Manitoba Water Quality Standards, Objectives, and Guidelines Dwight Williamson, Manager Water Quality Management Section Manitoba Conservation

Similar documents
2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Water Pollution & Quality. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

Wastewater Treatment Processes

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Fundamental Concepts: Overview of Water Quality

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Treated Municipal Wastewater Irrigation Guidelines EPB 235

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Grand River Monitoring

Read: Case Study: America s First River : A Success Story Summarize the story of the Hudson River and PCB s:

Delaware River Basin Commission

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Ammonia Water Quality Criteria Past, Present and Future

Water Recycling and Reuse

Water quality monitoring and assessment: general principles and fitness for purpose

Evaluation of Pollutants in Wastewater Generated by Mobile Car Washing Operations

Exploring Ways to Benchmark River Basin Performance

Earth s Pools of Water What is the residence time of these pools?

Impact Of The Urbain And Industrial Rejection On The Environment «Annaba, North - Est Algeria»

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Protecting Our Water Keeping Our Water Healthy

MARK CREEK DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

Emission accounts. Julian Chow United Nations Statistics Division September 2016 Putrajaya, Malaysia

Reasonable Potential Analysis & Impacts to Pretreatment Programs. Raj Kapur Clean Water Services

Alternatives Development and Evaluation 4-1 CITY OF HAMILTON WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program F A C T S H E E T

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER MONITORING:

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Total Solids (TS) - material remaining after evaporation of sample liquid

6. Pollutant Sources in

Water Resources on PEI: an overview and brief discussion of challenges

NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT EVALUATION

RECYCLED WATER AT SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK. Andrzej Listowski SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK AUTHORITY

Costs and Benefits of Requiring On-Site Wastewater System Treatment Standards Greater Than Nationally Recognized Standards

Cycles of Ma,er. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 3.4 Cycles of Matter

2009 Columbia River Water Quality Monitoring Data Report

Idealism vs. Realism: Implementing Akron s Watershed Control Program. Jessica Glowczewski Watershed Superintendent

EFFLUENT DOMINATED WATER BODIES, THEIR RECLAMATION AND REUSE TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABILITY

South Venice Water Quality

4.1 Federal Regulations

# 588 Fertilizer Pollution of Water Sciencefaircenter.com Study Kit

GULF OF MEXICO - SEGMENT 2501

General Information on Nitrogen

Summary. River. 5 th 8 th. about the. Chemical. anteceden. Grade Level: 5 th. 12 th. Objectives: instructions to. determine the. Chicago River Field

Water and Waste Water Management in Yangon, Myanmar

Monitoring and Assessment of Chemical Quality. Session Objectives

Sampling Surface and Ground Water Sources Compiled by Deanne Meyer and Patricia Price Department of Animal Science, UC Davis, September 2012

Decision Rationale. Total Maximum Daily Load for Phosphorus for the Sassafras River, Cecil and Kent Counties, Maryland 4/1/2002

F A C T S H E E T (Revised)

Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

Warm Mineral Springs Sampling by Sarasota County

Water Quality: The Basics

MURPHY DRAIN CATCHMENT

Operation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse

Northern Michigan Operators Spring Seminar. Lab Issues

Constructed Wetlands

Operations Report. September 10, 2015

Benefits of On-line Monitoring of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus

Draft Wasteload Allocation Report Town of Haworth

WWF SHRIMP AQUACULTURE DIALOGUE Effluent impact assessment:water quality monitoring vs nutrient budget

An Introduction to The Ecology of Lakes, Ponds and Reservoirs. Developing a Management Plan

First Flush Water Quality Results 2016

Chapter 1. Introduction and Background

IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES: PHASE I TMDLs FOR TOXIC POLLUTANTS IN THE DELAWARE RIVER ESTUARY

Modeling Eutrophication Processes in the Delaware Estuary to Link Watershed Efforts to Control Nutrient Impacts

Activity 1: Using the Level of Oxygen- Saturation Chart graph Dissolved Oxygen vs. Temperature at 100% saturation. Start by making a 2 column table.

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

FINAL 2012 BACTERIA AND TURBIDITY TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS FOR THE RED RIVER, OKLAHOMA (OK311100, OK311200, OK311210, OK311510, OK311600, OK311800)

CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA WATER QUALITY MONITORING AGREEMENT

Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division WYPDES (Wyoming Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Program STATEMENT OF BASIS

NPDES COMPLIANCE OF COOLING TOWERS BLOWDOWN AT POWER PLANTS WITH RECLAIMED WATER AS SOURCE WATER

Discipline Chemical Testing Issue Date Certificate Number T-3553 Valid Until Last Amended on - Page 1 of 9

EUTROPHICATION. Teacher s Manual

Introduction. Wetland System. A Wetland Scene at Lorne C. Henderson Conservation Area near Petrolia

Domestic grey water treatment and recovery to meet up the standards of characteristics of irrigation water

The Mekong River Report Card on Water Quality ( )

UV DISINFECTION OF LOW TRANSMITTANCE PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER

Linda Cooper, Eno River State Park, Durham, NC

3 Objectives 3 Ob jec tives

Proposed New 18 CFR Part Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale and Other Formations:

Ammonia Removal and ph Adjustment in Aerated Lagoons

Water Chemistry. Water 101

Form 2L - Land Application of Industrial Wastewater and/or Sludge

Dry-season water quality in the San Gabriel River Watershed

ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT IN COASTAL CAROLINAS

Performance of Sewage Oxidation Pond in USM Engineering Campus

Protecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues

Water Quality Monitoring:

The City of Cocoa (City) is located in east

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

Tolerance and Classification

Chronic Stream Pollution in a CAFO Rich Watershed in Duplin County, NC

Module 20: Trickling Filters Answer Key

Surface Water Samples: Containers, Preservation and Hold Times Table

WEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia

Transcription:

Manitoba Water Quality Standards, Objectives, and Guidelines 2002 Dwight Williamson, Manager Water Quality Management Section Manitoba Conservation 1

Outline Brief history Review process Overview of proposed revisions Introduce concepts likely to be discussed during these hearings Ammonia objectives Overview of water quality in Red River in relation to MWQSOG 2002 Concluding comments 2

History of Program 1976-1979 1980-1982 1983-1988 1988-1990 1990-1991 2000-2003 3

Review Process Information and initial comments April 20, 2000 - September 29, 2000 Detailed technical review February 1, 2001 - October 31, 2001 Final draft review November 22, 2002 - March 31, 2003 - FINAL DRAFT - - For Additional Review and Comment - Manitoba Water Quality Standards, Objectives, and Guidelines 4

Water Quality Protection Technology-Based Approach Consistent for each major water discharge sector Best Practicable or Best Available Technology Water Quality-Based Approach Considers unique water uses, stream flow, and water quality at each site Ensures that activities do not cause exceedances of water quality objectives Includes concept of assimilative capacity 5

Assimilative Capacity and Wasteload Allocation 500 Concentration (mg/l) 400 300 200 100 Tier II - Water Quality Objective 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Distance (km) 6

Principal Changes Three-tiered approach Surface water and groundwater quality Ecosystem health - biological communities Sediment and tissue residue guidelines 7

Tier I: Water Quality Standards Technology-based standards Municipal wastewater effluents Fecal coliform densities (200 organisms/100 ml) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (30 mg/l) Total Suspended Solids (30 mg/l) Key existing legislation is referenced, including ground water Not intended to be modified 8

Tier II: Water Quality Objectives Short list of variables (<20) Chronic and acute Common pollutants in Manitoba Good confidence for Manitoba May be modified based upon scientificallysound site-specific information Implementation Mixing zones Design low flows Three levels of protection Develop effluent discharge limitations 9

Tier II (continued) Ammonia Trace metals Chlorine Cyanide Dissolved oxygen Fecal coliform and Escherichia coli Nitrate-nitrite Sodium adsorption ratio and major ions or salts Suspended sediments and turbidity Temperature 10

Ammonia Included as a Tier II Water Quality Objective 1988 MSWQO modified from US EPA Criteria published in 1984 US EPA 1984 criteria superceded by new criteria published in 1999 MWQSOG 2002 based on US EPA 1999 11

Ammonia (continued) 12 separate objectives 6 apply to cool water assemblages 3 apply when early life stages absent 3 apply when early life stages present 6 apply to cold water assemblages 3 apply when early life stages absent 3 apply when early life stages present 12

Ammonia (continued) Include both chronic and acute 30 day average (chronic) 4 day average (chronic) 1 hour average (acute) 13

Comparison of MSWQO 1988 to MWQSOG 2002 Comparison of 1988 and 2002 Water Quality Objectives for Ammonia at ph 8.00 Total Ammonia (mg/l as N) 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 1988 MSWQO 30 Day (ELS Present) 4 Day (ELS Present) 30 Day (ELS Absent) 4 Day (ELS Absent) 1 Hour Temperature (C) 14

Implementation - Mixing Zones Not reasonable to require all objectives to be met at end-of-pipe Tier I - Water Quality Standards still apply A relatively small area is allowed for mixing to occur where not all objectives have to be met Allow a zone of passage Not cause acute lethality Others 15

Implementation - Design Low Flows Not reasonable to require wastewater treatment systems to be designed to meet objectives all of the time especially under low stream flows Recognizes that healthy aquatic life communities can withstand occasional stress and can recover 30Q10 7Q10 1Q10 16

Design Low Flows (continued) Statistical technique to identify the probability of a low flow event based upon historical hydrological record Longest period of representative historical flow record must be used to confidently predict most likely probability of future low flow event fundamental statistical principle 17

Design Low Flows (continued) Similar principle used by Manitoba for predicting the probability of other hydrological events low flows to allocate water for withdrawal high flows to protect public health and property from flood events 18

Tier III: Water Quality Guidelines General statements of desired quality Long list of pollutants, mainly from CCME (>100) Water quality Sediment quality Tissue residues 19

Tier III (continued) Not all pollutants of concern at present in Manitoba May not have good confidence for Manitoba Implementation More flexible than Objectives Assist to interpreting monitoring data Can be used as a basis for developing Objectives or Standards 20

Other Proposed Changes Guidance for mixing zones Adoption of both acute and chronic objectives Objectives for metals expressed as dissolved forms Definition of field crop irrigation expanded to include irrigation of parklands and golf courses Deleted irrigation category for short-term protection of medium to fine textured soils 21

Other Proposed Changes (continued) Deleted secondary recreation category Fecal coliform objective identified for protection of groundwater used for drinking purposes Guideline for ensuring biological integrity Guideline for maintenance of minimum instream flows 22

Other Proposed Changes (continued) Guideline for promoting water conservation Guideline related to non-indigenous species 23

Issues Presently Under Review Inadequate, scientificallydefensible water quality objectives for nitrogen and phosphorus Nutrient Management Strategy Once developed, adopt nutrient objectives in the MWQSOG 24

Stream Water Quality Monitoring 25

Fecal Coliform in Red River Fecal Coliform Densities in Red River near Selkirk (May 1 to September 30) 100000 10000 1000 100 10 1 26 1973-09-05 1975-09-05 1977-09-05 1979-09-05 1981-09-05 1983-09-05 1985-09-05 1987-09-05 1989-09-05 1991-09-05 1993-09-05 1995-09-05 1997-09-05 Fecal Coliform (organisms/100 m 1999-09-05 2001-09-05

Ammonia in Red River (Early Life Stages Present) Ammonia in Red River at Selkirk (Early Life Stages Present) 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 27 1970-06-09 1972-06-09 1974-06-09 1976-06-09 1978-06-09 1980-06-09 1982-06-09 1984-06-09 1986-06-09 1988-06-09 1990-06-09 1992-06-09 1994-06-09 1996-06-09 Total Ammonia (mg/l) 1998-06-09 2000-06-09 2002-06-09

Ammonia in Red River (Early Life Stages Absent) Ammonia in Red River at Selkirk (Early Life Stages Absent) 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 28 1974-12-30 1976-12-30 1978-12-30 1980-12-30 1982-12-30 1984-12-30 1986-12-30 1988-12-30 1990-12-30 1992-12-30 1994-12-30 1996-12-30 Total Ammonia (mg/l) 1998-12-30 2000-12-30

Dissolved Oxygen in Red River (Early Life Stages Present) Dissolved Oxygen in the Red River near Selkirk (Early Life Stages Present) 16.0 15.0 14.0 13.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 29 1967-01-13 1969-01-13 1971-01-13 1973-01-13 1975-01-13 1977-01-13 1979-01-13 1981-01-13 1983-01-13 1985-01-13 1987-01-13 1989-01-13 1991-01-13 1993-01-13 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l 1995-01-13 1997-01-13 1999-01-13 2001-01-13

Dissolved Oxygen in Red River (Early Life Stages Absent) Dissolved Oxygen in the Red River near Selkirk (Early Life Stages Absent) 16.0 15.0 14.0 13.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 30 1967-01-13 1969-01-13 1971-01-13 1973-01-13 1975-01-13 1977-01-13 1979-01-13 1981-01-13 1983-01-13 1985-01-13 1987-01-13 1989-01-13 1991-01-13 1993-01-13 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l 1995-01-13 1997-01-13 1999-01-13 2001-01-13

2,4-D in Red River 2,4-D in Red River near Selkirk 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 31 1984-02-23 1986-02-23 1988-02-23 1990-02-23 1992-02-23 1994-02-23 1996-02-23 2,4-D (ug/l) 1998-02-23 2000-02-23 2002-02-23

Zinc in Red River Zinc (extractable) in the Red River near Selkirk 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 32 1974-08-23 1976-08-23 1978-08-23 1980-08-23 1982-08-23 1984-08-23 1986-08-23 1988-08-23 1990-08-23 1992-08-23 1994-08-23 1996-08-23 Zinc (extractable) (µg/l 1998-08-23 2000-08-23 2002-08-23

Concluding Comments Substantive revisions incorporated to MWQSOG Final draft presently available for public review MWQSOG 2002 are the most comprehensive in Canada Represent the most current scientific information available and therefore, are being used to guide water quality management 33

Concluding Comments (continued) Water quality issues of concern bacteria ammonia dissolved oxygen nutrients 34

Concluding Comments (continued) Emerging water quality issues pharmaceuticals endocrine disrupting substances 35

Thank You 36