Practice Plan for Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Stand 33: Restore Old Growth

Similar documents
Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PINELANDS AREA. March 25, 2006 INTRODUCTION

MANITOBA ENVIROTHON WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Managing for a healthy sugarbush in a changing climate

MANAGED FOREST LANDS STEWARDSHIP FORESTRY PLAN

A brief introduction to general terms and concepts related to the forestry learning objectives

CHEAT MOUNTAIN WILDLIFE HABITAT ENHANCEMENT

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions

Principles of Wildlife Ecology & Management Maryland Woodland Stewards Training Workshop

Mechanical Site Preparation

Telegraph Forest Management Project

SILVICULTURE & WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT

Chapter 13 Private Native Forestry: River Red Gum

Forestry. A Big Thanks

Natural Communities of Clay Soils in the Lake Champlain Basin

Ontario Envirothon LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Ontario Envirothon Learning Objectives

Wildlife Conservation Strategy

Unit A: Introduction to Forestry. Lesson 2:Understanding Forest Ecology

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

Characteristics of Five Climax Stands in New Hampshire

Huron-Manistee National Forests Mio Ranger District 107 McKinley Road Mio, MI 48647

Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

Province Integrated Resource Management Project

MONITORING QUESTIONS AND TASKS FOR THE GEORGE WASHINGTON PLAN

Value of native bees to agriculture

Township of Washington Master Plan Highlands Element Exhibit A:

BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSIDERATIONS IN MANAGED FORESTS

Responsible Forest Management IS Wildlife Management

LAND AND USE. Figure 2. Land cover in Rhode Island, Forest land. Nonforest land and smaller forest patches predominate in the area surrounding

Northern Long Eared Bat Habitat Assessment

Section 3: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment. Description - Wildfire

BMPs TO CONSERVE WOODED AREAS AT THE SUBDIVISION LEVEL

North Black Reroute Habitat Assessment for Cardamine pratensis

RESTORING OLD-GROWTH FEATURES TO MANAGED FORESTS IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO

For the property described as: Property Owner: Name. Phone Number. Mailing Address. City. Report Year:

4 CONSERVED LANDS, PUBLIC LANDS, AND OTHER RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

8/5/2011. Lesson Overview. Disturbance/Fragmentation. Shifting Mosaic. Number one cause of biodiversity loss. Types of disturbance. - Scale, frequency

TRENDS IN DELAWARE S FORESTS

3.6 Riparian Ecosystem Wildlife

New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles

Lesson 2-2: Riparian Zones

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Study of the North-facing Slope. of the Grand Valley State University Ravines. B.M. Hussey. K.J. Sylvester

Ontario Hardwood Overview. Hardwood Tour Oct.19-21

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFER

Bird Response to Wildlife Enhancement Silvicultural Treatments

Nancy L. Young, Forester USAID/USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

A Case Study of Habitat Conservation Plans and the Protection of Snags and Coarse Woody Debris on Industrial Forest Lands 1

719 Griswold, Suite 820 Detroit, MI DANVERS POND DAM REMOVAL AND STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT

Appendix A Silvicultural Prescription Matrix Spruce Beetle Epidemic and Aspen Decline Management Response

WOODLOT LICENCE W1900 WOODLOT LICENCE PLAN TERM 10 YEARS. August, 2007 to August, 2017

Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013

Northern deciduous forest as wildlife habitat. Tom Paragi Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fairbanks

Wildlife Management Concepts

Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1

Regional Ecosystem Analysis Puget Sound Metropolitan Area

Forsythe II Project. September 2015

DECISION MEMO. Non-Commercial Thinning on the Ocala National Forest (PALS project # 39238)

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

Mixed Conifer Forests An Overview

Very slight to negligible limitations no special land management practices required.

Riparian Buffer Plantings. Image: Virginia Outdoor Foundation

NEW Vision 2020 CFLRP Work Plan Template 2012

Aspen Ecology. Read Hessl, Why have a whole lecture for a single species?

Minnesota Gap Analysis Project. Gary Drotts Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Area Wildlife Supervisor, Brainerd

WETLANDS AND OPEN WATERS Compensatory Mitigation Definitions of Factors

Fire History in the Colorado Rockies

Building Resilient Communities - Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure Strategies

Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

APPENDIX A VEGETATION RESTORATION TREATMENT SUMMARY ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE HARVEST TREATMENT SUMMARY TABLES

Developing forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:

SECTION 2. SFI Forest Management Standard

Louisiana-Pacific Canada Ltd.

Jefferson Township Highlands Environmental Resource Inventory. April 2012

NRI/FSD and FOREST CONSERVATION EXEMPTION SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY

Forest Resources of the Ashley National Forest

Intermittent Stream Reclamation

Site Preparation: The First Step to Regeneration

Early Scoping for Proposed Application for Incidental Take Permit and Habitat

Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program Encouraging Responsible Forest Stewardship Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry

Katahdin Forest Management 2014 SFI Summary Audit Report

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field. Climate Projections for Forests: A Quick Summary

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field

August, 2010 A-1, FSD 1 Page 1 STANDARD FSD NOTES. General Notes to include on all FSDs with all blanks filled in:

Nantahala Pisgah NF Plan Process - Natural Range of Variation. Gary Kauffman National Forests in NC Ecologist

Highlands Council Meeting May 19 19, 2011

THE EFFECTS OF INVASIVE SPECIES AND HABITAT MANAGEMENT ON NATIVE TREE RECRUITMENT

Applying Ecosystem Services to Collaborative Forest Management Elk River Public Meeting

Introduction. Methodology for Analysis

1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE / COVER TYPES (SEE GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS ON PAGE 7) A 2. ADJACENT LANDS & EASEMENTS 3. FAMILY AGRICULTURAL LEGACY

Complex Stand Management

Plantation Forestry: A Global Look

Transcription:

Practice Plan for Sparta Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Stand 33: Restore Old Growth This practice plan addresses a general activity provided for in year 2017-2018 of the management schedule within the approved Sparta Mountain Forest Stewardship Plan. Practice Plan Prepared by: Don Donnelly, Forester New Jersey Audubon Society 1024 Anderson Road, Port Murray, NJ 07865 Practice Plan Date: February 1, 2018 Practice Plan being submitted on behalf of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Fish and Wildlife, PO Box 420 MC 501-03, Trenton, NJ 08625 Property parcel data below as referenced in the approved Sparta Mountain Forest Stewardship Plan and on the original property deeds. Some township block and lot designations may have since changed. Sparta Township Sussex County Hardyston Township Sussex County Borough of Ogdensburg Sussex County Block 1, Lots 1.02, 1.03 & 2 Block 35, Lot 18 Block 1, Lot 1 Block 2, Lot 1 Block 59, Lot 1 Block 1, Lot 3 Block 3, Lots 1, 12, 13, 1 4 & 21 Block 60, Lot 1 Block 11, Lot 35 Block 7, Lots 2, 2.01, 16,17 & 90 Block 60, Lot 1.03 Block 60, Lot 2.01 Block 60, Lot 2.02 Block 60, Lot 3.02 Block 60, Lot 17 Purpose The management objective is to accelerate old growth attributes within a forest type that is better suited to developing a climax forest. This system mimics the natural regeneration processes of an old-growth forest through a concept known as gap-phase replacement. Gap phase replacement means that the small canopy gaps created via the death (natural or anthropogenic) of individual or small groups of trees provide opportunities to release preexisting shade tolerant trees, or to stimulate some new shade tolerant regeneration. The proposed treatment of this stand is aimed at maintaining its ecological integrity; specifically the shade tolerant and potentially moisture sensitive species composition. Uneven-aged management entails the continual recruitment of new cohorts of trees into the stand, eventually having three or more age classes existing at any given time. Proper implementation requires removal of trees from all size classes to avoid skewing the residual tree distribution into a singular stand structure. Trees targeted for removal

are those declining in health, or those unlikely to persist under the site conditions that are perpetuated under a climax forest ecosystem. The small openings also present opportunities for moisture sensitive herbaceous plants to benefit from additional, but moderate amounts of light that are often associated with increased flowering and seed production. In short, this system enhances stand complexity while buffering the short-term, but extreme, changes to the site conditions experienced under some other silvicultural and natural disturbances. Proactively manipulating the stand, rather than waiting for natural mortality to occur, helps to increase the forest s resiliency to the sometimes more severe impacts resulting from natural causes (e.g. severe storm events or widespread pathogen outbreaks). Below find a Stand Visualization Simulator (SVS) depiction of pre- and post-treatment, respectively. Site Description This project site is located in the far northeastern section of property, roughly 500+/- feet west of Tamarack Lake in Hardyston Township. The treatment site s primary access is from Route 23 in the north. The area is a gently sloping hillside roughly 17 acres in size, has an irregular border, and is predominately oak/hickory. The stand is comprised of Hollis Rock Outcrop/Chatfield Complex soils with scattered large boulders. The soil is generally rocky, well rooted and highly unlikely to erode post treatment. Most trees are pole to small sawlog sized. The configuration of the treatment follows both land contours and clear forest type boundaries. Topography is mostly gentle, with some undulations in terrain and areas with large rock outcrops and boulders. The northern extent of the site is flat and has an established access road. Wetlands, streams, and water bodies: The project boundaries were compared against NJDEP GIS 2012 wetland mapping as well as stream and water body layers. Franklin Pond Creek is >150 feet from the project boundary except where the stream runs adjacent to State Highway 23. North and west of the project area, freshwater wetlands are >50 feet from the project boundary with an existing old woods road in between. East of the project area freshwater wetlands are >35 feet from the project boundary. Areas within the project boundary that are within 150 feet of freshwater wetlands will maintain >75% canopy cover and Forestry and Wetland BMPs will be

implemented as necessary. No heavy machinery or herbicides will be used in the project area. The entire project area was also physically walked to field verify if unmapped wetlands exist, and none were found Rare plants: Review of information in the Natural Heritage (Biotics) Database, as well as review of the results of field surveys performed in the Sparta Mountain WMA during 2017 but not currently documented in Biotics, has indicated one potential occurrence of a State Endangered plant species in the project boundary. No activity will be conducted within 100 feet of the potential occurrence. Rare Wildlife: Review of information in NJDEP s Landscape Project (v3.3) has indicated the project area likely contains habitat for Indiana bat hibernacula, maternity roosts and foraging. The proposed tree felling period (Nov 16 March 31) aligns with USFWS recommendations that all cutting of vegetation/trees with > 5 DBH (using machinery and/or by hand/on foot) occur between October 1 and March 31 to minimize harm to roosting Indiana bats. Efforts will be made to retain trees and shrubs > 5 meters high with sloughing bark and/or bark with cavities/cracks/crevices as potential maternity roosts. The proposed tree felling period aligns also with recommendations from NJ Fish and Wildlife s Endangered and Nongame Species Program to minimize harm to breeding songbird, raptor, reptile, and insect species of concern documented in the area. The area is >500 feet from documented raptor nests and >400 feet from documented vernal pools. Forest Description Preliminary site visits indicate that the general location has a relatively diverse woody shrub understory, native grasses and other herbaceous plants. Most of the advanced tree regeneration is comprised of shade intolerants awaiting release. The site has very few non-native invasive species, so any post treatment germination will be highly controllable before becoming widespread. Inventory data suggests the following forest composition: Total Red Oak Ches Oak Red Mpl Mock Hick Wh Oak Beech Wh Ash Bl Birch Sug Mpl Basal Area 110.8 38.1 31.2 9.2 8.1 5.8 4.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 Stems/Ac 270.5 86.2 40 30 17.3 9.8 17.7 9.6 18.4 37.3 Quad. 8.7 9 11.9 7.5 9.2 10.4 6.9 8.1 5.9 4.1 DBH Net 3,772 1,779 1,462 92 168 89 0 0 0 92 Bdft/Ac Net Cords/Ac 21 8 7 1 1 1 1 1 0 0.5

Treatment Description Variable retention forest management using a combination of single tree selection and group selection is prescribed in Year 1 of the Sparta Mountain WMA Forest Stewardship Plan for < 17 acres in Stand 33 (see pages 64-67 in the plan). Chainsaws or hatchets will be used to mechanically girdle or fell trees, and all felled trees will be left on site. Trees marked for felling/girdling are either in declining health or unlikely to persist under the site conditions of a climax forest ecosystem. Primary access will be from Route 23 in the north. No heavy machinery or herbicides will be used. Forestry and Wetland BMPs will be implemented as necessary. Herbicide treatment for invasive plants is not needed. Tree felling will be conducted prior to April 1, 2018 but may resume after November 15, 2018. Treatment Maps

Project Location and Topography

Project Location on 2012 Aerial Photograph with Wetlands

Project Location on 2012 Aerial Photograph with Wetlands and Vernal Pools