI Imagery, 2014. P l City of San Rafael Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing Project EXHIBIT 1 Project Site Design

the crossing in both directions, would provide the train operator ample distance within which to bring the train to a stop in the event that the crossing was obstructed. Under this scenario, as SMART's train approached the crossing and reached the point where the operator would need to begin reducing speed, the on board Positive Train Control equipment would emit an 85 A-weighted decibels (dba) audible alert and would indicate the 15 miles per hour speed restriction. Per 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 222.21, SMART s train operators will be required to sound their horns at all public grade crossings. The rule would require operators to sound their horns at least 15 seconds, and no more than 20 seconds, in advance of all public grade crossings. Train horns would be required to be sounded in a standardized pattern of two long, one short, and one long blast. The pattern would need to be repeated or prolonged until the train occupied the at-grade crossing. The rule does not stipulate the durations of long and short blasts. Per the regulation, the maximum volume level for the train horn would be 110 dba, with the minimum volume level being 96 dba. Local jurisdictions may apply to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for designation as a Quiet Zone, where audible warning devices are not required. The application must be a joint application between the local jurisdiction (the City of San Rafael) and the rail operator (SMART) and must include supplementary safety measures to ensure that safety is not compromised by eliminating the sounding of the train horns. The City is exploring the possibility of applying for an exemption to the horn requirement under FRA s Quiet Zone Establishment Process. In addition, SMART has committed to work with any local jurisdictions wishing to be designated Quiet Zones to cooperatively meet the requirements for designation. However, FRA has final jurisdiction over Quiet Zone applications. Therefore, at the time of this writing it cannot be predicted with certainty that FRA would grant the exemption. Further, the specific constraints at the Andersen Drive crossing could preclude the implementation of a Quiet Zone at that crossing. Therefore, as part of the SMART Downtown San Rafael-Larkspur Extension, the rule presumably still would apply, and SMART trains would be required to sound their horns at each crossing along the extension. Because the railway is an existing facility, construction activities associated with the proposed project would include rehabilitation of the existing track over the crossing and associated improvements to the Andersen grade crossing and installation of a new signal system. Construction would begin in spring 2016 and is expected to last approximately 6 months. The at-grade crossing rehabilitation at Andersen Drive would include removal of the existing track, roadway, and old signals, and the installation of new track and crossing panels, new roadway approaches, drainage improvements, and new signal protection, including signal system software. Temporary detours related to construction activities would occur but would be short-lived and generally would not occur during peak traffic periods. Roadway and at-grade crossing work at Andersen Drive also could require occasional night work and/or street closures. Based on experience constructing similar crossings, the needed time for a closure would not be likely to exceed 48 hours. Construction materials, such as clean soils for stockpiling, drainage piping, and concrete, would be delivered to the construction site. Some relocation of existing utilities, possibly both underground and aboveground, as well as the installation of new or upgraded utilities could be required. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 3 Technical Report Noise

ACOUSTIC FUNDAMENTALS Noise is generally defined as sound that is loud, disagreeable, unexpected, or unwanted. Sound, as described in more detail below, is mechanical energy transmitted in the form of a wave because of a disturbance or vibration, and as any pressure variation in air that the human ear can detect. SOUND PROPERTIES A sound wave is introduced into a medium (air) by a vibrating object. The vibrating object (e.g., vocal cords, the string and sound board of a guitar, the diaphragm of a radio speaker) is the source of the disturbance that moves through the medium. Regardless of the type of source that creates the sound wave, the particles of the medium through which the sound moves are vibrating in a back-and-forth motion at a given frequency (pitch). The frequency of a wave refers to how often the particles vibrate when a wave passes through the medium. The frequency of a wave is measured as the number of complete back-and-forth vibrations of a particle per unit of time. If a particle of air undergoes 1,000 longitudinal vibrations in 2 seconds, then the frequency of the wave would be 500 vibrations per second. A commonly used unit for frequency is cycles per second, called hertz (Hz). Each particle vibrates as a result of the motion of its nearest neighbor. For example, the first particle of the medium begins vibrating at 500 Hz and sets the second particle of the medium into motion at the same frequency (500 Hz). The second particle begins vibrating at 500 Hz and sets the third particle into motion at 500 Hz. The process continues throughout the medium; hence each particle vibrates at the same frequency, which is the frequency of the original source. A guitar string vibrating at 500 Hz will set the air particles in the room vibrating at the same frequency (500 Hz), which carries a sound signal to the ear of a listener that is detected as a 500-Hz sound wave. The back-and-forth vibration motion of the particles of the medium would not be the only observable phenomenon occurring at a given frequency. Because a sound wave is a pressure wave, a detector could be used to detect oscillations in pressure from high to low and back to high pressure. As the compression (high-pressure) and rarefaction (low-pressure) disturbances move through the medium, they would reach the detector at a given frequency. For example, a compression would reach the detector 500 times per second if the frequency of the wave were 500 Hz. Similarly, a rarefaction would reach the detector 500 times per second if the frequency of the wave were 500 Hz. Thus, the frequency of a sound wave refers not only to the number of back-and-forth vibrations of the particles per unit of time, but also to the number of compression or rarefaction disturbances that pass a given point per unit of time. A detector could be used to detect the frequency of these pressure oscillations over a given period of time. The period of the sound wave can be found by measuring the time between successive highpressure points (corresponding to the compressions) or the time between successive low-pressure points (corresponding to the rarefactions). The frequency is simply the reciprocal of the period; thus, an inverse relationship exists so that as frequency increases, the period decreases, and vice versa. A wave is an energy transport phenomenon that transports energy along a medium. The amount of energy carried by a wave is related to the amplitude (loudness) of the wave. A high-energy wave is characterized by high amplitude; a low-energy wave is characterized by low amplitude. The amplitude of a wave refers to the maximum amount of displacement of a particle from its rest position. The energy transported by a wave is directly proportional to the square of the amplitude of the wave. This means Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 4 Technical Report Noise

that a doubling of the amplitude of a wave is indicative of a quadrupling of the energy transported by the wave. SOUND AND THE HUMAN EAR Because of the ability of the human ear to detect a wide range of sound-pressure fluctuations, soundpressure levels are expressed in logarithmic units called decibels (db) to avoid a very large and awkward range in numbers. The sound-pressure level in decibels is calculated by taking the log of the ratio between the actual sound pressure and the reference sound pressure squared. The reference sound pressure is considered the absolute hearing threshold (Caltrans 2011). Use of this logarithmic scale reveals that the total sound from two individual sources, each measured at 65 A-weighted decibels (dba), is 68 dba, not 130 dba; that is, doubling the source strength increases the sound pressure by 3 dba. Because the human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies, a specific frequencydependent rating scale was devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. A dba scale performs this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. The basis for compensation is the faintest sound audible to the average ear at the frequency of maximum sensitivity. This dba scale has been chosen by most authorities to regulate environmental noise. Typical indoor and outdoor noise levels are presented in Exhibit 2. With respect to how humans perceive and react to changes in noise levels, a 1-dBA increase is imperceptible, a 3-dBA increase is barely perceptible, a 6-dBA increase is clearly noticeable, and a 10-dBA increase is subjectively perceived as approximately twice as loud (Egan 1988), as presented in Table 1. Table 1 was developed on the basis of the reactions of test subjects to changes in the levels of steady-state pure tones or broadband noise and to changes in levels of a given noise source. It is probably most applicable to noise levels in the range of 50 70 dba, as this is the usual range of voice and interior noise levels. Table 1 Subjective Reaction to Changes in Noise Levels of Similar Sources Change in Level, dba Subjective Reaction Factor Change in Acoustical Energy 1 Imperceptible (except for tones) 1.3 3 Just barely perceptible 2.0 6 Clearly noticeable 4.0 10 About twice (or half) as loud 10.0 Note: dba = A-weighted decibels Source: Egan 1988 Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 5 Technical Report Noise

Source: Data compiled by AECOM 2010 Typical Noise Levels Exhibit 2 Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 6 Technical Report Noise

SOUND PROPAGATION AND ATTENUATION As sound (noise) propagates from the source to the receptor, the attenuation, or manner of noise reduction in relation to distance, is dependent on surface characteristics, atmospheric conditions, and the presence of physical barriers. The inverse-square law describes the attenuation caused by the pattern in which sound travels from the source to the receptor. Sound travels uniformly outward from a point source in a spherical pattern with an attenuation rate of 6 dba per doubling of distance (dba/dd). However, from a line source (e.g., a road), sound travels uniformly outward in a cylindrical pattern with an attenuation rate of 3 dba/dd. The characteristics of the surface between the source and the receptor may result in additional sound absorption and/or reflection. Atmospheric conditions such as wind speed, temperature, and humidity may affect noise levels. The presence of a barrier between the source and the receptor may also attenuate noise levels. The actual amount of attenuation depends on the size of the barrier and the frequency of the noise. A noise barrier may be any natural or human-made feature such as a hill, tree, building, wall, or berm (Caltrans 2011). All buildings provide some exterior-to-interior noise reduction. A building constructed with a wood frame and a stucco or wood sheathing exterior typically provides a minimum exterior-to-interior noise reduction of 25 dba with its windows closed; by contrast, a building constructed of a steel or concrete frame, a curtain wall or masonry exterior wall, and fixed plate glass windows of one-quarter-inch thickness typically provides an exterior-to-interior noise reduction of 30 40 dba when its windows are closed (Paul S. Veneklasen & Associates 1973, cited in Caltrans 2002). NOISE DESCRIPTORS The selection of a proper noise descriptor for a specific source depends on the spatial and temporal distribution, duration, and fluctuation of the noise. The noise descriptors most often encountered when dealing with traffic, community, and environmental noise are defined below (Caltrans 2011). L max (Maximum Noise Level): The maximum instantaneous noise level during a specific period of time. The L max may also be referred to as the peak (noise) level. L min (Minimum Noise Level): The minimum instantaneous noise level during a specific period of time. L eq (Equivalent Noise Level): The energy mean (average) noise level. The instantaneous noise levels during a specific period of time in dba are converted to relative energy values. From the sum of the relative energy values, an average energy value is calculated, which is then converted back to dba to determine the L eq. In noise environments that are determined by major noise events, such as aircraft overflights, the L eq value is heavily influenced by the magnitude and number of single events that produce the high noise levels. L dn (Day-Night Noise Level): The 24-hour L eq with a 10-dBA penalty for noise events that occur during the noise-sensitive hours between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. In other words, 10 dba is added to noise events that occur in the nighttime hours, and this generates a higher reported noise level when determining compliance with noise standards. The L dn attempts to account for the fact that noise during this specific period of time is a potential source of disturbance with respect to normal sleeping hours. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 7 Technical Report Noise

CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): Similar to the L dn described above, but with an additional 5-dBA penalty added to noise events that occur during the noise-sensitive hours between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., which are typically reserved for relaxation, conversation, reading, and television. When the same 24-hour noise data are used, the reported CNEL is typically approximately 0.5 dba higher than the L dn. SENL (Single-Event [Impulsive] Noise Level): A receiver s cumulative noise exposure from a single impulsive noise event, which is defined as an acoustical event of short duration and involves a change in sound pressure above some reference value. SENLs typically represent the noise events used to calculate the L eq, L dn, and CNEL. Community noise is commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given noise environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level L eq, which corresponds to a steady-state A-weighted sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given time period (usually 1 hour). The L eq is the foundation of the composite noise descriptors such as L dn and CNEL, as defined above, and correlates well with community response to noise. NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF NOISE ON HUMANS Negative effects of noise exposure include physical damage to the human auditory system, interference, and disease. Exposure to noise may result in physical damage to the auditory system, which may lead to gradual or traumatic hearing loss. Gradual hearing loss is caused by sustained exposure to moderately high noise levels over a period of time; traumatic hearing loss is caused by sudden exposure to extremely high noise levels over a short period. Gradual and traumatic hearing loss both may result in permanent hearing damage. In addition, noise may interfere with or interrupt sleep, relaxation, recreation, and communication. Although most interference may be classified as annoying, the inability to hear a warning signal may be considered dangerous. Noise may also be a contributor to diseases associated with stress, such as hypertension, anxiety, and heart disease. The degree to which noise contributes to such diseases depends on the frequency, bandwidth, and level of the noise, and the exposure time (Caltrans 2011). FUNDAMENTAL NOISE CONTROL OPTIONS Any noise problem is generally composed of three basic elements: the noise source, a transmission path, and a receiver. The appropriate acoustical treatment for a given project should consider the nature of the noise source and the sensitivity of the receiver. The problem should be defined in terms of appropriate criteria (L dn, L eq, or L max ); the location of the sensitive receiver (inside or outside); and the time that the problem occurs (daytime or nighttime). Noise control techniques should then be selected to provide an acceptable noise environment for the receiving property while remaining consistent with local aesthetic standards and practical structural and economic limits. Fundamental noise control options are described below. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 8 Technical Report Noise

Setbacks Noise exposure may be reduced by increasing the distance between the noise source and the receiving use. Setback areas can, for example, take the form of open space, frontage roads, recreational areas, and storage yards. The available noise attenuation from this technique is limited by the characteristics of the noise source, but is generally about 4 6 dba. Barriers Shielding by barriers can be obtained by placing walls, berms, or other structures (such as buildings) between the noise source and the receiver. The effectiveness of a barrier depends on blocking the line of sight between the source and receiver; effectiveness is improved when the sound must travel a longer distance to pass over the barrier than if it were traveling in a straight line from source to receiver. The difference between the distance over a barrier and a straight line between source and receiver is called the path length difference, and is the basis for calculating barrier noise reduction. Barrier effectiveness depends upon the relative heights of the source, barrier, and receiver. In general, barriers are most effective when placed close to either the receiver or the source. An intermediate barrier location yields a smaller path length difference for a given increase in barrier height than does a location closer to either source or receiver. For maximum effectiveness, barriers must be continuous and relatively airtight along their length and height. To ensure that sound transmission through the barrier is insignificant, barrier mass should be about 4 pounds per square foot, although a lesser mass may be acceptable if the barrier material provides sufficient transmission loss. Satisfaction of the above criteria requires substantial and wellfitted barrier materials, placed to intercept the line of sight to all significant noise sources. Earth, in the form of berms or the face of a depressed area, is also an effective barrier material. There are practical limits to the noise reduction provided by barriers. For vehicle traffic or railroad noise, a noise reduction of 5 10 dba may often be reasonably attained. A 15-dBA noise reduction is sometimes possible, but a 20-dBA noise reduction is extremely difficult to achieve. Barriers usually are provided in the form of walls, berms, or berm/wall combinations. The use of an earth berm in lieu of a solid wall may provide up to 3 dba additional attenuation over that attained by a solid wall alone, because of the absorption provided by the earth. Berm/wall combinations offer slightly better acoustical performance than solid walls alone, and they are often preferred for aesthetic reasons. Site Design Buildings can be placed on a project site to shield other structures or areas from areas affected by noise, and to prevent an increase in noise level caused by reflections. The use of one building to shield another can significantly reduce a project s overall noise control costs, particularly if the shielding structure is insensitive to noise. Site design should guard against creating reflecting surfaces that may increase on-site noise levels. For example, two buildings placed at an angle facing a noise source may cause noise levels within that angle to increase by up to 3 dba. The open end of U-shaped buildings should point away from noise sources for the same reason. Landscaping walls or noise barriers located within a development may inadvertently reflect noise back to a noise-sensitive area unless located carefully. Avoidance of these problems while attaining an aesthetic site design requires close coordination between local agencies, the project engineer and architect, and the noise consultant. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 9 Technical Report Noise

Building Façades When interior noise levels are of concern in a noisy environment, noise reduction may be obtained through acoustical design of building façades. Standard construction practices provide a noise reduction of 10 15 dba for building façades with open windows and a noise reduction of approximately 25 dba when windows are closed. Thus, an exterior-to-interior noise reduction of 25 dba can be obtained by requiring that building design include adequate ventilation systems, which allows windows on a noise-affected façade to remain closed under any weather condition. Where greater noise reduction is required, acoustical treatment of the building façade is necessary. Reducing relative window area is the most effective control technique, followed by providing acoustical glazing (thicker glass or increased air space between panes) in frames with low air infiltration rates, using fixed (nonmovable) acoustical glazing, or eliminating windows. Noise transmitted through walls can be reduced by increasing wall mass (using stucco or brick in lieu of wood siding), isolating wall members by using double or staggered stud walls, or mounting interior walls on resilient channels. Noise control for exterior doorways is provided by reducing door area, using solid-core doors, and by acoustically sealing door perimeters with suitable gaskets. Roof treatments may include the use of plywood sheathing under roofing materials. Vegetation Trees and other vegetation are often thought to provide significant noise attenuation. However, approximately 100 feet of dense foliage (so that no visual path extends through the foliage) is required to achieve a 5-dBA attenuation of traffic noise. Thus, the use of vegetation as a noise barrier should not be considered a practical method of noise control unless large tracts of dense foliage are part of the existing landscape. Vegetation can be used to acoustically soften intervening ground between a noise source and a receiver, increasing ground absorption of sound and thus increasing the attenuation of sound with distance. Planting trees and shrubs also offers aesthetic and psychological value, and it may reduce adverse public reaction to a noise source by removing the source from view, even though noise levels will be largely unaffected. However, trees planted on the top of a noise-control berm can slightly degrade the acoustical performance of the barrier. This effect can occur when high-frequency sounds are diffracted (bent) by foliage and directed downward over a barrier. The effects of vegetation on noise transmission are minor, and are primarily limited to increased absorption of high-frequency sounds and to reducing adverse public reaction to the noise by providing aesthetic benefits. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 10 Technical Report Noise

REGULATORY SETTING FEDERAL PLANS, POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA s) Office of Noise Abatement and Control was originally established to coordinate Federal noise control activities. After its inception, EPA s Office of Noise Abatement and Control issued the Federal Noise Control Act of 1972, establishing programs and guidelines to identify and address the effects of noise on public health, welfare, and the environment. In 1981, EPA administrators determined that subjective issues such as noise would be better addressed at lower levels of government. Consequently, in 1982 responsibilities for regulating noise control policies were transferred to state and local governments. However, noise control guidelines and regulations contained in EPA rulings in prior years remain in place by designated Federal agencies, thereby allowing more individualized control for specific issues by designated Federal, state, and local government agencies. To address the human response to groundborne vibration, the FTA of the U.S. Department of Transportation has set forth guidelines for maximum-acceptable-vibration criteria for different types of land uses. These include 65 VdB referenced to 1 μin/sec and based on RMS velocity amplitude for land uses where low ambient vibration is essential for interior operations (e.g., hospitals, high-tech manufacturing, laboratory facilities); 80 VdB for residential uses and buildings where people normally sleep; and 83 VdB for institutional land uses with primarily daytime operations (e.g., schools, churches, clinics, offices) (FTA 2006). Standards have also been established to address the potential for groundborne vibration to cause structural damage to buildings. These standards were developed by the Committee of Hearing, Bio Acoustics, and Bio Mechanics (CHABA) at the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (FTA 2006). For fragile structures, CHABA recommends a maximum limit of 0.25 in/sec PPV (FTA 2006). STATE PLANS, POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS GOVERNOR S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH The State of California, Governor s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), published the State of California General Plan Guidelines (OPR 2003), which provide guidance for the acceptability of projects within specific L dn contours. Table 2 summarizes acceptable and unacceptable community noiseexposure limits for various land use categories. Generally, residential uses (e.g., mobile homes) are considered to be acceptable in areas where exterior noise levels do not exceed 60 dba L dn. Residential uses are normally unacceptable in areas exceeding 70 dba L dn and conditionally acceptable within 55-70 dba L dn. Schools are normally acceptable in areas up to 70 dba L dn and normally unacceptable in areas exceeding 70 dba L dn. Commercial uses are normally acceptable in areas up to 70 dba CNEL. Between 67.5 and 77.5 dba L dn, commercial uses are conditionally acceptable, depending on the noise insulation features and the noise reduction requirements. The guidelines also present adjustment factors that may be used to arrive at noise acceptability standards reflecting the noise control goals of the community, the particular community s sensitivity to noise, and the community s assessment of the relative importance of noise pollution. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 11 Technical Report Noise

Table 2 Summary of Land Use Noise Compatibility Guidelines Land Use Category Residential Low-Density Single-Family, Duplex, Mobile Home Normally Acceptable 1 Community Noise Exposure (dba Ldn) Conditionally Acceptable 2 Normally Unacceptable 3 Clearly Unacceptable 4 <60 55 70 70 75 75+ Residential Multifamily <65 60 70 70 75 75+ Transient Lodging Motel, Hotel <65 60 70 70 80 80+ Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes <70 60 70 70 80 80+ Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters <70 65+ Sports Arena, Outdoor Spectator Sports <75 70+ Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks <70 67.5 75 72.5+ Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries Office Building, Business Commercial, and Professional <75 70 80 80+ <70 67.5 77.5 75+ Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture <75 70 80 75+ Notes: dba = A-weighted decibels; L dn = day-night average noise level 1 Specified land use is satisfactory, based on the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without 2 3 any special noise insulation requirements. New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will normally suffice. New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Outdoor areas must be shielded. 4 New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Source: OPR 2003 In addition, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations establishes standards governing interior noise levels that apply to all new single-family and multifamily residential units in California. These standards require that acoustical studies be performed before construction at building locations where the existing L dn exceeds 60 dba. Such acoustical studies must establish mitigation measures that will limit maximum L dn levels to 45 dba in any habitable room. Although there are no generally applicable interior noise standards pertinent to all uses, many communities in California have adopted an L dn of 45 dba as an upper limit on interior noise in all residential units. LOCAL PLANS, POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES CITY OF SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN The City of San Rafael addresses noise impacts through its General Plan and Municipal Code. The Noise Element of the City of San Rafael General Plan utilizes noise exposure information to identify existing and potential noise conflicts through the Land Use Planning and Project Review processes. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 12 Technical Report Noise

The Noise Element establishes exterior noise level standards and maximum allowable noise exposure from stationary noise sources at noise-sensitive land uses. The exterior noise standard for backyards and/or common usable outdoor areas in new residential development is up to L dn of 60 dba. In common usable outdoor areas in Downtown, mixed-use residential, and high density residential districts, up to L dn of 65 dba may be allowed if determined acceptable through development review (N-2 Exterior Noise Standards for Residential Use Areas). For stationary noise sources, new nonresidential development shall not increase noise levels in a residential district by more than L dn 3 dba, or create noise impacts that would increase noise levels to more than L dn 60 dba at the property line of the noise receiving use, whichever is the more restrictive standard. These standards may be waived if, as determined by an acoustical study, there are mitigating circumstances (such as higher existing noise levels), and no uses would be adversely affected (N-4 Noise from New Nonresidential Development). If a commuter rail service or other use is developed along the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit right-of-way, minimize noise impacts on existing development. A detailed noise assessment and appropriate mitigation measures should be prepared for any rail project on the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit right-of-way. The analysis should address the City's noise standards and the Federal Transit Administrations (FTA) guidelines (N-8a Future Transitway Mitigation Measures). Lastly, through environmental review, identify mitigation measures to minimize the exposure of neighboring properties to excessive noise levels from construction-related activity (N-10b Mitigation for Construction Activity Noise). Include noise specifications in requests for equipment information and bids for new City equipment and consider this information as part of evaluation of the bids (N-10c Noise Specifications). SAN RAFAEL CODE OF ORDINANCES The San Rafael Code of Ordinances governs noise generated within the City limits through Chapter 8.13 NOISE and 14.16.260 NOISE STANDARDS of the Code of Ordinances. The following are the relevant portions of the Code of Ordinances to the proposed project. Sections: 8.13.030 - Loud or unusual noises prohibited. No person shall maintain, emit or make, or cause, suffer or permit to be maintained, emitted or made, any noise or sound produced by human, animal, mechanical or other means, which by reason of its raucous or nerve-wracking nature, shall disturb the peace or comfort or be injurious to the health of any person or persons; and such a noise or sound may be deemed in violation of this section regardless whether it is found to be within the noise limits established elsewhere in this chapter for the location or type of noise or sound. 8.13.040 - General noise limits. Subject to the exceptions and exemptions set forth in Sections 8.13.050 and 8.13.060 of this chapter, the general noise limits set forth in this section shall apply. A summary of the general noise limits set forth in this section is set forth in Table 8.13-1 (included below from the San Rafael Code of Ordinances). Where two or more noise limits may apply, the more restrictive noise limit shall govern. For purposes of determining sound levels from any source of sound, a sound level measurement shall be made at any point on any receiving private or public property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in multi-family structures, the microphone shall be placed no closer than 3-½ feet from a wall through Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 13 Technical Report Noise

which the source of sound at issue is transmitting, and shall also be placed five (5) feet above the floor regardless of whether the source of sound at issue transmits through the floor, ceiling or wall. Sound level measurements shall be made with a sound level meter (Type 1 or 2) set to A-weighting, and "fast" response for intermittent sound. Slow or fast response may be used for constant noise sources. For intermittent sound, the one second rms maximum level (Lmax) shall be used. For constant sound, the average level (Leq) shall be used. A Residential property noise limits. 1. No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or by any other means, a noise level greater than the following, when measured on any residential property: a. Daytime: 60 dba intermittent 50 dba constant b. Nighttime 50 dba intermittent 40 dba constant 2. No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal, or device, or by any other means, a noise level greater than the following, when measured on any mixed use property: a. Daytime: 65 dba intermittent 55 dba constant b. Nighttime 55 dba intermittent 45 dba constant 3. No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or by any other means, within the interior of a multi-family residential structure, a noise level greater than the following, when measured through a common interior partition (wall, floor or ceiling) from any other interior location: a. Daytime: 40 dba intermittent 35 dba constant b. Nighttime 35 dba intermittent 30 dba constant B Commercial property noise limits. No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal, or device, or by any other means, a noise level greater than sixty-five (65) dba intermittent or fifty-five (55) dba constant, when measured on any commercial property. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 14 Technical Report Noise

C Industrial property noise limits. No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or by any other means, a noise level greater than seventy (70) dba intermittent or sixty (60) dba constant, when measured on any industrial property. D Public property noise limits. No person shall produce, suffer or allow to be produced by any machine, animal or device, or by any other means, a noise level, when measured on any public property, that is greater than the most restrictive noise standard applicable under this chapter to any private property adjoining the receiving public property. Table 8.13-1 General Noise Limits City of San Rafael Code of Ordinances Property type or zone Daytime limits Nighttime limits Residential Mixed-use Multifamily residential (interior sound source) Commercial 60 dba Intermittent 50 dba Constant 65 dba Intermittent 55 dba Constant 40 dba Intermittent 35 dba Constant 65 dba Intermittent 55 dba Constant 50 dba Intermittent 40 dba Constant 55 dba Intermittent 45 dba Constant 35 dba Intermittent 30 dba Constant 65 dba Intermittent 55 dba Constant Industrial Public Property 70 dba Intermittent 60 dba Constant Most restrictive noise limit applicable to adjoining private property 8.13.050 Standard exceptions to general noise limits. 70 dba Intermittent 60 dba Constant Most restrictive noise limit applicable to adjoining private t The following standard exceptions to the provisions of Section 8.13.040 shall be allowed as of right, to the extent and during the hours specified. A summary of the standard exceptions provided in this section is set forth in Table 8.13-2 (included below from the San Rafael Code of Ordinances). A Construction. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this section, or by the planning commission or city council as part of the development review for the project, on any construction project on property within the city, construction, alteration, demolition, maintenance of construction equipment, deliveries of materials or equipment, or repair activities otherwise allowed under applicable law shall be allowed between the hours of seven a.m. (7:00 a.m.) and six p.m. (6:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday, and nine a.m. (9:00 a.m.) and six p.m. (6:00 p.m.) on Saturdays, provided that the noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed ninety (90) dba. All such activities shall be precluded on Sundays and holidays. Violation Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 15 Technical Report Noise

of the foregoing may subject the permittee to suspension of work by the chief building official for up to two (2) days per violation. Construction hours MONDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOLIDAYS 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Prohibited NOISE LIMITS Noise level at any point outside of the construction property plane shall not exceed ninety (90) dba. Violation of the construction hours and noise limits may be enforced as either an infraction or a misdemeanor punishable by fines or jail time or both, or by an administrative citation with a fine, or by a civil action with a monetary penalty, injunction and/or other remedies, as provided in Chapter 1.42 of this codec. In addition, the chief building official may issue a stop work order requiring suspension of work for up to two (2) days per violation. A Residential Power Equipment and Construction Activities by Residential Property Owners. Residential power equipment, and construction activities undertaken by residential property owners to maintain or improve their property, shall be allowed between the hours of eight a.m. (8:00 a.m.) and eight p.m. (8:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday, and nine a.m. (9:00 a.m.) and six p.m. (6:00 p.m.) on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, providing such equipment and/or activities do not produce a noise level that exceeds ninety (90) dba beyond the property plane of the property on which the equipment is being used or the activity is occurring. For purposes of this subsection, "construction activities undertaken by the residential property owner" shall include work personally done by the property owner(s) and by a family member, friend or other persons assisting the property owner(s). Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 16 Technical Report Noise

Table 8.13-2 Standard Exceptions to General Noise Limits San Rafael Code of Ordinance Type of Activity Maximum Noise Level Days/Hours Permitted Construction 90 dba Mon-Fri 7:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Sat 9:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Sun, Hol. prohibited or as otherwise set by city approval Residential Power Equipment and Construction Activities Undertaken by Residential Property Owners 90 dba Mon-Fri 8:00 a.m. 8:00 p.m. Sat, Sun, Hol. 9:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. Sound performances 80 dba measured fifty (50) feet or more from property plane, or as excepted by permit approval Every day 10:00 a.m. 10:00 p.m., or as excepted by permit approval Residential or mixed-use property: Mon-Sat 6:00 a.m. 9:00 p.m. Industrial or commercial property: Daily 4:00 a.m. 9:00 p.m. Refuse Collection 95 dba Residential or mixed-use property: Mon-Sat 6:00 a.m. 9:00 p.m. Industrial or commercial property: Daily 4:00 a.m. 9:00 p.m. 8.13.070 - Exemptions. The following shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter: A Aerial warning devices which are required by law to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community; B Emergency vehicle responses and all necessary equipment utilized for the purpose of responding to an emergency, or necessary to restore, preserve, protect or save lives or property from imminent danger of loss or harm; C Aviation, railroad, and public transit operations; D The operation of any municipal or public utility vehicles; E Uses established through any applicable discretionary review process containing specific noise conditions of approval and/or mitigation measures; F Work on capital improvements, or repairs on public property by employees or contractors of the city; Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 17 Technical Report Noise

14.16.260 Noise standards. A. Any new development located in a "conditionally acceptable" or "normally unacceptable" noise exposure area, based on the land use compatibility chart standards in the general plan, shall require an acoustical analysis. Noise mitigation features shall be incorporated where needed to assure consistency with general plan standards. New construction is prohibited in noise exposure areas where the land use compatibility chart indicates the noise exposure is "clearly unacceptable." B. Development Adjacent to Residential Areas. New nonresidential construction adjacent to residential areas shall not increase noise levels in a residential area by more than three (3) dba (L dn ), or create noise impacts which would increase noise levels to more than sixty (60) dba (L dn ) at the boundary of a residential area, whichever is the more restrictive standard. This standard may be waived by the planning director if, as determined by a noise analysis, there are mitigating circumstances (such as higher existing noise levels), and no uses would be adversely affected. C. Development Adjacent to Commercial, Mixed Use and Industrial Districts. New nonresidential development shall not increase noise levels in a commercial area by more than five (5) dba (L dn ), or create noise impacts which would increase noise levels to more than sixty-five (65) dba (L dn ) for office, retail or mixed use districts, or seventy (70) dba (L dn ) for industrial districts, at the property line of the noise receiving use, whichever is the more restrictive standard. This standard may be waived by the planning director if, as determined by a noise analysis, there are mitigating circumstances (such as higher existing noise levels), and no uses would be adversely affected. Andersen Drive At-Grade Crossing 18 Technical Report Noise