Orchard Irrigation Determining the Application Rate & Uniformity of a Microirrigation System

Similar documents
Microirrigation Systems

Irrigation Systems. Lawrence J. Schwankl and Terry L. Prichard

SOP 21: Evaluation of design and operation of a micro-sprinkler system

SOP 14 Distribution uniformity evaluation for micro-sprinklers. Updated 7/28/14. Materials needed:

Low Pressure Drip/Micro System Design Analysis of Potential Rebate

Drip System Design for Established Landscape Trees and Shrubs

Irrigation Scheduling for Urban and Small Farms

When does a plant need water? Water uptake by roots. Factors that influence Transpiration

Field Evaluations of Irrigation Systems: Solid Set or Portable Sprinkler Systems 1

The Santa Clara Valley Water District. Handbook for Agricultural Water Use Efficiency

Simplifying Micro-Irrigation System Design with AquaFlow 3.2 Design Assist Software

The Irrigator. March 2018 (707) Vaca Valley Parkway, Suite 201 Vacaville, CA Upcoming Irrigation Efficiency Workshop

ET is only affected by Water stress when readily available water (RAW) is depleted Grow it is restricted, we want to avoid this if possible

IRRIGATION DESIGN & MAINTENANCE FOR MAXIMUM EFFCIENCY

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE...V CONTRIBUTORS... VI I. MICROIRRIGATION THEORY AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION...1

Gardening Tips fresh food.. community.. land.. food security. Stewardship. People. learning. living.

EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY

4.1 Field evaluation of Drip-Micro irrigation systems

Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) Controlled Irrigation Pumps Analysis of Potential Rebate

Agricultural Irrigation Assessment Form

Chemigation. in Georgia

Sizing Irrigation Fields

BENEFITS FROM IMPROVING FLOOD IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY

Water Quality Design Storms for Stormwater Hydrodynamic Separators

VWEA Operations Challenge Roanoke, VA July 14, 2016

The 1/128th of an Acre Sprayer Calibration Method 1

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Synthetic Turf Athletic Field Drainage Design Assistance

EM 8713 Reprinted May 2000 $5.50. Western Oregon Irrigation Guides

Irrigation Efficiency, Uniformity & Crop Response. System performance evaluation

Irrigated Acreage in Florida: A Summary through

Progress Report (task 3) Project Title: BMPs for Florida blueberries. Contract # : Dorota Z. Haman Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Avocado Irrigation in California. Ben Faber University of California Cooperative Extension Santa Barbara/Ventura Cos.

AALSO Summary of Formulas needed for Levels I, II and III.

Large Scale Studies. UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Co

IRRIGATION OF APPLES. rotator technology. Handy Pocket Guide. save water, save energy and do a better job of irrigating.

Drip irrigation, also known as micro irrigation

First Quarter Report. Performance Evaluation of Chameleon 60 Atmospheric Water Generator. Yemane Ghebreiyessus, Roosevelt Payne and Mila Berhane

Interpretation of Soil Moisture Content to Determine Soil Field Capacity and Avoid Over Irrigation in Sandy Soils Using Soil Moisture Measurements

Strawberry: Drip Irrigation and Fertigation

James David D., J. I. Awu, N. Y. Pamdaya, and M. Y. Kasali National Centre for Agricultural Mechanization Ilorin-Kwara State, Nigeria.

Agricultural Pumping Efficiency Program. Irrigation Planning. Helping California Agriculture...

Reducing Energy Use and Costs for Pumping Water

Model Layout/Components of a Drip Irrigation System

Subtropical Frost and Freeze Hazards

Blueberry Automated Quasi- Pulse Irrigation

Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management

Best Value Drip Irrigation Products High Quality Yet Affordable

Advanced Irrigation Management for Container-Grown Ornamental Crop Production

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI

Arnold Schumann, Kevin Hostler, Kirandeep Mann, Laura Waldo (UF/IFAS, CREC) 3rd UF Water Institute Symposium February 15-16, 2012 Gainesville, FL

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

Irrigation of Lawns and Gardens 1

Water Utility Science Water Math and Hydraulics 050. Name: Date:

by Inge Bisconer Watering Success

SPILL ESTIMATION. Not Just A Guess Anymore

Lift irrigation Using man or Animal power Using Mechanical or Electrical Power Flow irrigation a)inundation Irrigation b) Perennial Irrigation Direct

DW Module WDC Volume I Answer Key

In most areas of California, a mature walnut orchard

AALSO Proficiency Program Level I, II & III

Saving Energy on Electric, Lighting and Water Systems

CSU Extension Small Acreage Irrigation Evaluation Instructions. Denis Reich Colorado Water Institute / CSU Extension OVERVIEW

DOWNSTREAM DEFENDER TESTING USING MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTOCOL UTILIZING OK-110 FEED SAND

Precipitation Rates and Sprinkler Irrigation

Under-Tree Sprinkler Design in a Walnut/Cherry Orchard

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

Tillage and Crop Residue Removal Effects on Evaporation, Irrigation Requirements, and Yield

Evaluation of Castle Pines North Metropolitan District Water Level and Well Production Data Technical Memorandum

Student Handout Calculating Runoff

Wastewater Flow Monitoring Services

Calculating Length and Width for Limiting Zone with 20 Inches of Suitable Soil

The Amity Single Disc Drill is the best in the industry for productivity, accuracy, simplicity, and versatility.

Design of Agricultural Irrigation Systems in Florida 1

Energy Efficient Homes: The Irrigation System 1

Tulare Farm Equipment Show 2007

REDUCING RUNOFF FROM IRRIGATED LANDS PUBLICATION Tailwater Return Systems TAILWATER RUNOFF COLLECIION AND REUSE

5/9/2016. Advancing Water Requirements for Mandarin Orange with New Sensor Methods

Shad D. Nelson, Ph.D. Texas A&M University-Kingsville Citrus Center Dept. of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences

Evaluation of the Monitor / RED1 Statistical Inventory Reconciliation Method

Management Systems and Irrigation Planning

Factors to Consider in Selecting a Farm Irrigation System

Metric Conversion Tables

A5 PC Series Pressure Compensating Ag Dripline

EXPERIMENTAL SITE AND METHODS

Option 11. Divert Water from Miocene and Hendricks Canal to Supply the Ridge

BROWARD GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MAPS - PREDICTED CHANGES AND PLANNED UPDATES

Principle Investigators:

GEORGIA FARM POND EXEMPTION GUIDE

PRECISION PIVOT IRRIGATION CONTROLS TO OPTIMIZE WATER APPLICATION. Biological & Agricultural Engineering and NESPAL ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Flow Monitoring of Blueprint Columbus Sump Pump Pilot Program

Irrigating with Booms vs. Big Guns in Northwestern Washington

Book 2. Chapter 1. Irrigation

Water Treatment Math

What is (are) the types of pollution discussed in your article? How does this pollution affect people and the environment?

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. 158 Attachment 2. Borough of Perkasie

AR No. # Efficient Irrigation

Placement and Interpretation of Soil Moisture Sensors for Irrigated Cotton Production in Humid Regions SITE SELECTION IN A FIELD OBJECTIVE

Glossary Irrigation Terminology

Using Dairy Manure as a Fertilizer Source for Forage Crops. Workgroup. Marsha Campbell Mathews University of California Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

Transcription:

Orchard Irrigation Determining the Application Rate & Uniformity of a Microirrigation System Larry Schwankl UC Cooperative Extension 559-646-6569 e-mail: schwankl@uckac.edu Determining the application rate of microirrigation systems can be confusing because irrigation scheduling and tree water use information is usually presented in inches per day (in/day), while discharge from microirrigation emitters is measured in gallons per hour (gph). The following may be helpful in determining required operating times for microirrigation systems. The water use of the tree and the application rate of the microirrigation system determine how long the drip and microsprinklers should be operated. Drip Emitters and Microsprinklers Step 1 in determining the required operating time is to convert the tree water use (ET) information (usually available in inches per day) to gallons per day of tree water use. The following formula may be used (or see Table 1): Water use Tree Tree water by the tree = spacing x use x 0.623 (gal/day) (ft 2 ) (in/day) Example: Tree spacing = 16 ft. x 22 ft. = 352 ft 2 Tree water use = 0.3 in./day Water use by the tree = 352 ft 2 x 0.3 in/day x 0.623 = 66 gal/day (gal/day) Table 1. Tree water use (gallons/day) for various plant spacing and tree water use (in/day). Tree spacing (ft 2 ) 0.05 0.1 0.15 ET (in/day) 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 50 2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 100 3 6 9 12 16 19 22 25 150 5 9 14 19 23 28 33 37 200 6 12 19 25 31 37 44 50 250 8 16 23 31 39 47 55 62 300 9 19 28 37 47 56 65 75 350 11 22 33 44 55 65 76 87 400 12 25 37 50 62 75 87 100 450 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112 500 16 31 47 62 78 94 109 125 Tree spacing (ft 2 ) = row spacing (ft) x tree spacing with the row (ft) 1

Step 2 is to determine the average application rate and application uniformity of the microirrigation system. Step 2.1 Collect water from selected drip emitters or microsprinklers. Drip emitter or microsprinkler discharge may vary with system pressure. For example, a 1 gallon per hour (gph) dripper may not actually be discharging at 1.0 gph. Discharge rates of microirrigation systems with pressure-compensating (PC) drippers or microsprinklers are not as affected by system pressure differences. If there are multiple irrigation blocks, each block should be evaluated separately since they may be operating at different pressures. In addition, you might sample at any other spots where you suspect there could be a difference in the pressure and discharge rate. For example, sample at low or high elevation areas in the orchard. More drippers or microsprinklers than suggested below should be sampled on large irrigation blocks (greater than 20 acres). Step 2.2 Sample drip emitters or microsprinklers at the following locations. See attached Microirrigation System Evaluation Form: Head of the system - 4 near the head of the lateral - 4 near the middle of the lateral - 4 near the end of the lateral Middle of the system - 4 near the head of the lateral - 4 near the middle of the lateral - 4 near the end of the lateral Tail end of the system - 4 near the head of the lateral - 4 near the middle of the lateral - 4 near the end of the lateral Step 2.3 For drip irrigation systems, collect water for 30 seconds in a 100 ml graduated cylinder. Use Table 2 to convert the amount of water collected from each sampled emitter to the discharge rate in gallons/hour for that emitter. For microsprinklers, collect water for 30 seconds in a 500 or 1000 ml graduated cylinder. Use Table 3 to convert the collected water volume to microsprinkler discharge rate (gallons/hour). The following examples are summarized on the attached Sample Data Sheet. Example Determine Average Application Rate Drip Emitters For each irrigation block, calculate the average of all your discharge rate measurements. If you measured the output of 36 drip emitters, find the average discharge rate (gph) of the 36 emitters. Average discharge rate of all emitters = 1.04 gph (see sample data sheets) 2

If there are 4 drip emitters per tree Application rate = 1.04 gph x 4 drippers = 4.16 gph/tree per tree(gph) per dripper per tree Average Application Rate is 4.16 gph/tree Microsprinklers For each irrigation block, calculate the average of all your discharge rate measurements. If you measured the output of 36 microsprinklers, find the average discharge rate (gph) of the 36 microsprinklers. Average discharge rate of all microsprinklers = 10.41 gph (see sample data sheets) If there is one microsprinkler per tree Application rate = 10.41 gph x 1 micro = 10.41 gph/tree per tree(gph) per micro per tree Average Application Rate is 10.41 gph/tree Table 2. Determining drip emitter discharge rate in gallons per hour (gph) using a graduated cylinder Milliliters of water collected in 30 seconds Drip emitter discharge rate (gallons/hour) 10 0.32 12 0.38 14 0.44 16 0.51 18 0.57 20 0.63 22 0.70 24 0.76 26 0.82 28 0.89 30 0.95 32 1.01 34 1.08 36 1.14 38 1.20 40 1.27 A 100 ml graduated cylinder works well. These are available in many hardware stores. If possible, use a glass cylinder because it is easier to read than plastic. Values in Table 2 were calculated using the following equation: Drip emitter discharge = Water (ml) collected x 0.0317 rate (gph) in 30 seconds 3

Table 3. Determining microsprinkler discharge rate in gallons per hour (gph) using a graduated cylinder Milliliters of water collected in 30 seconds Drip emitter discharge rate (gallons/hour) 200 6.34 220 6.97 240 7.61 260 8.24 280 8.88 300 9.51 320 10.14 340 10.78 360 11.41 380 12.05 400 12.68 420 13.31 440 13.95 460 14.58 480 15.22 500 15.85 520 16.48 540 17.12 560 17.75 580 18.39 600 19.02 A 500 or ml graduated cylinder works well. These are available in many hardware stores. Values in Table above were calculated using the following equation: Drip emitter discharge = Water (ml) collected x 0.0317 rate (gph) in 30 seconds Using a Flowmeter to Determine How Much You Are Applying An alternative method of determining the average depth of applied water (inches) during an irrigation set is to monitor the flow meter (if available) at the pump or irrigation turnout. The following formula can then be used: Applied depth of water (inches) Pump discharge (gpm) x Irrigation time per set (hrs) = 449 x Acres irrigated per set 4

Determine the Emission Uniformity Each drip emitter or microsprinkler in the orchard will be discharging water at a different rate. This discharge variability is due to manufacturing variation between emitters, pressure differences in the system, and any emission device clogging which may be occurring. We need to compensate for the variability when we determine how much to irrigate. The microirrigation system s application uniformity is quantified using a measurement called the Emission Uniformity (sometimes referred to as the Distribution Uniformity). The Emission Uniformity (EU) is defined as: Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% sampled emission devices Avg. discharge rate of all the sampled emission devices x 100 To determine the average discharge rate (gph) of the low 25% of sampled emitters or microsprinklers, the discharge rate of each of the sampled emission devices should be ranked from lowest to highest. If you are familiar with computer spreadsheet use, this becomes very quick and easy. Then 25% of the drippers or microsprinklers with the lowest discharge rate should be averaged together. For example, if 36 emitters were monitored, the average of the 9 emitters with the lowest discharge rates would be determined. Examples: Drip System (see sample data sheets) Average discharge rate of all sampled emitters = 1.04 gph Average discharge rate of the low 25% sampled emitters = 0.98 gph 0.98 gph 1.04 gph x 100 = 94% Average Emission Uniformity is 94% (This is excellent) Microsprinkler System (see sample data sheets) Average discharge rate of all sampled emitters = 10.41 gph Average discharge rate of the low 25% sampled emitters = 9.29 gph 9.29 gph 10.41 gph x 100 = 89% Average Emission Uniformity is 89% (This is very good) Step 3 is to determine the irrigation system operation time in hours per day. Step 3.1 The irrigation amount (gross irrigation amount) includes the water you have chosen to replace (net irrigation amount) plus some additional water to account for the inefficiencies of the irrigation system. The irrigation amount is determined as: 5

Gross irrigation amount = Net irrigation amount Irrigation efficiency (%) x 100 Irrigation efficiency is difficult to quantify but if the drainage * and the runoff is minimal, then irrigation efficiency can be approximated using the emission uniformity. The above equation becomes: Net irrigation amount Gross irrigation amount = Emission uniformity (%) x 100 Example: Net irrigation amount = 66 gal per tree per day (from Step 1) Average drip application rate per tree = 4.16 gph (from Step 2 example) Drip System Emission uniformity = 94% (from Step 2 example) Average microsprinkler application rate per tree = 10.41 gph (from Step 2 example) Microsprinkler System Emission uniformity = 89% (from Step 2 example) Example (cont.): Drip Irrigation System: Gross irrigation amount (gal/day) = Microirrigation System: Gross irrigation amount (gal/day) = 66 gal/day 94 66 gal/day 89 x 100 = 70 gal/day x 100 = 74 gal/day Step 3.2 To determine the hours of drip or microsprinkler operation per day, the Gross Irrigation Amount (gal/day) and the Average Application Rate (gal/hr) are used as follows: Hours of operation per day = Gross Irrigation Amount (gal/day) Avg. Application rate (gal/hr) Example (cont.): Drip emitters: Tree water use (gal/day) = 70 gal/day (Step 3.1) Application rate (gal/hr) = 4.16 gal/hr (Step 2.3) Hours of operation per day = 70 gal/day 4.16 gal/hr = 16.8 hrs/day Microsprinklers: Tree water use (gal/day) = 74 gal/day (Step 3.1) Application rate (gal/hr) = 10.41 gal/hr (Step 2.3) Hours of operation per day = 74 gal/day 10.41 gal/hr = 7.1 hrs/day * Drainage is water that has moved below the tree s root system. 6

Table 4 gives the same hours of operation for these examples. Table 4. Hours of operation per day for various application rates (gal/hr) and tree water use (gal/day). Tree Water Application rate (gal/hr) Use (gal/day) 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 5 5.0 2.5 1.3 10 10.0 5.0 2.5 1.7 1.3 1.0 15 15.0 7.5 3.8 2.5 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.1 25 12.5 6.3 4.2 3.1 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 50 12.5 8.3 6.3 5.0 4.2 3.6 3.1 2.8 2.5 75 18.8 12.5 9.4 7.5 6.3 5.4 4.7 4.2 3.8 100 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 5.6 5.0 125 20.8 15.6 12.5 10.4 8.9 7.8 6.9 6.3 Example: Summary In order to match tree water use in this example, the drip irrigation system would need to be operated nearly 17 hours per day, while the microsprinkler system would need to be operated a little over 7 hours per day. The drip system would need to be operated every day when tree water use is high as in this example (0.3 in/day). It would be preferable to not operate the microsprinklers every day though. Longer microsprinkler set times encourages deeper water penetration, so an irrigation interval of 3 days would be suggested. During periods of lower tree water use, the irrigation interval of both the drip and microsprinkler systems would be adjusted to match the lower tree water requirements. 7

Microirrigation Evaluation Form Page 1 of 2 Location: Date: Observer: Comments: Microirrigation System Layout (sketch) including emitter sampling locations: 8

Microirrigation Evaluation Form Page 2 of 2 Sampled Drip Location Water (ml) collected Emitter discharge Ranking Emitter in 30 seconds rate (gph) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Avg. discharge rate of all sampled emitters = gph Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% of sampled emitters = gph Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% sampled emitters Avg. discharge rate of all the sampled emitters x 100 = x 100 = % 9

Sampled Drip Emitter Microirrigation Evaluation Form Drip System Location Water (ml) collected in 30 sec Emitter discharge rate (gph) Ranking 1 33 1.05 18 2 35 1.11 30 3 33 1.05 19 4 32 1.01 8 5 35 1.11 31 6 34 1.08 25 7 36 1.14 35 8 35 1.11 32 9 34 1.08 26 10 30 0.95 1 11 32 1.01 9 12 37 1.17 36 13 32 1.01 10 14 32 1.01 11 15 33 1.05 20 16 32 1.01 12 17 33 1.05 21 18 32 1.01 13 19 34 1.08 27 20 31 0.98 3 21 35 1.11 33 22 32 1.01 14 23 33 1.05 22 24 34 1.08 28 25 32 1.01 15 26 31 0.98 4 27 34 1.08 29 28 32 1.01 16 29 30 0.95 2 30 31 0.98 5 31 32 1.01 17 32 35 1.11 34 33 31 0.98 6 34 33 1.05 23 35 33 1.05 24 36 31 0.98 7 Avg. discharge rate of all sampled emitters = _1.04_ gph Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% of sampled emitters = _0.98 gph Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% sampled emitters x 100 Avg. discharge rate of all the sampled emitters = 0.98 x 100 = 94 % 1.04 10

Sampled Drip Emitter Microirrigation System Evaluation Form Microsprinkler System Location Water (ml) collected in 30 sec Micro discharge rate (gph) Ranking 1 313 9.93 10 2 310 9.83 7 3 333 10.57 20 4 317 10.04 14 5 313 9.93 11 6 300 9.51 4 7 310 9.83 8 8 353 11.20 30 9 317 10.04 15 10 320 10.14 17 11 300 9.51 5 12 220 6.97 1 13 317 10.04 16 14 347 10.99 26 15 313 9.93 12 16 293 9.30 2 17 310 9.83 9 18 333 10.57 21 19 333 10.57 22 20 343 10.88 25 21 367 11.62 33 22 313 9.93 13 23 357 11.31 31 24 293 9.30 3 25 347 10.99 27 26 357 11.31 32 27 300 9.51 6 28 387 12.26 34 29 393 12.47 36 30 333 10.57 23 31 327 10.36 18 32 327 10.36 19 33 347 10.99 28 34 350 11.10 29 35 387 12.26 35 36 340 10.78 24 Avg. discharge rate of all sampled micros = 10.41 gph Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% of sampled micros = 9.29 gph Avg. discharge rate of the low 25% sampled micros Avg. discharge rate of all the sampled micros x 100 = 9.29 x 100 = 89 % 10.41 11