The 17th Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies Animal Science Congress

Similar documents
Valuing Fed Cattle Using Slice Shear Force Measurements

Valuing Fed Cattle Using Objective Tenderness Measures

Heterosis and Breed Effects for Beef Traits of Brahman Purebred and Crossbred Steers

Forage Finishing Beef Cattle in Northern Ontario

Wagyu 101. Michael Scott Certified Executive Chef Academy of Chefs Corporate Chef for Rosewood Ranches Texas Raised Wagyu Beef

Effect of Angus and Charolais Sires with Early vs Normal Weaned Calves on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

The Professional Animal Feeding Scientist Cull Cows 19 (2003):

More cattle are being marketed on carcass. Selection for Carcass Merit. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle IX: Genetics of Carcass Merit

Understanding and Using Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs)

Forage Systems for Pasture Finishing Beef

Effect of rotation crop, cover crop, and bale grazing on steer performance, carcass measurements, and carcass value

EFFECT OF SLAUGHTER DATE ON PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY OF FEEDLOT STEERS. Story in Brief

Value of Modified Wet Distillers Grains in Cattle Diets without Corn

Prediction of Carcass Traits Using Live Animal Ultrasound

Post-Weaning Nutritional Management Affects Feedlot Performance, 12 th Rib Fat, and Marbling Deposition of Angus and Wagyu Heifers

Effect of breed on growth performance and carcass composition of Aberdeen Angus, Charolais, Hereford and Simmental bulls

Change FORAGES MORE PEOPLE FORAGES: CHANGE-CHALLENGES- OPPORTUNITIES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Beef - Horse - Poultry - Sheep - Swine. August 2016

Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with carcass traits in a population of Brahman and Brahman-influenced steers

Ascophyllum Nodosum Supplementation Strategies That Improve Overall Carcass Merit of Implanted English Crossbred Cattle

Residual Feed Intake: Sustainability and Meat Quality

Value-Based Marketing for Feeder Cattle. By Tom Brink, Top Dollar Angus, Inc.

Q1 How well are you able to satisfy your customers' orders?

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

Animal response or performance is determined. Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II:

Comparison of Machine Milkout and Calf Nursing Techniques for Estimating Milk Yields of Various Two-Breed Cross Range Cows.

Effects of Artificial Insemination and Natural Service Breeding Systems on Steer Progeny Backgrounding Performance

Spotted Profits VS. Solid Profits Jessica Leetch AGEC 4960 March 1, 2010

Corresponding author information:

Using Live Animal Carcass Ultrasound Information in Beef Cattle Selection

A Comparison of Milk Production In

Q1 How well are you able to satisfy your customers' orders?

Breed Utilization and Production Efficiency

Distillers Grains Feeding and Beef Quality

Effect of Backgrounding System on Performance and Profitability of Yearling Beef Steers

Matching Cow Type to the Nutritional Environment

Relationship of Cow Size to Nutrient Requirements and Production Management Issues 1

Effect of Selected Characteristics on the Sale Price of Feeder Cattle in Eastern Oklahoma: 1997 & 1999 Summary

How growth affects carcase and meat quality attributes

Can Selection Indexes Improve Profitability in Beef Cattle

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES ABERDEEN ANGUS. Management Guide. blade-farming.com

Canfax Research Services A Division of the Canadian Cattlemen s Association

Cattle Market Situation and Outlook

BLUP and Genomic Selection

Key words: cattle, feedlot, liver abscesses, meat tenderness, palatability, quality grade

EFFECT OF GRAZING TALL FESCUE ENDOPHYTE TYPES ON SUBSEQUENT FEEDLOT PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS QUALITY

Economics of Grain Supplementation for Organic Dairy Cows

Update on Preconditioning Beef Calves Prior to Sale by Cow Calf Producers. Objectives of a Preconditioning Program. Vac-45 Calves

United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. is revising the United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef (beef standards) to

The USDA quality grades may mislead consumers 1

Review of Instrument Augmented Assessment of USDA Beef Carcass Quality Grades

What Hay Is Right For Your Livestock. Tom Gallagher Capital Area Agriculture Horticulture Program Livestock Specialist

U.S. Beef Production Practices ---

Which dog do you want to be?

The value of oats in ruminant diets. Jon Moorby Aberystwyth University

MCA/MSU Bull Evaluation Program 2016 Buyer Survey and Impact Report

Texas A&M Ranch to Rail - North/South Summary Report

Quality Grade: What is driving the recent upswing?

1999 American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting

FEED EFFICIENCY IN THE RANGE BEEF COW: WHAT SHOULD WE BE LOOKING AT?

November Feed Price Evaluations

Balancing Forage Demand with Forage Supply

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES CONTINENTAL CATTLE. Management Guide. blade-farming.com

Chloe Elizabeth Gresel. A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph

Australian Red Angus Selection Indexes

Published December 2, 2014

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing

2010 UW Extension Cattle Feeder Clinic Proceedings 1

Feedlot Nutrition for Holsteins

Bred to Solve Problems, Not Create Them

Session 13_Manninen.pdf.

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

William C. Templeton, Jr. President, Grassland Advisory Services, Inc. 800 Brook Hill Drive, Lexington, KY 40502

2

PALATABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LOAIGISSIMUS MUSCLE OF YOUNG BULLS REPRESENTING DIVERGENT BEEF BREEDS AND CROSSES i

Influence of Cow BCS and Late Gestation Supplementation: Effects on Cow and Calf Performance 1

Introduction BEEF 140

Beef Cattle Handbook

Economic Effects of Bovine Respiratory Disease on Feedlot Cattle during Backgrounding and Finishing Phases

Beef Cattle Library. Weaning Management of Beef Calves 1. Oregon State University. Beef Cattle Sciences

Animal Protein Production Impacts and Trends Dr. Judith L. Capper

Market Outlook for Cattle and Beef

A model of the New Zealand beef value chain: evaluating opportunities

Matching Beef Genetics with Production Environment

Improving Genetics in the Suckler Herd by Noirin McHugh & Mark McGee

Effects of Creep Supplementation While Grazing Improved Irrigated Pastures

ANIMAL SCIENCE (ANSI)

Feeding the Organic Dairy Herd During 2013 and Beyond Introduction Organic Dairy Production

Reducing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef and Dairy Production: A Canadian Perspective

Performance Testing Bulls on the Farm

COW CALF BREEDING AND GENETICS. Dhuyvetter

CHOICES The magazine of food, farm, and resource issues

TECHNICAL BULLETIN December 2017

Comparison of Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits Among Various Three-Breed Cross Calves

Rough-N-Ready. Maximize Your Calves Growth Potential

Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XXIV November 17, 18 and 19, 2015, Loveland, Colorado HOW TO USE COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE GENOMIC PREDICTIONS

2017 Beef Cattle Market Outlook

An integrated approach to expand marketing. producers from value-added heifers and steers

Beef Cattle Outlook Dr. Curt Lacy Extension Economist-Livestock

Transcription:

Table 1. Carcass weight (lbs.), marbling, and shear force value (kg) of grass-fed beef (2013 2015) Trait N Mean SD CV Minimum Maximum Carcass wt., kg 311 279.3 49.62 17.8% 178.7 572.9 Marbling * 308 13.3 3.36 25.3% 4 20 Shear force, kg 314 4.43 1.12 25.2% 1.95 11.37 * Practically devoid (-, o, and +): 1, 2, and 3; Trace (-, o, and +): 4, 5, and 6; Slight (-, o, and +): 7, 8, and 9; Small (-, o, and +): 10, 11, and 12; Modest (-, o, and +): 13, 14, and 15; Moderate (-, o, and +): 16, 17, and 18; Slightly abundant: 19; Moderately abundant: 20; Abundant: 21 Fig. 1. Shear force value distribution of ribeye steaks from grass- The rectangular region indicates the area below the minimum tenderness threshold value (MTTV) required to claim USDA Certified Tender.

Fig. 2. Shear force value by age group (A), sex (B), carcass size (C) and marbling (D). Means not sharing the same superscript differ at P<0.05. Fig. 3. Relationship between shear force and marbling score. The description of numerical marbling score is the same as in Table 1.

Fig. 4. Shear force value by ranches. Means not sharing the same superscript differ at P<0.05. References American Society for Testing and Materials International. 2011. Standard specification for tenderness marketing claims associated with meat cuts derived from beef. F2925-11. DOI: 10.1520/F2925-11. Choat, W.T., Paterson, J.A., Rainey, B.M., King, M.C., Smith, G.C., Belk, K.E., and Lipsey, R.J. 2006. The effects of cattle sex on carcass characteristics and longissimus muscle palatability. Journal of Animal Science 84:1820 1826. Davis, G.W., Cole, A.B., Backus, W.R., and Melton, S.L. 1981. Effect of electrical-stimulation on carcass quality and meat palatability of beef from forage-finished and grain-finished steers. Journal of Animal Science 53:651 657. Faucitano L., Chouinard, P.Y., Fortin, J., Mandell, I.B., Lafreniere, C., Girard, C.L., and Berthiaume, R. 2008. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability. Journal of Animal Science 86:1678 1689. Gracia, E., Sink, J.D., Wilson, L.L., and Ziegler, J.H. 1970. Sex, sire and physiological factors affecting muscle protein solubility and other characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 31:42 46. Kim, Y.S., Allison, O, Bobbili, N., DuPonte, M.W., and Fukumoto, G.K. 2007. Evaluation of meat tenderness of forage-finished cattle produced in Hawai i, and factors affecting the tenderness. FST-27, Cooperative Extension Service, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai i, Manoa. Miller, M.F., Carr, M.A., Ramsey, C.B., Crokett, K.L., and Hoover, L.C. 2001. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. Journal of Animal Sciences 79:3062 3068. Prost, E., Pelczynska, E., and Kotula, A.W. 1975. Quality characteristics of bovine meat. II. Beef tenderness in relation to individual muscles, age and sex of animals and carcass quality grade. Journal of Animal Science 41:541 547. Razminowicz, R.H., Kreuzer, M., and Scheeder, M.R.L. 2006. Quality of retail beef from two grass-based production systems in comparison with conventional beef. Meat Science 66:567 577. Realini C.E., Duckett S.K., Brito G.W., Dalla Rizza M., and De Mattos D. 2004. Effect of pasture vs. concentrate feeding with or without antioxidants on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and quality of Uruguayan beef. Meat Science 66:567 577. Van Elswyk, M.E. and McNeill, S.H. 2014. Impact of grass/forage feeding versus grain finishing on beef nutrients and sensory quality: The US Experience. Meat Science 96:535 540. USDA Livestock, Poultry, & Grain Market News. 2016. https://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/lsddcbs.pdf United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. 2007. United States standards for livestock and meat marketing claims, grass (forage) fed claim for ruminant livestock and the meat products derived from such livestock. Federal Register 72:58631 58637. Wheeler, T.L., Shackelford, S.D., and Koohmaraie, M. 2005. Shear force procedures for meat tenderness measurement. Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. http://www.ars.usda.gov/sp2userfiles/place/30400510/protocols/shearforceprocedures.pdf. Wulf, D.M., Tatum, J.D., Green, R.D., Morgan, J.B., Golden, B.L., and Smith, G.C. 1996. Genetic influences on beef longissimus palatability in Charolais- and Limousin-sired steers and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 74:2394 2405.