Energy Audit Summary Report Audit No. 72. Food Industry Bakery

Similar documents
Energy Audit Summary Report Audit No DE. Märkisch Edel Eberswalde, Germany. Food Industry

Energy Audit Summary Report. Food Industry

GREENFOODS energy efficiency in the food and beverage industry

EINSTEIN. Del.No7.3: Report on impact assessment of demonstration plants THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS IN EXISTING BUILDINGS

Advanced Building Systems Dirk Müller, Azadeh Badakhshani, Alexander Hoh

Flexibility of the conventional Power Plants as necessary response to the electricity market conditions

SorTech package solution description

Oil Conservation in Biscuit Industry

INSIDE: ASHRAE Hall of Fame

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 48 (2014 )

Energy Savings within. Facilities. Conservation and Reduction

Project summary. 2 MW project Schalkwijk Haarlem Netherlands

TransPacific Energy Advantage: Case Studies

Experiences from design studies, simulation studies and installations

BENEFIT. from our products and services.

University of Illinois Utility Master Plan and Dispatch Model

Hamm MW Pyrolysis Plant. Integrated Pyrolysis into Power Plant Plant capacity 100,000 t/a Pre-processed Waste Materials

STEELMAKING PROCESS GASES UTILIZATION

Heat Integration Across Plants Considering Distance Factor

COGENERATION THE SMART DECISION! Why and how cogeneration can make your company more profitable and energy efficient?

Optimal sizing and operation of on-site combined heat and power systems for intermittent waste-heat recovery

Solar Thermal Application in Industry

Case study : RIO VENA (Seasonal Storage Solar DH Study)

DISTRICT HEAT DRIVEN ABSORPTION COOLING OF DISTRICT COOLING PLANTS IN TRONDHEIM, NORWAY

EINSTEIN Software Tool

Low temperature cogeneration using waste heat from research reactor as a source for heat pump

Capacity Enhancement and Energy Conservation in Cement Plant

Recommendations for the design and establishment of an energy efficiency obligation scheme in Greece Christos Tourkolias, CRES

Design and development of a residential gas-fired heat pump

Application of Advanced Energy Technologies

Imp ementation Case:

Texas Hospital. Central Plant Redesign. Central Utility Plant SECOND PLACE HEALTH CARE FACILITIES, EXISTING 2013 ASHRAE TECHNOLOGY AWARD CASE STUDIES

Modeling and analyzing solar cooling systems in Polysun

Development of an Innovative 2.5 kw Water- Silica Gel Adsorption Chiller


Technical Description Package Micro Auto Gasification System (MAGS )

FLEXI BURN CFB WP4: Boiler design and performance

New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Clean Energy Incentive Program

After refurbishment, heat recovery and demand control of the air flow were installed and the use of the systems were optimized.

GEO-HEAT CENTER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Energy Savings. Performance contracting installs energy. costs, paid for out of guaranteed energy savings from your existing operating budget.

RETScreen ICE AND CURLING RINKS Model

Absorption Chillers in Industry

Texas Tech University Energy Savings Program October 2010 Update

SOLAR COOLING: STATE OF THE ART, TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND FIRSTS APPLICATIONS

Biofuel boiler technology and sizing for premise heating

Cogeneration in a Hospital: a case Study

Preparatory study for Steam Boilers Ecodesign

PhD student Mikko Wahlroos Supervisor Prof. Sanna Syri. Department of Mechanical Engineering

Turboden Biomass Solutions

THE NEW WAY TO PROVIDE COMFORT IN 4 PIPES SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS

Mechanical-Electrical Technology MECHANICAL-ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGY Sacramento City College Catalog

Action 3.1 GCHP Case Studies from Italy

Biogrid; an affordable alternative for a sustainable future

Deliverable 3.a (Combining former deliverables 3.1; 3.2; 3.5)

Welcome / Bienvenue. RETScreen Training Institute RETScreen 101 Introduction to Clean Energy Project Analysis

Ground-Coupled Heat Pump And Energy Storage

Authors. Towards 2020 OVERVIEW AND OUTCOMES. 1. General information. 2. Objectives

Integration of the hidden refrigeration capacity as a heat pump in smart energy systems

CHP from Updraft Gasifier and Stirling Engine

Condensing boilers: still the most cost-effective technology for domestic space heating and hot water

Christian Ohler, ABB Switzerland Corporate Research Efficiency versus Cost - a Fundamental Design Conflict in Energy Science

Klimaneutraler Campus Leuphana Universität Lüneburg - Energiekonzept und Umsetzung

EBRD s Experience in Financing Sustainable Energy Projects in the Region. Yevgeniya Afanasenko, Principal Environmental Adviser, EBRD, London

IN LEBANON ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR

Draft for an Appendix O Cost Structures

ANDERS DYRELUND, RAMBOLL INTEGRATION OF WIND AND SOLAR IN THE SMART ENERGY SYSTEM INTEGRATION OF WIND AND SOLAR IN THE SMART ENERGY SYSTEM

Introduction and purpose of this meeting. A New Day in Energy Management

UC Irvine Energy Efficiency Energy Storage Energy Optimization. Matt Gudorf CEM, LEED AP Assistant Director Energy, Engineering, and Inspection

northern ireland Renewable heat

Asset Energy Calculator Guidance

Audits and inspections in HVAC Auditorias e inspecções aos sistemas de AVAC

Turbine Inlet Air Chilling

Del 2.3 Technology specification for different E-HUB district scenarios

energiestro The most economical energy for remote sites Energiestro is an innovative system for energy production and storage.

METHODOLOGY FOR ENERGY AUDITS IN POWER PLANTS REGARDING ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Industrial heat pumps and cooling machines Oilon ChillHeat. Optimized heating and cooling performance

Energy consulting for industrial clients - current data analytic methods Examples in food & beverage Michael Tenner, May 9 th 2017, Chicago

Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings through Energy Services The example of Germany

Request for Proposals Town of Plymouth, New Hampshire

COMBINED CYCLE OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL GAS TURBINES

BIRMINGHAM DISTRICT ENERGY DELIVERING LOW CARBON ENERGY

Gas Turbine Inlet Air Cooling System

ELECTROTECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY END-USES: APPLICATION OF MVR TO FOOD INDUSTRIES

ENERGY EFFICIENT SYSTEMS Recover & recycle your waste heat

14 th NATIONAL CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION FOR ENERGY AUDITORS August, 2013

ORC technology and its applications to the RE sector

Energy Conservation. Work Shop on Knowledge exchange Platform on Best practices in Iron & Steel Industry. By MCJ Energy Engineers Pvt Ltd

Need for incorporating reliability and availability in payback calculations

Solvent Recovery Systems

Australian Solar Cooling 2013 Conference April 12th, 2013 North Ryde, Australia. All-in-oneSolar Thermal CoolingandHeatingSystem

Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (CCHP) in Distributed Generation (DG)

Solar Thermal Systems Status Technologies - Perspectives. Dr. Bernd Eikmeier Bremer Energie Institut

Messiah College Natural Gas and Combined Cooling, Heat and Power Plant

Performance evaluation of a small-scale polygeneration plant including a desiccant cooling system and an innovative natural gas ICE

Energy Management with HOCHTIEF simply efficient.

Renewable Energy Based Active Cooling System

CASE STUDY FOR RETROFIT OF TURBINE INLET COOLING IN BATAM, INDONESIA.

Deliverable 3.a (Combining former deliverables 3.1; 3.2; 3.5)

2016 BioCleantech Forum TURBODEN ORC TECHNOLOGY: STATE-OF-THE-ART. Ilaria Peretti. Manager, Sales and Business Development North America

Transcription:

Energy Audit Summary Report Audit No. 72 Food Industry Bakery energyxperts.net Berlin (Germany) / Barcelona (Spain) September 2012 This energy audit has been carried out with cofunding of the European Commission (EACI) in the Framework of the EU funded project EINSTEIN-II (ProjectNo. IEE/09/702/SI2.558239)

1. Contact data of the auditors Claudia Vannoni, Hans Schweiger energyxperts.net, Barcelona (Spain) - Berlin (Germany) www.energyxperts.net info@energyxperts.net 2

2. Description of the company (status quo) EINSTEIN Audit Summary Report Reference year of data/information: 2011 (Date of the visit on site: 09 05 2012) 2.1. General information of the company Sector Products Yearly production Current final energy consumption [MWh] (*) Food (bakery) Piadina and other bread products 820 t total for heating and cooling - natural gas 718 718 - electricity 134 33 (*) fuel consumption in terms of MWh lower calorific value (LCV) 3

2.2. Description of the company a) Productive process The company produces piadina bread (90% of the production) and other bread products. Concerning the production steps, in the early morning flour is extracted from the silos and pumped to the kneading vessels where it is mixed with chilled water and other ingredients in order to obtain the dough of the piadina and of other bread products. The dough is then formed and temporary stored before being baked either in a plate oven (piadina) or in rotary ovens (other products). Before packaging, only piadina is actively cooled down. Offices and the production hall are equipped with space heating and air conditioning systems. The most energy consuming processes in the company are the baking and cooling down of the piadina breads. Material inputs Final products Flour and other ingredients Kneading Baking Bread products Cooling chamber Water Cooling of production water Cooling chamber Piadina Space heating Air conditioning heating process cooling process process w/o active heating / cooling Figure 1. Simplified production flow sheet 4

b) Energy supply system All ovens are equipped with natural gas fired burners. In wintertime, an additional hot water boiler supplies heat to the offices space heating circuit (radiators) while the off - gases of the piadina oven are recoved to heat the renovation air inflow in the production hall. Cooling is mainly provided by several electrically driven chillers (air cooled). Final energy input Heat & cold supply equipment Distribution pipes and ducts Processes Natural gas Burners (Ovens) Direct Heating Baking Hot Water Boilers Hot Water Space Heating (offices) Air conditioning (production hall) Chilled water (kneading) Electricity Chillers Cooling pipes Cooling chambers Figure 2. Overview of the heat and cold supply system 5

3. Comparative study of alternative proposals EINSTEIN Audit Summary Report A comparative study of several technically feasible alternative proposals for energy saving has been carried out. In the following sections 4 of them are first shortly described and then the results of the comparative study are presented. 3.1. Proposed alternatives The technical potential alternatives that have been investigated are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Overview of the alternative proposals studied Short Name Description PO Baking Piadina (PO BP) PO Cooling Piadina (PO CP) PO Baking + Cooling Piadina (PO) PO +Thermal Chiller (PO + TC) Process optimization baking piadina (by reduction of thermal losses in the oven) Process optimization cooling chamber piadina (by dividing the process in two phases at high and low temperature and by increasing the free cooling contribution) Combination of the measures proposed in PO Baking Piadina and PO Cooling Piadina. Combination of the measures proposed in PO Baking Piadina and PO Cooling Piadina + New thermal chiller fed by the offgases of the piadina oven. Thermal nom. power: 12 kw. 6

3.2. Energy performance 1 Table 2. Comparative study: yearly primary energy consumption. Alternative Primary energy consumption Savings [MWh] [MWh] [%] Present State 1.080 --- --- PO Baking Piadina 977 103 9,54 PO Cooling Piadina 1.047 33 3,05 PO Baking + Cooling Piadina 944 136 12,59 PO + Thermal Chiller 934 146 13,52 1.100 Primary energy consumption (MWh) 1.050 1.000 950 900 850 Present State PO BP PO CP PO PO + TC Figure 3. Comparative study: yearly primary energy consumption. 1 The factors for conversion of final energy (for fuels in terms of LCV) to primary energy used in this study are 2,17 for electricity and 1,1 for natural gas. 7

3.3. Economic performance Table 3. Comparative study: investment costs. Investment costs for the baking and cooling optimisation are provided on a purely indicative basis. Investment costs for the cooling process optimisation account for the control strategy improvement only. No susbsidies considered. Alternative Total investment Subsidies [ ] [ ] Present State --- --- PO Baking Piadina 20.000 0 PO Cooling Piadina 5.000 0 PO Baking + Cooling Piadina 25.000 0 PO + Thermal chiller 34.600 0 40.000 35.000 30.000 Investment Costs [ ] 25.000 20.000 15.000 10.000 5.000 0 Present State PO BP PO CP PO PO + TC Figure 4. Comparative study: investment costs. 8

Table 4. Comparative study: annual costs including annuity of initial investment 2. O&M costs are the additional costs associated to the new equipments. Alternative Annuity Energy Cost O&M Total [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Present State --- 59.322 0 59.322 PO Baking Piadina 1.927 54.538 0 56.465 PO Cooling Piadina 482 56.981 0 57.462 PO Baking + Cooling Piadina 2.409 52.197 0 54.605 PO +Thermal Chiller 3.333 51.434 380 55.148 70.000 Annuity Energy Cost O&M 60.000 50.000 Total Yearly Costs [ ] 40.000 30.000 20.000 10.000 0 Present State PO BP PO CP PO PO +TC Figure 5. Comparative study: annual costs including annuity of initial investment. 2 Annuity of initial investment: 9,63 % of yearly payments, calculated based on 8% nominal interest for external financing, 3 % general inflation rate and 15 years of economic depreciation period. 9

4. Selected alternative and conclusions 4.1. Selected alternative The alternative proposal PO Baking and Cooling Piadina that combines the energy optimisation of the piadina baking and cooling processes has been considered the best option because it shows the biggest energy saving potential in relation to the economic performances. In the following sections, the selected alternative is described more in detail. 4.1.1. Process optimisation The proposed energy saving alternative combines the following two process optimisation interventions: the improvement of the energy efficiency of the baking process by reducing the thermal losses in the plate oven, currenlty not insulated, splitting the piadina cooling process (currently from 90 ºC down to ambient temperature) in two temperature steps, in order to allow a better exploitation of the free cooling (suitable for the first cooling step, at higher temperature) and to reduce the electricity consumption of the existing chillers. As can be seen from Table 2, this measure leads to a primary energy saving of 12,5% of which 9,5% is due to the baking process improvement (resulting in a fuel consumption reduction), and the residual 3% to the cooling optimisation (resulting in a electricity consumption reduction). 4.1.2. Heat recovery No additional heat exchangers foreseen. 4.1.3. Heat and Cooling Supply No additional equipments have been proposed with respect to the existing heating and cooling supply systems. 10

Table 5. Heat and cooling existing supply equipments. Selected alternative. Equipment Type Contribution to total he [MWh] Boiler hot water boiler 21 BakingOvenPiadina burner (direct heating) 529 NewBakingOven burner (indirect heating) 36 OldBakingOvens burner (indirect heating) 12 Chiller_KneadingWater compression chiller (air cooled) 1 GroundWater ground water 1 Chillers_Production compression chiller (air cooled) 34 Chiller_Warehouse compression chiller (air cooled) 19 Chiller_CoolingChamber compression chiller (air cooled) 13 The total and monthly contribution of the existingt equipments to the total heat supply (598 MWh) is shown respectively in Table 6, Figure 6 and Figure 7 while the contribution to the cooling supply (67 MWh) is shown in Table 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9. 11

Table 6. Contribution of the different equipments to the total useful heat supply (USH) in the company. Equipment USH by equipment [MWh] [% of Total] Boiler 21 3,51 BakingOvenPiadina 529 88,45 NewBakingOven 36 6,08 OldBakingOvens 12 1,95 Total 598 100 BakingOvenPiadina 88% Boiler 4% OldBakingOvens 2% NewBakingOven 6% Figure 6. Contribution of the different equipments to the total useful heat supply (USH) in the company. 12

60 Boiler BakingOvenPiadina NewBakingOven OldBakingOvens 50 [MWh/month] 40 30 20 10 0 February January March April May June July August October December September November Figure 7. Contribution of the different equipments to the total useful heat supply (USH) per month. Table 7. Contribution of the different equipments to the total useful cooling upply (USC) in the company. Equipment USC by equipment [MWh] [% of Total] Chiller_KneadingWater 1 0,93 GroundWater 1 1,03 Chiller_Production 34 50,26 Chiller_Warehouse 19 28,00 Chiller_CoolingChamber 13 19,77 Total 67 100 13

Chiller_Production 50% GroundWater 1% Chiller_KneadingWater 1% Chiller_CoolingChamber 20% Chiller_Warehouse 28% Figure 8. Contribution of the different equipments to the total useful cooling supply (USC )in the company. Chiller_KneadingWater 25 GroundWater Chiller_Production Chillers_PiadineConfez Chiller_Warehouse Chiller_CoolingChamber 20 [MWh/month] 15 10 5 0 January February March April May June July August October December September November Figure 9. Contribution of the different equipments to the total useful cooling supply (USC) per month. 14

4.2. Summary: saving potential with respect to present state and economic performance The following measures are proposed: Optimisation baking process: improvement of the baking process by reducing the thermal losses in the plate oven, currenlty not insulated Optimisation cooling process: splitting the piadina cooling process in two temperature steps, in order to allow a better exploitation of the free cooling. These measures allow to save 12,59 % of the current primary energy consumption and 12% of the current energy cost. The total estimated investment is 25.000 (3) and the expected pay-back is 3,7 years. The technical and economical feasibility of a thermally driven chiller fed by the off-gases of the oven after the baking optimisation should be further investigated in order to achieve higher savings. Table 8. Comparison of the present state and the proposed alternative: saving potential and economic performance. Total primary energy consumption (1) U.M. Present state Alternative Saving - total MWh 1.080 944 12,59% - fuels MWh 790 675 14,58% - electricity MWh 290 269 7,18% Primary energy saving due to renewable energy MWh 0 0 - CO 2 emissions t/a 238 208 12,75% Annual energy system cost (2) EUR 59.322 54.605 7,95% Total investment costs (3) EUR 0 25.000 - Payback period years - 3,7 - (1) including primary energy consumption for non-thermal uses (2) including energy cost (fuel and electricity bills), operation and maintenance costs and annuity of total investment (3) investment costs are provided on a purely indicative basis. Investment costs for the cooling process optimisation account for the control strategy improvement only. No subsidies considered. 15