DRUG DEVELOPMENT TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE

Similar documents
BIOPHARMA SOLUTIONS TM Expedite Your Drug Development Program

CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Clinical Trial Simulations

Celerion s Symposia Series: Bridging the Gap from Phase I to Proof-of-Concept. San Francisco, CA Tue 8 th, Apr 2014

Office for Human Subject Protection. University of Rochester

8. Clinical Trial Assessment Phase II

Key concepts of the paediatric regulation and latest developments

Experience with Adaptive Dose-Ranging Studies in Early Clinical Development

Regulatory Challenges of Global Drug Development in Oncology. Jurij Petrin, M.D. Princeton, NJ

Injectable modified release products

The Drug Development Process and Design of Clinical Trials

Drug Development: Why Does it Cost so Much? Lewis J. Smith, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Center for Clinical Research Associate VP for Research

PAREXEL GENOMIC MEDICINE SERVICES. Applying genomics to enhance your drug development journey

CRO partner in Rx/CDx Co-Development

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and/or intramuscular administration (SCIg/IMIg)

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL OR MICROBIOLOGICAL TESTS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

WITA/GWU TRADE SEMINAR September 29, 2016 Washington D.C. RICHARD KJELDGAARD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TRADE CONSULTANT

FDA Drug Approval Process Vicki Seyfert-Margolis, Ph.D.

S9 Implementation Working Group ICH S9 Guideline: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals Questions and Answers

Planning of Application

EFPIA-PHRMA PRINCIPLES FOR RESPONSIBLE CLINICAL TRIAL DATA SHARING REPORT ON THE 2016 MEMBER COMPANY SURVEY

Document Reuse: Theory and Practice

Session 7 Clinical Trial Assessment Bioequivalence Studies

The importance of regulatory science in a societal and industrial perspective Annual Conference CORS 24 November 2016

Novartis Business Services HR University Relations. Clinical Sciences and Innovation. Postgraduate Program

Investigator-Initiated INDs

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search

Global Development Challenges: Classical and Advanced Therapy Medicinal products

IMPURITIES IN NEW DRUG PRODUCTS

CADTH Canadian Drug Expert Committee Recommendation

Adoption by CHMP for release for 3-month public consultation 18 November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 28 February 2011

International Transfers of Personal Data at sanofi-aventis R & D

Industry Academic Collaboration: A Key to Successful Involvement of Patients Early in Clinical Development

The Promise and Challenge of Adaptive Design in Oncology Trials

New TB Drugs Approval in Thailand

Denosumab for the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with multiple myeloma first line

Early Phase Education WHITEPAPER. Three major items to consider when moving from preclinical to clinical development

Adaptive Design for Medical Device Development

Off-Label Use of FDA-Approved Drugs and Biologicals

Pascal Quiry March 2013

Special Delivery The SMFM E-Newsletter Digital Advertising Rates and Specifications

ISPOR 19 th International Meeting May 31 st June 4 th 2014, Montréal International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

Biosimilar regulation in Republic of Korea and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) developments

LABCORP SUPPLIER CODE OF CONDUCT

Aflibercept (Eylea) Benefit assessment according to 35a Social Code Book V 1

REFERENCE CODE GDHC1106CFR PUBLICATION DATE M AY 2013

Regulatory Approaches for New Drugs: BA/BE of Topical Drug Products

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) & Clinical Trial Registries

Designing Safe and Efficient Phase I Studies to Expedite Clinical Development

Streamlining Development and Approval Processes for 505(B)(2) NDAs

Importance of Pharmacovigilance for Pharmaceutical Industry

When to Stop Dose Escalation: MTD, MLD or?

CORPORATE NEWS EARNINGS PAION AG PUBLISHES GROUP QUARTERLY STATEMENT FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF 2016

Paradigm Shift in Comparability Assessment:

CTA/NDA Regulatory Landscape in China. Jack Xie, PhD, DABT SOT 2016

Passive vaccination as a global strategy for preventing RSV disease in infants. Filip Dubovsky MD MPH FAAP MedImmune March 2016

Session 2 summary Designs & Methods. Pairwise comparisons approach. Dose finding approaches discussed: Guiding principles for good dose selection

Guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and/or intramuscular administration (SCIg/IMIg)

Regulatory hurdles and opportunities

FOCUS REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGY TO DEMONSTRATE FULL VALUE STORY

REIMAGINING DRUG DEVELOPMENT:

Pharmaceutical Industry Research Credit Audit Guidelines

Small-Cap Research. Atossa Genetics (ATOS-NASDAQ) ATOS: Zacks Company Report OUTLOOK

Decoding Phase II Clinical Trial Terminations

Complex Generics: Charting a new path

Four entry strategies for small and midsized companies

ICH Topic E16 Genomic Biomarkers Related to Drug Response: Context, Structure and Format of Qualification Submissions. Step 3

Non-clinical documentation Overview of Requirements

FUTURE MEANS CREATIVITY

UBS Global Life Sciences Conference

Simonetta Viviani, MD BIO-VIPE Consulting Limited, Hong Kong

GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY ON FIXED DOSE COMBINATIONS (FDCs)

Roche, Roche Molecular Diagnostics and more

Insights into the Evolving Pricing & Market Access Environment

Pharmaceutical Industry Research Credit Audit Guidelines - Revised - 4/30/04

Rare Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities NIH Perspective

BEAM ASPECTS OF COMPOUNDING PRODUCT DESIGN. Reinout C.A. Schellekens, PharmD, RHPh, QP. Head Clinical Drug Production and Development

1 st Quarter 2007 Earnings. April 19, 2007

Swissmedic Accepts Santhera's Filing of SNT-MC17 in Friedreich's Ataxia

Section I: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices

March 18 th, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Blood procurement: Process development, clinical trials and the market

Promotion & Advertising of Combination Products: Key Postmarket Considerations

Pega Care Management for Healthcare

THE INHERENT CHALLENGES OF TESTING C. DIFFICILE

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Product Monograph

Second Quarter 2017 Financial Results. August 8, 2017

Disclaimer. 2

Official Letter from the DOH

FDA Guidance, Clinical Pharmacology, and Regulatory Science

New Dairy Products and Value Chains

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE NON-CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF FIXED COMBINATIONS OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Generic entries of new chemical entities: challenges for controlling promotion and ensuring safety.

Venture Philanthropy Models: The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's Therapy Acceleration Program. A FasterCures Webinar June 19, 2013

REQUEST FOR AUTHORISATION TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY: REQUEST FOR OPINION OF THE ETHICS COMMITTEE:

A drug development crossroad lies ahead

Akadeemilised kliinilised uuringud kellele ja milleks? Irja Lutsar Tartu,

Transcription:

DRUG DEVELOPMENT TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE Template This template provides suggested considerations that may assist biopharmaceutical companies in their decisions as to whether to proceed with a drug development program (Program). This template is provided solely as a convenience aid, not as a decision-making tool. It does not necessarily include a comprehensive list of all of the information that may be useful to collect and evaluate in connection with any particular Program. In deciding whether to proceed with a Program, users of this template may find it necessary or beneficial to evaluate additional information not included in this template, exclude certain information included in this template, otherwise modify the approach suggested in this template and/or consult with others who are knowledgeable about their Program, as appropriate for the Program. This template is provided as is without any representations or warranties, express or implied.

Asset Overview Trademark: Therapeutic Area: Development Phase: Generic Name: Pharmacological/Chemical Class: Project Code: Order of Market Entry: First Launch (MM/YY): 1. INDICATIONS AND USAGE Target Annotations Comments 2. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION Target Annotations Comments 3. COMPARATOR PROFILE Patent Life Date Approved: Date Generic Available: Indications Approved: In Development: Market Share (U.S.) Present: Future: Other Criteria

4. TARGET BRAND POSITIONING: Key Risk Decisions (examples) Early decisions on whether to proceed with a drug development program (go decisions) or to discontinue the program (no-go decisions) may be based on Phase I single agent or combination study data. The development strategy may be based on the need to pursue comparator trials. Reassessment of endpoint criteria for go/no-go decision may be required based on progress/status of competitors in development. Indication(s) and Projected Launch Date: Target Population (Check all appropriate boxes): Infants Children Adolescent Adults Elderly Other Men Women (Example: Special 5. ESSENTIAL TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE CLAIMS Messages/ (Pharmacology, efficacy, safety or Study Design Description/ Title Attributes for Registration Data Phase I Biomarker, Combo, Open Label, Basket, Adaptive) Not Phase I Safety/ Tolerability SAD/MAD, DDI, PK, Food Effect, Special Not

5. ESSENTIAL TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE CLAIMS Messages/ (Pharmacology, efficacy, safety or Study Design Description/ Title Attributes for Registration Data Phase II Biomarker, Combo, Open Label, Basket, Adaptive) Not Phase II Safety SAD/MAD, DDI, PK, Food Effect, Special Not Phase III Biomarker, Combo, Open Label, Basket, Adaptive) Not Phase III Safety SAD/MAD, DDI, PK, Food Effect, Special Not

6. DEVELOPMENT DECISION POINTS BASED ON COMPARATORS Endpoint Comparator Equivalence Significant increase Superior increase Safety Rapid Decision Point Go/No-go Decision Criteria: If there is insufficient evidence of increased efficacy vs comparator data (defined as meeting none of the significant activity thresholds for efficacy endpoint), this may indicate that a no-go decision is appropriate. In Phase I trials, if there is some evidence of increased efficacy vs. comparator data (defined as meeting or exceeding at least one significant activity threshold for one efficacy endpoint), proceeding with a controlled Phase II study may be appropriate. These results may be useful in deciding whether to begin Phase III studies. If there is evidence of superior efficacy vs. comparator historical information (defined as meeting all efficacy endpoints thresholds and at least one superior increase), it may be appropriate to accelerate development and begin Phase II-III controlled registration studies. If there is some evidence of comparable or increased efficacy vs. comparator data (defined as meeting or exceeding at least one significant activity threshold for one efficacy endpoint), and superior safety or clinical benefit it may be appropriate to begin a controlled Phase II study. These results may be useful in deciding whether to begin Phase III studies. EXAMPLES OF SUGGESTED GO/NO-GO CRITERIA FOR EACH MILESTONE Phase I Adequate safety and tolerability Phase II Proof of Concept (PoC ) threshold Comparable or better safety Phase IIb Dose ranging Comparable or better than adequate safety and efficacy Phase III Registration Trials Safety Registration Decision Point (RDP) Totality of safety and efficacy data greater than or equal to standard of care

7. ADDITIONAL CLAIMS Messages/ (Pharmacology, efficacy, safety or Study Design Description/ Title Attributes for Registration Data Japan Specific Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) Existing data: Increase Risk (Study Code To Be Determined) Decrease Risk Support Average Risk of Phase Not Safety / Tolerability Combination Therapy Incidence of AEs Existing data: Increase Risk Discontinuation Rate Decrease Risk Support Average Risk of Phase Not Biomarker Messages/ (Pharmacology, efficacy, safety (EU/USA) or Target Measures Comparative Data/ Information Life Cycle Management Pharmacology Other Profiling Messages/ (Pharmacology, efficacy, safety, convenience, pharmacoeconomics) or Target Measures Comparative Data/ Information

Dosage and Administration Pharmaceutical Form/Size: Colors: Route: oral/iv/sc/im administration Schedule/Duration: daily or weekly. Add food directive Unfavorable Profile Elements (e.g., teratogenicity, significant contraindications, inferiority data) Special Technical Requirements (e.g., special packaging, delivery devices, required diagnostic tests, non-standard package sizes/configurations) Shelf Life: Primary and secondary packaging: Special Marketing Requirements (e.g., need for co-promotion or co-marketing partner, or need to develop new market) Need to DIFFERENTIATE in a crowded market through distinct messaging) Health Economics dossier required to support premium pricing in the already difficult pricing/reimbursement/regulatory environment) Covance Inc., headquartered in Princeton, NJ, USA is the drug development business of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp). COVANCE is a registered trademark and the marketing name for Covance Inc. and its subsidiaries around the world. The Americas +1.888.COVANCE (+1.888.268.2623) +1.609.452.4440 Europe/Africa +00.800.2682.2682 +44.1423.500888 Asia Pacific +800.6568.3000 +65.6.5686588 Copyright 2018 Covance Inc.