Immobilization and Death of Bacteria by Flora Seal Microbial Sealant

Similar documents
Study Summary. Results: All tested media-filled vials were negative for growth of any microorganisms.

á61ñ MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF NONSTERILE PRODUCTS: MICROBIAL ENUMERATION TESTS

Growth Promotion Test Guide for Media Used in Sterility Tests

Tests to Support Sterility Claim. Imtiaz Ahmed

Evaluation of a Novel Non-Sterile Glove Dispensing System Uyen Nguyen

Final text for addition to The International Pharmacopoeia

Hot Topics in Drug Product Process Validation: A Reviewer s Perspective

Microbiological Quality Control as Described in the Compendia. Scott Sutton, Ph.D.

á62ñ MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF NONSTERILE PRODUCTS: TESTS FOR SPECIFIED MICROORGANISMS

Microbicidal Properties of a Silver-Containing Hydrofiber Dressing Against a Variety of Burn Wound Pathogens

Erin Patton, MS Senior Product Specialist Charles River Labs, Microbial Solutions

Intravenous infusion bottle plugs as a source of microbial contamination

Disinfectant Qualification A Multifaceted Study

Comparison of the speed of kill of pathogenic bacteria using ACTICOAT and AQUACEL Ag analysed using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

Histoacryl Flexible Improved closure of surgical incisions

Method Suitability Report Membrane Filtration Sterility Test with QTMicro Apparatus

DISINFECTION QUALIFI CATION TESTING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ASEPTIC AND CLEANROOM MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENT

Cosmetics Microbiology Detection of Candida albicans

Rapid Bacterial Identification Using a Mass Spectrometry Based Molecular Diagnostics Approach: Evaluation of the Iridica Platform

CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH - DISINFECTANTS AND ANTISEPTICS

Indigo-Clean White Paper: #1 Bactericidal Performance Testing of Indigo-Clean Upon Bacterial Species. Healthcare

The Parenteral Drug Association

Lab Exercise #4 Microbial Control Lab Exercise #4 Control of Microorganisms: Physical, Chemical and Chemotherapeutic

Guidance. Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs DRAFT GUIDANCE

PURE CULTURE TECHNIQUES

2.1 Tryptone Soya Broth containing 4% Tween 80 (TSB + T), or another appropriate deactivating broth.

Efficacy Report Summarization for SoClean 2

IDEXX is an ISO certified facility. Gil Dichter World Wide Technical Support Manager

Section III Research Articles and Short Communications

USP <1116> and Contamination

Large Volume Serial Dilutions:

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Bacterial Counts - Quantitative Analysis of Microbes

2.6. BIOLOGICAL TESTS

CONTROL OF MICROBIAL GROWTH - DISINFECTANTS AND ANTISEPTICS

Air Quality Monitoring of Operation Theaters in Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, India

BD GeneOhm MRSA ACP Lysis Kit

GENUS STAPHYLOCOCCUS: Isolation and Identification

Aseptic Techniques. A. Objectives. B. Before coming to lab

Analytical Service Code

Media Fill Test Kits USP <797> COMPLIANT. HARDY DIAGNOSTICS. Low Risk. Medium Risk. High Risk

Biofilm Protocol Optimization For Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Introduction. Materials and Methods. Culture Media, Incubation Time, and Biofilm Measurement

Lab Exercise: Examining Water Quality: Most Probable Number & Colilert Test Kit Lab

The Most Probable Number Method and Its Use in QC Microbiology

Formula One-Step Coating Solvent-Based For Difficult Materials

Interpretation Guide. Environmental Listeria Plate

UNDER SECRETARY FOR HEALTH S INFORMATION LETTER MICROBIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CLEANROOMS

ANTIMICROBIAL. AlphaSan A SILVER BASED ANTIMICROBIAL FROM MILLIKEN CHEMICAL

An Overview of Antimicrobial Testing for Textile Applications

Avoid recurrent microbial contamination using trending of historical data. El Azab Walid Technical Service Manager STERIS

Case 6. Fight Against Nosocomial Infections

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(10)

The Most Probable Number Method and Its Use in QC Microbiology

BIOSAFETY GUIDELINES BACKGROUND ON BIOSAFETY

Lab Exercise 13: Growth Curve

Annex A2. Guidance on Process Validation Scheme for Aseptically Processed Products

ISAH Warsaw, Poland Vol 2

WHY DO THEY PUT MINT IN TOOTHPASTE? WOULD GARLIC BE BETTER?

ASEPTIC TRANSFER & PURE CULTURE TECHNIQUES

Detecting the Presence of Microbes: Instructor s Manual

A MICROBIAL RESISTANCE EVALUATION OF INDOOR MATERIALS AIR KRETE INSULATION SAMPLE. prepared for AIR KRETE

Overview of a sterility assurance program for PET drugs

The University of Ferrara Study At the St. Anne Hospital

extremely different from terrestrial conditions, it is supposed that microorganisms in

Preservation Efficacy Testing

Development of a recommended protocol high pressure processing trials with pathogenic microorganisms for the prevention of cross-contamination

Antimicrobial packaging films with a sorbic acid based coating

BIP Central Venous Catheter

Microbial Nutrition and Growth

STS Directory Accreditation number: STS 0268

Environmental. National Legionella Conference Sample Taking Workshop. Right Solutions Right Partner

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) Agar LI acc. EP/USP

MICROBIAL GROWTH. Dr. Hala Al-Daghistani

Dentistry Test methods for dental unit waterline biofilm treatment

Media Fill A Process Simution. Presented By Shikha Chauhan

Laboratory Procedure October 1999 HEALTH PROTECTION BRANCH OTTAWA ANALYSIS OF SPROUTS FOR COLIFORMS, ESCHERICHIA COLI, AND KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE..

FINAL REPORT Efficacy of a Cold Plasma System

Microbiology Research Associates

USP Chapter 823 USP 32 (old) vs. USP 35 (new)

BT-201: INVESTIGATION OF THE SPIDER WEB FOR ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY

Aqua 65JL. Water-Based Hydrophilic Coating. Highly Lubricious, Non-Eluting, surface coating for the reduction of biofilm adhesion.

EM021. Co-Trimoxazole Ezy MIC TM Strip (COT)( mcg/ml) (Trimethoprim/ Sulphamethoxazole) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Activities of the USP Microbiology Subcommittee of Revision During the Revision Cycle

TRANSFER OF BACTERIA USING ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE

21.4 Recombinant DNA technology Calculation worksheet. AQA Biology. Calculating the efficiency of DNA transfer during genetic engineering

Entry Level Assessment Blueprint Biotechnology

Policies Concerning Survival Surgery of Mice

MIC and MBC Evaluation of Pure Products Antimicrobial Product against Selected Bacteria:

BD BBL CHROMagar CPE

Establishing a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm in a Murine Model

Managing Your Environmental Isolates

Ezy MIC Strip FEATURES AND ADVANTAGES

Sample for use a Guide Revised IDEXX COLILERT -18 TEST METHOD FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION OF TOTAL COLIFORMS AND E.

ELISA for Alpha-hemolysin (Hla) in Methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Varandt Y. Khodaverdian 1* and Menachem Shoham 2

RAC. Interpretation Guide. Rapid Aerobic Count Plate

Plasmid Midiprep Plus Purification Kit. Cat. # : DP01MD-P10/ DP01MD-P50 Size : 10/50 Reactions Store at RT For research use only

Transcription:

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 6718, ISSN (Print): 2319 670X Volume 6 Issue 6 June 2017 PP. 45-49 Immobilization and Death of Bacteria by Flora Seal Microbial Sealant Daniel Prince 1, Kristah Kohan 1, Zankhna Solanki 1, Jozef Mastej 1, Derek Prince 1, Remy Varughese 1 and Mahesh Patel 2 1 Gibraltar Laboratories Department of Microbiology 2 Gibraltar Laboratories Department of Chemistry Abstract:A new advantage of cyanoacrylate surgicalmicrobial sealant, i.e. FloraSeal, is that organisms dieshortly upon contact providing additional protection to the patient. Keywords: Cyanoacrylate, water activity, immobilization, microbial death, nosocomial infection risk I. Introduction Surgical procedures can cause infection to the patient due to a break in aseptic technique causing severe patient distress [1, 2]. Specifically, incised wounds can become infected by the healthcare provider. Cyanoacrylate surgical glues were originally developed to close approximated wounds obviating the need to close wounds with sutures [3]. Now more is known about the additional applications of cyanoacrylate. We report for the first time that FloraSeal, a combination of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (80%) and butyl cyanoacrylate, traps, immobilizes bacteria that may cause infection to the patient or healthcare provider andrapidly and powerfully kills clinically relevant gram positive and gram negative bacteria. II. Methodology USP Procedures for Water Activity(aW) [4] and Karl Fischer [5] were followed (see Tables 1-2).For the immobilization study, sterile Pig Skin was used to simulate contamination of freshly made surgical incisions. Sterile pig skin was aseptically cut into 4 x 1 cm pieces.each of two pieces of sterile pig skin/test article was inoculated by delivering 0.1 ml [~75,000 colony forming units] of the test organism to a marked ~ 4 cm by 1 cm area of the skin [surgical site]. The incision site was defined by a metric ruler to the depth of the fat layer below the dermis and length of ~4 cm. The inoculated skin was placed under a laminar flow hood to allow the inoculum to dry at ambient laboratory temperature. With the supplied applicator, the inoculated skin was painted over the incision site with FloraSeal and allowed to dry under a laminar flow hood [~4 minutes]. With a sterile scalpel an incision [incision site] was made. The incision site was manipulated while wearing sterile gloves by gently squeezing together the incision site four times to simulate surgical trauma. Organisms were recovered from the incision site. Excess skin was cut away from the incision site with a sterile scalpel. The incision site was irrigated with 0.1 ml of sterile Elution Fluid and the eluate collected. This step was repeated four additional times each time plating the eluate separately.ten-fold serial dilutions of the eluate were prepared and duplicate pour plate counts and or membrane filtration counts performed. Plates were incubated for 48 to 72 hours at 35 to 37 C. See results in Table 3. The antimicrobial study was performed with 20 samples/organism. All of the contents of FloraSeal was aseptically transferred to a suitable container. Twenty (20) containers were prepared per organism. A challenge of greater than or equal to 8 CFUs of the test organisms shown in Table 4 was aseptically transferred to the container containing 2.5 ml of FloraSeal previously just inoculated with the test organism loop.after a three (3) minute contact time, the entire contents of the inoculated sample of FloraSeal was transferred to 97.5 ml of Sterile USP Purified Water(PW) using a micropipette. The final volume was ~0.0 ml. The jar was immediately shaken for 15 seconds. Jar 1 = ~ 8 cells/0 ml. 1.0 ml from Jar 1 was used to make the next dilution [Tube 2] and the remaining 99 ml from jar 1 was membrane filtered.ten-fold serial dilutions were made to -6. s were prepared by aseptically transferring 1.0 ml into 9.0mL of sterile USP PW. Each dilution tube was vortexed for 15 seconds. 45 P a g e

III. Discussion Floraseal is very anhydrous as demonstrated by its very low Water Activity (Table 1, 0.4 aw) and very low USP Karl Fischer moisture content (0.2%,Table 2). As an immobilization agent, FloraSeal will mitigate the spread of microorganisms in the surgical field by sealing microorganisms to the skin and preventing possible nosocomial related infection of a wound site. The immobilization effect is broad spectrum against gram positve, gram negative bacteria as well clinically relevant bacteria and yeast including strains resistant to antibiotics.low water activity is a known limiting factor for microbial survival [6]. Floraseal completley kills 8 logs of bacteria after a three minute contact time(table 4). As per USP<1112>, materials with water activty levels of less than 0.6 are hostile to microbial growth and the specified organisms as described in USP <62>, Microbial Examination of Nonsterile Products: Tests for Specified Microorganisms, are by definition presumed to be absent.the results are equivalent to another form of the product, SurgiSeal [6]. 4.1 4.2 4.3 0Time IV. Results Table 1Chemical Measurements of Water USP <1112>Water Activity is Stable 24 month Product Description 0Time aw Reading 24 month aw Reading 474289/1 476668/1 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.424 0.440 474289/2 476668/2 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.408 0.434 474289/3 476668/3 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.419 0.432 474289/4 476668/4 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.408 0.432 474289/5 476668/5 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.4 0.425 474289/6 476668/6 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.403 0.426 474289/7 476668/7 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.397 0.427 474289/8 476668/8 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.416 0.436 474289/9 476668/9 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.407 0.435 474289/ 476668/ FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.405 0.430 Average 0.4 0.432 Sample Standard Deviation 0.008 0.005 0Time Table 2Chemical Measurements of USP <921> Moisture Determination is Stable 24 month Product Description 0 Time % Moisture 24 month % Moisture 474334/1 476665/1 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.15 0.20 474334/2 476665/2 FloraSeal Microbial Sealant 0.16 0.20 Table 3FloraSeal is a Barrier to Ingress of Challenge Organisms to Incised Wound Staph. Coryne- Pseudomonas MRSA epidermidis bacterium species aeruginosa C. albicans A B A B A B A B A B 3.94 0.0 3.93 0.0 3.91 0.0 3.97 0.0 4.1 0.0 GBL= Gibraltar Laboratories Test Reference # 208671/1-2.43 A = Challenge to Incised wound site B= Recovered from Wound Site Treatment with FloraSeal 4.4 Antimicrobial Kill of FloraSeal Summary of Kill After 3 Minute Contact Time [Detail follows below, Table 4] Organism Escherichia coli 8.0 Klebsiella pneumoniae 9.0 Staphylococcus epidermidis 9.0 Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus [MRSA] 9.0 46 P a g e

Table 4 Quantitative Kill Against FourClinically Relevant Microorganisms Control: Escherichia coli 0 to -3 Not Performed -4 TNTC TNTC -5 >200 >200-6 6 117-7 11 13 CFU/~mL 1.1 x 8 8.04 = 8 CFU/~mL 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 3 TNTC TNTC TNTC TNTC >200 22 2 2.2 x 6 6.34 = 6 8-6 = 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 8-0 =8 Control: Klebsiella pneumoniae 0 to -3 Not Performed -4 TNTC TNTC -5 TNTC TNTC -6 >200 >200-7 38 47 CFU/~mL 4.3 x 8 8.63 = 9 CFU/~mL 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 9-0 = 9 1 1 47 P a g e

Control: Staphylococcus epidermidis 0 to -3 Not Performed Not Performed -4 TNTC TNTC -5 TNTC TNTC -6 >200 >200-7 33 43 CFU/~mL 3.8 x 8 0-1 -2 CFU/~mL -3-4 -5-6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 9-0 = 9 1 1 Control: Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus [MRSA] 0 to -3 Not performed -4 TNTC TNTC -5 TNTC TNTC -6 >200 >200-7 86 93 CFU/~mL 9.0 x 8 8.95 = 9 CFU/~mL 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <1 0 9-0 = 9 1 1 48 P a g e

V. Conclusion The important clinical attributes of FloraSeal are [1] as a surgical microbial sealant that [2] immobilizes bacteria, prevents surgical site contamination, [3] seals any residual bacteria and [4] kills the bacteria from entering the incision site during a surgical procedure. References [1] Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing: official publication of the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society/WOCN (J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurse) Nov-Dec; 33(6) Suppl: S3-8 Additional Info: United States 2006 [2] Jeremy L Rushbrook, Grace White, LiziKidger, Philip Marsh, and Thomas FO Taggart The antibacterial effect of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond ) skin adhesive J Infect Prev.2014 Nov; 15(6): 236 239. [3] G. M. Bot, K. G. Bot, J. O. Ogunranti, 2J. A. Onah, A. Z. Sule, I. Hassan, and E. D. Dung. The Use of Cyanoacrylate in Surgical Anastomosis: An Alternative to Microsurgery J Surg Tech Case Rep. Jan-Jun; 2(1): 44 48 20. [4] 2017 U.S. Pharmacopeia USP40-NF35 <1112>Application of Water Activity Determination to Nonsterile Pharmaceutical Products [5] 2017 U.S. Pharmacopeia USP40-NF35 <921>Water Determination [6] Prince, et al. The Antibacterial Effect and Proposed Mechanism of Action of a Topical Surgical Adhesive (SurgiSeal ),2017 Submitted 49 P a g e