Study on the factors affecting coagulation and flocculation in treatment of industrial effluents

Similar documents
EFFECT OF ALUMINIUM SULPHATE AGING ON COAGULATION PROCESS FOR THE PRUT RIVER WATER TREATMENT

Coagulation and Flocculation: Color Removal

an alternative for textile wastewater

Treatability Study of Pharmaceutical Wastewater by Coagulation Process

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALUM AND FERRIC CHLORIDE FOR REMOVAL OF TURBIDITY FROM WATER

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

OPERATORS PERSPECTIVE : OPTIMISATION OF A NEW PACKAGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT. Melina Entwistle. North East Water Authority

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

The Conservation Fund Freshwater Institute, Shepherdstown, West Virginia 25443, USA PHILIP L. SIBRELL

Fenton Oxidation Process Control Using Oxidation-reduction Potential Measurement for Pigment Wastewater Treatment

Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment of Textile Industrial Effluents

Suspended Solids Sedimentation of River Water Influenced by Electrocoagulation

Treatment Processes for Potable Water

TREATMENT OF DAIRY WASTE WATER BY MORINGA OLEIFERA AS NATURAL COAGULANT

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

ISSN: TEXTILE WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION AND REDUCTION OF ITS COD & BOD BY OXIDATION

Removal of Dye from Textile Wastewater by Electrolytic Treatment

SRI RAMAKRISHNA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY COIMBATORE First Year BE/B.TECH ( ) Engineering Chemistry- I

Chemical purification of peat harvesting runoff water

Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Vol.9 No.3 (December 2007) ISSN:

Guide to Inclined Plate Settlers

Laboratory # 1. Measurement of Water Quality Parameters

TREATMENT OF TEXTILE EFFLUENT USING HETEROGENEOUS FENTON AND MICROFILTRATION

SUBSEQUENT FENTON PROCESS AND NEUTRALIZATION FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT OF TEXTILE HOME INDUSTRY

Distillery Wastewater Decontamination by the Fenton Advanced Oxidation Method

Agenda. Pretreatment Background Typical Contaminants Practical Examples Methods of Treatment and References

Study on Coagulation Characteristics of Drinking Water Sources in Upper Yangtze River

Reverse Osmosis. Lecture 17

A Technology for Enhanced Control of Erosion, Sediment and Metal Leaching at Disturbed Land Using Polyacrylamide and Magnetite Nanoparticles

Aprocessing Heavy Metal In River Water Trough Coagulant Flocculation Process Using Moringa Seeds ( Moringa oleifera ) or biji kelor as Biokoagulan

CHARACTERIZATION OF DYE INDUSTRY EFFLUENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ITS SUITABILITY FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSE

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

METHOD #: Approved for NPDES (Issued 1971) Oxygen, Dissolved (Modified Winkler, Full-Bottle Technique) ANALYTE: CAS # O Oxygen

Investigate the optimal dose for COD and TSS removal using chemical treatment

FILTRATION INDUSTRY -An Overview

Fundamental Concepts: Overview of Water Quality

An Introduction to Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment

KKB Micro Testing Labs Pvt. Ltd., , 2 nd Floor, Tarun Plaza, NFC Main Road, Krishna Nagar Colony, Moula Ali, Hyderabad, Telangana

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Iron filings (Fe) 56g IRON + SULPHUR IRON SULPHIDE

Decolouration of Real Textile Wastewater with Advanced Oxidation Processes

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Aerobic Sludge Digestion in the Presence of Chemical Oxidizing Agents Part II. Fenton's Reagent

Phosphorus Management in Primary Treatment at the Lou Romano Water Reclamation Plant

Electrocoagulation applications for industrial wastewaters: a critical review

Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date Certificate Number T-3553 Valid Until Last Amended on - Page 1 of 9

Chemical Oxygen Demand- Acid Waste Disposal and Recovery of Mercuric Sulphate to minimise the test impact on our environment. Murendeni Stewart Mafumo

Leachate Treatment Technologies

East Coast P Removal Technology Performance Summary

ADVANCED SOFTENING MATERIAL FOR PROBLEM WATER

Biological Nutrient Removal vs. Chemical Nutrient Removal

ADVANCED SOFTENING MATERIAL. for problem water. SIMPLE SOLUTION FOR 5 PROBLEMS hardness iron manganese natural organic matter ammonium

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 4, April ISSN

Design of Precipitation System for the Removal of Total Suspended Solid, Turbidity and Mineral Content from Coal Processing Plant Wastewater

AMMONIA AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN WASTE WATER TREATMENT

Enhanced coagulation of surface waters with high organic content by permanganate preoxidation

INTEGRAL INDICES FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PULP AND PAPER MILL EFFLUENTS

Advanced Treatment of Flowback Water Using Magnetic Ballast Clarification and Vortex Generating Membrane Systems for Discharge

ISSN: ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 4, Issue 1, July 2014

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

UV DISINFECTION OF LOW TRANSMITTANCE PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER

Pilot Testing Reveals Alternative Methods to Meet Wisconsin s Low Level Phosphorus Limits

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Available online at Scholars Research Library. Archives of Applied Science Research, 2011, 3 (2):

EFFECTIVE SLUDGE DEWATERING USING Moringa oleifera SEED EXTRACT COMBINED WITH ALUMINIUM SULFATE

DW Module 21: Chemical Addition Answer Key- Revised Oct 2015

Advanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment in the Pulp and Paper Industry: A Review

POLLUTION CONTROL IN RECYCLING INDUSTRY

Direct filtration using coarse media and dual media filters in series

Pollution reduction and biodegradability index improvement of tannery effluents

ENHANCED MEMBRANE CLEANING WITH REDUCING AGENTS TO REMOVE IRON FOULING. Introduction

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. customer base of over seven million in Peninsula Malaysia and Sabah ( TNB, 2010 ).

INDIAN SCHOOL MUSCAT SENIOR SECTION DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY CLASS X- PRACTICAL WORKSHEET

Concentration mg/l TDS mg/l 10, ,000 Recovery 75% Waste TDS mg/l 44,000 COD mg/l 3,500 0 BOD NTU 1,250 0 Power Used kwh/m3 2.

STREAMING CURRENT MONITOR FOR COAGULANT OPTIMIZATION IN WATER TREATMENT PLANTS - LAP EXPERIENCE

Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent by Electrocoagulation with Aluminium Electrodes

LIMERICK COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL GOVERNMENT (WATER POLLUTION) ACTS 1977 AND 1990

Comparative Study of Different Forms of Moringa Oleifera Extracts for Turbidity Removal

ACUSOL 445/445N/445ND Detergent Polymers for Industrial Machine Dishwash (Warewash)

Membrane Filtration Technology: Meeting Today s Water Treatment Challenges

IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT

Water Treatment Overview. Gabe Sasser December 2016

ecowirl d wastewater treatment

Textile Wastewater Treatment by the Fenton Method

akvofloat for refinery wastewater reuse a flotation-filtration technology based on novel ceramic membranes

Drinking Water Treatment: Filtration and Disinfection

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Comparison of Water Quality Parameters

Extraction of enzymes from activated sludge

CeraMem. Ceramic Membrane Technology. Advanced Heavy Metals Removal System WATER TECHNOLOGIES

WODCON XXI, June 2016, Miami, Florida Some Proven Benefits of Polymer Use in the Treatment of Sediments in Recent Dredging Projects

PRESENTATION OF CONDENSATE TREATMENT

85 Q.51 Which of the following carbonates would give the metal when heated with carbon? (1) MgCO 3 (2) PbCO 3 (3) K 2 CO 3 (4) CuCO 3

Selenium Reduction. Caroline Dale

Module 19 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater. Lecture 24 : Aerobic Secondary Treatment Of Wastewater

utilization of chemical treatments to maintain and restore membrane performance

FLOW SEGREGATION OPTIONS TO REDUCE EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT RUNNING COSTS

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Transcription:

Study on the factors affecting coagulation and flocculation in treatment of industrial effluents I.G. Bantcheva Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Durban- Westville, South Africa Abstract The introduction of wastewater treatments increases the plant cost; therefor any attempt to improve their efficiency is valuable. The industrial liquid effluents are very dacult to generalize. Their characteristics not only vary with the type of the industry, but also from plant to plant producing same type of end products. Coagulation and flocculation can achieve the effective removal of suspended particles. Operating within the optimum parameters will reduce the cost of treatment and will increase the quality of the water. The objectives of the study were, to compare the effectiveness of different coagulants, to determine their optimum dosage, and the optimum ph. In the present study "Jar Test" was used. Samples from Pulp and Paper, and Textile effluents were used. The following coagulants were used: ferric chloride, ferrous sulphate, aluminium sulphate, and combination of them. Aluminium sulphate was regarded as the best coagulant since it achieved 98% solids removal for pulp and paper effluent and 95% for textile effluent at ph=7. With the combination of aluminium sulphate and femc chloride the turbidity of 1.83 NTU was achieved for pulp and paper effluent, compared with 74.5 NTU from the industry. For the textile effluent 6.01 NTU turbidity was achieved. 1 Introduction The continued increase in water consumption for industrial and domestic use, stringent discharge standards, and high cost of wastewater treatment processes have prompted the research efforts to identify and improve the methods for wastewater treatment and water recycling. Large amount of water is used in

156 Water Resources Management pulp-papermaking and textile industries. These industries have total dependence upon enormous quantities of water. The suspended sediments play an important role in the biological and chemical dynamics of the aquatic environment. The textile waste effluents are one of the very difficult to treat because they are highly variable in composition [7]. Coagulation and flocculation play an important part in many liquid-solid separations and is widely used in wastewater treatment. The polar, high molecular weight and hydrophobic compounds are best remove by coagulation and flocculation. Hydrophobic colloids are charged particles surrounded by a cloud of opposite and equally charged ions [g]. Near the border of the particle there is a charge-free space, called the sternlayer. On the interface between the strenlayer and the diffuse layer there is zeta potential, which is important for the stability of the colloids [6]. The destabilization of the colloidal system can be achieved by suppression of the zeta potential. Coagulation is the transformation of colloidal and dispersed particles into small flocs. The aggregation is controlled by a combination of hydrodynamic and surfacechemical interactions. In flocculation the destabilized suspended particles are agglomerated into large rapidly settling flocs [l]. The flocculation is caused by the random "Brownian" motion of the particles (perkinetic flocculation), the velocity gradient (orthokinetic flocculation) [l l]. Most of the coagulants used are salts of iron or aluminium. When mixed with water a mutual exchange of groups is taking place, and the end product is hydroxides in the form of gelatinous precipitate [g]. The choice of the best coagulant for any particular water is determined by experiment. The operating factors as ph, Merent coagulants, amount of coagulant, mixing parameter are explored in this work to determine their respective effects on the efficiency of the coagulation and flocculation. The optimum operating range for each of those variables were experimentally determined. When the salt of the trivalent aluminium and iron cations are dissolved in water, the metal ion hydrates attaching six molecules of water and forms an aquametal ion. The form ion then can hydrolyze and form monomeric and polymeric ferric compounds [3]. 2 Characteristics of wastewater emuents The fibers used in the textile industry may be broadly classified into four groups: cotton, wool, regenerated and synthetics. The pollutants in the textile wastewater include natural impurities in the fibers used, and processing chemicals. The liquid waste comes from the following operations: slashing, scouring and desizing, bleachmg, mercerizing, dyeing and finishing. The entire liquid effluent may include the following organic and inorganic substances: starch, carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium hydroxide, detergents, peroxides, hypochlorites, dyes and pigments, sodium gums, dextrins, waxes, sulphides, sulphates, etc. The combination of strong color and high dissolved solid content lead to high turbidity of the liquid effluent [2].

Crude pulp and paper mill wastes, or insufficiently treated wastes cause very serious pollution problems, when discharged into the streams. Generally the pulp and paper mills wastes are characterized by strong color, high BOD, high amount of suspended solids and high COD/BOD ratio. The pulp and paper effluents contain resin acids, fatty acids, phenols, tannins, lignins, terpenes, etc [91. 3 Materials and methods 3.1 Apparatus A jar test apparatus was used in order to determine the effectiveness of various coagulants. It consists of a set of six beakers, which can be stirred simultaneously at specified speed. This makes it possible to simultaneously determine the effect of six different dosage of coagulant, as well as the effect of six different values of ph. The turbidity meter was used to measure the turbidity. It consists of nephelometer with a light source for illuminating the sample and one or more photoelectric detectors with a readout device. The turbidity is expressed in NTU (nephelometric turbidity units). 3.2 Experimental procedure For optimal coagulation and flocculation it is important that aggregates of certain size, strength and density are formed. These properties are largely determined by coagulant type, dose, ph and mixing intensity [4, 51. In order to determine the optimum ph, first the initial dosage of coagulant was determined using 200 m1 of sample. The coagulant was added in small increments. Atler each addition, a 1-minute rapid mix (250 rpm), followed by a 15-minutes slow mix (20-rpm) was carried out. This continued until a visible floc had been formed. In order to determine the optimum ph the sample of 1000 m1 was placed in each of the beakers and the initial dosage of coagulant was added. The ph was adjusted at 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0. Rapid mix (250 rpm) for 1 minute, followed by 15 minutes mix at slow speed (20 rpm) was carried out. The samples were allowed to stand for 30 minutes and then turbidity was determined. The optimum dosage of coagulants was determined by keeping the optimum ph constant and varying the dosage of coagulant. The wastewater effluents from Sappi Fine Papers and Alitex Textile were investigated. The Sappi Fine Papers produces coated paper from sugar cane bagasse. The Alitex Textile produces cotton textile. The initial turbidty of the effluent was 229.4 NTU at ph 6.8 from Sappi Fine Papers, and 226.6 NTLJ at ph 7.1 from Alitex Textile respectively. The particles were in all sizes from those in true suspension to colloidal range. Three Merent coagulants, namely, aluminium sulphate, femc sulphate, femc chloride and combination of them were used.

158 TZ.hter Resources Management 4 Results and discussion 4.1 Pulp and paper effluent The initial turbidity of the wastewater was 229.4 NTU and ph was 6.8. The optimum ph was determined by using the three coagulants and the combination of the two best ones. The appearances of the flocculated solids and supernatants were quite different for each of the three coagulants used. The addition of ferric chloride resulted in fine grey-brown floc, which tended to form quite slowly. The supernatant was light brown in colour. Ferrous sulphate led to light brown flocs, which settled readily, and the supernatant was a clear yellow. Aluminium sulphate resulted in an almost clear supernatant and fine dark brown flocs, which settled very quickly. The initial dosage of the coagulants was found to be for femc chloride 7.01 mg, ferrous sulphate 8.93 mg, and for aluminum sulphate 6.54 mg. The respective initial dosages were used in order to determine the optimum ph for each coagulant. The turbidity and the % solid removal were determined at different values of ph ranging from 3 to 10. The optimum ph was determined by plotting the ph Vs turbidity. The results are shown in fig. 1. - 200 l50 L. 3 loo 3 50 0 -+-Feric chloride -m- Ferrous sulphate -6- Aluminium sulphate Figure 1: Optimum ph- pulp and paper effluent The optimum ph determined were 4.12, 8.15, and 7 for ferric chloride. ferrous sulphate and aluminium sulphate respectively. At the optimum ph the turbidity obtained was 9.99 NTU for ferric chloride, 74 NTU for ferrous sulphate and 5.15 NTU using aluminium sulphate. The effect of ph was extremely important.

Iibter Resources Ilanagenzent 159 The next to be determined was the optimum dosage of each coagulant. The optimum ph for each coagulant was kept constant and the dosage was varied. The resulk are shown in fig.2. -a 0 1 - -m- F- Chloride I Fmus Sulphate Figure 2: Optimumdosage - pulp and paperefient The optimum dosage was found to be almost the same for each of the coagulants 10 mga. In order to determine the effect of the combination of coagulants on the process of coagulation and flocculation, the two best coagulants, namely aluminium sulphate and femc chloride were used. Thereafter a percentage of each coagulant was added together and the experimental procedure was carried out. The results are shown in table 1. Table1 : Combination of the best two coagulants. I Aluminium sulphate 1 Ferric chloride l Turbidity l % Solids 1 The comparison between the coagulants is shown in fig.3. The best coagulant was aluminium sulphate. It achieved a final turbidity of 3.17 NTU at ph 7. With the femc chloride turbidity of 4.55 NTU was obtained at ph 4.12. The turbidity obtained using ferrous sulphate was 90.8 NTU at ph 8.15. The best results were obtained by the combination of aluminurn sulphate and ferric chloride. The turbidity of 1.83 was achieved, compared with 74.5 NTU from the industry.

160 Water Resources Management 100 90 80 70 60 %Solids 50 removal 40 30 20 10 0 Ferric Chloride Ferrous Ahnn Alum+Ferric Sulphate Chloride Figure 3. Comparison ktmn the coagulants 4.2 Textile effluent The sample was initially dark maroon in colour. The initial turbidity was 226.6 NTU and ph 7.1. The addition of ferric chloride resulted in gelatinous purple flocs, which are formed and settled relatively slow. The supernatant was light orange in colour. Ferrous sulphate coagulation form dark brown flocs, which settled very quickly, and the supematant was light purple in colour. With the aluminium sulphate the resulted supematant was clear and formed reddishblack flocs. The initial dosage of each of the coagulants was determine to be 15.46 mg, 18.95 mg, and 13.25 mg for femc chloride, ferrous sulphate and aluminium sulphate respectively. Series of experiments were carried out in order to determine the optimum ph for each coagulant. The turbidity and ph readings were recorded by using turbidmeter and ph-meter. The optimum ph was determined by plotting the ph Vs turbidity. The results are shown in fig. 4. *Ferrous Sulphate +B-- Aluminium Sulphate Figure 4: OptimumpH- tehle effluent

The point with the lowest turbidity gives the value of the optimum ph. The optimum ph determined were 4.5, 9.01, and 7.06 for ferric chloride, ferrous sulphate and aluminium sulphate respectively. At the optimum ph the turbidity obtained was 15.02 NTU for ferric chloride, 122 NTU for ferrous sulphate and 11.01 NTU using aluminium sulphate. The optimum dosage of each coagulant was determined. The turbidity Vs dosage of each coagulant was plotted as it is shown in fig.5. g 250 200 150 g l00 + so 3 0 0 10 20 30 40 Dosage mgl Figure 5: Optimum dosage- textile emuent Fenous Sulphate The optimum dosage was found to be 20 rng, 25 mg/l, and 20 mg/l for ferric chloride, ferrous sulphate, and aluminium sulphate respectively. Again the best results were obtained by using aluminium sulphate. The turbidity was 6.13 NTU, compared with 15.6 NTU for femc chloride and 101.7 M W for ferrous sulphate. The results from the combination of aluminium sulphate and ferric chloride are shown in Table 2. With the combination of aluminium sulphate and femc chloride the turbidity of 6.0 1 NTU was obtained. Table2: Combination of the best two coagulants. 1 I Aluminium sulphate l Ferric chloride l Turbidity l % solidsp l mg/l mg/l ( removal 1 I 7.0 3.0 1 17.19 1 92. 5 Conclusion From the results obtained it can be concluded that the ph plays important role in the process of coagulation and flocculation. Aluminium sulphate was the best

162 Water Resources Management coagulant for both, pulp and paper and textile effluents. With the aluminium sulphate 98 and 97% removal of the solids were achieved for pulp and paper and textile effluent. The other advantage of this coagulant is that the optimum ph was about 7, so there is not need to adjust the ph of the water. Ferric chloride was found to be also effective at a ph range of 3 and 5. In order to achieve the max removal adjustment of the ph of the water is required. The aluminium sulphate is more expensive that the femc chloride. The combination of the two coagulants could lead to the reduction in the cost of the wastewater treatment, and in the same time obtaining better removal of the solids. Acknowledgement. The author would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance of Mr. R. Sayed and Mr. P. Pillay. Sappi Fine Papers and Alitex provided the effluent sample. References Ali, W., O'Melia, C.R. & Ednvald. J.K.. Colloid stability of particles in lakes: measurement and sigruf~cance. Water Science Technologv, 17, pp.701-712, 1984. Balanosky, E., Herrera, F., Lopez, A. & Kiwi, J., Oxidative degradation of textile wastewater. Modeling reactor performance. Water Research, 34(2), pp. 582-596, 2000. Ching, H.W., Tanaka, T.S. & Elimelech M, Dynmcs of coagulation of kaolin particles with femc chloride. Water Research, 28(3), pp. 559-569, 1994. Gregory, J.E., Flocculation test methods. Efluent & Water Treatment Journal, 5, pp. 199-205, 1983. Gregory, J.E., Nokes, C.J. & Fenton, E., Optimising natural organic matter removal from low turbidity waters by controlled ph adjustment of aluminium coagulation. Water Research, 31(12), pp. 2949-2958, 1997. Kruize, RR., Flocculation of clay particles with a synthetic anionic polymer. Efluent & Water Treatment Journal, 5, pp. 205-209, 1981. Li, S.H. & Lin., C.M., Treatment of textile waste effluents by ozonation and chemical coagulation. Water Research, 27(12), pp. 1743-1748, 1993. Stephenson, R. & Duff, J.B.Duff, Coagulation and precipitation of a mechanical pulping effluent- I. Removal of carbon, colour and turbidity. Water Research, 30(4), pp. 781-792, 1996. Stephenson, R. & Duff, J.B.,Coagulation and precipitation of a mechanical pulping effluent- 11. Toxicity removal and metal salt recovery. Water Research, 30(4), pp. 793-798, 1996. [l01 Tan, B.H., Teng, T.T. & Omar, A.K., Removal of dyes and industrial dye wastes by magnesium chloride. Water Research: 34(2), pp. 597-601,2000. [l11 Thornas, D.N., Judd, S.J., & Fawcett, N., Flocculation modelling: a review. Water Research, 33(7), pp. 1579-1592, 1999.