SOME ASPECTS REGARING CHLORINE DECAY IN WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS

Similar documents
STUDY OF WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK USING EPANET

PipelineNet: A GIS Based Water Quality Model for Distribution Systems

Analysis of Continuous Water Distribution in Surat City using EPANET: A Case Study

A Method to Determine Biodegradable Dissolved Organic Nitrogen in Water ND 58108, USA

2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Jackson Twp Water Authority PWSID #

Online Methodology for Determining THM Formation Potential & Predicted Network TTHM Levels

Granular Activated Carbon System

Contents. 1 Characteristics of US Water Supply Systems 1

NOVEL APPROACHES TO TRIHALOMETHANE MANAGEMENT. Dr Rino Trolio. Water Corporation (WA)

Modelling water quality in drinking water distribution networks from real-time direction data

Drinking Water Treatment Optimization Tools

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Beau Chêne Water System Public Water Supply ID: LA June 14, 2017

Technical Discussion Paper on Proposed Ontario Drinking Water Quality Standards

VILLAGE OF GREENWICH STATE OF OHIO Administration Offices: 45 Main Street. Greenwich, Ohio (419)

INTRODUCTION: WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM?

Este reporte incluye información importante sobre el agua para tomar. Para asistencia en español, favor de llamar al telefono

Pueblo Water 2017 Water Quality Report

Pinellas County Utilities provides drinking

East Hanover Water Quality Report 2014 PWS ID#

2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM?

YOUR WATER IS SAFE TO DRINK SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD is

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Washington City 2015

Impact of Chlorine Dioxide on TTHMs Reduction in Drinking Water By Douglas D. Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2015 MINERAL WELLS PSD 53 Fox Run Dr. Mineral Wells WV, PWS# WV June 13, 2016

FORT JACKSON WATER SYSTEM 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT. Delivering Excellence, One Drop at a Time. PSUS s Water Philosophy

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report for 2013 Niagara County Water District 5450 Ernest Road, Lockport, NY (Public Water Supply ID# NY )

BWA DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT YEAR 2006 DATA (817)

Dover Water Company (PWSID#: NJ ) 100 Princeton Avenue, Dover, NJ Year 2017 Annual Water Quality Report

WATER. Annual QUALITY REPORT. Reporting Year Presented By City of Plantation PWS ID#: FL

Trihalomethane Formation Potential in Rainwater Harvested from Different Roofing Materials

WATER SAFETY PLANS FROM THE ENGINEER S PERSPECTIVE

Water Quality Changes in the Distribution System. Module 6

Lesson 2 Science Concepts. Chemical Characteristics of Water. The Operator as a Chemist

Mixing, Short-Circuiting, Stratification, Buoyant Jet, DBPs, Water Quality, Water Age

Mass Transfer of High Concentration Ozone With High Efficiency Injectors and Degassing Separators

East Hanover Water Quality Report 2017

Localized Treatment for DBP s using Spray Aeration and Online Monitoring

WATER QUALITY. Santa Margarita Water District

Treatment Processes for Potable Water

Water Quality Report Annual. Cambridge Water System PWS ID: NY

2017 Water Quality Report

CITY OF KENT. Division of Water

Water for Instrument Processing

Should we use a residual in our drinking water distribution systems?

2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

2016 Water Quality Report to Consumers

Microbiological Quality: Understanding Drinking Water Quality and Management

2014 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report (Consumer Confidence Report) TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY FREEMAN RANCH PWS# Phone No:

FORT JACKSON WATER SYSTEM Public Water System # WATER QUALITY REPORT. Delivering Excellence, One Drop at a Time. PSUS s Water Philosophy

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Big Creek Water System ( ) May 11, 2017

Water Quality Modelling for Drinking Water Distribution Systems

USING GAC TO CONTROL THMs IN DRINKING WATER. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE ATHENS WATER WORKS AND AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE METHOD

2016 DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT CITY OF PASADENA El cary Estates PWS

Water Company of Green Valley June Water Quality Report

REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS OF USING DYNAMIC SIMULATION SOFTWARE TO OPTIMIZE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS OPERATIONS

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Name ffm!?f( ea,nrja/1. Phone. Sources of Drinking Water

Drinking Water Annual Report City of Kelowna

THM Removal by Water Spray Aeration- Tank Top Results. Thomas F. Clark, P.E. Production Engineer Monroe County Water Authority Rochester, New York

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report of Reedy Creek Improvement District

We would like to thank you, our customers, for your continued support of our potable (drinking) water system.

JACKSON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY

CHAPTER 4 MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA

1.782 Environmental Engineering Masters of Engineering Project Fall Spring 2008

Isabelle Papineau, Ph.D., École Polytechnique de Montréal Yves Dionne (V de G) and Benoit Barbeau (EPM)

EVALUATION OF A WATER TREATMENT PLANT PERFORMANCE CASE STUDY

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF CITRIC ACID CIP CARRYOVER ON DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCT FORMATION IN MEMBRANE TREATMENT FACILITIES.

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2016 Ripley Water Works 108 South Street Ripley, WV PWSID# January 30, 2017

Quality. Service. Value.

Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas Dept. of Process Engineering and Environmental Sciences

Water Quality Considerations In Green Building Design

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH ASPECTS OF WATER TREATMENT AND SUPPLY Design of Water Treatment Facilities - Katsuyoshi Tomono, Yasumoto Magara

Este informe contiene informacion muy importante sobre su agua potable. Traduzcalo o hable con alguien que lo entienda bien.

City of Lake Jackson 2004 Drinking Water Quality Report

UAU102F University of Iceland

The Water We Drink. Water Source and Treatment. Contact Information. Period Covered by Report Consumer Confidence Report

City of Pasadena 2013 Drinking Water Quality Report

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

Evaluation of Second-Stage Contactor Media for Manganese Removal

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY BAHRAIN(NSA I, BANZ, AV UNIT) 2015 DRINKING WATER CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT

EVENT-BASED PATHOGEN ASSESSMENT IN A DEGRADED CATCHMENT. Heidi Josipovic. North East Water

Rural Water Supply Pipelines and Water Quality Modeling

CEE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING PROBLEM SET #5

Introduction and Water Resources Source Water Assessment Additional Health Information

Haiti Project MAP. SODIS, Pete. THM s, Daniele. Best Practices, Farzana. Chlorine Generation, Nadine

2016 Report on Water Quality Relative to Public Health Goals

Annual. Water. Quality. Report. Proudly Presented By: City of Moscow Water Department PWS ID#:

2016 Consumer Confidence Report

WATER QUALITY AND STANDARDS Vol. I - Basic Concepts and Definitions in Water Quality and Standards - Yasumoto Magara

FORT BLISS WATER SYSTEM WATER QUALITY. Fort Bliss. WATER SERVICES COMPANY A Subsidiary of American States Utility Services, Inc.

2017 DMU Water Quality Report

City of River Rouge, MI

CITY OF ST. LOUIS Water Quality Report 2016

Steamboat Springs 2013 Drinking Water Quality Report For Calendar Year 2012

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Northstar-Zoot Water System

Module 1: CHAPTER FOUR PHYSICAL PROCESSES

NUMERICAL STUDY ON THERMAL DEPLETION OF THE GROUND AROUND A GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMP S PROBE

Clean energy saving: applied research into Etna s water supply systems in Catania, Italy

Transcription:

SOME ASPECTS REGARING CHLORINE DECAY IN WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS LIANA IOANA VU 1, GABRIELA ELENA DUMITRAN 2 ABSTRACT. A major objective of drinking water treatment is to provide microbiologically safe drinking water. The combination of conventional drinking water treatment and disinfection has proved to be one of the major public health advances in modern times. The quality of drinking water delivered to the customer s tap is influenced by a number of processes; namely water treatment, disinfection and changes during transport of treated water via the distribution system. All natural waters and even treated drinking water exerts disinfectant demand due to the reactions with NOM and other constituents in water. Therefore, the applied disinfectant dose must be sufficient to meet the inherent demand in the treated water, to provide sufficient protection against microbial infection. Thus, controlling free residual chlorine properly is definitely important to ensure meeting regulatory requirements and satisfying customer needs. This paper presents the main aspects regarding chlorine decay in drinking-water distribution networks and, also a free chlorine decay simulation with EPANET2 on Ramnicu Valcea water distribution system. Keywords: drinking water quality, chlorine decay, distribution system, Epanet. 1. INTRODUCTION Water distribution system makes water available to the consumer in proper quantity and pressure. Tap water should not contain microorganisms, parasites or substances that might represent a potential hazard for human health and it must meet the minimal requirements stipulated in regulations concerning the quality parameters of potable water (microbiological and chemical indicators). The quality of water delivered to the customers depends on its initial chemical and physical composition, the proper choice of purification technology, technical condition of water storage tanks and the pipe network as well as hydraulic conditions and exploitation manner of the water distribution system. Thus, water distribution systems act as large-scale chemical and biological reactors and sometimes, due to improper design or operation, can greatly modify the quality of water (e.g. long retention times which lead to water aging, reduced disinfectant residual and formation of disinfection by-products, bacterial growth, appearance of cooper and lead, taste and odor problems and so on). 1 University "Politehnica" of Bucharest, Power Engineering Faculty, 060042 Bucharest, Romania, e- mail: l_vuta@yahoo.com, tel: 0744535933 2 University "Politehnica" of Bucharest, Power Engineering Faculty, 060042 Bucharest, Romania, e- mail: dumitran@hydrop.pub.ro, tel: 0741146060 253

Preserving the water quality throughout the distribution system is, therefore, one of the most challenging technological issues for suppliers. Many water utilities use chlorine residual to inactivate potential pathogenic organisms and preserve water quality during distribution. In 1976, it was discovered that disinfections by-products (DBPs) were produced during the disinfection process (Marhaba and Washington 1998). Chlorine reacts with natural organic compounds found in water (humic and fulvic acids) and form a wide range of undesired halogenated organic compounds, including trihalomethanes (THMs), haloacetic acids (HAA), chlorophenols, chloral hydrate and haloacetonitriles (Gallard and von Gunten 2002). The concern of DBPs formed during disinfection processes is based on the evidence that they have some adverse health effects: cancer, reproductive disorders, liver and kidney damage, birth defects and possibly miscarriage (Arora et al. 1997). Thus, controlling the residual chlorine concentration in drinking water is a very important aspect, since the decrease of chlorine concentration below the minimal level may cause secondary development of microorganisms and excessive chlorine concentration may cause formation of dangerous disinfection by-products. 2. MECHANISM OF CHLORINE DECAY Chlorine decay in distribution system is generally considered to consist of two components. One component is associated with decay in the bulk phase of the water, and the other with the wall demand. Chlorine demand and DBPs formation are influenced by treatment conditions and by the constituents in the raw and treated water. The demand due to inorganic compounds is smaller than the one associated with the reaction between chlorine and natural organic matter (NOM). Among the factors that influence the demand of chlorine and the formation of DBPs can be mentioned: - Chlorine dose: high chlorine concentration lead to increased DBPs leves; - Reaction time: long reaction times results in high chlorine demand and increased DBPs leves; - ph: an increase in the ph lead to increase in THMs formation but to decrease in HAA; ph modification has a neglijable effects on chlorine demand; - Temperature: high temperature lead to greater chlorine demand and higher levels of DBPs. In order to be able to estimate correctly the residual concentration in water distribution systems, all the factors that influence the chlorine demand must be identified. 254

3. MODELLING APPROACH Chlorine propagation inside the water distribution system may be studied with the use of mathematical models comprehensively describing the variable hydraulic conditions and reflecting individual factors influencing the disinfectant decay. Simulation of residual chlorine concentration in selected water supply network nodes makes gathering the knowledge about transported water quality possible and helps in considering the network segments/parts in which water quality deterioration occurs. One of the available software for water distribution network modelling is Epanet. Epanet allow the hydraulic studies of water distribution systems and also the movement and fate of drinking water constituents within distribution systems. Decay simulation conducted within EPANET takes into consideration the phenomena of chlorine reaction with chemical species at bulk fluid and with pipe walls. The reactions occurring in the bulk flow can be modelled with n-th order kinetics, where the instantaneous rate of reaction (R in mass/volume/time) is assumed to be concentration-dependent according to: R=K b C n (1) Where Kb = bulk reaction rate coefficient, C = reactant concentration (mass/volume), and n = reaction order. The decay of free residual chlorine because of reaction occurring in the bulk water is generally assumed in the literature (Munvalli and Kumar, 2006; Haestad, et al., 2001) to be a first order reaction. In practice, bulk decay coefficients can be determined by running a bottle test on the water entering the distribution system. The contribution of wall reactions is introduced into the software through another constant K w, whose meaning is more complex. The rate of water quality reactions occurring at or near the pipe wall can be considered to be dependent on the concentration in the bulk flow by using an expression of the form: R=(A/V)K w C n (2) Where K w = wall reaction rate coefficient and (A/V) = the surface area per unit volume within a pipe (equal to 4 divided by the pipe diameter). There is currently no established method for directly determining the kinetics of chlorine decay due to pipe wall reactions and calibration against field data must be used instead. Still, the literature indicate that pipe diameter and pipe material are the categories most likely to impact wall coefficient values in a calibration process (Munvalli and Kumar, 2006; Haestad, et al., 2001; Michael Hudkins, et al., 2010). To assure the correct use of the water quality simulator, incorporated in the EPANET, a model calibration process must be done, determining the correct values to K b and K w coefficients. In most cases, model calibration is conducted a posteriori, altering parameter values in order to obtain, in the model, values that match real ones. Still, values reported in the literature, for similar condition regarding the distribution system structure can be used in order to determine the residual chlorine concentration at the consumers. 255

4. CASE STUDY: RAMNICU VALCEA WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The Ramnicu Valcea network is a gravity fed system from 4 reservoirs, and the distribution to consumers (about 120,000 inhabitants) is provided through metal pipes network, with sizes ranging from 80 to 600 mm. The network layout is presented in figure 1, and figure 2 presents the base demands at consumers. For the daily flow variation, three different regimes are considered: domestic, commercial and industrial consumers. The flow patterns are presented in Figures 3. For all pipes, the equivalent pipe roughness is set to 0.2 mm and Darcy Weisbach formula is used as a headloss equation. Under these assumptions, the hydraulic behaviour of the network was investigated, using Epanet v2. From the hydraulic point of view, the network does not present any problems: water in sufficient quantity and at adequate pressure is delivered to all consumers. The minimum available pressure is recorded in junction 5 and is above 9 m. Figure 1. Ramnicu Valcea water distribution system layout Regarding the residual chlorine concentration in Ramnicu Valcea network nodes, previous investigations considered only the bulk flow reaction (Rotaru 2006; Vuta 2008). In this paper, two hypotheses are considered for modelling chlorine decay: the first one considering only the chlorine reaction in the bulk flow and the second, considering also the pipe wall reaction. The values for k b and k w used (-0.1 h -1 and - 0.17 h -1 respectively) have been chosen around the ones reported in the literature (according with the pipe material, diameters and age/roughness) (Castro et al. 2003; Nagatani et al. 2008; Hudkins et al. 2010). 256

Figure 2. Base demands for Ramnicu Valcea water distribution system Figures 3. Flow patterns for domestic, commercial and industrial consumers When considering only the bulk flow reaction and a first-order decay reaction, few nodes experienced low levels of residual chlorine concentration during low period consumption (between 2.00 and 7.00 am ): 18, 29, 31, 75, 76. 75 and 76 are industrial consumers, 31 is commercial and 18 and 29 are domestic. The low residual chlorine concentration find in those nodes is related with high travel time of water from reservoirs, as it can be seen in figure 4 and figure 5. Figure 4. Chlorine concentration in networks nodes, k b = -0.1 h -1, k w = 0 Figure 5. Water age in networks nodes 257

Differences in residual chlorine concentration are expected to appear when considering also pipe wall reaction. In this case, beside the bulk reaction described by a first-order decay reaction, a zero-order reaction at the pipes wall is considered. As a result, large area of the network presents very low residual chlorine concentration, presented in figure 6. The correlation between high water age and low chlorine concentration is still evident. Figure 6. Chlorine concentration in networks nodes, k b = -0.1 h -1, k w = -0.17 h -1 In this case, the residual chlorine concentration drops below 0.1mg/l in some nodes in the network. Figure 7 presents the values obtained for node 18 in the two hypotheses. As it was expected, introduction of the pipe wall reaction lead to high chlorine demand, making the system unsecure if the residual chlorine concentration is very low (for some nodes in the network, during the low demand period, residual chlorine concentration drop below 0.1 mg/l). In the theoretical case presented in this article, the chlorine demand increased only by 30%, but, according to the literature, the wall demand can represent up to 80% from the total disinfectant. Figure 7. Differences between residual chlorine concentrations for node 18 6. CONCLUSION Controlling the residual chlorine concentration in drinking water is a very important aspect, since the decrease of chlorine concentration below the minimal level may cause secondary development of microorganisms and excessive chlorine concentration may cause formation of dangerous disinfection by-products. Mathematical modelling of chlorine decay along the water supply system is a problem whose solution is not yet absolutely mastered. 258

Still, hydraulic/water quality models can be used by drinking water utilities in order to efficiently plan, operate, and expand their potable water systems. But, in applying water quality models to actual water distribution system it is critical that a well-calibrated hydraulic model to be used along with site-specific reaction rate data. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work has been co-funded by the Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007-2013 of the Romanian Ministry of Labor, Family and Social Protection through the Financial Agreement POSDRU/89/1.5/ S/62557. REFERENCES 1. Arora, H., LeChevallier, M. W., Dixon, K.L. DBP occurrence survey. Journal of American Water Works Association, 89, (6), 60 68, 1997 2. Pedro Castro, Mário Neves. Chlorine decay in water distribution systems. Case study Lousada network. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem., ISSN 1579-4377, 2003 3. Gallard, H. and von Gunten, U. Chlorination of Natural Organic Matter: Kinetics of chlorination and of THM Formation. Water Research, 36, 65-74, 2002 4. Haestad, et al. Water Distribution Modeling. 2001 5. Lewis A. Rossman. Epanet User Manual. 2000 6. Marhaba, T. F., and Washington, M. B. Drinking water protection and byproducts: history and current practice. Advances in Environmental Research, 2, 103 115, 1998 7. Michael Hudkins, et al. FieldVerification ofwater QualityModels: Process, Results & Benefits. FLORIDAWATER RESOURCES JOURNAL, Aprilie, 2010 8. Munavalli GR, Kumar MSM. Autocalibration of a water distribution model for water quality parameters using GA. Journal American Water Works Association 98 (9): 109-123 SEP 2006 9. F. Rotaru. Contributii in probleme de dimensionare si de exploatare a statiilor de pompare si a retelelor de distributie a apei. PhD Thesis, Bucharest, 2006 10. Toru Nagatani et al. Residual chlorine decay simulation in water distribution system. The 7 th International Symposium on Water Supply Technology, Yokohama 2006, November 22-24, 2008, Yokohama, Japan 11. L.I.Vuta. Modelarea calitatii apei potabile din retelele de distributie. PhD Thesis, Bucharest, 2008 259