Letter Health Consultation

Similar documents
SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE DOVER MUNICIPAL WELL 4 DOVER TOWNSHIP, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE ROCKY HILL MUNICIPAL WELLS ROCKY HILL BOROUGH, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE FRIED INDUSTRIES EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

General Electric Site-Lyman Street

SITE REVIEW AND UPDATE NASCOLITE CORPORATION MILLVILLE AND VINELAND, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NEW JERSEY CERCLIS NO. NJD

INTRODUCTION. 1 Proposed Plan for the Former Lee Field Naval Air Station Landfill Area 2 Site

Health Assessment Section

Hazardous Materials December 9, Hazardous Materials Existing Conditions

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

Health Consultation. South Indian Bend Wash Landfill Area TEMPE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA. CERCLIS No. AZD

Frequently Asked Questions

- INSTALLATION RESTORATION DIVISI~ON

Staff Report for Former ANG Coos Head Recommendation for Partial No Further Action for Groundwater at AOC C

Proposed Changes to EPA s Spreadsheet Version of Johnson & Ettinger Model (and some new spreadsheet tools)

PROPOSED DECISION DOCUMENT. CE - E. 19th St. Station Voluntary Cleanup Program New York, New York County Site No. V00542 October 2017

Project Background. Project Purpose

November 8, 2016 International Petroleum Environmental Conference. Tim Nickels Pastor, Behling & Wheeler, LLC

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency FACT S. Ground Water Purchase %

On March 6, 2014, 17 shallow soil samples were collected along the proposed trail alignment according to

Trans- Ash Landfill Benton County, Tennessee Class II Disposal Facility

7.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

Railroad TCE HSCA Site Public Hearing Warwick Township Building November 17 th, 2015

Public Health Assessment. Red Rock Road Sutherlin, Oregon

DRAFT FINAL. for the. of the. Former Victory Ordnance Plant. Decatur, Macon County, Illinois. August Prepared for:

Ground Water Remedy Optimization Progress Report: Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation

Fact Sheet #4, March 2009

H&H Job No. DS0-05. April 29, South Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, NC

NORTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL SITE NORTH BRUNSWICK, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY EPA FACILTY ID: NJD

RCRA Corrective Action Inspection Training

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Scotland County Water District - South PWS ID# June 16, 2016

August 14, Dear Mr. Chapman:

Site Map Investigative Areas (IAs) IA-3

Urban Area Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Study Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives

VAP Introduction to the Voluntary Action Program. Division of Emergency and Remedial Response

Public Health Assessment

General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Five-Year Review. Table of Contents

1. What is the cleanup level look-up table and where can I find it?

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)

State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

GROUNDWATER INFORMATION SHEET. Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE)

Modern Electroplating Site Update. Dudley Vision Advisory Task Force September 2008 Meeting

INTRODUCTION: WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM?

EPA Superfund Record of Decision:

ADDITIONAL SAMPLING REPORT WITH SITE CLOSURE REQUEST BUILDING 311 NCDENR Incident Number: Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

Treatment Technologies for Site Cleanup: Annual Status Report (Twelfth Edition)

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

Dayton Bar Association

Linde FUSRAP Site Tonawanda, New York

Cabot Koppers Superfund Site, Gainesville, FL

Environmental Solutions. Klozur CR. Combined Chemical and Bio-Remediation

Collection #432 Butterworth Landfill Files Collection 432

COUNTY OF NEVADA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY NEVADA COUNTY CDA GUIDELINES FOR ASH AND BURN DEBRIS CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL AFTER A FIRE

September 20, 2015 PN:

Manufactured Gas Plant Site Management - Program 50

A REVIEW OF VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE BY STATE

CITY PLACE SANTA CLARA: ADDRESSING VAPOR INTRUSION IN A MASSIVE LANDFILL REDEVELOPMENT

FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE (4 WASTE AREAS) SPOKANE, WA

WHITE SWAN CLEANERS/SUN CLEANERS AREA GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION (a/k/a WHITE SWAN LAUNDRY AND CLEANERS INCORPORATED) WALL TOWNSHIP, MONMOUTH COUNTY,

Technical Impracticability Waiver as a Component of a Site-Wide Remedy at a Fractured Bedrock Superfund Site in New England

Tylerville Center Water Supply Alternatives Evaluation

OBSTACLES TO COMPLETE PCE DEGRADATION DURING REDUCTIVE DECHLORINATION

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION REGION 1 50 CIRCLE ROAD STONY BROOK, NY 11790

WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOIL TRIGGER VALUES FOR EPA-LICENSED SOIL RECOVERY FACILITIES

In-Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Source Zone using ZVI-Clay Treatment Technology

PA Vapor Intrusion Guidance

A Clean, Green Remediation

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION SERVICES FORT DETRICK, FREDERICK MD

Southeast Hennepin Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion Site

San Jacinto River Waste Pits Superfund Site

APPENDIX M: Hazardous Waste Technical Report

Tyree 26 Town Forest Road, Webster, MA Fax: Phone:

PAHs in Surface Water by PDA and Fluorescence Detection

TREATMENT OF PERCHLORATE AND 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN GROUNDWATER USING EDIBLE OIL SUBSTRATE (EOS )

Form for assessing a chemical substance

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

Port Angeles Harbor Sediments Investigation Community Meeting. Peter defur, Ph.D. Laura Williams Environmental Stewardship Concepts, LLC May 7, 2012

K ATALYST, INC. adding value to our natural resources facilitating community change

Advanced Tools for Subsurface Sampling and Analysis

West Orange County System

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

Roche s Position 1 on Landfills / Contaminated Soil

316 Flynn Avenue Mixed-Use Redevelopment CCRPC Brownfield Grant Narrative

AECOM tel 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite fax Beltsville, MD 20705

Water Quality Report Annual. Cambridge Water System PWS ID: NY

ASH AND BURN DEBRIS CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL PROCESS

Continental Aluminum Exposure Investigation Executive Summary

Material Characterization Report

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Big Creek Water System ( ) May 11, 2017

DOCUMENTATION OF DUE CARE COMPLIANCE REPORT

Record of Decision. Sherwin-Williams/Hilliards Creek Superfund Site United States Avenue Burn Superfund Site Route 561 Dump Site

BMPS FOR STATE DRYLEANER FUNDS

STORMWATER RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY IMPACT REVIEW

Abstract. Thomas R. Eschner and David Dinsmore, Woodard & Curran.

Cost Estimate for Removal and Disposal of Contaminated Soil

DRAFT Alberta Risk Management Plan Guide

Health Consultation. Surface Water/Sediment and Soil Contamination at the Heizer Creek Landfill HEIZER CREEK POCA, PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

Imperial Gear Compound EP ISO 68, 100, 150, 220, 320, 460, 680 Page 1 of 6

CAMP LEJEUNE HISTORIC DRINKING WATER. Questions and Answers SECOND EDITION MARCH 2012

Roosevelt Irrigation District (RID)

Voluntary Clean-up Plan (VCUP) 3330 Brighton Boulevard Denver, Colorado

Transcription:

Letter Health Consultation Health Evaluation of Groundwater Samples Collected in February 2010 by U.S. EPA Contractors at the Former Benfield Industries NPL Site WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA EPA FACILITY ID: NCD981026479 Prepared by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services OCTOBER 5, 2010 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Atlanta, Georgia 30333

Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov

LETTER HEALTH CONSULTATION Health Evaluation of Groundwater Samples Collected in February 2010 by U.S. EPA Contractors at the Former Benfield Industries NPL Site WAYNESVILLE, HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA EPA FACILITY ID: NCD981026479 Prepared By: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health Under Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

Letter Health Consultation To: From: Mr. Carmine F. Rocco, MS Health Director Haywood County Health Department Waynesville, NC Sandy Mort, MS Health Assessor Health Assessment, Consultation and Education Program N.C. Department of Public Health / DHHS Raleigh, NC Date: September 29, 2010 Subject: Health evaluation of groundwater samples collected in February 2010 by U.S. EPA contractors at the former Benfield Industries NPL site (EPA ID: NCD981026479) Purpose This Health Consultation reviews groundwater analytical data collected in February 2010 at the former Benfield Industries National Priorities List (NPL or Superfund ) site located in Waynesville, N.C. The purpose of a Health Consultation is to identify harmful health effects that could result from exposure to hazardous substances in the environment and to identify interventions necessary to protect public health. The groundwater data discussed in this report was collected after the completion of the N.C. Division of Public Health s (DPH) Public Comment Release Public Health Assessment published on February 18, 2010 for the same site [PHA 2010]. Site Background The former Benfield Industries NPL site is located at 112 through 124 Riverbend Street in Waynesville, Haywood County, N.C. Benfield Industries, Inc. operated a bulk chemical mixing and repackaging facility on the site from 1976 until 1982, when a fire destroyed the plant. Products handled by Benfield Industries included: paint thinners, solvents, sealants, cleaners, de-icing solutions and wood preservatives. The original site covered 6 acres. After the fire, the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) ordered Benfield Industries to remove all chemicals and debris, and cover the site with clean fill material. This was completed in 1982. In 1989 the site was added to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA) National Priorities List (the Superfund program) as a means to finance further cleanup activities when Benfield Industries went out of business. During the Superfund clean-up it was identified that the soil and groundwater was contaminated with a variety of organic and metal substances. Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-1

Soil cleanup began in 1997 and continued until 2000. Active groundwater cleanup began on site in 2001 and continued until 2007. In 2002, Haywood Vocational Opportunities, Inc. bought the 6-acre property. Haywood Vocational Opportunities completed re-development of the site in 2004 and currently operates a vocational training center on the site. The property deed includes perpetual land use restrictions recommended by N.C. DENR for the purpose of protecting public health and the environment. These restrictions prevent use of the property for residential purposes, prevent alteration or removal of existing soil, and prevent disturbance of existing soil contours. The deed also restricts the use of any surface or groundwaters on the site as source waters for drinking or swimming [EPA 2008]. Additional information on the site history, clean-up and re-development are available in the referenced EPA documents and the N.C. Division of Public Health s (DPH) Public Comment Release of the Public Health Assessment (PHA) released in February 2010 [PHA 2010]. Discussion of the Site Data N.C. DPH concluded in the February release of the PHA [PHA 2010] that soils and groundwater on the site did not present a potential public health hazard because the property deed prevents disruption of soils or use of the groundwater on the former Benfield Industries site. The PHA also identified that N.C. DPH was not able to conclude if groundwater moving away from the site in the subsurface has the potential to harm people s health. This conclusion was based on: a lack of current analytical data to document the concentration of metals in the groundwater, a lack of information to determine if there are any private wells in the direction of groundwater flow away from the site, and, a lack of analytical data to determine if the lower bedrock aquifer (that EPA stated would likely be used as a local source for private drinking water wells) has been impacted by chemical contaminants from the site N.C. DPH recommended the following to insure the protection of the local community: verify there are no private drinking water wells in the area that would be impacted by contaminated groundwater flowing away from the site, evaluate the need to test the lower bedrock aquifer that would likely be used for private drinking water wells, if existing, and, continue to monitor the groundwater for contaminants moving away from the site In addition to the above recommendations, N.C. DPH requested copies of any new analytical data to be collected for the site so that N.C. DPH could evaluate the data to provide an independent evaluation of potential human health impacts of contaminants associated with the site. Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-2

There has been continued monitoring of the groundwater as part of EPA s on-going oversight of the former Benfield Industries NPL site. A groundwater remediation system constructed in 2001 was shut down in 2007. At that time, EPA recommended evaluation of monitored natural attenuation (MNA) as a cost effective and environmentally appropriate process to continue clean-up of the groundwater moving under and away from the site. MNA takes advantage of natural biological and chemical processes that can take place in a suitable groundwater environment to breakdown low levels of organic chemical contamination. Approval of the use of MNA at a Superfund site requires extensive testing to verify that this remedy will be protective of both human health and the environment. In February 2010, an EPA contractor collected groundwater samples from 14 wells to determine if MNA was an appropriate remediation alternative for this site. Seven wells were located on the site, and 7 were located off-site (see Figure 1). The well sampled the greatest distance away from the site in the direction of groundwater flow was a private well last used in 1996. This closed private well is located 1900 feet northwest of the site (see Figure 2). This well had been drilled into the lower bedrock aquifer (405 feet below ground surface). Chemical analyses were completed on the groundwater samples to monitor the current concentration of contaminants. The analyses also provided data to evaluate chemical and physical conditions for the suitability of the proposed monitored natural attenuation remediation alternative, and to look for indications that it was occurring. The analyses completed on the groundwater samples included: volatile organic compounds semi-volatile organic compounds metals inorganic and geochemical parameters N.C. DPH s Evaluation of the Groundwater Data for Potential Health Effects N.C. DPH received a draft copy of the EPA contractor s site report on May 12, 2010 [EPA 2010]. This report included the groundwater analytical data. N.C. DPH has reviewed the report and evaluated the groundwater analytical data. The Health Consultation process evaluates substances detected in the groundwater to determine their potential to adversely impact health if persons should come into contact with the groundwater. The Health Consultation process also includes an evaluation of how, and for how long, persons may come into contact with the groundwater. The potential for adverse health effects is determined by comparing the concentration of substances found in the groundwater to human health guideline values routinely used by N.C. DPH for this type of public health evaluation. The source of these values includes the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), which is an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (U.S. DHHS), and the EPA. N.C. DPH s public health evaluation process is described in detail in Appendix D of the PHA [PHA 2010]. Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-3

N.C. DPH s review of the data gathered by the EPA contractor in February 2010 [EPA 2010] identified: There are no known existing private well users in the vicinity of the site in the direction of groundwater flow. All private well users in the area were connected to the municipal supply in 1996 when the area was annexed by the Town of Waynesville. Two volatile organic compounds detected at estimated concentrations less than the minimum reporting limit were detected in the closed private well sample. Neither compound was at a concentration greater than N.C. DPH s health screening value. Neither compound was detected in any of the other groundwater samples. A total of 41 organic compounds and 15 metals were detected in the groundwater samples. Three organic compounds, all in samples collected from groundwater wells located on the former Benfield Industries NPL site, were present at concentrations greater than health screening values. No organic chemicals were detected at concentrations greater than health screening values in off-site well waters. Three metals were present at concentrations greater than health screening values in the up-gradient groundwater well 1 located on the site. Two of the metals (cadmium and lead) were found only in the on-site up-gradient well. The third metal (manganese) was the only substance detected in both an on and off-site groundwater sample at a concentration greater than a N.C. DPH s health screening value. These manganese levels may be a result of native levels in this area, or may be increased in the area of microbial activity that is degrading the organic contaminants in the groundwater. Table 1 lists substances detected in the groundwater samples at concentrations greater than the health screening values used by N.C. DPH for the health evaluation. N.C. DPH s Conclusions N.C. DPH concluded that chemical substances detected in the groundwater will not harm people s health. The basis of this conclusion is: There are no private wells existing in the immediate area of groundwater flow moving away from the former Benfield Industries NPL site. Therefore, people cannot come into contact with the water, and it is not being used as a drinking water source. The property deed for the former Benfield Industries NPL site (currently operating as Haywood Vocational Opportunities) restricts the use of groundwater on the site. This prevents contact with the groundwater under the site. 1 The up-gradient well (or background well) is placed to intercept the groundwater flow before it reaches the contaminated area of the site. The up-gradient groundwater is used as an uncontaminated reference point for comparison of chemical concentrations in the groundwater collected in the contaminated areas. Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-4

N.C. DPH s Recommendations N.C. DPH makes the following recommendations regarding the continued monitoring and remediation efforts associated with the former Benfield Industries NPL site: EPA or N.C. DENR should continue to monitor the concentration of organic chemicals and metals in the groundwater under and flowing away from the site. Do not allow drinking water wells to be drilled in the area impacted by the site until all contaminants associated with the site have been reduced to levels that would not cause adverse health effects with long-term drinking, inhalation, or direct skin contact. Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-5

References [EPA 2008]. Final Superfund Second Five Year Review Report, Benfield Industries Site, EPA ID: NCD981026479, Waynesville North Carolina. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4. Prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nashville District. July 2008. [EPA 2010]. Draft Monitored Natural Attenuation Evaluation Report, Remedial Action Oversight Benfield Industries Site, Waynesville, North Carolina. Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Remedial Action Contract II LITE, Region IV, EPA Contract No. EP-S4-08-03. Task Order 009. J.M. Waller Associates, Inc. May 2010. [PHA 2010]. Public Health Assessment Public Comment Release Benfield Industries NPL Site, Waynesville, Haywood County, North Carolina, EPA Facility ID: NCD981026479. Prepared by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. February 18, 2010. Available at: http://www.epi.state.nc.us/epi/oee/hace/ncmap/countyinfo.html#haywood Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-7

Figure 1. Location of groundwater samples collected by U.S. EPA contractors in February 2010 for investigations at the former Benfield Industries NPL site, Waynesville, NC. Source: [EPA 2010] Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-8

Figure 2. Location of the closed private well sampled in February 2010 during groundwater investigations of the former Benfield Industries NPL site. Source: [EPA 2010]. Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-9

Table 1. Substances detected in groundwater samples collected for the former Benfield Industries NPL site, Waynesville, NC, in February 2010. Includes chemicals detected at concentrations greater than N.C. DPH health screening values. Substances Detected in Groundwater Samples Substance Type Well Location Concentration in Groundwater (in µg/l) Health Screening Value 1 (in µg/l) Cadmium Metal MW02 2.1 J 1 Health Screening Value Type ATSDR Child Chronic EMEG Lead Metal MW02 210 15 EPA MCL AL Manganese Metal MW02 MW05 MW08 PZ10 660 550, 2000 2400 4400 300 EPA LTHA Benzo(a)pyrene PAH / SVOC MW03 0.11 0.005 ATSDR CREG Benzo(a)anthracene PAH / SVOC MW03 MW05 0.68 2 0.29 0.05 3 ATSDR CREG Vinyl chloride VOC MW05 0.24 2 0.02 ATSDR CREG Notes: µg/l = microgram per liter (equivalent to parts per billion ) MW = monitoring well J = estimated concentration below analytical method reporting limit EMEG = Environmental Media Evaluation Guide MCL AL = Maximum Contaminant Level Action Level (EPA drinking water regulatory value for public water systems) PZ = piezometer (a type of monitoring well) LTHA = Lifetime Health Advisory PAH = polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon SVOC = semi-volatile organic compound VOC = volatile organic compound CREG = Cancer Risk Evaluation Guide 1 Health screening values determined by N.C. DPH for evaluation of potential for adverse health effects from ingesting (drinking) the groundwater. 2 Concentration value listed is the average of 2 samples 3 Substance concentration is adjusted to a benzo(a)pyrene-equivalent concentration for comparison to PAH health screening values Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-10

Contact Information Contact information for additional inquiries regarding the Benfield Industries NPL Site Letter Health Consultation: Web links: N.C. DPH HACE: http://www.epi.state.nc.us/epi/oee/hace/reports.html ATSDR access to the Benfield Industries NPL Site Benfield Industries NPL Site Letter Health Consultation: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/pha/index.asp HACE e-mail address: nchace@dhhs.nc.gov HACE telephone number: (919) 707-5900 HACE fax number: (919) 870-4807 HACE mailing address: Health Assessment, Education and Consultation Program N.C. Division of Public Health/DHHS 1912 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1912 Letter Health Consultation Benfield Industries NPL Site, N.C. DPH, September 2010-11