Determination of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Environmental Waters

Similar documents
Practical guidance for switching between anion and cation analysis systems

Determination of Oxalate and Other Anions in Bayer Liquor Using Ion Chromatography

Analysis of Glyphosate and AMPA in Environmental Water Samples by Ion Chromatography and On-Line Mass Spectrometry with Minimal Sample Preparation

Determination of halogens in coal using combustion ion chromatography

PRODUCT MANUAL FOR THE. ELECTROLYTIC ph MODIFIER (EPM) EPM, P/N

Thermo Scientific. Dionex IonPac AS9-HC. Column Product Manual. P/N: May Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific

EUTROPHICATION. Student Lab Workbook

Dionex Eluent Generator Cartridges

Monitoring and fractionation of

AUTOMATED WATER ANALYSIS

The Effect of Working Electrode Gasket Thickness on the Sensitivity and Linearity of Carbohydrate Response by Pulsed Amperometric Detection

General Information on Nitrogen

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Water Chemistry. Water 101

Preparing for Nutrient Removal at Your Treatment Plant

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Status and Trends of Water Quality in Wisconsin s Lakes, Streams, and Rivers

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

Understanding the Environmental Requirements for Fish

Cycles of Ma,er. Lesson Overview. Lesson Overview. 3.4 Cycles of Matter

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

Process Monitoring for Biological and Chemical Nutrient Removal

Master 5.1, Newspaper Articles. Special Edition December 14. Special Edition March 17

Comparison of Total Phosphorus and Macro Invertebrates and the Impact of Land Use on Water Quality. Laura Roldán Isardo Braverman Puerto Rico

Triplepoint Environmental

Total Solids (TS) - material remaining after evaporation of sample liquid

INTRODUCTION BMP DATABASE PROJECTS IN PA

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER MONITORING:

Determination of Metal Cyanide Complexes in Solid Wastes by Anion-Exchange Chromatography with UV Absorbance Detection

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Technical Guide. Thermo Scientific. Capillary High-Pressure Ion Chromatography. simplifying IC while increasing resolution and speed

Concentration of Human Hormones in Drinking Water Using Solid Phase Extraction and Analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Benefits of On-line Monitoring of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus

Fundamental Concepts: Overview of Water Quality

Determination of N-Methylpyrrolidine in Cefepime Using a Reagent-Free Ion Chromatography System

Errata. Product Manual for Dionex IonPac Cryptand Columns

Ammonia Removal and ph Adjustment in Aerated Lagoons

Wastewater Treatment Processes

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

Chapter 3 Ecosystem Ecology. Tuesday, September 19, 17

Nitrogen, Simplified TKN (s-tkn ) DOC

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

North Dakota s Nutrient Reduction Strategy. Presented to the 2016 ND Water Quality Monitoring Conference March 4, 2016

Lagoons Operation and Management in New Brunswick

Evaluation of Pollutants in Wastewater Generated by Mobile Car Washing Operations

Ecosystems: Nutrient Cycles

HIC as a Complementary, Confirmatory Tool to SEC for the Analysis of mab Aggregates

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Livestock Analytical Package

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

GULF OF MEXICO - SEGMENT 2501

EUTROPHICATION. Teacher s Manual

Monosaccharide and Sialic Acid Determinations in Biosimilars Using HPAE-PAD

Read: Case Study: America s First River : A Success Story Summarize the story of the Hudson River and PCB s:

Susquehanna River Monitoring

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Aquaculture Effluents and the Environment. CS Tucker, Mississippi State University

TEKS Lesson 7.8C: Effects of Human Activity on Surface Water and Groundwater

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Arkansas Water Resources Center

Measurement of Bromate and Haloacetic Acids In Drinking Water by IC-MS/MS

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

Real-time Nitrate Monitoring in Streams and Rivers

Automated Real-Time Determination of Bromate in Drinking Water Using LC-ICP-MS and EPA Method Application

What Are the Causes and Effects of Water Pollution?

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

Impact Of The Urbain And Industrial Rejection On The Environment «Annaba, North - Est Algeria»

NPDES COMPLIANCE OF COOLING TOWERS BLOWDOWN AT POWER PLANTS WITH RECLAIMED WATER AS SOURCE WATER

Struvia Technology for Phosphorus Recovery. o Re-Water Braunschweig November 2015

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2009 results update 1

Protecting Utah s Water Resources. Nutrient Issues

Interpretive Guide & Summary Statistics

Environmental Geography

Methods for Determining Sugars and Hydroxymethylfurfural in Biomass

City of Paso Robles Uses Online Monitor to Detect Low-Level of THMs in Treated Wastewater

Dionex OnGuard II Cartridges

An Introduction to The Ecology of Lakes, Ponds and Reservoirs. Developing a Management Plan

So You ve Removed Your Phosphorus? Now What? JTAC Luncheon April 9 th, 2014

Chapter Two: Cycles of Matter (pages 32-65)

Autotrophs vs. Heterotrophs

Delaware River Basin Commission

SWAT INPUT DATA: SEPTWQ.DAT CHAPTER 34

Evaluation copy. Chloride and Salinity. Computer INTRODUCTION

Diffuse Pollution Conference, Dublin 2003 NUTRIENT BALANCE IN A PADDY FIELD WITH A RECYCLING IRRIGATION SYSTEM

ANSWER KEY - Ecology Review Packet

MURPHY DRAIN CATCHMENT

Coal Ash Concrete Blocks for Reduction of Algal Growth and Ammonia Toxicity

Warm Mineral Springs Sampling by Sarasota County

Nitrate and Phosphorous Levels in Selected Surface Water Sites in Southern Ontario

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Environmental. Edgar Naegele Agilent Technologies, Inc. Waldbronn, Germany

AGRICULTURAL MINERAL SOIL ADDITIVES FOR PASSIVE NITRATE REMOVAL

The Mekong River Report Card on Water Quality ( )

Presence And Effects Of Aromatic Hydrocarbons On Sewage Treatment Efficiency

Cudjoe Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant: Water Quality Issues Brian E. Lapointe, Ph.D. and Don Maynard, P.E.,C.G.

WATER QUALITY. Utra Mankasingh. University of Iceland

Wisconsin River. Hardest Working River In the Nation

Summary. River. 5 th 8 th. about the. Chemical. anteceden. Grade Level: 5 th. 12 th. Objectives: instructions to. determine the. Chicago River Field

Transcription:

Determination of Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Environmental Waters Brian De Borba, Jeffrey Rohrer, and Richard Jack Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA PITTCON Conference & Expo March 4, 2014 OT70961_E 03/14S 1

Nutrient Pollution What are nutrients? Chemical elements required by all living organisms to grow Nitrogen and phosphorus support growth of algae and aquatic plants that provide food/habitat for fish and other aquatic life. Problem: excess nitrogen/phosphorus enter environment (e.g., human activity) causing increase in algae growth One of America s most costly, widespread, and challenging environmental problems 14,000 nutrient-related impairment listings in 49 states >47% of streams have medium-high phosphorus and >53% have medium-high nitrogen Impact reflects doubling of U.S. population over the past 50 years 2

3 We Have a Problem!

Impact of Increased Algae Growth Environmental Bad odor, increased fish deaths, waterfowl and pet deaths, decreased dissolved oxygen Public Health 23 suspected illnesses, recreation/boating advisory, fish consumption advisory Economic Millions in revenue lost to local businesses and public parks due to decreased tourism 4

Sources of Nutrient Pollution Primary Sources: Agriculture, storm water, wastewater, fossil fuels, around the home Runoff of fertilizers, animal manure, sewage treatment plant discharge, storm water runoff, car and power plant emissions, and failing septic tanks Mississippi River Basin (spans 31 states) drains to Gulf of Mexico nutrients from crops and concentrated animal feeding operations contribute the most nutrient pollution Piotrowski, J. Nutrients and Harmful Algal Blooms: A National Overview and Need for Action, Watershed Academy Webcast, U.S. EPA, 2011. 5

Nitrogen Classifications Nitrogen Ammonia (NH 3 ) Organic Inorganic (Nitrite/Nitrate) Total Nitrogen (TN) TN = TKN + NO 3 + NO 2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) TKN = NH 3 + Organic N 6

Nitrogen Cycle Gardiner, L. Traveling Nitrogen, Windows to the Universe. National Earth Science Teachers Association [Online] www.windows2universe.org/earth/life/ nitrogen_cycle.html (accessed Feb 26, 2014). 7

Phosphorus Classifications Organic Phosphorus Found in plant or animal tissue Inorganic Phosphorus Required by plants and found in animals 8

Phosphorus Cycle U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Monitoring and Assessment: Phosphorus [Online] http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/vms56.cfm (accessed Feb 26, 2014). 9

EPA Methods for Determining Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus Total Nitrogen EPA Methods 351.2, 351.4, 353.2 EPA 351.2/351.4 TKN EPA 353.2 Nitrate/nitrite (colorimetric, cadmium reduction) Total Phosphorus EPA Methods 365.2 and 365.4 EPA 365.2 Phosphorus, all forms (colorimetric) EPA 365.4 Total phosphorus (colorimetric) 10

Analysis Issues Measuring Nitrogen The currently accepted, EPA-approved method for total nitrogen (TN) is the sum of total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and nitrate plus nitrite nitrogen (NOx). There is no EPA-approved method for the determination of TN as a single result. The determination of TN as TKN + NOx is problematic: When NOx exceeds the TKN concentration, the TKN result can be low (negative bias). In some matrices NOx can be partially measured as TKN (positive bias). States are requiring TN in permits without clearly defining what TN is. 11

System Thermo Scientific Dionex ICS-2100 integrated RFIC system including: Pump Degasser Eluent Generator Column Heater Dionex AS-AP Autosampler with 250 µl syringe Consumables Thermo Scientific Dionex IonPac AG19/AS19 Anion-Exchange Column set Thermo Scientific Dionex EGC III KOH Eluent Generator Cartridge Thermo Scientific Dionex CR-ATC 500 Continuously Regenerated Anion Trap Column Thermo Scientific Dionex AERS Anion Electrolytically Regenerated Suppressor Thermo Scientific Dionex Chromeleon Chromatography Data System software for system control and data processing 12

Chromatographic Conditions Columns: Dionex IonPac AS19 Analytical, 2 x 250 mm Dionex IonPac AG19 Guard, 2 x 50 mm Eluent Source: Dionex EGC III KOH Cartridge with Dionex CR-ATC Eluent: 20 mm KOH 0 10 min, 20 50 mm 10 12 min, 50 mm 12 20 min Flow Rate: 0.30 ml/min Injection Volume: 5 µl Temperature: 30 o C Detection: Suppressed conductivity, Dionex AERS suppressor, 2 mm, recycle mode Run Time: 20 min 13

Sample Preparation Add 2 ml of Alkaline Persulfate to 4 ml of Sample Heat Sample at 120 o C for 60 min Allow Sample to Cool to Room Temperature Dilute Sample in DI Water Filter with 0.2 µm Filter Prior to Analysis 14

Standard Separation of Nitrite-N, Nitrate-N, and Phosphate-P 0.8 1 2 Column: Dionex IonPac AG19/AS19, 2 mm Eluent: 20 mm KOH 0 10 min, 20 50 mm KOH 10 12 min, 50 mm KOH 12 20 min Eluent Source: Dionex EGC III KOH with Dionex CR-ATC Flow Rate: 0.30 ml/min Inj. Volume: 5 µl Detection: Suppressed conductivity, Dionex AERS 500, 2 mm, recycle mode 4 µs 3 Peaks: 1. Nitrite-N 100 µg/l 2. Nitrate-N 100 3. Carbonate 4. Phosphate-P 100 0.3 0 5 10 15 20 Minutes 15

Results Analyte Calibration Range (µg/l) Linearity 1 (r 2 ) System LOD 2 (µg/l) System LOQ 3 (µg/l) Sample LOD (µg/l) Sample LOQ (µg/l) Nitrite-N 2.5 300 0.9999 0.76 2.5 Nitrate-N 2.5 300 0.9999 1.0 3.4 58 Phosphate-P 2.5 300 0.9998 1.3 4.2 16.5 54 1 Ten calibration levels, each injected in duplicate 2 Limit of detection (LOD) calculated as 3 S/N 3 Limit of quantificaiton (LOQ) calculated as 10 S/N 16

Evaluation of the N and P Recovery from Quality Control Standards Nitrogen-Containing Compounds Nicotinic acid Urea Ammonium chloride Glycine Glycine Phosphorus-Containing Compounds Glucose-1-phosphate Adenosine triphosphate Phytic acid Glycerophosphate Glycerophosphate 17

Recovery of N and P from Quality Control Standards (Each Diluted 15 ) Nitrogen Compounds Nominal Concn (mg N/L) Expected Concn (mg N/L) Found Concn (mg N/L) % Recovery Nicotinic Acid 1.95 0.129 0.129 100.1 Urea 2.02 0.133 0.127 95.4 Glycine 1.49 0.098 0.094 95.6 Ammonium Chloride 2.07 0.137 0.127 93.1 Phosphorus Compounds Nominal Concn (mg P/L) Expected Concn (mg P/L) Found Concn (mg P/L) % Recovery Glucose-1-Phosphate 1.93 0.1290 0.1253 97.1 Adenosine Triphosphate 1.76 0.1162 0.099 85.2 Phytic Acid 1.86 0.1232 0.1052 85.4 Glycerophosphate 1.63 0.1077 0.107 99.3 18

Glycine-N and Glycerophosphate-P after Alkaline Persulfate Digestion 1.0 2 Column: Dionex IonPac AG19/AS19, 2 mm Eluent: 20 mm KOH 0 10 min, 20 50 mm KOH 10 12 min, 50 mm KOH 12 20 min Eluent Source: Dionex EGC III KOH with Dionex CR-ATC Flow Rate: 0.30 ml/min Inj. Volume: 5 µl Detection: Suppressed conductivity, Dionex AERS 500, 2 mm, recycle mode 3 µs 1 Peaks: 1. Nitrate-N 101 µg/l 2. Sulfate 3. Phosphate-P 105 * 15 Dilution 0.3 0 5 10 15 20 Minutes 19

Undigested and Digested Local Wastewater Sample Results Sample 1 Undigested (mg N/L) Digested (mg N/L) Undigested (mg P/L) Digested (mg P/L) SVL Effluent T3 06.52 08.54 2.85 3.20 SVL Primary Effluent 00.31 36.52 2.02 3.87 SJC Filtered Effluent 11.02 13.01 0.23 0.43 SJC Final Effluent 14.77 12.66 0.33 0.40 SJC TPS 11.69 13.43 0.25 0.39 SJC Raw Sewage 00.55 39.87 2.19 4.50 All results are calculated after accounting for the dilution factor 1 SVL = Sunnyvale, CA; SJC = San Jose, CA 20

Comparison Between Undigested and Digested Raw Sewage 0.8 µs A 1 Undigested Sample 2 Column: Dionex IonPac AG19/AS19, 2 mm Eluent: 20 mm KOH 0 10 min, 20 50 mm KOH 10 12 min, 50 mm KOH 12 20 min Eluent Source: Dionex EGC III KOH with Dionex CR-ATC Flow Rate: 0.30 ml/min Inj. Volume: 5 µl Detection: Suppressed conductivity, Dionex AERS 500, 2 mm, recycle mode 0.3 1.4 B 1 Digested Sample Samples: A. Undigested raw sewage, 100 dilution B. Digested raw sewage, 150 dilution Peaks: A B 1. Nitrate-N 5.5 262 µg/l 2. Phosphate-P 22 30 µs 2 0.3 0 5 10 15 20 Minutes 21

Correlation Between Ion Chromatography and Colorimetric Determination of Total N 10 8 / L ) N g 6 (m tric e 4 rim lo o C 2 y = 1.0087x - 0.0815 R² = 0.9993 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Ion Chromatography (mg N/L) 22

Influence of High Chloride Concentrations on the Recovery of N and P Injected Chloride Concn (mg/l) Test Compound N or P Retention Time (min) Nominal Concn (mg N or P/L) Dilution % Recovery 560 997 1472 Glycine-N 9.10 1.49 18 104.5 Glycerophosphate-P 16.80 1.63 18 096.2 Glycine-N 8.90 1.49 10 101.2 Glycerophosphate-P 16.70 1.63 10 094.0 Glycine-N 8.70 1.49 7 087.5 Glycerophosphate-P 16.70 1.63 7 088.9 23

Day-to-Day Digest Variability Day Sample N Total N (mg N/L) Total P (mg P/L) 1 SVL Primary Effluent 6 37.27 3.88 2 SVL Primary Effluent 6 36.86 3.68 3 SVL Primary Effluent 6 36.72 3.55 4 SVL Primary Effluent 6 34.74 3.62 Average 36.40 3.68 Standard Deviation 01.13 0.14 RSD 3.10% 3.92% 24

Conclusions Demonstrated an accurate and precise IC method for determining total N and P in municipal wastewater samples. IC is a good alternative to TKN and other colorimetric procedures. Avoids toxic and harmful chemicals Provides comparable results to the colorimetric procedure IC enables the determination of other anions of interest to municipal water treatment plants. 25

26 Thank You!