QUEENS LIBRARY LABOR RELATIONS COMMITTEE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, Central Library Merrick Blvd., Jamaica, NY AGENDA

Similar documents
Compensation Philosophy. Compensation Policy and Guidelines Purpose. Scope. Responsibilities. Definitions

AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL. Item Number: 202 Page 1 of 12. COMPENSATION POLICY Issued 09/01/02

QUEENS LIBRARY AUDIT COMMITTEE THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, Central Library Merrick Boulevard Jamaica, NY AGENDA

UNIVERSITY of HOUSTON MANUAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CONTENTS I. POLICY SUMMARY

Staff Employee Compensation Plan Administrative Procedures Guide

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Request for Proposal For: 2018 American Bar Association Temporary Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) LEGAL SERVICES. Submission Date: November 28, :00 p.m.

1) Please share the last years expenditure under this contract. Answers: LIPA expects to spend approximately $1.2 million a year.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Macomb County, Michigan. Classification and Compensation Study. Final Results Presentation February 14, 2018

TOTAL COMPENSATION POLICY STATEMENT APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISION

However, with the rotating schedule of the Police department this has become an issue and is not clearly addressed. Recommended language becomes:

AUBURN UNIVERSITY. Salary Administration Policies (Administrative/Professional and University Staff)

Request For Proposal Of Printing and Design Services. Marketing Department

Project Executive Compensation Project - 2

Employment Process. October 16, Presented by Human Resource Services

Managing Compensation & Classification. HRS Strategic Workforce Solutions

BOARD GUIDELINES ON SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ISSUES

Principles of Corporate Governance

JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. HRIS Human Resources Information Software Fort Morgan, Colorado

Model Job Descriptions for an Overtime-Exempt Account Manager & an Overtime-Exempt Recruiter

Employee Compensation System. A guide to employee compensation strategic framework and administration.

Job UIC. Click to Add Title. APAC Town Hall Job Analysis Update APAC. UIC Human Resources September 26, 2013

WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA) ONE STOP SYSTEM OPERATOR SERVICES

Dah Sing Banking Group Limited Nomination and Remuneration Committee - Terms of Reference

POLARIS INDUSTRIES INC.

Chapter 9. Compensation (Core Compensation) Copyright 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. 9-1

May 22, 2017 MEMORANDUM

NEW YORK CITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PURCHASING PROCEDURES. Updated as of November 19, 2015 (Reaffirmed on March 10, 2017)

RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (RA), SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE (SRA)

Job Evaluation Guide for TMG. October 2016

Preferred Education, Experience or Other Qualifications

RFP # Request for Proposal Branding Services. Date: January 12, Proposals must be submitted by 3:00 PM: February 10, 2017

Gena W. Jones, DM, SPHR, SHRM-SCP

West Virginia University Compensation Strategy Non-classified Employees August, 2015

TEEKAY TANKERS LTD. Corporate Governance Guidelines

8 Human Resource Management

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. Corporate Governance Guidelines

Alabama Community and Technical Colleges Schedule A Presidents

NATIONAL VISION HOLDINGS, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RELATED SERVICES

FLSA: Exemption Test Questionnaire

CORPORATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL JULY LITERATURE KEY FINDINGS Selecting HR Metrics

Internal Communications: MMU Board of Commissioners, General Manager, department managers, department supervisors, utility staff

Relationships between positions and their worth. Competition with the external employment market

Corporate Policy Human Resources

GOVERNANCE BODIES AND COMMITTEES AND THEIR FUNCTION

IPMA-CANADA INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM IPMA-CP (IN TRAINING) IPMA-CP IPMA-ACP IPMA-EX IPMA-CE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

2018 SALARY GUIDES NOW AVAILABLE! FINANCE & ACCOUNTING SALARY GUIDE

Reward next practices

Staff Compensation Program Salary Administration Guidelines

The ADT Corporation. Compensation Committee Charter

GENERAL HUMAN RESOURCES AND PAYROLL ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES

TALLAHASSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Pay and Salary Setting HR-03-30

2016 Architecture & Engineering

NEW STAFF RECRUITING THE PEOPLE CENTER

FLSA Regulation Changes (Effective December 1, 2016) June 2016

Commonwealth of Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Deval L. Patrick, Governor Aaron Gornstein, Undersecretary FOR

The university shall pay employees on a scheduled basis for work performed as

Costing Allocations. Is there any limit to the number of FAS accounts that can fund a position? No, there is no limit.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS RYDER SYSTEM, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY ESTIMATED TIMES. Tomi Ryba, President and CEO Mick Zdeblick, COO Andrew Lewis, Sullivan Cotter and Associates

PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES AND DELIVERY

Broader Public Sector Executive Compensation Program

Nasdaq Talks to Don Kalfen of Meridian Compensation Partners about Preparing for CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

Prince William County 2004 Human Resources and Training & Development SEA Report

INTERNAL/EXTERNAL POSTING Human Resources Manager

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MANUAL. Approved by the Board of Directors. on March 2, and last updated as at

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES

Executive Order Number Seventy-Seven Regarding State Employee Obligations And Compensation During Severe Weather Conditions And Emergencies

Sam Houston State University. Compensation Plan Document

Administrative Professionals Staffing Practices

MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM STAFF COMPENSATION AND PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND PAY RULES

OPTINOSE, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF NIAGARA EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR ONTARIO S PUBLICLY FUNDED SCHOOL BOARDS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR EXECUTIVE SEARCH FIRM

Corporate Governance Principles. As Amended June 7, 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR

SUNEDISON, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (Adopted October 29, 2008)

FOR BASE PLUS COMMISSIONED ASSISTANT STORE MANAGERS LEVEL B

BTG plc Terms of Reference of the Remuneration Committee ( Committee ) of the Board of Directors ( Board ) of BTG plc ( Company )

CHARTER DOCUMENT FAIR LABOR ASSOCIATION

Office of the City Auditor. Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency

Lincoln National Corporation Board of Directors Corporate Governance Guidelines

Audit of Executive Compensation

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES

WEB MERIT TRAINING PART I

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

Tracey Tsugawa- Director of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Tracey comes to us from the University of Santa Cruz.

ACCENTURE PLC CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

BBC. Equal Pay Audit Report. October 2017

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The ADT Corporation. Board Governance Principles. December 2013

Request for Qualifications. Career Pathways for English Language Learners. April 21, 2014

Transcription:

QUEENS LIBRARY LABOR RELATIONS COMMITTEE THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2016 Central Library 89-11 Merrick Blvd., Jamaica, NY 11432 AGENDA 6:30 PM LABOR RELATIONS COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING Hon. Robert T. Groh Conference Room I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call II. Action Items 1. Contract Authorization Employee Compensation Study 2. Merit Based Compensation Increases for FY'17 III. Adjournment Motion: Second: Time: Generated 11/7/2016 11:28 AM

II. ACTION ITEMS 1. Contract Authorization Employee Compensation Study Background: This is an action item seeking approval from the Queens Borough Public Library s Board of Trustees to enter into a contract with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Price Waterhouse) to conduct an employee compensation study and provide related professional services. The Board s approval is required pursuant to the Library s Purchasing Policy, which states, in pertinent part, that contracts for professional services with an annual cost in excess of $35,000 must be approved by the Board of Trustees. In 1998, the Library retained an outside consultant (Hay Group) to conduct an employee compensation study and to help implement a comprehensive performance management and compensation program for non-union employees. The consultant was selected to help ensure that the Library continued to competitively recruit and retain talented non-represented employees so as to provide the highest levels of quality service to the Library s customers and stakeholders. In September of 2015, the Board of Trustees recommended that the Library undertake a competitive solicitation for such services. Current Status: Accordingly, in June 2016, the Library issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking proposals from firms to provide an compensation study of non-union employees within a six (6) month period, review and make recommendations of appropriate compensation within two (2) years, and perform other related services as may be required by the Library. 2 Page

The RFP was advertised in the New York City Record, Bid Net, and the New York State Contract Reporter and posted on the Library s website. The notification of the solicitation was sent to an internal bidders list of nine (9) firms. The following five (5) firms submitted timely proposals: Firm M/WBE 1 Compensation Resources, Inc. 2 JER HR Group LLC MBE 3 Korn Ferry Hay Group, Inc. 4 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 5 Sibson Consulting a Division of The Segal Company The proposal submitted by JER HR Group LLC was deemed non-responsive because the firm did not submit pricing in accordance with the instructions of the RFP thereby preventing the Library from being able to compare that firm s pricing to the pricing provided by other proposers. A selection committee comprised of Library staff evaluated the remaining four (4) proposals, utilizing technical criteria and cost as the bases for the initial scores. The results were as follows: 1 2 3 4 Compensation Resources, Inc. Korn Ferry Hay Group Price Waterhouse The Segal Company Combined Cost/ Technical Score: 68.05 55.50 83.43 81.66 Not to exceed Fee- up to 150 employees $104,500 $313,500 $232,500 $136,000 Other related services - Average Hourly Rate $229.33 $590.83 $523.00 $356.00 3 Page

As indicated above, the proposals submitted by Price Waterhouse and the Segal Company had the two highest initial scores. As such, the selection committee interviewed these firms. The results of the final scoring, which included interview performance, were as follows: The Segal Price Waterhouse Company Combined Cost, Technical & Interview Score: 97.18 89.08 Price Waterhouse received the highest total score and had far superior technical and interview performance scores than the Segal Company. The firm demonstrated its extensive previous experience in providing the proposed services to entities similar to the Library, has the qualifications and staffing readily available to perform the services and has a firm understanding of the Library s structure and operations. A full listing of all applicable fees is attached. References indicated that Price Waterhouse is extremely competent, reliable and fully capable of providing the services sought by the Library. A reference from the New York Public Library stated that Price Waterhouse has been providing timely, professional and responsive services for the last five (5) years, and has an excellent understanding of the not-for profit market. A reference from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation indicated that the Foundation has retained Price Waterhouse for ten years and that the length of their working relationship is indicative of the Foundation s satisfaction with the consultant s work. 4 Page

Finally, while there are cautions in the City s Vendex system pertaining to federal and state investigations of Price Waterhouse s accounting activities, those investigations has been settled and the City and other public entities have, notwithstanding such cautions, awarded numerous contracts to Price Waterhouse and extensively used such contracts for services worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Recommended Motion for Consideration by the Labor Relations Committee: I move that the Labor Relations Committee recommend to the Board of Trustees that the President and CEO be authorized to enter into a contract with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for an employee compensation study for a term of three years for a not to exceed amount of $232,500 with an option to renew for two additional one-year periods. Price Waterhouse Fees Scope Number Scope of Services Not to exceed Fee- up to 150 employees 1 2 3 4 Review all non-union employee job descriptions and make recommendations for new job descriptions or updates to existing job descriptions according to the function each employee actually performs compared to his or her stated job description. $63,000 Compare all non-union employee salaries, including the President & CEO, to internal and external markets. Determine if there are compression or inequity problems and make recommendations for improvements. $110,000 Compare all non-union employee benefits packages to the external markets. Determine if there are inequity issues and make recommendations for resolution. $8,000 Recommend an Executive Compensation Policy for the President and CEO position. $6,000 5 Page

5 6 Provide benchmark findings of total compensation packages by position that includes comparable positions in other local library systems, non-profit and private sector organizations. Conduct FLSA exempt/non-exempt review and analysis of all full-time positions. Cost included in Scope #3 Cost included in Scope #2 7 8 9 10 11 Scope Number 12 Review and analyze non-union positions and determine if there are any equity issues within the same titles based on qualifications, experience and tenure and provide recommendations for resolving such issues. $13,000 Develop recommendations for determining new hire or promotional salaries. $4,000 Evaluate current compensation structure and determine if the structure aligns with and supports operational goals. Provide recommendations for employees that have reached salary range caps. $25,000 Recommend alternative compensation systems that may better align with the Library s goals. $2,000 Review and make recommendations for salary ranges on a bi-annual basis. $1,500 Total: $232,500 Scope of Services Other related services as may be required by the Library to be performed at hourly rates. Hourly Rates for the First Two Years of the Titles Contract. Additional years increase by the CPI-U Partner $695.00 Director $620.00 Manager $540.00 Senior Associate $425.00 Associate $335.00 6 Page

2. Merit Based Compensation Increases for FY'17 Labor Relations Committee Agenda Background: In 1998, the Library s Board of Trustees adopted a Pay- For-Performance Program to ensure that the Library continued to competitively recruit and retain talented non-represented employees so as to provide the highest levels of quality service to our customers and stakeholders. An annual performance appraisal is conducted for every non-represented employee and is based on a best practices model aligned with numerous other similar organizations. Non-represented positions are reviewed regularly to determine market competitiveness, internal equity within the Library, and whether significant changes in scope of job responsibilities have occurred. Union represented employees received retroactive salary increases in September of 2016 based on the DC37 Economic Agreement negotiated with the City of New York. Non-represented employees last received meritbased increases in October of 2015 (retroactive to July 1, 2015). Raises were between 2.5-4% based on annual performance reviews. With respect to salary increases for key executive employees, the Labor Relations Committee is required to annually review and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees regarding the compensation for such employees. More specifically, in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in Article V, Section 4, of the By-Laws, this review should include (i) obtaining and relying upon appropriate data of similar salaries paid to similar executives at comparable organizations; (ii) evaluating the key executive employee s performance in 7 Page

light of the goals and objectives relevant to his or her compensation, and the Library s performance relative to the Library s mission; (iii) evaluating the key executive employee s contributions to the Library s purposes and activities, and how his or her qualifications contribute to his or her achievement of such goals; and (iv) adequately documenting the basis for the Committee s determination concurrently with making that determination. The Chief Librarian and Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President, and General Counsel and Senior Vice President, are eligible for merit- based increases for FY 17. We are providing the relevant information pertaining to the compensation and performance of the aforementioned key executive employees, which includes confidential performance evaluations and personal information, in a separate transmission. Current Status: The President and CEO recommends that nonrepresented employees receive a merit-based increase between 2.5-4.0% based on annual performance reviews for FY16, pro-rated merit-based increases of.89% for the Chief Librarian and Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President, and a 4.0% merit-based increase for the General Counsel and Senior Vice President, retroactive to July 1, 2016. 8 Page

Recommended Motion for Consideration by the Labor Relations Committee: I move that the Labor Relations Committee recommend to the Board of Trustees, that non-represented employees receive a merit-based increase between 2.5-4.0% based on annual performance reviews for FY16, prorated merit-based increases of.89% for the Chief Librarian and Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President, and a 4.0% merit-based increase for the General Counsel and Senior Vice President, retroactive to July 1, 2016. Generated 11/7/2016 11:28 AM