Environmental Impact Statement for the Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project

Similar documents
POINTE DU BOIS MODERNIZATION PROJECT

ENVIRONMENT ACT TERMS OF REFERENCE NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS. Beaver Bank Bypass

Northern Frontier Northern Homeland

Comprehensive Study Scoping Document. for Lower Mattagami Hydroelectric Complex Redevelopment CEAR Reference Number:

Shell Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Shell Canada Limited

February Reference Section in Supplemental. Reference Section in Consultants Reports. Reference Section in Application. TOR No.

Factor Potential Effects Mitigation Measures

GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN IN NEW BRUNSWICK

Outline for. Protected Areas Management Planning

Operations Mine Site, Tote Road and Railway

Ontario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Ontario Envirothon Learning Objectives

available in multiple formats Environmental Self-Assessment Handbook for Rail Infrastructure Projects

The list of SGCN identified in the 2005 Kansas Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan was revised according to the following decisions:

CMPDI. 4.6 Mine Closure Plan

Manitoba s Submission Guidelines for Peatland Management Plans

Hydropower, Aboriginal Peoples and Environmental Assessment in Canada

Welcome to the Boulevard Lake Dam Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Session #1. June 14, 2016

A P P E N D I X E T A N C O O P E N H O U S E D I S P L A Y B O A R D S

Final Environmental Assessment Guidelines (including the Scope of the Environmental Assessment)

The Social and Economic Importance of Canada s Privately Owned Forest Lands

Integrated Watershed Management Plan

Generic Guidelines for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012

Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

Applications for Power Plants, Substations, Transmission Lines, Industrial System Designations and Hydro Developments

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Appendix 1: Forest Carbon Emission Offset Project Development Guidance

Department of Environment and Conservation. NEIA newleef 2013 October 10, 2013

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION

Rob; Sincerely, Brian Causton, President FMLA. Jim Russell, Vice President FMLA [67 Highland Crescent, Cambridge, ON, N1S 1M1]

Operational Policy Statement

7. Value Management Workshop

Ajax Mine Project Joint Federal Comprehensive Study / Provincial Assessment Report

Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Training Aid

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

9.0 Environmental Protection Program

Alouette Project Water Use Plan Monitoring Program Terms of Reference

Star Orion South Diamond Project ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY

Advice to decision maker on coal mining project

The Project. Federal Regulatory Approvals and Involvement

CHAPTER 3 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

Sustainability and Sustainable Development

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Information Request 37

2. Project Justification and Feasible Alternatives

Calculating Mitigation

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES FOR HYDROPOWER PROJECTS IN MYANMAR

Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide

The province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT

DETAILED IMPACT ANALYSIS OF MARMOT BASIN LONG RANGE PLAN

8. ASSESSMENT OF THE BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

THE FEDERAL POLICY ON WETLAND CONSERVATION. Government of Canada 1991

Characteristics of Land Resources

Annex F Scoping Checklist

SCHOOL SITE SELECTION GUIDE

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

Telephone Lake project

Rattlesnake Mountain OHV Trails

SITE C CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT

North Black Reroute Habitat Assessment for Cardamine pratensis

Where Funds are Spent

C&B Alberta Solar Development ULC

PROPOSED PIPELINES TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY OF FENELON FALLS: ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

WOODLOT LICENCE W1900 WOODLOT LICENCE PLAN TERM 10 YEARS. August, 2007 to August, 2017

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

PLANT AND ANIMAL DIVERSITY

Honeysuckle Reservoir decommissioning

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Mt Arthur Coal Open Cut Modification Environmental Assessment

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE REVIEW OF THE WHITES POINT QUARRY AND MARINE TERMINAL PROJECT

Provincial Policy Statement 2014

Species at Risk Act Policies and Guideline Series

Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland: A Natural Resource Analysis

Australia Pacific LNG Project. Volume 5: Attachments Attachment 2: ToR Cross-Reference Table

Highlands Environmental Resource Inventory for the Town of Phillipsburg

County of Calaveras Department of Planning

BIOMES. Living World

1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Background

MAPPING BIODIVERSITY METRICS REPRESENTING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AT THE LANDSCAPE SCALE IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TRACK REPORT GALORE CREEK COPPER-GOLD-SILVER MINE PROJECT. Northwestern British Columbia

TERMS OF REFERENCE SOUTHWEST INTERLAKE INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN

Dang Thi Tuoi Biodiversity Conservation Agency (BCA) Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam (MONRE)

Energy Company Suriname (NV Energie Bedrijven Suriname)

William Rutley Solar Park

Smokey Ridge Peat Harvest Proposal

Information Letter How to Prepare the Environmental Assessment Required Pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act

Airport Road from 1 km North of Mayfield Road to 0.6 km North of King Street Public Information Centre #1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY (EIS) TERMS OF REFERENCE & SUBMISSION STANDARDS

GAUTENG BIODIVERSITY GAP ANALYSIS

BALDY RIDGE EXTENSION PROJECT

Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission 2015 Annual Summary State Wildlife Grants

COLE ENGINEERING GROUP LTD.

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Office of Field Operations

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

FINAL SCOPING DOCUMENT

Detour Lake Gold Mine Project Follow-up Program

Appendix 2a CEAA Terms of Reference

DECISION MEMO. West Fork Blacktail Deer Creek Hardened Crossing

Campbell River Project Water Use Plan Physical Works Terms of Reference

Wind Energy Development Specialist Report

Transcription:

Environmental Impact Statement for the Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project Prepared for Submitted by 41844.101 March 2008

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE SLAVE FALLS TRAMWAY CONVERSION PROJECT Prepared for Submitted by March 2008 41844.101

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 BACKGROUND...1 1.2 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT...1 2.0 PROJECT NEED, PURPOSE AND ALTERNATIVES...2 2.1 PROJECT NEED AND PURPOSE...2 2.2 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS CONSIDERED...4 2.3 EVALUATION OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS...5 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...9 3.1 ROAD DESIGN...9 3.1.1 Drainage Design...11 3.2 SITE PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION...12 3.2.1 Right-of-Way Area Estimates...13 3.2.2 Right-of-Way Acquisition...13 3.2.3 Centreline Clearing...13 3.2.4 Right-of-Way Clearing and Grubbing...15 3.2.5 Topographic Survey and Geotechnical Investigation...15 3.2.6 Detailed Design and Tender Preparation...15 3.2.7 Roadway Embankment Construction...16 3.2.8 Roadway Subgrade Construction...17 3.2.9 Track and Communication Line Removal...17 3.2.10 Conversion of Rail to Road at the Slave Falls Generating Station...18 3.2.11 Workforce and Labour Requirements...18 3.3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE...18 3.4 DECOMMISSIONING...19 3.5 ACCESS CONTROL...19 3.6 PROJECT SCHEDULE...20 4.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING...20 4.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...20 4.1.1 Climate...20 Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement i

4.1.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions for the Existing Tramway...21 4.1.3 Groundwater and Hydrological Description...22 4.1.4 Surface Water...23 4.1.5 Surface Drainage...23 4.1.6 Physiography and Landscape...23 4.1.6.1 Ecological Land Classification...23 4.1.6.2 Surficial Geology and Physiographic Setting...24 4.1.6.3 Bedrock Geology...24 4.1.7 Soils...24 4.1.7.1 Soil Investigation and Classification...25 4.1.7.2 Soil Classification...25 4.2 BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...27 4.2.1 Aquatic Resources and Habitat...27 4.2.1.1 Physical Habitat Description...27 4.2.1.2 Moose Creek Description...27 4.2.1.3 Fish Community and Movements...28 4.2.1.4 Threatened and Endangered Species...29 4.2.2 Terrestrial Resources...30 4.2.2.1 Habitats and Ecosystems...30 4.2.2.2 Mapping...31 4.2.2.3 Habitat Characterization and Rare Plant Survey...33 4.2.2.4 Habitat Characterization...33 4.2.2.5 Surface Materials, Soils, and Groundwater...35 4.2.2.6 Vegetation...37 4.2.2.7 Habitat Variations with Site Conditions and Disturbance...38 4.2.2.8 Habitat Diversity...40 4.2.3 Priority Habitats and Plant Species...40 4.2.3.1 Rare Habitats...42 4.2.3.2 Rare Plants...42 4.2.4 Wetlands...46 4.2.5 Mammals...46 4.2.6 Birds...52 4.2.7 Reptiles and Amphibians...59 4.2.8 Insects...67 Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement ii

4.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT...68 4.3.1 Economy...68 4.3.2 Property Ownership...70 4.3.3 Infrastructure and Services...70 4.3.4 Personal, Family and Community Life...71 4.3.5 Aboriginal Land and Resource Use...72 4.3.6 Commercial Resource Use...73 4.3.7 Recreational Resource Use and Tourism...74 4.3.8 Heritage Resources...76 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONSULTATION...78 5.1 PROCESS...78 5.2 RESULTS...79 6.0 EFFECTS AND MITIGATION...81 6.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...82 6.1.1 Air Quality and Climate...82 6.1.2 Groundwater Resources...84 6.1.3 Terrain and Soils...85 6.2 BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...86 6.2.1 Aquatic Resources and Habitat...86 6.2.2 Habitat and Ecosystems...88 6.2.2.1 Habitat...89 6.2.2.2 Rare Plant Species...91 6.2.2.3 Broad Ecosystem Issues...93 6.2.3 Mammals and Birds...94 6.2.4 Reptiles and Amphibians...95 6.2.5 Insects...96 6.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT...96 6.3.1 Economy...96 6.3.2 Property and Ownership...97 6.3.3 Infrastructure and Services...98 6.3.4 Personal, Family and Community Life...99 6.3.5 Aboriginal Land & Resource Use...102 6.3.6 Commercial Resource Use...102 6.3.7 Recreational Resource Use and Tourism...104 Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement iii

6.3.8 Heritage Resources...105 6.4 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT...106 7.0 MONITORING AND FOLLOW-UP...110 7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MONITORING APPROACH...110 7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MONITORING PLAN...111 7.2.1 Compliance Monitoring...111 7.2.2 Pre-construction Monitoring...112 8.0 REFERENCES...113 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F TAC Review Comments on EAPF Detailed Soil Survey Information Aquatic Habitat Assessments Botanical Survey Report Consultation Report General Environmental Protection Measures FIGURES Figure 1.1 Map of General Study Area Figure 2.1 Map of Alternative Road Alignments Figure 2.2 Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project Plan Showing Proposed Road Layout Figure 3.1 RoW Area Estimates Figure 4.1 Map of Detailed Soil Investigation Sites Figure 4.2 Habitat Study Area, Tramway and Proposed Road Areas and Surrounding Region Figure 4.3 Habitat and Rare Plant Sample Locations Figure 4.4 Habitat Diversity Measured as the Number of FLI Vegetation Types per 25 km 2 Tile Figure 4.5 Rare Plant Locations Along North Half of Tramway Figure 4.6 Rare Plant Locations Along South Half of Tramway Figure 4.7 Wetlands Intersected by the Tramway and Proposed Road Area Figure 4.8 Habitat Composition of Moose Creek and Southern Wetland Complex Figure 4.9 Moose Creek Wetland Complex Figure 4.10 Southern Wetland Complex Figure 4.11 Mammal Locations From All Surveys Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement iv

Figure 4.12 Locations of Recorded Barred Owl Calls Figure 4.13 Anuran Call Survey Sites along the Tramway Line 2007 Figure 4.14 Locations of Reptile and Amphibian Sightings During Visual Encounter Surveys along the Tramway Line - 2007 Figure 4.15 Locations of Incidental Observations of Reptile and Amphibians along the Tramway Line - 2007 Figure 4.16 Existing Local Setting Figure 4.17 Archaeological Sites Located in the Project Area TABLES Table 2.1 Table 3.1 Table 3.2 Table 4.1 Table 4.2 Table 4.3 Table 4.4 Table 4.5 Table 4.6 Table 4.7 Table 4.8 Table 4.9 Table 4.10 Table 4.11 Table 4.12 Table 4.13 Table 4.14 Table 6.1 Alignment Evaluation Collector Class B Design Criteria Project Schedule Selected Climate Data for Pinawa WNRE GHG Emission Estimates Existing Tramway Operation Land and Water Area for the Study Areas Surface Material Texture in the Study Areas Landform in Commercial Forest Lands Number of Soil Pits from each Soil Order Number of Soil Pits by Thickness of Surface Organic Matter and Depth to Bedrock Land Cover in the Study Areas Broad Vegetation Type in the Study Areas Species found in the Search Areas that are Ranked S1 to S3? by the CDC Tramway Mammal Species Observations Tramway Bird Species Observations Life History Patterns for Anuran Species Found in Southeast Manitoba Description of Call Ranks Used for Breeding Amphibian Call Surveys Summary GHG Emissions Estimates Road Operation Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement v

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The Slave Falls Generating Station is located on the Winnipeg River approximately 160 km northeast of Winnipeg. The station was constructed from 1928 to 1948, with the first unit entering service in 1931. In 2002, Manitoba Hydro acquired the generating station as part of its purchase of Winnipeg Hydro. The Station is currently accessed via a Manitoba Hydro owned rail line (tramway) running from Pointe du Bois. The Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Project (the Project) involves the construction of an allweather road from Pointe du Bois to the Slave Falls Generating Station. The all-weather road will replace the existing tramway. 1.2 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT The Project is defined as a Class 2 Development under The Environment Act (Manitoba) and is subject to Environment Act licencing. Manitoba Hydro submitted an Environment Act Proposal Form (EAPF) on August 14, 2007 to Manitoba Conservation, Environmental Assessment and Licensing Branch, which served to initiate the environmental assessment review process pursuant to the Act. This Environmental Impact Statement is in support of the EAPF. An interdepartmental Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was formed by Manitoba Conservation to guide the review of the Project (see Appendix A for TAC review comments on the EAPF). After reviewing the EAPF and obtaining further information on the Project, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency has determined that the Project is not subject to assessment under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. The environmental assessment for the Project includes consideration of the environmental effects of undertakings associated with: Site preparation Construction, operations and maintenance Abandonment and rehabilitation of the existing tramway line and ancillary developments (i.e., work staging areas and rock borrow areas) Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement 1

Figure 1.1 shows the general study area. The spatial boundaries of the assessment vary. The site-specific concerns related to rare flora, fauna, heritage resources, stream crossings, wildlife habitat, borrow pits, recreational use, etc., are addressed within a narrow spatial framework that centres on the length of the road from Pointe du Bois to Slave Falls, and varying buffer distances from the road alignment. Socio-economic discussions are based upon a larger study area that encompasses the proposed road and is bounded by the northern limit of cottages at Pointe du Bois, the western shore of the Winnipeg River to the east, the Slave Falls Generating Station to the south and the Whiteshell Provincial Park boundary to the west. In some cases, discussion includes communities outside the study boundaries, such as Lac du Bonnet and Pinawa. The Environmental Impact Statement addresses the following: Project Need, Purpose and Alternatives Project Description Existing Environmental Setting Environmental Assessment Consultation Effects and Mitigation Monitoring and Follow-up 2.0 PROJECT NEED, PURPOSE AND ALTERNATIVES 2.1 PROJECT NEED AND PURPOSE The Slave Falls Generating Station is currently not accessible by road. As a result Manitoba Hydro has concerns regarding its ability to adequately and quickly respond to any emergency that might arise at the Station. Quick access in response to fire, environmental, health and safety emergencies is currently limited by the capabilities of the current tramway. In addition the operation and maintenance of the tramway system carries high costs to Manitoba Hydro, both in terms of the tramway itself, and in terms of inherent limitations it imposes on moving personnel and equipment to the Slave Falls Generation facilities. Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement 2

Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement 41844.101 MMM Group Limited March 2008 Figure 1.1: Map of the General Study Area 3

Conversion of the existing tramway to an all-weather road will reduce associated operation and maintenance costs, and will improve response times to emergencies. The all-weather road will support efficient vehicle access to the Slave Falls Generating Station and will increase the ability of Manitoba Hydro to safely operate and maintain the station. 2.2 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS CONSIDERED In July 2007, Manitoba Hydro retained Earth Tech (Canada) Inc. to review alternative alignments for the all-weather access road to Slave Falls as part of a comprehensive Slave Falls planning study. The objectives of the planning study were to develop a functional design for the road connecting Pointe du Bois and Slave Falls, that would: Be economical to construct Maximize utilization of the existing railroad bed Meet Manitoba Transportation and Government Services criteria for Collector Road Class B Consider the 1982 Whiteshell Master Plan and the Park s Main Thoroughfares and Park Entrances Minimize environmental impacts and consider socio-economic issues Three alignment options were evaluated by Earth Tech (Canada) during the course of the planning study. The alignments are shown on Figure 2.1 and are described as follows: Alignment Option 1 Alignment Option 1 utilizes 34% of the existing tramway railway embankment. Option 1 has 17 curves. Alignment Option 2 Alignment Option 2 is the same as Option 1 for the first 3500 metres but then diverges from Option 1 and proceeds in a south-westerly direction east of the existing tramline. Option 2 then crosses the Moose Creek inlet from the Winnipeg River approximately 800 metres west of the river and rejoins Option 1 just prior to the wye (turn-around) at Slave Falls. Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement 4

Option 2 would make better use of the more suitable subgrade material found east of the existing railway alignment. The number of curves for Option 2 was minimized to produce a straighter alignment, with 13 curves. Alignment Option 3 Alignment Option 3 is the same as Option 1 for the first 1900 metres and then diverges from Option 1 proceeding in a south-easterly direction away from the existing railway. Option 3 then parallels an existing transmission line right-of-way for approximately 450 metres, then follows a south-westerly direction for approximately 2500 metres where it becomes common with Option 2. Option 3 makes better use of the more suitable subgrade material found east of the existing railway alignment and is less curvilinear. Option 3 has 13 curves. 2.3 EVALUATION OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS The three alignment options were evaluated by Earth Tech (Canada) Inc. in the planning study in the following categories: Environmental Screening Operational Issues Implementation Cost Criteria were developed for each category and each alignment was compared to the criteria to determine which alignment best satisfied the criteria. The criteria used for each category were as follows: Environmental Screening The environmental screening criteria used to compare each alignment option included consideration of the following factors: Terrestrial Fauna (includes impacts on ungulates, upland birds, bear and trapping) Aquatic/Riparian Fauna (includes the impact on beaver, fish, waterfowl and amphibians) Slave Falls Tramway Conversion Environmental Impact Statement 5