INDEPENDENT DEMAND SYSTEMS: PROBABILISTIC MODELS Introduction

Similar documents
Johan Oscar Ong, ST, MT

ECONOMIC PRODUCTION QUANTITY MODEL WITH CONTINUOUS QUALITY INSPECTION

Question 2: How do we make decisions about inventory?

Reorder Quantities for (Q, R) Inventory Models

Inventory Control Models

Planned Shortages with Back-Orders

A Dynamic Rationing Policy for Continuous-Review Inventory Systems

Inventory Management Reasons for maintaining Inventory Types of Inventory Calculation of Inventory stock consumption value

Notes for Production and Operations Management- I

VII. THE DUCTILE/BRITTLE TRANSITION, GAGING DUCTILITY LEVELS

Inventory Control Model

Principles of Inventory Management

Sven Axsäter. Inventory Control. Third Edition. Springer

Determining order-up-to level considering backorder cost per unit short on the base-stock inventory system under intermittent demand

Three-echelon Inventory Model with Defective Product and Rework Considerations under Credit Period

A PERIODIC REVIEW INVENTORY MODEL WITH RAMP TYPE DEMAND AND PRICE DISCOUNT ON BACKORDERS Sujan Chandra 1

Chapter 4. Models for Known Demand

Lecture 10: Managing Uncertainty in the Supply Chain (Safety Inventory) INSE 6300/4-UU. Overview

SLIDES BY. John Loucks. St. Edward s Univ.

PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE COLUMNS

6.5. Traits and Probability. Punnett squares illustrate genetic crosses.

The Training Material on Logistics Planning and Analysis has been produced under Project Sustainable Human Resource Development in Logistic Services

Inventory Control Models

Inventory Management

Operations Research Models and Methods Paul A. Jensen and Jonathan F. Bard. Inventory Level. Figure 4. The inventory pattern eliminating uncertainty.

Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2017 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies

Core Drying Simulation and Validation

Inventory systems for independent demand

The integration of online and offline channels

Report for Handbook on large plastic pipes, published 2015, ISBN

Inventory Replenishment

LOT SIZING IN MRP. Week Gross requirements Scheduled receipts Projected available balance Net Requirements

Cover-Time Planning, An alternative to Material Requirements Planning; with customer order production abilities and restricted Work-In-Process *

A numerical study of expressions for fill rate for single stage inventory system with periodic review.

FUZZY INVENTORY MODEL FOR TIME DEPENDENT DETERIORATING ITEMS WITH LEAD TIME STOCK DEPENDENT DEMAND RATE AND SHORTAGES

OPTIMIZATION AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. IV - Inventory Models - Waldmann K.-H

We consider a distribution problem in which a set of products has to be shipped from

RADON MIGRATION MODEL FOR COVERING U MINE AND ORE PROCESSING TAILINGS *

RRS Education Session #1

History IE 376 PRODUCTION INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Course Notes Lecture #2.A Material Requirements Planning

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 189 ( 2015 ) XVIII Annual International Conference of the Society of Operations Management (SOM-14)

Strain limit dependence on stress triaxiality for pressure vessel steel

European Journal of Operational Research

The Probability Model of Expectation Disconfirmation Process

Supply Chain Inventory Management. Multi-period Problems. Read: Chap Chap 11.

MRP Configuration - Adobe Interactive Forms (Japanese) - SCN Wiki

HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF GEOTHERMAL HEAT EXCHANGERS IN GROUND-COUPLED HEAT PUMP SYSTEMS. Abstract. 1. Introduction

A Simple and Robust Batch-Ordering Inventory Policy Under Incomplete Demand Knowledge

Chapter 12 Stormwater Sand Filters

Improvement of Company ABC s Inventory to determine the best safety stock to keep. Kholwa Inneth Ngoma

An Integrated Single Vendor-Buyer Stochastic Inventory Model with Partial Backordering under Imperfect Production and Carbon Emissions

An EOQ Model for A Deteriorating Item With Time Dependent Exponentially Declining Demand Under Permissible Delay In Payment

Strength Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints

Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference B. Johansson, S. Jain, J. Montoya-Torres, J. Hugan, and E. Yücesan, eds.

Offshore Oilfield Development Planning under Uncertainty and Fiscal Considerations

Basestock Model. Chapter 13

! " # $ % % & $'( # ) * 1

A Genetic Algorithm on Inventory Routing Problem

Inventory Theory. Inventory Theory

An Inventory Replenishment Model under Purchase Dependency in Retail Sale

Optimal Economic Manufacturing Quantity and Process Target for Imperfect Systems

Ibrahim Sameer (MBA - Specialized in Finance, B.Com Specialized in Accounting & Marketing)

Optimizing the Safety Stock Inventory Cost Under Target Service Level Constraints

Materials Selection for a Torsionally Stressed Cylindrical Shaft

Inventory Management

INVENTORY SYSTEM Introduction

Beyond Pareto: 12 Standard Principles of Inventory and Forecasting. Thomas L. Freese, Principal. Freese & Associates, Inc. Freese & Associates, Inc.

Container packing problem for stochastic inventory and optimal ordering through integer programming

SAP Material Master A Practical Guide. Matthew Johnson

Simulation of Lean Principles Impact in a Multi-Product Supply Chain

Inventory Production Control Model With Back- Order When Shortages Are Allowed

GBS 660 Production and Operations Management

Note 8: Materials Requirements Planning

Academy session INVENTORY MANAGEMENT

Assignment 10 (Solution) Six Sigma in Supply Chain, Taguchi Method and Robust Design

A Single Item Non Linear Programming (NLP) Economic Order Quantity Model with Space Constraint

Supply Chain Inventory Policy Analyser (SCIPA) Software Package -User Manual

Homework 1 Fall 2000 ENM3 82.1

An Adaptive Kanban and Production Capacity Control Mechanism

INVENTORY AND ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY MODELS

Shop Control Guide DBA Software Inc.

Determining Dryness Fraction

Lot-Sizing in MRP. Lot Sizing in MRP IE 376 PRODUCTION INFORMATION SYSTEMS. Course Notes Lecture #3 Lot sizing in MRP Systems

INVENTORY STRATEGY INVENTORY PLANNING AND CONTROL

LOADING AND SEQUENCING JOBS WITH A FASTEST MACHINE AMONG OTHERS

Keyur C. Patel a *, Vikas J. Lakhera b, Dilip Sarda c

SINGLE MACHINE SEQUENCING. ISE480 Sequencing and Scheduling Fall semestre

PERT 03 Manajemen Persediaan (1) Fungsi Inventory Inventory Management Inventory Model dengan Independent Demand. EOQ Model

Optimal Policy for an Inventory Model without Shortages considering Fuzziness in Demand, Holding Cost and Ordering Cost

A MANAGER S ROADMAP GUIDE FOR LATERAL TRANS-SHIPMENT IN SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY MANAGEMENT

Monte Carlo Simulation for Sparepart Inventory

More-Advanced Statistical Sampling Concepts for Tests of Controls and Tests of Balances

Film Capacitors. Quality. Date: May 2009

Operations Management

STP351: Purchase Order Collaboration in SNC

Inventory Decisions for the Price Setting Retailer: Extensions to the EOQ Setting

Design of Six Sigma Supply Chains

Outline. Push-Pull Systems Global Company Profile: Toyota Motor Corporation Just-in-Time, the Toyota Production System, and Lean Operations

The maximum sustainable yield management of an age-structured salmon population: Fishing vs. conservation

Retail Inventory Management for Perishable Products with Two Bins Strategy

Transcription:

INDEPENDENT DEAND SYSTES: PROAILISTIC ODELS Introduction Demand and Lead-Time are treated as random variable The models in this section assumes that the average demand remains approximately constant with time Probability distribution o demand is available The inventory can be divided into working stock and saety stock see ig. 1 S UANTITY S Working Stock Working Stock Saety Stock TIE Fig. 1 Working stock and saety stock in a -system o inventory control Working stock is the quantity expected to be used during a given time period The average working stock is one-hal the order quantity lot size, which may be determined by the EO ormula or some variant o it. Saety stock is the quantity used to protect against higher than expected demand levels It is the extra inventory kept on hand as a cushion against stockouts due to random perturbations o nature or the environment It has two eects on a irm s cost: decreases the cost o stockouts or increases holding costs Organisation can use countermeasures to prevent, avoid or mitigate stockouts. Typical countermeasures are expediting, emergency shipping, special handling, rescheduling, overtime, and substitution The prevention cost can be considered as stockout costs even though the stockout does not occur Customer s reaction to a stockout condition can result in a back order or a lost sales 1 Department o echanical Engineering

Saety stock determination is depends on the type o inventory control system used FIXED ORDER UANTITY SYSTE OR -SYSTE Inventory variation in an ideal and realistic situation is given in igs and 3 respectively S UANTITY S Lead Time Reorder Point Saety Stock Order Lot Order Lot Placed Received Placed Received TIE Fig. Ideal inventory model S UANTITY S Lead Time Stockout Lead Time Lead Time TIE Fig. 3 Realistic inventory model Department o echanical Engineering

Saety stock is needed to protect against a stockout ater the reorder point is reached and prior to receipt o an order This period is usually called lead-time The reorder point is composed o the mean lead-time demand plus saety stock Average inventory level on hand just beore the receipt o a replenishment order is the saety stock. Over many cycles, the inventory level will sometimes be more than the saety stock and sometimes less, but it should average to the saety stock Larger the order quantity, ewer the annual orders, which means the ewer opportunities or stockout to occur Saety stocks are dependent on stockout cost or service level, holding cost, demand variation and lead-time variation Working stock quantity is determined beore considering saety stock In the order quantity ormulations, it is assumed that the order quantity can be determined by an economic balance o the relevant cost, and that it is independent o the reorder point Average inventory Expected level o inventory beore receiving the order is saety stock Expected level o inventory immediately ater receiving the order is Saety stock Average inventory is the average o these two values is There are two approaches or saety stock calculation: 1 Known stockout cost explicit costs can be allocated to shortages Saety stock Unknown stockout costs management speciies a service level based on some probability distribution o demand during the lead-time Statistical considerations Notations lead-time demand in units a random variable - mean lead-time demand - standard deviation o lead-time demand probability density unction o lead time demand P probability o a lead-time demand o units max - maximum lead-time demand reorder points in units P> probability o stockout 3 Department o echanical Engineering

Department o echanical Engineering 4 E> expected stockout in units during lead-time Continuous Distribution 0 d 0 d > d P > d E Discrete Distribution max 0 P max 0 m P > max 1 P P > max 1 P E Lead-time demand distribution is required or inventory analysis in -system Frequently the demand distribution is expressed on a time basis that is dierent rom the lead-time Convolution technique is used to get the demand distribution or varying length o time Standard Distributions Normal Distribution Parameters are mean and standard deviation π e or < < - > d E

Z 1 F Z [1] S Z [] Equations [1] and [] uses standard normal variate values Another way o estimating E > is given below Standard Normal Distribution ean 0, standard deviation 1 Z Z e Z π Transormations or normal distribution to standard normal distribution Let a value o normal random variable be and the corresponding value or standard normal random variable Z be t. t t E Z > t E t E > For standard normal random variate, the values or the ollowing are tabulated Z, FZ, Z, and EZ Note: Poisson Distribution Single parameter P > d P Z > t Z dz Normal random variate representing lead time demand average lead time demand in units S saety stock in units Z standard normal variate - standard deviation o lead time demand Poisson distribution is not symmetrical with respect to mean when mean is small - Skewed to the right t 5 Department o echanical Engineering

Normal approximation to Poisson is usually adequate when mean is 1 or greater Negative Exponential Distribution Single parameter SAFETY STOCK ESTIATION: KNOWN STOCKOUT COST AND LEAD TIE Stockout cost is expressed as backorder cost per unit, backorder cost per outage, lost sales cost per unit or lost sales per outage ackorder cost per outage is a ixed amount and can occur at most once during a replenishment cycle Assumed a variable demand and constant lead-time ackorder Case: Stockout Cost per unit No lost sales Notations reorder points in units S saety stock in units H holding cost per unit o inventory per year A backordering cost per unit R average annual demand in units lot size or order quantity in units lead-time demand in units a random variable average lead time demand in units probability density unction o lead time demand TC s expected annual saety stock cost s 0 d d 0 0 d E > d Expected annual saety stock cost holding cost stockout cost AR TC s SH d 6 Department o echanical Engineering

AR H d dtc s To get optimum value o, 0 d ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LEINIZ S RULE G x k x h x g x, y dy k x dg x dx h x g x, y dk x dh x dy g x, k x g x, h x x dx dx d b d d d P > dtc s d P > RA H H AR [ P > ] 0 This ormula can be applied to both discrete and continuous probability distribution o lead-time demand When discrete distributions are used, the exact optimum stockout probability is usually unattainable When the optimum stockout probability cannot be attained, the next lower attainable stockout probability is selected Problem What is the optimal reorder point or the inventory problem speciied below? The lead time demand distribution is given in table below. 7 Department o echanical Engineering

R 1800 units per year C Rs 300 per order F 15 % P Rs 0 per unit A Rs 10 per unit backordered Also, calculate the expected stockout quantity, saety stock and expected annual saety stock cost. Determine the standard deviation and mean o the distribution. Consider this mean and standard deviation as the parameters o normal distribution and determine reorder level and saety stock. ackorder Case: Stockout Cost Per Outage G backorder cost per outage R TC s SH G d For Normal distribution For discrete distribution GR P H dtc s 0 d Z H GR > When the optimum reorder point lies between two integer values select the integer with the lower Lost sales case: Stockout cost per Unit All stockouts are lost and not recovered Saety stock is zero whenever Average number o annual cycles is R E > Expected stockout quantity per cycle is E> R Lead time demand Probability 48 0.0 49 0.03 50 0.06 51 0.07 5 0.0 53 0.4 54 0.0 55 0.07 56 0.06 57 0.03 58 0.0 1.00 8 Department o echanical Engineering

Department o echanical Engineering 9 d S 0 0 d d d > d E s d AR SH TC d H AR H H AR H P d dtc s > 0 Lost Sales Case: Stockout Cost Per Outage s d GR SH TC d GR d F H H GR H F P d dtc s > 1 0 SAFETY STOCK ESTIATION: KNOWN STOCKOUT COST AND VARIALE LEAD TIE Constant Demand and Variable Lead Time Solution technique similar to variable demand, constant lead time case Demand distribution during lead time is obtained by multiplying the constant demand by probability distribution or the lead time I lead time ollows normal L ZD DL Z Where D constant demand rate per period standard deviation o demand during lead time

L standard deviation o lead time L average lead time in periods Variable Demand and Variable Lead Time Joint probability distribution JPD is required Range o the JPD is rom the level indicated by the product o the smallest demand and shortest lead time to level indicated by the product o largest demand and largest lead time JPD is used to analyse the appropriate stockout cost situation as previously discussed When demand and lead time distributions are independent DL L D D L Where L average lead time length in periods D average demand per period D standard deviation o demand distribution L standard deviation o lead time distribution standard deviation o demand during lead time When demand and lead time distributions are not independent DL L D D L With variable demand and variable lead time, the solution procedures are the same as those previously discussed SAFETY STOCK ESTIATION: SERVICE LEVELS When stockout costs are not known or eels very uneasy about estimating them, it is customary or management to set service levels or which reorder points can be ascertained. A service level indicates the ability to meet customer demands rom stock, or in some other timely manner For make-to-stock or order-to-stock environment, service implies illing demand rom inventory and better service involves excess inventory investment For make-to-order or assemble-to-order, service implies providing in time and better service involves excess capacity As the service level approaches 100 %, the investment in saety stock oten increases drastically The principle o diminishing return applicable here D L 10 Department o echanical Engineering

While perect customer service might not be attainable, lead time reduction and just-in-time approaches can substantially improve the customer service A production line where ailure to provide needed parts can bring the line to halt and in such environment RP system is suitable than a ixed order size system The service level takes on dierent meaning, depending upon how it is stated as a decision criterion Service per order cycle Service per units demanded Saety stocks under dierent service concepts will be dierent Service per Order Cycle It indicates the probability o not running out o stock during the replenishment lead time It is not concerned with how large the shortage is, but with how oten it can occur Service level per order cycle SLc is deined as the raction o replenishment cycles without depletion o stock number o cycles with a stockout SL c 1- total number o order cycles 1- P > P> is the probability o a stockout during the lead time or the stockout probability per order cycle. It represents the probability o at least one stockout during the lead time or the raction o lead time periods during which the demand will exceed the reorder point Service per order cycle does not indicate how requently stockout will occur over a given time period or all products This is because the order cycle will vary rom product to product ore requently stock is replenished, the greater the number o expected stockout cycles This indicates that service per order cycle does not allow or uniorm treatment o dierent products It also does not indicates the percentage o demand that will be satisied Service per Units Demanded It does indicate the percentage o demand that will be satisied and allow uniorm treatment o dierent products 11 Department o echanical Engineering

number o units stockouts SL u 1 - total number o units demanded E > 1 - or backorder E > 1 - E > or Imputed Stockout Costs or the given Service Level Service level really does impute a stockout cost lost sales For a given service level the imputed stockout cost can be calculated rom previously developed optimum ormulations or the probability o a stockout Imputed stockout cost is a convenient way to determine i the value chosen or the service level is appropriate FIXED ORDER INTERVAL SYSTE: PROAILISTIC ODELING Inventory position is monitored at discrete point in time Once an order is placed at time t, another order can not be placed until t T, and the second order will not be illed until the lead time period has elapsed, at t T L Thus saety stock protection is needed or the lead-time L plus the order interval T In the ixed order size system, saety stock is needed only or the lead-time period, because the inventory position is monitored with each transaction In the ixed order size system, a higher than normal demand causes a shorter time between orders whereas in the ixed order interval system, the result would be a larger order size Predetermined inventory level E E S RT LR Where S is the saety stock considering demand variation during T L period RT LR is the average demand during T L period 1 Department o echanical Engineering

Realistic inventory model or P system Predetermined inventory level E UANTITY Inventory level o expected demand during lead-time and saety stock Saety stock level L L L T T TIE Stockout Fig: P-System: Inventory variation with time Saety stock is determined based on the inventory variation during lead time and review period. That is, or saety stock calculation, the demand variation during the TL period is considered. The order interval T T C HR 0 EOI in years Determination o Saety Stock when stockout cost known Approach is same that o -system is a random variable shows the demand distribution or T L period 13 Department o echanical Engineering

Table. Formula or determining saety stock Stockout case Stockout cost per unit Stockout cost per outage ackorder P > E HT A E HT G Lost sale HT P E > E A HT 1 P > E G HT Determination o Saety Stock when service level known Service level per order interval SL c number o order intervals with a stockout SL c 1- total number o order intervals 1- P > E Service levels per units demanded SL u A worked out Problem number o units stockouts SL u 1 - total number o units demanded E > E 1 - TR Daily demand or hamburger buns at a city centre production plant is as ollows: Daily Demand Probability 400 0. 450 0. 500 0.3 550 0. 600 0.1 The plant can produce several other products using the same acility. The lie o the product is 5 days. Consider 5 days as planning horizon and -system o inventory control, determine the batch size. The ollowing data is also available or the above problem. Carrying cost Rs 1 per unit day Setup cost Rs 450 per setup What should be the reorder point with a lead-time o 1 day and the service level per order cycle o 85 %? What is the saety stock? What is the stockout cost per unit imputed by this service level? Assume that the daily demand is normally distributed with parameters that can be determined rom the daily demand distribution given above. Determine the reorder point and saety stock i the above service level is applicable. 14 Department o echanical Engineering

I P-system o inventory control is used, what are the review period, predetermined inventory level and saety stock? Compare the total cost o expected saety stock o both the system o inventory controls. 1. Given data: Daily demand distribution Daily demand Probability 400 0. 450 0. 500 0.3 550 0. 600 0.1 Total 1.0 Service level per order cycle SL c 85 %. Lead time 1 day Planning horizon 5 days Carrying cost H Rs. 1 per unit per day. Set up cost C Rs. 450 per set up. atch size RC H Where, R average demand in the planning horizon average demand per day Number o days in a planning horizon Average demand per day 400 0. 450 0. 500 0.3 550 0. 600 0.1 490 Units. Now R 490 5 450 Units. 450 450 1 5 Reorder Point: SL c 1- P> 0.85 1 P > P > 0.15 664 Units. 15 Department o echanical Engineering

Daily demand Probability Cumulative probability Stock out probability P > 1- cumulative probability 400 0. 0. 0.8 450 0. 0.4 0.6 500 0.3 0.7 0.3 550 0. 0.9 0.1 600 0.1 1 0 From the above table, Reorder point, or 0.15 stockout probability is 550 units. Reorder point S 550 490 S Thereore, Saety stock, S 550 490 60 Units. Stock out cost per unit A imputed by given service level : H P > AR 5 664 0.15 A 450 A 9.0 Rupees per unit. I the daily demand is normally distributed with parameters that can be determined rom the daily demand distribution given above: ean, 490 Units, Variance, n i i 1 P 400 490 0. 450 490 0. 500 490 0.3 550 490 0. 600 490 0.1 3900 6. 449 Standard normal deviate, Z From statistical tables, Z or P> 0.15, is 1.0487 1.0487 555.49 Units. 490 6.449 16 Department o echanical Engineering

Reorder point S 556 490 S Thereore, Saety stock, S 556 490 66 Units. I P system o inventory control is used: Economic order interval, T o 0.7 5 days 1.35 days 1 day approximately C 450 0.7 RH 450 5 horizon o the planning Service level per order cycle SL c 85 %. SL c 1- P>E 0.85 1 P >E P >E 0.15 For inding, maximum inventory level E, we need demand distribution or T o Lead time period. T o Lead time 11 days. Preparation o demand distribution or days First day Second day Demand Probability Demand Probability Total demand probability 400 0. 400 0. 0. 0. 0.04 800 0.04 450 0. 0. 0. 0.04 850 0.04 500 0.3 0. 0.3 0.06 900 0.06 550 0. 0. 0. 0.04 950 0.04 600 0.1 0. 0.1 0.0 1000 0.0 450 0. 400 0. 0. 0. 0.04 850 0.04 450 0. 0. 0. 0.04 900 0.04 500 0.3 0. 0.3 0.06 950 0.06 550 0. 0. 0. 0.04 1000 0.04 600 0.1 0. 0.1 0.0 1050 0.0 500 0.3 400 0. 0.3 0. 0.06 900 0.06 450 0. 0.3 0. 0.06 950 0.06 500 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.09 1000 0.09 550 0. 0.3 0. 0.06 1050 0.06 17 Department o echanical Engineering

600 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.03 1100 0.03 550 0. 400 0. 0. 0. 0.04 950 0.04 450 0. 0. 0. 0.04 1000 0.04 500 0.3 0. 0.3 0.06 1050 0.06 550 0. 0. 0. 0.04 1100 0.04 600 0.1 0. 0.1 0.0 1150 0.0 600 0.1 400 0. 0.1 0. 0.0 1000 0.0 450 0. 0.1 0. 0.0 1050 0.0 500 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.03 1100 0.03 550 0. 0.1 0. 0.0 1150 0.0 600 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 100 0.01 Demand distribution or days Demand Calculation o probability Probability Cumulative probability 800 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.96 850 0.040.04 0.08 0.1 0.88 900 0.060.060.04 0.16 0.8 0.7 950 0.040.060.060.04 0.0 0.48 0.5 1000 0.00.040.090.040.0 0.1 0.69 0.31 1050 0.00.060.060.0 0.16 0.85 0.15 1100 0.030.040.03 0.10 0.95 0.05 1150 0.00.0 0.04 0.99 0.01 100 0.01 0.01 1.00 0.00 Total 1.0 Stock out probability P >E 1- cumulative probability From the above table, aximum inventory level, E or 0.15 stock out probability is 1050 Units. aximum inventory level E S 800 0.04 850 0.08 900 0.16 950 0. 1000 0.1 1050 0.16 1100 0.10 1150 0.04 100 0.01 980 Units. Thereore, Saety stock, S E 1050-980 70 Units. 18 Department o echanical Engineering

Comparison o total cost o maintaining expected saety stock in and P systems, i stock out cost is Rs. 6 per unit: System: max R TC SH A P s P-System: s 1 450 66 5 6 600 550 0.1 664 33097.4096 47.409 Rupees. 1 max T o E 1 TC SH A E P 70 5 6 5 1100 1050 0.1 1150 1050 0.04 100 1050 0.01 350315 665 Rupees. 19 Department o echanical Engineering