NC STATE UNIVERSITY. Dr. Ron Heiniger Vernon G. James Research Center North Carolina State University

Similar documents
R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center North Carolina State University

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

Quest for 300 Bushel Corn

Irrigating for Maximum Economic Return with Limited Water

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum News

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Organic Systems Trial. Advisory Group Meeting 2008

SMart On-Farm Part 1. Michigan Soybean Committee, PO Box 287, Frankenmuth, MI FRANKENMUTH, MI PERMIT 20 PAID US POSTAGE NON-PROFIT

Stanly County Center, E Newt Road, Albemarle NC Union County Center, 3230-D Presson Road, Monroe NC

Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.

Conservation Seeding Practices. John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist

The Seven Wonders of High Corn Yield

Number 209 September 11, 2009

2014 YWTG. Disease and Insects

Reduced Rates of Residual Herbicides with Burndown Products Perform Well with Conventional Corn Hybrids

Understanding the Impact of Drought on Crop Yield in South and North Carolina

Seven Wonders of The Corn Growing World

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

STARTER POTASSIUM FOR CORN: WHY AND WHEN? Nicolas Bergmann, Antonio P. Mallarino, and Daniel E. Kaiser * Iowa State University, Ames.

Optimum Seeding Rate for Different Wheat Varieties in Kansas

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

Monsanto Learning Center at Gothenburg, NE 2013 Demonstration Reports

Planting Guide for Forage in North Carolina

CORN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES APPENDIX A. Corn Planting Guide

Drought Traits in Corn. Rob Aiken, K-State Northwest Research Extension Center, Colby 2014 No-till Oklahoma Conference

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

Exercise 2: Determining a Phosphorus Nutrient Recommendation and Fertilizer Rate

Urea Volatilization and Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers for Small Grains Crop Pest Management School January 6, 2011

Response of DEKALB Brand Corn Products to Row Configuration and Population

Result Demonstration Report

Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

MAIZE GROWERS GUIDE. Table of Contents

Optimum Soybean Seeding Rate when Using Cruiser Maxx and Precision Seeding

Institute of Ag Professionals

Weather Effects on Expected Corn and Soybean Yields

Alabama s Water- Agriculture Nexus Water Resource Management and Economics Conference October 23, 2014

Fertility requirements for peas and alternative crops. Rich Koenig, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist

ASSESSING LAND PRODUCTIVITY: A GROWER S PERSPECTIVE PRESENTED BY: IAN OLSON REGULATORY SPECIALIST CENTROL CROP CONSULTING

County Farm Centre May 2014 Your May issue:

Alternative Livestock/Dryland Forage Systems in the Texas Panhandle

Grain Sorghum 101. Copyright 2015 Sorghum Partners All Rights Reserved

Evaluations of the FLEX Characteristics of Three DEKALB Brand Corn Products

MULTI-HYBRID PLANTING MAKING THE MOST OUT OF EVERY ACRE

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Michael E. Salassi 1 and Michael A. Deliberto 2 1 Professor and 2 Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

Roundup Ready Sugarbeet Production. Your Way To Grow 2008

Purpose and Introduction:

Methods The trial was designed as a randomized complete block.

Interpreting Nitrate Concentration in Tile Drainage Water

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

Climate and soils. Temperature. Rainfall. Daylength. Soils

2015 Vegetable Fertility Management Trial

EVALUATION OF ADAPT-N IN THE CORN BELT. Introduction

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series June 20, 2008

Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Influence on Spring Canola Performance in the Northern Great Plains

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

2010 Vermont Organic Grain Corn Performance Trial Results

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

Bourgault Agronomy Trials March 13, 2017 Bourgault Industries Ltd Curtis de Gooijer PAg, CCA

Estimating the Cost of Delaying Irrigation for Cotton on Clay Soil

KEEPING livestock well fed during the

Nutrient Management in Crop Production

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

SUMMER DROUGHT: CAUSE OF DIEBACK IN PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEED FIELDS?

Adaptation: Advising Local Governments on Climate Change Vulnerability

Organic Row Cropping Systems, Cover Crops, and Soil Health

CHIAA RESEARCH REPORT NUMBER 32 RELATIONSHIP OF WEATHER FACTORS AND CROP YIELDS IN ILLINOIS

Barley & Corn Silage Costs

Cover Crop Impact on Carbon and Nitrogen. Michael Plumer Conservation Agriculture Illinois Council on Best Management Practices

Nitrogen & Nutrient Strategies for 2014

DETERMINING THE GROWTH STAGES OF CORN AND SOYBEANS

Understanding How Precision Ag Works Regardless of Your Farm Size

Independent Farm Research 2015 Research Data

ON-FARM NETWORK SOYBEAN TRIAL RESULTS

POTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE. Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames

OPTIMIZING CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS

November 2008 Issue # Nutrient Management Considerations in a High-Cost Environment

Estimated Costs of Crop Production in Iowa 2006

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Digitization: The Next Revolution in Agriculture

Contents: Purpose and objective Water and energy conservation 1 1

33. Fate of pesticides in soil and plant.

harvest management plan for success

Good Agricultural Practices for Producing a High Quality Peanut Product

Institute of Ag Professionals

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, soybeans,

Capturing Manure s Value. March 2008

Foliar Fungicide Use and Management in Field Crops

The Effect of Climate on Sugar Beet Yields In Western Montana

Climate Change, Precipitation Trends and Water Quality David S. Liebl

Objective 1: Manage the demonstration site using common agricultural practices and monitor runoff quantity and quality.

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Extending the Summer Grazing Season. John Jennings Professor - Forage Specialist

UNDERSTANDING A TURF FERTILIZER LABEL

Transcription:

Dr. Ron Heiniger Vernon G. James Research Center North Carolina State University

1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 NC STATE UNIVERSITY 160 140 State Average Yield 142 bu per acre Total 126.5 mil bu Actual Yield bu/acre Corn Yield, bu acre -1 120 100 80 60 40 20 Linear (Actual Yield bu/acre) 0

Rainfall (inch) Temperature (F) NC STATE UNIVERSITY 3 2.5 Rainfall Low Temp High Temp 100 2 80 1.5 1 60 40 0.5 20 0 0

Current moisture is the result of very low southerly dip in the Jet Stream.. No sign of this shifting anytime soon expect continuation of current pattern Very Cold January through March if Jet Stream pattern persists then expect plenty of rain and possibility of snow Break expected in April and May with warm and dry conditions. Pattern will reemerge in early June with rain and cool weather to early July Final change in July to very hot and dry conditions into September

Corn Prices Jan 2012 to Today

Corn Price Required to Cover Input Costs Break Even Price ($ acre -1 ) Highest Yield (220 bu acre -1 ) Average Yield (134 bu acre -1 ) Lowest Yield (88 bu acre -1 ) $2.30 $3.78 $5.76

The Effects of Lower Corn Prices Remember that yield is a MULTIPLIER. High yield should still be the goal. To offset reductions in price yield must increase. Select inputs that have a HIGH likelyhood of increasing yield. Inputs must be able to increase yield enough to return revenue over cost. Select inputs that reduce environmental stresses and help maintain yield. An input that helps guarantee profitable yield levels reduces the risk of economic loss.

What Management Practices Contribute the Most to Yield and PROFIT? Technologies in Corn Production Advances in Hybrids Drought Hybrids Higher Plant Populations 43,000 vs 33,000 plants/acre Advanced Starter Fertilizers (in furrow) + (2x2) vs 2x2 only Seed Treatments enhancing emergence Fungicides improving kernel weight

Management Overall Summary - 2013 Hybrid DKC 64-69 DKC 68-05 1498 1690 2088 Syng. N68B Location Beaufort Pamlico Davidson Sampson Standard Standard Standard Standard Practice Practice Practice Practice 207.8 195.8* 248.0 202.3 245.1 235.6 207.4 189.8-5 to 46 bu per acre Advantage! 241.2 223.4 227.9 197.7 254.3 229.3 202.6 193.9 Risk = -$83.55 per acre Maximum Return over Cost= $123.45 per acre Breakeven = 18.6 bu/acre 215.1 198.8 221.9 207.0 246.5 225.3 187.8 166.9 220.8 225.5 259.5 233.6 243.0 226.8 197.5 170.2 236.3 236.4 267.7 231.1 233.2 216.6 190.7 186.8 194.2 198.8 203.3 196.2 241.3 221.1 156.5 111.0

Corn Yield, bu per acre NC STATE UNIVERSITY 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 53.2 115.7 28 20.5 82.1 115 64 bu Difference In drought tolerant vs conventional 0

Corn Yield, bu per acre NC STATE UNIVERSITY 350 300 302.8 310 311.3 300 289.5 250 200 150 100 50 0-19 bu Difference In drought tolerant vs conventional

Increasing Seeding Rates (33,000 vs 43,000) - 2013 Hybrid DKC 64-69 DKC 68-05 1498 1690 2088 Syng. N68B Location Beaufort Pamlico Davidson Sampson 43000 43000 33000 33000 43000 43000 33000 33000 43000 43000 33000 33000 27000 27000 37000 37000 207.8 196.3* 248.0 217.0 245.1 229.1 207.4 198.0* -4 to 48 bu per acre Advantage! 241.2 213.5 227.9 214.0 254.3 220.6 202.6 186.6 Risk = -$33.80 per acre Maximum Return over Cost= 215.1 209.0 221.9 $182.20 203.0 per acre 246.5 226.1 187.8 164.8 Breakeven = 7.5 bu/acre 220.8 212.9 259.5 228.7 243.0 236.2 197.5 188.7 236.3 236.5 267.7 219.3 233.2 224.8 186.8 175.5 194.2 198.2 203.3 191.7 241.3 224.7 156.5 135.3

No starter 11-37-0 @ 20 gal/acre

Added Starter Fertilizer (3-18-18 in furrow) - 2013 Hybrid DKC 64-69 DKC 68-05 1498 1690 2088 Syng. N68B Location Beaufort Pamlico Davidson Sampson 3-18-18 No 3-18-18 3-18-18 No 3-18-18 3-18-18 No 3-18-18 3-18-18 No 3-18-18 207.8 195.6* 248.0 219.4 245.1 229.6 207.4 198.6-9 to 47 bu per acre Advantage! Risk = -$22.50 to $25 per acre Maximum Return over Cost = $186.50 per acre Breakeven = 5.5 bu per acre 241.2 229.9* 227.9 220.5 254.3 244.8 202.6 201.6 215.1 214.3 221.9 225.4 246.5 257.5 187.8 180.0 220.8 212.2 259.5 235.0 243.0 233.7 197.5 193.7 236.3 234.2 267.7 220.1 233.2 225.7 186.8 184.8 194.2 205.3 203.3 209.2 241.3 223.1 156.5 134.3

Seed Treatment (Pentilex) - 2013 Hybrid DKC 64-69 DKC 68-05 1498 1690 2088 Syng. N68B Location Beaufort Pamlico Davidson Sampson Pentilex No Pentil Pentilex No Pentil Pentilex No Pentil Pentilex No Pentil 207.8 202.2 248.0 237.0 245.1 233.9* 207.4 202.6-19 to 35 bu per acre Advantage! 241.2 239.7 227.9 223.7 254.3 253.4 202.6 200.1 Risk = -$10.75 per acre Maximum Return over Cost= $147 per acre Breakeven = 2.3 bu per acre 215.1 212.6 221.9 222.1 246.5 257.9 187.8 185.7 220.8 230.2 259.5 247.5* 243.0 240.1 197.5 200.9 236.3 238.9 267.7 232.0 233.2 226.8 186.8 190.7 194.2 213.4 203.3 203.0 241.3 219.6 156.5 161.3

Corn Yield, bu per acre NC STATE UNIVERSITY 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100

Hybrid DKC 64-69 DKC 68-05 1498 1690 2088 Syng. N68B NC STATE UNIVERSITY Fungicide (Quilt Xcel @ V5) - 2013 Location Beaufort Pamlico Davidson Sampson Quilt No Quilt Quilt No Quilt Quilt No Quilt Quilt No Quilt 207.8 210.5 248.0 237.0 245.1 239.7 207.4 205.8-17 to 43 bu per acre Advantage! 241.2 237.7 227.9 228.2 254.3 246.2 202.6 201.3 Risk = -$14 per acre Maximum Return over Cost= $179.50 per acre Breakeven = 3.1 bu per acre 215.1 217.0 221.9 225.0 246.5 245.4 187.8 181.0 220.8 232.3 259.5 227.3 243.0 232.1 197.5 188.2* 236.3 235.7 267.7 224.0 233.2 233.0 186.8 188.2 194.2 211.6 203.3 205.9 241.3 225.2 156.5 175.7

Kernel Weight, g per 200 kernels NC STATE UNIVERSITY Increasing Yield through Kernel Weight Beaufort 2013 65 60 55 50 45 40 58.6 57.4 55.6 57

Conclusions GET VALUE FROM EVERY INPUT YOU APPLY!! Hybrid is the most important decision you make. Plant Population is the second most critical factor. Match plant population to hybrid capability, water availability, fertility, and risk. Change population from field to field based on yield history.

Conclusions With the best hybrid at optimum plant population starter is important but costly - USE STARTER TO AVOID RISK. Alternative (or addition) to starter fertilizer is the use of a nutrient seed treatment. Cost effective way to achieve the starter effect. Quilt at V5 increased kernel weight - Fungicides are most effective when the crop is under stress.