State Freeways/Expressways State Highways Roundabouts Special Markings Notes

Similar documents
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No T-02 October 30, 2014

research report Virginia Transportation Research Council Final Report VTRC 09-R24 MICHAEL D. FONTAINE, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Research Scientist

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

TXDOT SIGNING AND MARKINGS REVIEW OF MATERIALS & PRACTICES

Efforts to Improve Micro Surfacing Performance

NCAT Pavement Test Track. Buzz Powell Pavement Preservation Research

Chapter 8 WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROLS

550 Surface Treatments

Concept of Operations prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for Rural Intersection Conflict Warning Systems II Deployment

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Temporary Work-Zone Pavement Marking Products

CTRE DURABLE, COST-EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PHASE I: SYNTHESIS OF CURRENT RESEARCH FINAL REPORT

SECTION 905 TRAFFIC SIGNS, STRIPING AND RAISED MARKERS

Safety. Introduction. Total System

2017 Highway Safety Improvement Program Call

CEDAR RAPIDS METROPOLITAN AREA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS April 2003

Implementation, Training, and Outreach for MnDOT Pavement Marking Tool - Phase II

Appendix B. Benefit-Cost Technical Memorandum

Transportation Research Forum

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Pavement Management Systems

Maintenance, Construction & Secondary Roads. Terry Gibson, PE Chief Engineer February 20, 2013

Annual CSAH Needs Update for 2017

53.20 PAINTED ROADWAY LINES

Tech Brief PRECAST CONCRETE PAVEMENT IMPLEMENTATION BY U.S. HIGHWAY AGENCIES

2015 Sub Committee on Maintenance Des Moines, Iowa

The Cost Savings Potential of Sustainability Practices

603 - ASPHALT PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS SECTION 603 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

SHRP2 R21 Composite Pavement Systems Project Overview

NCAT Pavement Test Track

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM

High Friction Surface Treatments Frequently Asked Questions

2016 MUTCD CONCEPT TTC COMMENTS. Michael A. Chacon Traffic Operations Division

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 7270 High Build Paint

A. Texas Department of Transportation 2004 Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges (TxDOT).

IOWA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

The Ultimate Stress Absorbing Membrane

APPENDIX A GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF BARRIER/CHANNELIZING DEVICES IN WORK ZONES INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 10: PAVING. Refer to page 548 of the 2016 Spec book or page 573 of the 2018 Spec book for material specifications under G.

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

An Overview of Low Cost Pavement Alternatives in Canada

MAINE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Chapter URBAN & RURAL FREEWAY DESIGN

Bridge Deck Preservation Treatment Options

2015 ATSSA Traffic Expo Report

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects

Benefits of Pavement Preservation

NCAT Pavement Test Track. Buzz Powell

construction checklist

Liquid Road Bituminous Surface Treatment for Parking Lots

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

A MODAL COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION EFFECTS ON THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. November 2007

GENERAL NOTES FOR WORK ZONE SAFETY SET UP GUIDE

QUALITY STANDARDS for Temporary Traffic Control Devices

Business Plan for FY14 FY15

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

MnROAD Safer, Smarter, Sustainable Pavements Through Innovative Research

CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES

CITY OF FARGO SPECIFICATIONS PAVEMENT MARKINGS

Performance of Aggregate Base Course Pavements in North Carolina

Nova Scotia 2009 Pavement Preservation. Jim Chisholm Highway Construction Services

Selecting Projects for Accelerated Bridge Construction

REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL

SECTION 402 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEVELING

Concrete Pavement Preservation Guide

Extraction and Sieve Analysis ( µm minus) Forming Marshall Specimens, Field Method

Legislative Trends: Upcoming Increases to Minimum Wage Round-up 2018

MUTCD Part 6F: Temporary Traffic Control Zone Devices

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient s Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-04/4128-2

INVITATION TO BID ON TOWN PAVING PROJECTS

Regional Engineers. Jack A. Elston

Rapid Repair Materials and Construction Rapid Bridge Repair Workshop Holiday Inn Tanglewood-Roanoke, Virginia May 21 and 22, 2009

Tack Coat Materials and Methods for Optimizing for Thin HMA Applications

Roadside Design Guide. Update from the Technical Committee on Roadside Safety Chris Poole, Iowa DOT

Performance Based Practical Design (PBPD)

500 Interchange Design

Appendix A. Specifications The following contact numbers may be used to obtain pavement marking specifications for the respective state:

LOUISIANA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

CHAPTER 12: DRAINAGE

USING REMAINING SERVICE LIFE AS THE NATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURE OF PAVEMENT ASSETS

DuPage County Division of Transportation 421 N. County Farm Road Wheaton, IL / (Fax) 630/

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 806 ASPHALT CONCRETE WITH JOINT DENSITY FOR MULTI-LANE HIGHWAYS.

Maintenance & Rehabilitation. Treatments. Crack Sealing. Sealant Types. Asphalt Pavement Preservation: Identification of Alternative Treatments

PCC/AC Shoulder Joint Seal Evaluation

SELECTIVE FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION BASED ON FORENSIC INVESTIGATION AND DEFLECTION ANALYSIS: SEVENTEEN YEARS CASE STUDY IN VIRGINIA

PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION QA PROCEDURES RIDEABILITY TESTING CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE

Ohio Department of Transportation

Recommended Practices for Crack Sealing HMA Pavement

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAMS GUIDELINES FOR GEOMETRICS

Farm Radio Habits Wave 1, Winter Conducted by Millennium Research, Inc.

LMC Overlays For Bridge Deck Preservation 2011 Southeast Bridge Preservation Partnership Meeting, Raleigh NC April 13-15, 2011

Industrial Energy Efficiency as a Resource by Region

Cost Estimating Guideline February, 2017

New Jersey Department of Transportation DATE : 10/21/10 PAGE : TABULATION OF BIDS

Survey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete

SECTION 616 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-11/

New Composite Pavement Systems

RAC Focus Group Priorities Agency Wide 2013 Question Is there a Better Way?

Transcription:

State Freeways/Expressways State Highways Roundabouts Special Markings Notes Alabama (Tape on concrete surfaces) (Tape on concrete surfaces) We have none at this time but would be same as left (Tape on concrete surfaces) Arkansas /Tape/Paint /Tape/Paint /Tape/Paint /Tape/Paint See attached guidelines for more information Conneticut Deleware Hawaii the initial application we use on a freshly paved surface is hot-applied painted pavement markings. After about 10-14 days we apply epoxy resin pavement markings over the paint. We use this treatment on all state maintained roadways including freeways, two-lane roadways, roundabouts, ramps, and special markings (symbols and legends). Tape center lines and Epoxy edge lines Epoxy Epoxy, unless there are areas to tight for a long line truck, then we use. Thermo on asphalt and tape on concrete. Same everywhere. Extrusion, raised pavement markers (non-retroreflective and retroreflective). Tape is also allowed, however Contractors do not use due to higher costs. Iowa Waterborne Paint Waterborne Paint Waterborne Paint Waterborne Paint Maine Waterborne paint Waterborne paint Preformed thermoplastic Preformed thermoplastic and paint Minnesota Concrete: Tape Lane lines, Wet Reflective Epoxy Edge lines, Bituminous: Wet reflective Epoxy ADT >1500, same as above, ADT<1500 Wet reflective Latex Epoxy longitudinal, Thermo or Tape messages Epoxy, Tape or Thermo Missouri Predominantly waterborne paint, rumble stripes for edge lines and a grooved in lane line with a wet reflective element. Epoxy is an option our districts can choose, but it is not typically included in a project Waterborne paint Waterborne paint Some form a preform (arrows, stop bars, etc.), either cold tape or a preformed thermo Montana Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy (sometimes will use preformed thermoplastic burn-downs ) Nebraska Grooved wet reflective polyurea for concrete. Grooved wet reflective thermoplastic or polyurea for asphalt. Grooved wet reflective tape is sometimes used. Grooved wet reflective polyurea for concrete. Grooved wet reflective thermoplastic or polyurea for asphalt (depending on ADT). Waterborne paint for lower ADT s. We try to mark all left turn bays with a durable material if we are using paint for the rest of the markings. Grooved Tape or Polyurea Preformed thermoplastic, or preformed tape New Hamphire Polyurea Latex paint for long lines, thermoplastic for intersections and stencils for one lane roundabouts, leaning toward tape for two-lane, high volume roundabouts. -

New York Epoxy is the primary marking used on all State roads except smaller lower traffic roads which are marked using waterborne paint by State forces. Waterborne is also used a temporary markings which are striped over with epoxy usually after a 3 months or so. Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy or preformed some thermoplastic. North Carolina Oregon on asphalt and Polyurea on concrete and snow plowed areas Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape on asphalt and Polyurea in snow plowed areas Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape Heated-in-place and extruded Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape Example attached South Dakota Durable markings (Typically epoxy, but allow epoxy, poly urea, and methyl methacrylate) Either waterborne paint, paint with high grade polymer, or durable markings (epoxy, poly urea, or methyl methacrylate) for rural highways depending on the traffic volumes; typically cold applied plastic pavement marking tape in urban areas, at the very least for the stop bars and crosswalk markings. Have not installed a roundabout on the state system yet. Texas /prefab Vermont Polyurea, Polyurea,, Tape, Paint Polyurea,, Tape, Paint Polyurea,, Tape, Paint Virginia Determined by pavement surface life (normally Type B Class VI Tape inlaid as part of VDOT s paving operation) and otherwise Thermo is generally used, but Traffic Paint may be applied on surface treatments. The link to the TE memo is: Type B Class VI Markings Policy Typically on primary roads and Traffic Paint may be used routinely on secondary s in some Regions. Typically and Preformed Thermo for Messages and Symbols and Preformed Thermo for Messages and Symbols West Virginia High build waterborne paint Waterborne paint Preformed / Waterborne Preformed Wyoming Initial applications are generally fast dry acrylic traffic paint done by maintenance forces. Depending on district requests (especially concrete roadways in urban areas) the initial application may be inlaid tape or no preheat thermoplastic preformed markings.

State Freeways/Expressways State Highways Roundabouts Special Markings Notes Alabama Class 1 Paint or Class 2T (thin thermoplastic) Class 1 Paint or Class 2T (thin thermoplastic) Not Applicable Arkansas Waterborne, sprayed with thermoplastic in high traffic areas Waterborne, sprayed with thermoplastic in high traffic areas Waterborne, sprayed with thermoplastic in high traffic areas Waterborne, sprayed with thermoplastic in high traffic areas Connetecut for restriping we apply epoxy resin markings on all state maintained roadways including freeways, two-lane roadways, roundabouts, ramps, and special marking (symbols and legends). Delaware Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy, unless there are areas to tight for a long line truck, then we use thermoplastic on asphalt and tape on concrete Hawaii Extrusion and paint Extrusion and paint Extrusion and paint Extrusion and paint Iowa Waterorne paint, using more tape on high volume urban freeways Waterborne paint Waterborne paint Waterborne paint Maine Waterborne paint Waterborne paint Preformed thermoplastic Preformed thermoplastic and paint Minnesota Epoxy or Latex, dependent on existing Epoxy or Latex, dependent on existing Epoxy longitudintal, Thermo messages Epoxy or Thermo Missouri Waterborne paint Waterborne paint Waterborne paint preformed material or waterborne paint Montana Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Nebraska Grooved wet reflective polyurea for concrete. Grooved wet reflective thermoplastic or polyurea for asphalt. Waterborne paint for long line, with grooved tape used for turn lanes. Have let safety projects using grooved wet reflective polyurea for concrete, and grooved wet reflective thermoplastic or polyurea for asphalt. Grooved Tape or Polyurea Preformed thermoplastic, or preformed tape New Hamphire Latex paint (in house staff) Latex paint (in house staff) Latex paint and/or thermoplastic - New York Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy Epoxy or some preformed thermoplastic North Carolina on asphalt and on asphalt and Polyurea in snow Heated-in-place and extruded Polyurea on concrete and snow plowed areas plowed areas Oregon Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape Pre-made plan(depends on climate/volume of traffic): Paint//MMA/Tape South Dakota Durable markings Paint with high grade polymer or waterborne paint Have not had to do this yet Texas /prefab Vermont Paint Paint Paint Paint

Virginia Typically B-VI is refreshed with Traffic Paint, Thermo is refreshed with Thermo Thermo is refreshed with Thermo, Paint is replaced with Paint Thermo is refreshed with Thermo, Preformed Messages eradicated and replaced Thermo is refreshed with Thermo, Preformed Messages eradicated and replaced West Virginia High build waterborne paint Waterborne paint Preformed / Waterborne Preformed Remaining pavement life is a consideration Wyoming Restriping in high wear areas is generally epoxy approximately every two years fast dry acrylic traffic paint Fast dry acrylic traffic paint with the exception of two out of five which were recently restriped with epoxy. Urban symbols and crosswalks are generally placed with a no preheat thermoplastic preformed marking once every 5 years. Spot locations may use fast dry acrylic traffic paint.

State Missouri Notes No, the durable option on our majors is a district call at this point. Unless the project is significant a durable doesn t do much for us, we restripe all our majors each year and isolated sections of durables are easily striped over. Notes: Our waterborne paint is a 1st generation resin and our glass beads are a MoDOT gradation, which incorporate a wider ranges of glass. No policy. We work with our fourteen Divisions and highly encourage the use of long life markings. In the western part of North Carolina the State, we encourage polyurea with highly reflective elements due to the aggressive snowplowing on concrete and asphalt. In other areas where snowplowing is minimal, we try to use thermoplastic on all asphalt areas and polyurea on all concrete. South Dakota No, but we are working on developing one. Currently up to each Region Traffic Engineer. Hawaii No. Project/standard plans determine material to be used. New Hamphire Not Really Delaware Yes http://deldot.gov/information/business/drc/pd_files/plan_development/striping_item_guidelines.pdf?080511 Nebraska No Minnesota Yes copy is attached. Connetecut No is our standard marking but districts can choose to use prefab warranty tape or epoxy depending on the Texas roadway surface and roadway ADT. Arkansas Yes copy is attached. Oregon List of why and what products are used per each highway. Alabama Yes Attached Remaining pavement life is a consideration; See Link: Type B Class VI Markings Policy Virginia for the Interstate Policy. Beyond that, each Regional Operations Maintenance Manager assesses the material that provides the best life cycle cost, including snow plow impacts New York https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/pls/portal/mexis_app.pa_ei_eb_admin_app.show_pdf?id=3005 Wyoming No Maine No West Virginia No Montana No Vermont We have a draft but have not finalized it. Our research section also has a pavement marking material research project along a several mile section of I-89. As part of the project we are trying different types of markings recessed and surface applied and different types of optics. The following materials were included in the project (paint, MMA, epoxy, thermoplastic, and polyurea)

Rev. 11-21-08 ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING MATERIAL SELECTION GUIDELINES FOR NEW PAVEMENTS TYPE ASPHALT ROADWAY CONCRETE ROADWAY CONCRETE BRIDGE FREEWAY Main Lanes, Ramps, & CD Roads SKIP PROF THERMO MARKING TAPE EDGE PROF THERMO MARKING TAPE CONTRAST PROF THERMO PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO PROF THERMO MARKING TAPE MARKING TAPE TRANSVERSE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE MISC THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE NON-FREEWAY (MULTI-LANE) CENTER THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO SKIP THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO EDGE THERMO THERMO THERMO TRANSVERSE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE MISC THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE Miscellaneous Markings include messages, arrows, railroad, etc. Transverse Markings include shoulder, stop bars, crosswalks, etc F-3

Rev. 11-21-08 ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING MATERIAL SELECTION GUIDELINES FOR NEW PAVEMENTS TYPE ASPHALT ROADWAY CONCRETE ROADWAY CONCRETE BRIDGE ADT>2000 (2-LANE) CENTER THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO SKIP THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO EDGE THERMO THERMO THERMO TRANSVERSE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE THERMO/TAPE MISC PAINT/THERMO PAINT/THERMO PAINT/THERMO ADT < 2000 (2-LANE) CENTER PAINT CONTRAST PROF THERMO SKIP PAINT CONTRAST PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO CONTRAST PROF THERMO EDGE PAINT PAINT PAINT TRANSVERSE PAINT PAINT PAINT MISC PAINT PAINT PAINT Miscellaneous Markings include messages, arrows, railroad, etc. Transverse Markings include shoulder, stop bars, crosswalks, etc. F-4

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No. xx-xx-x-xx DRAFT August 1, 2014 To: Distribution 57, 612, 618 and 650 From: Subject: Michael Barnes Director-Operations Division MnDOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations Expiration This technical memorandum will remain in effect until January 1, 2019, unless superseded before that date or incorporated into MnDOT manuals. This technical memorandum supersedes the provisions contained in Technical Memorandum 13-13-T-03, dated July 1, 2013 and Technical Memorandum 08-10-T-02, dated May 20, 2008. Implementation This technical memorandum shall be implemented immediately. Introduction The FHWA is continuing their efforts for developing minimum retroreflectivity criteria for pavement markings. When this process is completed, striping operations across the state will be responsible for assuring that pavement markings meet or exceed these minimum level criteria. Because of Minnesota s climatic extremes, a systematic approach to pavement markings (District and Statewide striping plans) has been developed and implemented in order to attain MnDOT s mission. Over the past several years, MnDOT has put emphasis on the efforts to increase the performance of pavement markings throughout the State. These efforts have focused on improving equipment, streamlining maintenance operations, evaluating new materials, retrofitting materials on existing surfaces, and investigating performance based specifications to better deliver MnDOT s goal to: Provide an appropriate pavement marking on all highways, 365 days per year. Purpose The purpose of this technical memorandum is to provide a consistent statewide approach for pavement marking operations on state trunk highways. This includes guidance on material usage for final pavement markings including both longitudinal lines and special markings (i.e. crosswalks, messages, etc.). The guidance contained in this technical memorandum applies to the pavement marking operations on all pavements that fall under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Definitions An appropriate pavement marking is one that meets or exceeds the standards defined in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD). During winter weather events, pavement markings should provide presence after pavement is clear of snow and ice. Performance Research has shown that the threshold between an acceptable and an unacceptable pavement marking based on nighttime driver visibility needs is between 80 and 120 MCD/m 2 /lux. MnDOT has adopted the minimum performance of 100 MCD/m 2 /lux for a white line and 80 MCD/m 2 /lux for a yellow line. These minimum performance values are used to schedule maintenance or replacement of all pavement marking installations and used to determine when pavement marking materials can be left beyond expected service life. If retroreflectivity data is not available, Districts may use expected life of MORE

Technical Memorandum No. xx-xx-x-xx Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations DRAFT August 1, 2014 pavement markings from tables below and a visual nighttime inspection to determine whether maintenance or replacement is necessary. Pavement markings are an important road asset that needs to be managed effectively and performance measures for pavement markings need to be developed to assess the health of the system. The Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology, through the Traffic Engineering Organization, will develop these performance measures for pavement markings. Pavement Marking Life Expectancy Experience has shown that traffic volumes and resulting snow and ice operations have the greatest impact on the longevity of pavement markings. The following chart outlines the life expectancy of various surface applied materials based on traffic volumes and the minimum retroreflective performance values listed above. Expected Life of Surface Applied Markings Material ADT <1,500 >1,500 Latex Paint >1 yr. 1 yr. Epoxy (Plural Component Liquid) >5 yr. 3-5 yr. Preformed Polymer Tape or >5 yr >5 yr Research has shown that recessing pavement marking materials below the pavement surface can significantly increase the life expectancy of the marking. Examples of recessing techniques would be grooving, inlaying, installing in a sinusoidal rumble strip, slightly raising the traveled lanes (while leaving the marking area recessed), etc. The following chart outlines the life expectancy of various materials that have been recessed based on traffic volumes. Expected Life of Markings Material ADT <1,500 >1,500 Latex Paint >3 yr. 3 yr. Epoxy (Plural Component Liquid) >6 yr. 5-7 yr. Preformed Polymer Tape or >7 yr >7 yr Wet Reflectivity/Recoverability Wet-night visibility is an increasingly important pavement marking issue. Wet reflective and wet recoverable products and processes have been shown to improve the visibility of markings in these adverse conditions. MnDOT considers wet reflective and wet recoverable products to be comparable in wet weather conditions, therefore this guidance will not distinguish between them. Wet Recoverable Materials and processes are those materials or installation processes that enhance performance of pavement markings during wet weather condition but still lose retroreflective properties when covered with water. Examples of these include larger glass beads, profiled markings and rumble stripes. Wet Reflective Materials are those materials that enhance performance of pavement marking during wet weather conditions and retain their retroreflective properties when covered by water. Examples of these materials are those that contain specialized elements that are retroreflective when covered by water. All wet reflective/recoverable materials shall be recessed to insure continued wet weather performance after snow plowing operations. To ensure performance these materials should be installed as recommended by the manufacturer. -MORE-

Technical Memorandum No. xx-xx-x-xx Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations DRAFT August 1, 2014 Statewide Guidance To meet the goal of providing an appropriate marking 365 days per year, flowcharts (attached) with recommendations for the application of pavement marking materials have been developed. The materials shown in the flowcharts are the minimum types recommended. Districts may choose to use materials with a longer life expectancy for specific projects or broader applications. All pavement marking materials used shall be on MnDOT s Qualified Products List (QPL). New materials to be investigated shall follow the provisional approval process of the QPL. When markings have reached the minimum performance levels and are scheduled to be replaced by Maintenance, it is recommended that the materials used are based on remaining life of the pavement surface. The following table lists the recommendations for refreshing markings. REFRESHING MARKINGS (MAINTENANCE) Remaining Pavement Surface Surface Applied Life 1 (years) 0-3 Latex Latex >3 Epoxy 3,4 Latex or Epoxy 2 1 Anticipated life of existing pavement is based on planned projects and anticipated life of surface is based on preventive maintenance plans. For the purpose of this tech memo, 3 years was chosen based on suggested optimum time until initial preservation project. 2 Avoid placing Epoxy over Latex unless Latex presence is minimal. Epoxy should be placed on Epoxy if the remaining surface life is anticipated to be 6+ years. 3 If pavement joint treatment is being used, latex can be used for lines at joints regardless of Remaining Pavement Surface Life. 4 If the surface condition of the road would require Epoxy to be replaced within 2 years, Latex may be used. Each year in January, the Office of Maintenance will ask the Districts to submit their annual maintenance striping request. The Districts will fulfill this request by submitting the information requested on the Request for Striping form that can be found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/pavement/manual.html. Aside from the material recommendations, it is also recommended that 6 edgelines are installed on rural two-lane two-way roads where there are no additional safety countermeasures for lane departures (such as rumble strips or stripes). Studies have shown a considerable reduction in crashes when wider edgelines are installed. A 2012 study done by the Texas Transportation Institute demonstrated a reduction in total crashes of 15-30% and a reduction of 15-38% in fatal plus injury crashes. An FHWA report released in late 2013 that detailed studies done in Kansas, Michigan and Illinois noted reductions of similar magnitude. The safety benefit determined by these studies makes this an important tool to add to our safety countermeasures. Alternative Practices and Installations Statewide goals and plans cannot include all conditions and circumstances. To allow the Pavement Marking Engineer to monitor alternative pavement marking practices, if a District chooses to have an alternative practice or installation that differs from the guidance in this technical memorandum, the District should provide notification to the Pavement Marking Engineer with details and reason(s) for the change. Notification is only requested for large scale differences or district-wide practices, and need not include short segments or intersections. The Pavement Marking Engineer will track alternate practices and installations for the purpose of using the results in future decisions on pavement marking practices and operations. Questions -MORE-

Technical Memorandum No. xx-xx-x-xx Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations DRAFT August 1, 2014 For information on the technical contents of this memorandum, please contact Ken Johnson, Work Zone, Pavement Marking and Traffic Devices Engineer at (651) 234-7386, or Michelle Moser, Pavement Marking and Traffic Device Engineer at (651) 234-7380. Any questions regarding publication or distribution of this Technical Memorandum should be referred to Sophia Wicklund, Design Standards Unit at (651) 366-4701 or Michael Elle, Design Standards Engineer at (651) 366-4622. A link to all active Memoranda and a list of historical Technical Memoranda can be found at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/atoz.html. -END-

Technical Memorandum No. xx-xx-x-xx Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations DRAFT August 1, 2014 New Bituminous (M&O or reconstruct) Longitudinal Striping New Concrete (restoration or reconstruct) <1500 ADT - Surface Applied Latex until Preservation Preservation planned within 3* years <1500 ADT WR Latex 1500 ADT - Surface Applied Epoxy until Preservation <1500 ADT- WR Latex Bituminous Preservation Projects (micro-surface, ultra-thin bonded wear course, chip seal**, fog seal) Preservation planned in more than 3* years 1500 ADT WR Latex/Epoxy (Depending on time before preservation) 1500 ADT - WR Epoxy Multilane Contrast WR Tape/Contrast WR Epoxy (CL, LL); WR Epoxy EL 2 Lane 2 Way WR Epoxy WR=Wet Recoverable/Reflective CL=Centerline LL=Lane line EL=Edgeline *based on life of material and suggested optimum time to initial preservation project **methods for recessing markings on chip seals are still being developed -END-

Technical Memorandum No. xx-xx-x-xx Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations DRAFT August 1, 2014 <1500 ADT- Latex Preservation Project planned within 1-2 years New Bituminous (M&O or reconstruct) 1500 ADT - Epoxy Bituminous Preservation Projects (micro-surface, ultra-thin bonded wear course, chip seal**, fog seal) <1500 ADT Epoxy Lit or Tape <1500 ADT- Epoxy 1500 ADT Pavement Messages (transverse and gore markings) Preservation Project planned 3* or more years out Unlit Tape 1500 ADT Lit or Tape Unlit Tape Lit or Tape WR=Wet Recoverable/Reflective CL=Centerline LL=Lane line EL=Edgeline New Concrete (restoration or reconstruct) Unlit Tape *based on life of material and suggested optimum time to initial preservation project **methods for recessing markings on chip seals are still being developed -END-